# data[].attributes.body
A perfect site for more information on the types of early peoples, but also includes visuals of their skulls to get a better sense of the differences between them all.

# data[].attributes.body
Article to show that early peoples migrated and have ended up in Britain among other places.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
As many as four different species of hominids have lived in England, starting 800,000 years ago

smithsonian.com

The London Olympics are a great excuse to talk about England's hominid history. Current evidence suggests that hominids reached Great Britain by at least 800,000 years ago, when the island was connected to mainland Europe. Since then, as many as four different hominid species have lived there. Coming and going in response to climate change, hominids probably fled England during extreme cold times when glacial ice covered the area. Sometime between 450,000 and 200,000 years ago, catastrophic flooding of a glacial lake eroded the land bridge connecting Great Britain and Europe and changed the drainage patterns of the region's rivers. As a consequence, during warm periods when polar ice sheets melted and sea levels rose, the land bridge was transformed into a channel. This barrier probably explains why hominids are absent from the fossil record 180,000 to 60,000 years ago. It wasn't until 12,000 years ago that the ancestors of modern Brits finally arrived on the island and stayed for good.

With that mini-review in mind, here are five of England's most important human evolution discoveries.

Happisburgh (~780,000 years ago): This site, about a three-hour drive northeast of London, contains England's earliest evidence of hominids. In 2010, archaeologists announced in the journal that they had found flaked stone tools dating to between 990,000 and 780,000 years ago, when Great Britain was connected to mainland Europe. Fossils and climate data suggest the environment was much like modern southern Scandinavia, home to coniferous forests. No hominid fossils have been found there yet. But back in 2010, paleoanthropologist Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London told Nature News that these hominids might have been members of the lesser-known species Homo antecessor.

Pakefield (700,000 years ago): Before the discoveries at Happisburgh, this was the oldest archaeological site in England. About an hour south of Happisburgh, the younger Pakefield find consists of more than 30 stone tools, and the environmental data suggests the hominids here experienced a warm, seasonally dry Mediterranean climate, researchers reported in in 2005.

Boxgrove (500,000 years ago): On England's southern coast in the 1990s, anthropologists recovered what are the oldest hominid remains ever found in that country: a shin bone and two teeth dating to half a million years ago. Researchers think the bones belonged to Homo heidelbergensis, the species that many anthropologists consider to be the common ancestor of modern humans and Neanderthals. Stone tools and fossils at the site reveal the hominids butchered horses, deer and rhinos. Wolves, lions and hyenas also lived nearby ( PDF).

Swanscombe (400,000 years ago): Between 1933 and 1955, amateur archaeologists discovered three separate pieces of the same female skull at a gravel quarry in Swanscombe. The skull is thought to be that of an early Neanderthal ( although the skull's age and species status have been questioned.) Less than an hour east of London, the Swanscombe site is now a historical park.

Kent's Cavern (~41,000 years ago): In 2011, researchers reanalyzed a partial upper jaw and teeth discovered in 1927 in Kent's Cavern in southwestern England. Originally thought to be 35,000 years old, the fossils are actually about 41,000 years old, the researchers reported in . The older date makes these the oldest modern human ( Homo sapiens) bones found in England and among the oldest ever found in Europe. Today, tourists can visit the cavern (and even get married there).

If this isn't enough British hominid history for you, try reading Chris Stringer's Homo britannicus.

Like this article?
SIGN UP for our newsletter

About Erin Wayman

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Top Five Human Evolution Discoveries from England

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
smithsonian.com The London Olympics are a great excuse to talk about England's hominid history. Current evidence suggests that hominids reached Great Britain by at least 800,000 years ago, when the island was connected to mainland Europe. Since then, as many as four different hominid species have lived there.

# data[].attributes.body
These sites show evolution of early peoples and their progress.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
10 Incredible Archaeological Sites in Africa - History Lists

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A list of 10 incredible archaeological sites in Africa and their significance for understanding of the ancient African civilizations and history of mankind.

# data[].attributes.headline
Otzi the Iceman, An Excellent example of Evolution.

# data[].attributes.subject
Otzi the Iceman, An Excellent example of Evolution.

# data[].attributes.body
A man found frozen in ice for 3500 years, he can show us the changes between us and him.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Ötzi the Iceman, Museum of Archaeology Bolzano

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ötzi, the glacier mummy, is displayed in the South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology in Bolzano, Italy together with his clothing and equipment.

# data[].attributes.body
To explain what evolution is and why it relates to the discoveries of early peoples.

# data[].attributes.body
A more creative and simpler version of the Khan Academy video.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Where and When Did Humans Evolve? | The Advanced Apes | PBS Digital Studios

# data[].attributes.body
Relates to how different early peoples were and why.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Learn for free about math, art, computer programming, economics, physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, finance, history, and more. Khan Academy is a nonprofit with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere.

