# data[].attributes.body
i can infer that globalisation benefits developing countries. due to globalisation, they can produce more products at a time. it can be seen in the picture where the women, probably the workers, doing the same work to produce a certain item. by having a lot of manpower, it allows more efficiency for the developing country.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the statement that globalisation benefits developing countries. I can infer that the workers are slaving off to work. This is supported by the source showing the communist china leaders saying,” We’ve tried threats, imprisonment, everything! They can’t just work any harder!” This suggest that the china workers are treated inhumanly and force to work harder like a slave. Thus, source A disagree.

# data[].attributes.body
I: I can infer that people in developing countries are forced to work everyday.

E: This can be seen in the line "Don't they know it's Christmas?"

E: This shows that the people in developing countries are forced to work hard for the big companies every day, even during the holidays.

Source A disagrees with the statement.

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer that Source A tells me that globalisation promotes a more work burden lifestyle for workers. This is supported by the cartoon that shows people were forced to work and "WE'VE TRIED THREATS, IMPRISONMENT". This suggests that globalisation do improve the economy however then downside of the influence is that it has brought a prisoner lifestyle to the workers who work in Developled Countries.

Source A disagree.

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer from Source A that the factory workers are treated poorly. This can be seen in Source A where it shows Chinese factory workers being hit with sticks and threats. This shows that the Chinese workers in factories are being treated harshly to increase production rates. Thus I disagree that globalisation is beneficial to developing countries.

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer that the chinese workers are being ill treated by the chinese companies.This can be seen by the cartoon,where the workers are being beaten up in order to try to maximize efficiency.this suggest that chinese companies care more about profits as compared to the wellbeing of workers,thus disagreeing with the statement that globalisation benefits developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
I agree that globalization benefits developing countries as this can be seen in source A that shows a warden which is representing China inc. whipping their employees in order for them to work faster. This is because they want their employees to work harder to meet their daily quota faster. By doing they can manufacture the products faster to be sold and make profit faster. However, the employees are paid basic salary eventhough they are working overtime which means the company earns more profit which allows the company to grow faster.

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer that Source B indicates that globalisation drivens dangerous worklife to be established in the developed countries

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer that the growth of MNCs has allowed violations of human rights.This can be seen in the source'children carrying bags of rocks and miners in narrow manmade tunnels risking permant lung damage' This suggest that the MNCs do not care about the wellbeing nor the basic human rights that the workers deserve.thus disagreeing with the statement globalosation benefits developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with this statement. i can infer that people are having amused with the technologies. it can been in ,” enjoy the benefits of new technologies”. it shows that people in development countries are satisfied by technologies,

# data[].attributes.body
I: i disagree with the statement to a large extent. As seen in the source, it shows that chinese corporations are exploiting female workers to do manual harsh labour for them.

# data[].attributes.body
This source suggest that authorities at nike do not adhere to human right rules.this can be seen in them asking staff to work 12 hour shifts.this suggest that nike is overworking their employees.thus disagreeing with the statement that globalisation benefits developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
source C disagree with the statement. i can infer that the poster is trying to discriminate the working condition in nike seeatshop in Indonesia. this can be seen in the poster where there are chain chains and on top of that it state that 'THERE IS NO FINISH LINE' . shown that they are chain inside that working condition and cant get out of the horrible environment. the does not benefit the developed countries as this post is showing that people in developed countries are mistreating the low developed countries.

# data[].attributes.body
This source suggests that globalisation has indeed benefitted developing countries.this can be seen in 'not only are sweatshops better than current working alternatives.'this suggest that due to globalisation,has indeed benefitted developing countries by providing better job and worklife.thus agreeing to the statement that globalisation has benefitted developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
I: I can infer that globalisation has treated their child workers poorly.
E: This can be seen in the line

# data[].attributes.body
Source C shows that globalisation does not benefit the developed countries as it shows that employees do not earn enough as it is supported by source C that the orignial cost of a Nike shoes $5 but the retail price is $140. This suggests that the profit goes to the company so the workers are underpayed by the company.

