# data[].attributes.body
Today,i wrote my first draft for Task 2.First,i wrote the summary and then i evaluated the text,i found that it is still not critical because i find it is difficult to use academic phrase in the article,In addition, i do not wire more detail about my evidence to support my evidence, and there is a problem in the link between two article,there is no comparing in the article.Furthermore i found that my evaluation just include the advantages about two article, i think i should also talk some limitation about two article such as some biased in two articles.

# data[].attributes.body
Today,i wrote my first draft for Task 2.First,i wrote the summary and then i evaluated the text,i find it is difficult to find the link between two article and combine them into the summary and evaluation.Because i have to simplify the context of the connection and use a simple sentence structure.I find that it is also Academic words into the article.I
also find that my sentence are not critical enough to support my point.Next time, i need to review two article again to find the key sentence to make me sentences more critical

# data[].attributes.body
Today,i wrote my first draft for Task I.First,i wrote the summary and then i evaluated the text,i found that some problems in my draft.For instance,i find that my evaluation is too long .So i have to abstract them into 150 words .the other problem is that i do not use some Academic words that make my article much more critical. in addition,i just copy original sentences from the article in my draft.This will lead to rising of the reference of  copying,so i should recombine theses sentences. Furthermore,my draft in lack of logic.I mean that there is no connection between every sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback

# data[].attributes.body
Draft

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback