# data[].attributes.body
1.the zanesville incident  is when terry tompson let his exotic animals out and i think they are refering to this because it can be an example for both.  2. the first writer thought that pets where ok but exotic animals as pets where not. the secound thought both pets where ok if you toke care of them. i know this because in the text there both support this.

# data[].attributes.body
1.they both refer to the Zanesville , Ohio incident because they both want to tell you how the feel about the incident. 2. The first writer feels that people should not own exotic animals because of the picture. The second writer feels the we should be able because of the picture.
Sawyer Zaluski
Sawyer Zaluski

The zanesville incident is when  Terry Thompson let his exotic animals out of their cage. Then killed himself. And left the animals to attack and kill each other. When the police arrived they had to shoot and kill most of them. This put the public in danger. Because if they got out of of the big pen they could've killed people.

1. Both the texts refer to each other because, they both talk about exotic animals  and what it could be like to have them as pets. Im more on the side to where you should be able to.

2. The first writer thinks that you shouldn't be able to have exotic pets.

# data[].attributes.body
1.the text both refer to the incident in zanesville ohio

2.in text the wild animals arent pets the other says that animal should not be kept as wild animals because  they belong in the wild
and the second text called let people keep exotic animal the author is trying to state that exotic pets should be kee

# data[].attributes.body
1. they both talked about the zansvile isted to tells us how they bot feel about the matter and to explain it to us. 2 they both feel hood about anmails but one person thinks we shouldnt have exotic ainmals as pets but we should have house pets that are not exotic. The other person thinks we should be aloud to have exotic aniams for pets becuase we should get a chice and they alose think that we should have house pets.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Both writers refer to the bad innocedent in Zanesville about Terry thompspoon letting out exotic animals then shooting himself.
2 The first writer is against exiotic animals but the second one is for it yet it does explain there opinion on other animals they only talked about exoitic ones.

# data[].attributes.body
Because, they refer to it there are most likely GOOD AND BAD things that happen there w/ exotic pets. 2. The 1st article explains wild animals can't be pets, and the 2nd one explains YEAH PETS AS IN EXOTIC pets, why, is because, it explains it.

# data[].attributes.body
the editorial of usa today belives that we should not have exotic animal as a pet,because he said he said they are not safe,and the  women said that we should have them as a pet because,u should be able to have a exotic animal as a pet but u cant have a recored

# data[].attributes.body
the 2 sides of the book is different one wants to allow the exotic anamals and then the outher want to not allow exotic anamals as pets

# data[].attributes.body
1st  writer feels like exotic animals are a threat and should not be pets. "Or how pottetially tradgic" States the text.
2nd writer feels exotic animals should be pets.

# data[].attributes.body
2. Each writer I believe does like animals, they just have different views on which ones can and should be kept as pets. I know this because the editorial includes the Zanesville incident and calls the animals that were killed "innocent victims", and clearly the commentary supports the idea that any pet practically should be allowed, making it clear to see they like animals

# data[].attributes.body
2. The first writer thinks the animals are bad. The second author thinks that  the animals should stay aslong as they don't attack .

# data[].attributes.body
the zanesville incident refered in both text they wanted the readers to know both side of the story, should u people have a exotic animal as a pet.
1

# data[].attributes.body
l. the Zanesvill  terry tompson let all the animals out of there cages and then killed them selfs

2. The writer thinks that the people should be able to have exotic animals as pets.

# data[].attributes.body
the zanesvill ohio was refered in both texed when terry tompson let ut all of his exotic anamals out of the cage and then killed himself

# data[].attributes.body
the zaneville incident is refered because, terry thompson let the animals go and then a sighn todl the people to be carful of exotic animals on the road. 2: I know because i understand what happend : the writer might feel mad for having terry thompson open the gate and leting the animals free. :3

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Zanesville insadint referd to a man letting lose exotic animals and then in zanesville ohio brought back the question if exotic animals should be alowed there.