# data[].attributes.body
A useful article full of information on all early humans and interactive pages to get you interested.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Scientists have discovered a wealth of evidence concerning human evolution, and this evidence comes in many forms. Thousands of human fossils enable researchers and students to study the changes that occurred in brain and body size, locomotion, diet, and other aspects regarding the way of life of early human species over the past 6 million years. Millions of stone tools, figurines and paintings, footprints, and other traces of human behavior in the prehistoric record tell about where and how early humans lived and when certain technological innovations were invented. Study of human genetics show how closely related we are to other primates - in fact, how connected we are with all other organisms - and can indicate the prehistoric migrations of our species, Homo sapiens, all over the world. Advances in the dating of fossils and artifacts help determine the age of those remains, which contributes to the big picture of when different milestones in becoming human evolved.

Exciting scientific discoveries continually add to the broader and deeper public knowledge of human evolution. Find out about the latest evidence in our What's Hot in Human Origins section.

Explore the evidence for human evolution in this interactive timeline - climate change, species, and milestones in becoming human.

Zoom in using the magnifier on the bottom for a closer look! This interactive is no longer in FLASH, it may take a moment to load.

The human family tree shows the various species that constitute the human evolutionary family.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Scientists have discovered a wealth of evidence concerning human evolution, and this evidence comes in many forms. Thousands of human fossils enable researchers and students to study the changes that occurred in brain and body size, locomotion, diet, and other aspects regarding the way of life of early human species over the past 6 million years.

# data[].attributes.headline
Findings of man in South Africa from 350,000 years ago.

# data[].attributes.subject
Findings of man in South Africa from 350,000 years ago.

# data[].attributes.body
I can use this to show how different people were back then; including diet, habits, and how and where they lived.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Remains of a new species of early human discovered in South African cave

By Philip Guelpa
14 September 2015

Newly announced findings of hominin fossils from a South African cave promise to provide new insights into human evolution. The remains are from a previously unknown species of early humans, Homo naledi. The research was reported in two companion articles published in the open-source journal eLIFE.

Remains of Homo naledi from Rising Star Cave

The original discovery was made accidentally by a pair of cave explorers who spotted bones lying on the floor of a deep, underground chamber of Rising Star Cave, located near Johannesburg. The find was reported to Lee Berger, an American paleoanthropologist who is a professor at the University of the Witwatersrand. He and a group of 60 international collaborators have conducted a systematic, two-year study of the remains.

So far, over 1,550 fossilized bone fragments have been recovered, representing a minimum of 15 individuals, and more are likely present. This already constitutes the largest collection of human fossils from a single site in Africa, and one of the largest in the world. Another such large accumulation is from Sima de los Huesos ("Pit of the Bones") in the Sierra de Atapuerca in Spain, dated to 350,000 years ago, where 6,500 fossil human bone fragments associated with Homo heidelbergensis have been recovered.

The large number of remains is a boon for researchers studying this period. Usually, the remains of early humans are found in small numbers at any given location, representing one or at most just a few individuals. This greatly limits researchers' ability to examine the range of variation that existed in a population at any one time and place, posing the danger of drawing highly skewed conclusions from a small and possibly unrepresentative sample. It's as if a handful of individuals were assumed to provide an accurate picture of the world's entire current human population. Such a statistically unrepresentative sample would present the danger of over- or underemphasizing the significance of characteristics present in the fortuitously selected individuals.

Skulls and jaws of Homo naledi

One of the more remarkable examples of this problem was manifested in one of the first discoveries of Neanderthal fossils. The remains painted a picture of a physical form very different from modern humans. When more specimens were unearthed, however, researchers realized that the previously found fossils were deformed as a result of arthritis and that Neanderthals in fact have a form and stature very similar to modern humans, though generally more robust.

By contrast, the Rising Star Cave group appears to represent a substantial sample of a more or less contemporaneous population, including individuals of different ages and sexes, as well as differing personal histories which would be reflected in their bones (e.g., the effects of accidents and diseases, variations in nutrition, etc.). This allows for a more complete understanding of the humans of that period, whose date is still uncertain.

Another intriguing aspect of the find arises from the setting in which the Homo naledi remains were found. The fossils were located 80 meters deep in a cave, making access both difficult and dangerous. Moreover, the specific chamber in which the bones were found is only accessible by a passage which at times is only about 20 centimeters (7.5 inches) wide. To that end, a specially selected team of six excavators, all women slender enough to fit through the gap, were engaged to conduct the two field seasons of investigation. The difficulty in reaching the chamber is illustrated in a NOVA/National Geographic video.

