# data[].attributes.body
This is a weak analogy because Jon Wiener is comparing a Richard Nixon,a former president, to Brett Kavanaugh. He compares the impeachment of the former president which was caused  by the Watergate scandal to the issue of Kavanaugh becoming a supreme court justice.

# data[].attributes.body
This is Ad hominen because it is attacking trump and ignores the main topic of the cure for cancer. This is wrong  because it is not focusing on the subject and instead focuses on a specific person in this case being trump.

# data[].attributes.body
This is Ad Hominem because it is targeting the women who accused kavanaugh of assault instead of actually targeting the issue with accusations of assault. This makes it wrong because the post should actually talk about the problem instead of the person involved.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a false dichotomy because he gives only two options in which there is only one ''good"option  which is being with them and the other being the "bad"option which is siding with the terrorists.This is wrong because this doesn't give options that take in consideration of other viewpoints.

# data[].attributes.body
This is post hoc because it is implying that the reason for cat deaths is the increase of curiosity  which is a false cause due to irrelevant data. This is wrong because the data is not related to each other so you can't say one causes the other.