# data[].attributes.body
i can infer that the workers are in an facility which is solely made for creating products for mncs but as they work they are being mistreated which can be seen as a officer lifts his cane to hit

# data[].attributes.body
i agree to a huge extent with this statement as source E explains how sweatshop are helping then instead of hindering them. source E states that globalisation is in fact making survival possible. this is evident from “we need jobs.” this evidence illustrates how people need jobs and globalisation is providing them more job opportunities. hence, globalisation is their pillars for financial

# data[].attributes.body
Source E shows that globalisation has benefitted developing countries.This is seen in the source 'it would be terrible if the orders stop coming and the factories close'This suggest that wothout this factories operating they would be unable tp make a living.thus agreeing that globalisation has benefitted developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
I can infer that the working conditions are poor. This can be seen in Source B, " children carrying bags of rocks, and minerals in narrow man-made tunnels risking permanent lung damage". This suggests that Children are tasked to do laborous job in harsh conditions. This shows that the conditions of the workplace is poor and unsafe.

# data[].attributes.headline
Let's try concluding: Route 1 (Reliability)

# data[].attributes.subject
Let's try concluding: Route 1 (Reliability)

# data[].attributes.body
Identify a source which is unreliable and based on purpose (4As) explain why this source is unreliable.

# data[].attributes.headline
Let's try concluding: Route 2 (Contextual Knowledge)

# data[].attributes.subject
Let's try concluding: Route 2 (Contextual Knowledge)

# data[].attributes.body
Based on what you know explain whether you think globalisation is beneficial to developing (poorer) countries. You may also google/ research some facts to support your argument.

# data[].attributes.headline
Let's try concluding: Route 3 (Balanced Conclusion)

# data[].attributes.subject
Let's try concluding: Route 3 (Balanced Conclusion)

# data[].attributes.body
Based on all sources (agree and disagree),provide a balanced judgment to acknowledge both the pros and cons. You may think of their interdependent relationship.

# data[].attributes.body
source B is unreliable in showing that globalisation is benefiting the developing countries. the reporter from Amnesty international humans rights group is trying to convince the viewers that due to globalisation children are being abused. this is so that viewers will not support the MNCs and can stop child abuse earlier. since this is from the international human rights group i would expect them to have a hidden agenda and to be more bias to stop globalisation. thus this source is unreliable in showing that globalisation has harm the developing countries rather than benefiting the developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
However the reliability of source A can be questioned as the author of the source  is an American who is trying to convince Netizens that the chinese abuse their workers in result to globalisation so that people wouldn't support China and their globalisation and as normally Americans do not like China I wouldn't be surprised that the author paint them in such a bad light thus source A is unreliable

# data[].attributes.body
Based on my knowledge I disagree with the statement that globalisation has benefitted developing countries as places such a India and Brazil have experience negative effects of globalisation through sweatshops as it pays little this can be seen in the fact that many citizens still lives in slums thus I disagree with the statement as globalisation has cause negative effects instead of positive effects

# data[].attributes.body
Source B shows globalisation has lead to children being exploited for labour

This is supported by"children carrying bags of rocks, and miners in narrow man made tunnels risking permanent lung damage"

This means that children, a cheaper source of labour,are made to work for the MNCs and are likely to suffer health issues due to their bad working condition

No, source B disagree with the statement and show that globalization has harmed rather than benefitted the developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
Source C shows that people from poor countries are exploited for their cheap labour

The poster shows that'while people from developing countries continue to be paid lowly, the MNC from developed countries continue to earn huge profits and become richer

No, source C disagree with the statement and shows that globalization has harmed rather than benefitted the developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is unreliable in showing that globalisation has benefitted developing countries. As source A depicts Chinese factory workers being mistreated by the staff which suggests that the working conditions provided by the MNCs to developing countries is poor thus disagreeing with the statement that globalisation benefits developing countries as they are being mistreated for the gain of the MNCs.

# data[].attributes.body
However the reliability of source A can be biased as the author of the source is an American who is trying to convince netizens that the china corporation violate their workers in result to globalisation so that people wouldn't support globalisation as it has harmed LDCs. Moreover, the American also wants views to become famous, and he comes from America so he wouldn’t know much about china sweatshops. Thus, this source is unreliable and the author has a hidden agenda and isn’t trustworthy.