Based on the studies conducted to date, the Rising Star Cave group is already the most well documented early human population anywhere in the world. Their physical characteristics encompass a range of primitive and derived (advanced) traits. Their wrists, hands, legs, and feet appear more modern than those of the early hominin genus Australopithecus. By contrast, small brain size, curved fingers, and form of the shoulder, trunk, and hip joints are similar to those of the earlier genus. Their jaws and teeth have an intermediate appearance.

The researchers have concluded that this previously unknown combination of characteristics warrants classification as a new species, an early member of the genus Homo, which they have named Homo naledi, "naledi" being the word for star in the local Sesotho language.

The age of the Rising Star Cave population has not yet been securely established. Fossil hominins are usually recovered buried in rock or sediment layers, the ages of which can be determined by a variety of methods, including radiometric dating and associated plant and animal fossils whose ages have previously been established. So far, there has not been the recovery of enough secondary material to use these methods reliably.

The small size of the H. naledi brain, between 465 and 560 cubic centimeters, roughly a third of that of modern humans, and other "primitive" characteristics are taken to indicate that these are very early members of the genus Homo. By comparison to other hominins, the researchers estimate that the age of this population dates back at least between 2.5 million and 2.8 million years. Geologists put the age of the cave at no more than 3 million years, thus placing the human remains within a span of about half a million years.

One criticism that has been raised of the research so far is that further efforts should have been made to determine the age of the fossils. Basing the age estimate on anatomy alone is questionable, given, for example, the small brain size and stature of the much more recent Homo floresiensis, the so-called hobbit from Indonesia, dated to as little as 12,000 years ago.

Despite their small brains, some characteristics of their hands and wrists suggest that, like other early members of Homo, they may have been toolmakers, though no tools have been reported from the cave. However, the curved fingers suggest that this population was not far removed from a tree-climbing existence.

The mosaic of anatomical characteristics exhibited by Homo naledi presents the opportunity to reassess the evolutionary status of many other, less well represented early hominin fossils. Potentially, specimens that possess traits which were previously thought sufficiently distinct to constitute separate species could now be seen as representing aspects of a single, evolving species with a wide range of variation. Chris Stringer, a researcher in human evolution at the Natural History Museum in London, states that he sees similarities to the early Homo erectus population of Dmanisi in the Republic of Georgia, dating to about 1.8 million years ago. Such a reassessment would bear on a fundamental question in human evolution.

In general, as species of plants and animals spread out over larger territories, they tend to evolve to adapt to local environments. Over time, this divergence often leads to the development of new, separate species. Uniquely, humans have increasingly used cultural (technology, etc.) rather than physical adaptation to cope with new environments, thus dampening the tendency to split into distinct species. The key question then is posed-how early did the use of cultural means of adaptation become a significant influence on the biological evolution of humans and what was the relative balance between the two at various times and places? The remains from Rising Star Cave may shed light on this question.

Another question arises-how did the Homo naledi individuals end up in this location? The chamber of the cave in which they were found is not only remote and difficult to reach, but has no natural light. The near-total absence of any fossils of other species is puzzling, tending to reduce the probability that natural processes were responsible for creating the accumulation of bones.

The researchers report that they entertained a range of possible scenarios regarding how this death assemblage was created. The one they ultimately propose is that the corpses, apparently complete at the time of deposition, were intentionally placed in this remote location by surviving members of the group. Such behavior suggests some sort of ritual meaning to this action, which would imply a level of abstract thought not previously associated with such early humans. It also implies the use of fire for light.

Modern humans during the Upper Paleolithic period in Europe intentionally penetrated deep into caves to create magnificent works of art. The placement of the art in such remote and relatively inaccessible settings must have had particular significance, reflecting a complex view of the world. The possibility that, more than 2 million years earlier, much earlier, less evolved humans were engaged in at least a rudimentary form of such behavior requires critical examination.

One alternate explanation is that there was once a much less difficult access route to the cave, which has subsequently been sealed. If so, disposal of the dead may have been a much simpler, "hygienic" measure. However, the researchers state that, after an extensive physical search and geological analysis, no evidence of any former entrances has been found.

Notwithstanding the issue of how the assemblage of bones was created, the Rising Star Cave discovery represents a major contribution to the study of human evolution, and demonstrates the importance of continued scientific research in this field.

To fight this blacklisting:

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Remains of a new species of early human discovered in South African cave

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By Philip Guelpa 14 September 2015 Newly announced findings of hominin fossils from a South African cave promise to provide new insights into human evolution. The remains are from a previously unknown species of early humans, Homo naledi. The research was reported in two companion articles published in the open-source journal eLIFE.

# data[].attributes.body
A site to explain what archaeology is before I explain how it is useful.