2. The writers not for the exotic animals most likely does not like animals or maybe just exotic ones cause in the story they explain all the harm animals do or could do.writers for exotic animals are most likely loves animals no matter how mean or nice they are and they have prof to prove what animals

# data[].attributes.body
The zanesville insadint

# data[].attributes.body
1.THE  Zanes vill inicedent with mean ol Terry Thompson

# data[].attributes.body
1.they both refer to the Zanesville , Ohio incident because they both want to tell you how the feel about the incident. 2. The first writer feels that people should not own exotic animals because of the picture. The second writer feels the we should be able because of the picture.

# data[].attributes.body
The zanesville incident is when  Terry Thompson let his exotic animals out of their cage. Then killed himself. And left the animals to attack and kill each other. When the police arrived they had to shoot and kill most of them. This put the public in danger. Because if they got out of of the big pen they could've killed people.

1. Both the texts refer to each other because, they both talk about exotic animals  and what it could be like to have them as pets. Im more on the side to where you should be able to.

2. The first writer thinks that you shouldn't be able to have exotic pets. The second one is the one i agree with because you with the proper licsense it should be okay.

The fitness gram pacer test is a multidatge

# data[].attributes.body
The Zanesville incedent is when Terry Tompson frees his animals.

# data[].attributes.body
1.the zanesvill ohio was referd in both texed because he wanted you to know that it was tragic and we shouldent have them as pets. 2.the writer feels that the anmials that are wild so he is telling you thing that anmials did to kill or try to kill humans also he dose not like them to be in houses that can break out and kill people

# data[].attributes.body
they both refer the zanesville accident because it was a bad accident that could of been prevented if he would of not opened his cages.2. the writer feels that animals can be out on farms but they need to have a back round record

# data[].attributes.body
1.Both texts refer to the Zanesville incident because editorial uses the incident in a negative way to persude readers that exotic animals are not pets. And the comatary uses the incident by saying that it was just because that Terry already had a criminal record.

2. The writer of the editorial has a feeling that exotic animals cannot be used as pets. I know that because his whole part was trying to persude people that exotic animals are not pets. The writer if the comitary feels like exotic animals should be pets. I know that because her whole part was trying to persude the readers the readers that exotic animals should be pets.

# data[].attributes.body
1.the zanesville ohio was refer  in both text  because one was about negitive effects on the accident and good things on the accident.2.one doesnt want to have them as pets and one wants to keep them as pets.I know this because they both are explaining there thoughts in there essays.

# data[].attributes.body
1.They both referd to the Zanesville adcite because it is  tells both sides on why it happen and how they feel about it. 2. One person thinks that wild animals shouldnt be keep as pets but they think that it is ok to keep other pets as pets. The other person Thinks that we should be able to keep exotic animals as pets and we should be able to have house pets as well.

# data[].attributes.body
The Zanesville incident were in both texts because one was a negative text  so the readers could think any person should not have exotic animals and the other text was saying he was a bad person to take care of animals but there is good people to care not like him.

Each writer feels about animals that the ones who are not exotic can be pets. But one writer say's all animals can be pets while the others who don't like exotic animals as pets.

# data[].attributes.body
1]The Zanesville incident is refered on both text because the negative paragraph because the author is trying to make it sound very bad but the positive paragraph is trying to make it sound like it is not the owners fault .
2] The first writer writing about the negatives about owning an exotic pet feels like you shouldn't own exotic pets because it is dangerous . The positive paragraph is writing about how you should own a exotic oet because myabe it needs shelter because it doesn't have one or is going extinced it might need a shelter so they are sayinh you should be aloud to take it in or just own one because it is not as dangerous as the negative paragraph says it is .The reason the positive paragraph is trying to mske it seem better than the negative paragraph is so that way you believe the positive paragraph . the reason you will beleive the positive paragraph is because it gives more reasonable explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
1.bolth text refer to the zanesville accident becuase for the editorial, it shows that things can be backwards, where the animals are injured/killed. and for the commentary, it shows it as a tragedy to support that animals aren't all as bad as the editorial makes them to be.