# data[].attributes.body
YEET

# data[].attributes.headline
Nationalism WAS Beneficial to Imperialism -Maggie

# data[].attributes.subject
Nationalism WAS Beneficial to Imperialism -Maggie

# data[].attributes.body
By having nationalism, more citizens of a certain country or power will most likely fight for that power. One examples for the people to gain power is Imperialism. By gaining power, the country will gain profit, influence, and more nationalism. Japan, Italy, and Germany were key countries who benefited from nationalism. :-)

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism overall was beneficial to imperialism. European Imperialism is an example of this. The White Man's Burden is an example of nationalism and it drove Europeans to imperialize. Europeans shared the identity of believing that they were superior to other beings, and therefore gave them a "right" to take over places like Africa. However, contrary, nationalism is detrimental to imperialism because the nation that is being supresed may stand up and resist the European power.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that nationalism negatively impacted imperialism. Nationalism, and believing that one's own country is better than all others made colonizers treat other races and nationalities badly. For example, King Leopold II was a nationalist, meaning that he believed Europeans were better than others. This belief made him think people in the Congo deserved to be treated badly. King Leopold II and his men killed 10 million Africans. Some of his men could only live with doing these horrible things by drilling into their brains that Africans deserve it.

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism can both be benificial and detrimental to imperialism, depending on perspective. It was benificial in that for countries such as Britain, nationalism was expressed through imperialism and the colonization of other regions boosted British power and pride, and also united many citizens in support of a common cause

# data[].attributes.headline
Nationalism was beneficial to Imperialism

# data[].attributes.subject
Nationalism was beneficial to Imperialism

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism was beneficial to imperialism because when people

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism was both beneficial and detrimental to imperialism because it made the colonies suffer and become oppressed while helping Europe thrive economically. Without nationalism, the European countries wouldn't have the drive to take over Africa & Asia. However, because Europe did have nationalism to take over those areas, it caused China to sign unequal treaties; The Africans being killed by the millions, and for Japan to come up with tactics to fend off Europe, so nationalism was beneficial to Europe, but harmful to the colonies.

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism could be looked at as detrimental to imperialism if we were to say look at Indian nationalism through the eyes of the expanding British Empire because it could be considered as an unneeded interference that would slow the rate of imperialism. But say we are talking about British Nationalism and the growth and effect it had on the British imperialism I would say it is extremely beneficial because it helped boost the support to expand as an empire because of the idea of the your home nation pushing some weight to make it easier to go out and expand as a nation. So it can either be an obstical or a massive boost

# data[].attributes.body
When countries realized that they had the best economy, government systems, and resources, they started to spread their ways around the world. With this in mind, it seems that nationalism gave the citizens a mindset that imperialism was good because they were helping out other countries with their impactful ways of ruling.

# data[].attributes.body
Despite creating discontentment between rebel groups and major nations, nationalism helped imperialism because it benefited major countries by giving them more support for expansion and colonization from the general population. The detriment of more inspired rebel groups was greatly outweighed by OUT OF TIME BYE

# data[].attributes.body
Although nationalism was detrimental to imperialism by causing rebellion in colonies, the overall effect was beneficial. First, nationalism was the ROOT CAUSE of all imperialism - the only reasons why nations wished to expand beyond their borders was because they wanted to benefit their country. Whether it be for prestige, economic motivations, or military supremacy, imperialism was always tied back to the idea of serving your country.

# data[].attributes.body
Beneficial to Imperialism because it caused conflict between people who were not of the same "nation". Yet this also caused more of a possibility of fighting back, because if you believe you belong to a nation your not going to want to be taken over by another.

# data[].attributes.body
Although nationalism was detrimental to countries being ruled by Imperialistic powers, it was overall beneficial because it influenced countries to unite, rebel, or expand. Without nationalism, countries were being ruled would have no reason to rebel.

# data[].attributes.headline
Although Nationalism was detrimental to some countries, it was mainly beneficial to countries such as Germany or Japan. Through Nationalism, both Germany and Italy became unified, and countries such as Japan became more industrial.

# data[].attributes.subject
Although Nationalism was detrimental to some countries, it was mainly beneficial to countries such as Germany or Japan. Through Nationalism, both Germany and Italy became unified, and countries such as Japan became more industrial.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think nationalism can be detrimental and helpful to imperialism. Nationalism was some of the reason behind the hurtful and violent things colonizers did behind the veil of Nationalism. From a colonizers perspective it gave leaders/troops more motivation to work harder.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think nationalism can be detrimental and helpful to imperialism. Nationalism was some of the reason behind the hurtful and violent things colonizers did behind the veil of Nationalism. From a colonizers perspective it gave leaders/troops more motivation to work harder.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that although nationalism provided a good excuse for imperialism, it was ultimately harmful to imperialism. People became blinded by their intense pride for their country and tried to do anything to incite more nationalism. For example, King Leopold treated the native Congolese terribly and ultimately became rich at their expense. However, because of the beautiful architecture and pride he provided for the Belgians, many people chose to look past his awful deeds.

# data[].attributes.headline
How was the East India Trading Company interfering with the monarchy?

# data[].attributes.subject
How was the East India Trading Company interfering with the monarchy?

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism was beneficial to imperialism. This is because when countries did well due to imperialism, for example gain more natural resources, people felt more nationalism for their country.

# data[].attributes.body
Nationalism was beneficial because the people's pride led them to fight for their country and fight for more land.

# data[].attributes.headline
Nationalism was detrimental because when people feel strongly about the success of their country, they are more likely to win in battle. Since they are more passionate, the citizens are more likely to rebel against the imperialist country.

# data[].attributes.subject
Nationalism was detrimental because when people feel strongly about the success of their country, they are more likely to win in battle. Since they are more passionate, the citizens are more likely to rebel against the imperialist country.

# data[].attributes.headline
Although some countries gained land, such as in Germany, nationalism overall tried to replace imperialist ideologies and focused more on what was happening in their country. Also, this new found national identity makes citizens ban together against being taken over by a country they do not identify with. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Although some countries gained land, such as in Germany, nationalism overall tried to replace imperialist ideologies and focused more on what was happening in their country. Also, this new found national identity makes citizens ban together against being taken over by a country they do not identify with. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Nationalism was detrimental was to imperialism because it brings a country together through the country's name. Imperialism wants to take over a country or take control, but when citizens band together to protects their country's name (in war) from outsiders that try to take over the country will become more resistant to overthrow.

# data[].attributes.subject
Nationalism was detrimental was to imperialism because it brings a country together through the country's name. Imperialism wants to take over a country or take control, but when citizens band together to protects their country's name (in war) from outsiders that try to take over the country will become more resistant to overthrow.

# data[].attributes.body
it was both  beneficial and detriemental. there were wars but then the wars led to gaining more land

# data[].attributes.headline
Nationalism was both detrimental and beneficial for a country.

# data[].attributes.subject
Nationalism was both detrimental and beneficial for a country.

# data[].attributes.headline
Also post any questions you have about the unit for us to discuss as a class.

# data[].attributes.subject
Also post any questions you have about the unit for us to discuss as a class.

# data[].attributes.headline
Post pieces of your response to this question or subtopics to discuss

# data[].attributes.subject
Post pieces of your response to this question or subtopics to discuss