# data[].attributes.body
Source E shows that globalization is needed to sustain the earnings of the people in developing countries

This is supported by, "However, it would be terrible if the orders stopped coming and the factories closed"

This shows that people in developing countries depend on globalization to earn a living and could not make ends meet without it

Yes, source E agrees with the Statement and shows that globalization has benefited the developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
to my contextual knowledge, i believe that globalisation is beneficial to developing countries. while it is true that sweatshops is a negative product of globalisation, the benefits are far greater than the negatives. globalisation created more job opportunities for people in developing countries such as china where it became the world’s biggest manufacturer hub by developing products for mnc’s. it has enhanced china’s economy. thus, in conclusion, globalisation is beneficial for developing countries.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D is unreliable due to its purpose. The economist published the perspective in Source D to encourage MNCs to create more sweatshops in developing countries.

This can be seen in Source D, which states "not only are sweatshops better than current working alternatives, but they are also part of the process of development that ultimately raises living standards."

This shows that globalisation serves as a benefit to developing countries as it has provided better job opportunities for people in developing countries. However, this makes the source unreliable due to the hidden agenda of the author, which is to increase production of products made in developing countries.

# data[].attributes.body
source B is unreliable in showing that globalisation is benefiting the developing countries. the reporter from Amnesty international humans rights group is trying to convince the viewers that due to globalisation children are being abused. this is so that viewers will not support the MNCs and can stop child abuse earlier. since this is from the international human rights group i would expect them to have a hidden agenda

# data[].attributes.body
Source A is unreliable based on its purpose of the source. This source is created by an American artist who is the author who is trying to convey to the Americans that China is mistreating their workers by portraying the china MNC workers have been threatened by the employer using baton to threatened them and the achievement shows that China is abusing human rights and this will let Americans think that USA is a better country than China. Its unreliable as this is only a hypothesis made by an American artist. Thus this cannot shows a full picture of China itself, as this source is not created by China themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Sources A, B and C show that globalisation is not beneficial to developing countries while Sources D and E says that it does actually benefit developing countries this shows that while globalisation has caused human rights to be abused it had also allowed the people of developing countries to be able to earn a livelihood

# data[].attributes.body
To my contextual knowledge sweatshops have bothe the positive and negative impacts on the people in developing countries however, there is more negative impacts due to how the workers are treated which is sometimes cruel like a slave as they are given little to none breaks and are paid little which barely support the workers family

# data[].attributes.body
in conclusion , I disagree that globalisation is benefitting the developing countries as there are more con's of globalisation than pros such as workers are being mistreated as they are forced to work for long hours and a large amount of work and also child labour and poor people labour are happening too which led to globalisation shown as negative but on the other hand , there are also pro such as the economic are growing well . hence , I disagree as globalisation is harming the people in developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
Source D is reliable  in showing that globalisation is benefiting the people in developing countries. Globalisation is needed to improve the livelihood of people, as MNCS provide better job opportunities for the people. More job opportunities means more people are earning money means more people spending money improving the economy of the country.

# data[].attributes.body
Globalisation is beneficial to the developing countries because it provides better job opportunities for the people and it improve the standard of living of people, there’s a decrease in poverty

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the pros and cons of all the sources, I think that globalisation harms the developing countries, rather than benefitting them. From a few sources, I can infer that globalisation exploits their workers for cheap labour. For example, in Source A, this can be seen in the cartoon which shows workers getting abused while working. This shows that workers in developing countries are being mistreated in order to meet the production demands of MNCs. Therefore, globalisation is harmful towards developing countries.

# data[].attributes.body
in conclusion, all sources shows that there are both good and bad side for globalisation in developing countries. from sources B and A it shows the disadvantages of globalisation as it harms human being. however in sources C and D it shows the positive side of globalisation as people there can have job opportunity and earn some money

# data[].attributes.body
source A maybe biased as the author of the source is an American who is trying to convince netizens that the china corporation violate their workers in result to globalisation so that the general public wont support globalisation as it has harmed LDCs. Moreover, the American also wants his views to become famous, and he comes from America so he wouldn’t know much about china sweatshops. Thus, this source is unreliable and the author has a hidden agenda and isn’t trustworthy.

# data[].attributes.body
To conclude, globalisation is more harmful rather than beneficial for the countries. Source A, B and C shows that globalisation is harmful for the developing countries while source D and E shows that developing countries are benefitted by globalisation. Globalisation brought suffering to the workers and exploited cheap labours while it also provide better job opportunities.