# data[].attributes.body
Tooltip itself is a useful tool. I am able to unpack tasks or terms by adding guiding questions and reminders. I am still not sure on how to make use of the STP tooltip for teachers. I see that it is teachers' facing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think annotation is really a great feature for students' learning. It looks like it's more for interaction between students-content. Is it possible to enhance this feature to a more advanced one to a student-student interaction? I would think if a student sees a peer does not understand certain vocabulary, they can help one another. On the other hand, if a teacher is able to see from a dashboard all the words students highlighted, it will be easier to close the learning gaps.

# data[].attributes.headline
Is there an instructional manual somewhere, so first timers (or old school) teachers can look at or flip through? Something like this SLS lesson is good, is it available to all teachers? I know learning by doing is best, but, for some, exploring a relatively unknown terrain can be scary?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is there an instructional manual somewhere, so first timers (or old school) teachers can look at or flip through? Something like this SLS lesson is good, is it available to all teachers? I know learning by doing is best, but, for some, exploring a relatively unknown terrain can be scary?

# data[].attributes.body
I am wondering if there is an easier way of looking at students' data for each individual, so that feedback can be given to them on how they can do better as a whole. Right now, feedback can be given only to individual question and it is quite difficult to track students progress from the start of the activity to the end. If only we could generate individual response, and even give them a printed copy to see their progress, coupled with handwritten feedback!

# data[].attributes.headline
Giving Feedback on Questions (Shown on Heatmap)

# data[].attributes.subject
Giving Feedback on Questions (Shown on Heatmap)

# data[].attributes.body
From the segment on Heatmaps earlier, I am pleased to discover that the Heatmap shows that the teacher has given feedback to a student's particular question. I'm wondering if the students will be notified and if the notification system is intuitive enough such that the students will be motivated to check back on the teacher's comment and take actions to enhance his or her answers?

# data[].attributes.body
Liked this feature as it enables teachers to differentiate content, process or product and assign appropriate tasks to selected groups of students. The assignment sharing feature when enabled also allows students to view what others have done if they had been assigned to another activity (promotes rich learning). At the same time, for students who are able to progress from a particular level's activities, they can move on to the next higher level where demands of the task are higher.

# data[].attributes.body
Not sure if there are features in SLS heatmap for teachers to analyse the facility index and discrimination index to better understand the assessment standards of the questions and evaluate the quality of the question construct.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the features in SLS can't be strictly tied to specific categories e.g. a MCQ question if crafted in a way which can surface students' thinking process can also be considered as a constructed response. It depends on the teachers' competency and confidence level but to pigeon-hole and state that selected responses means only some of the SLS features we might be limiting how teachers can check on understanding using SLS.

# data[].attributes.body
Can students of varying readiness to be directed to different questions for them to attempt and different set of resources for them to review their concepts within the same quiz? This feature is possible through Google Form but is not available on SLS.

# data[].attributes.body
I like how two-tier MCQ can be designed and used to identify students' misconceptions. At the moment, I don't think this feature is available on SLS.

# data[].attributes.headline
Annotation and Notes features - can they be collaborative?

# data[].attributes.subject
Annotation and Notes features - can they be collaborative?

# data[].attributes.body
I think the annotation and notes features are great and really useful! I'm wondering - building on the question about SLS groupings as well - can students collaborate and annotate a passage together? (E.g. one students' annotation will also appear in another students' account as they are part of the same group.)

# data[].attributes.body
Can the students complete tasks (e.g. FRQ) in groups that are pre-assigned by teachers? So that when we look at the heatmap, we see groups of students instead of individual students' names.