# data[].attributes.body
article a is just opinions and not factual evidence

# data[].attributes.body
article b because it has a lot of information and seems like

# data[].attributes.body
seems more realistic than article a

# data[].attributes.body
because it has more information while article A is trying to grab your attention.

# data[].attributes.body
I think article B give more information because it has evidence and sites than article A

# data[].attributes.body
It seems more likely that a fire started other than being attacked.

# data[].attributes.body
Article A is just opinions, not factual evidence

# data[].attributes.body
because it has attention grabbers as headlines

# data[].attributes.body
I belive that "Article B" is more credible based on both the content and the appearence of this article. Starting off, Article A has a "reward" or a bid for this articles claim. Whereas, Article B although has some reasonable bias it is also is based on facts.

# data[].attributes.body
It backs up its evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
because there is more information and it backs up evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
because Article A uses flashy headlines and other methods to sell the newspaper, but the story itself is full of opinions rather than facts. Article B uses facts and statements without much bias, as opposed to Article A

# data[].attributes.body
It actually gives information while A just gives headlines to grab attention.

# data[].attributes.body
It looks better and has better headlines and better format

# data[].attributes.body
a

# data[].attributes.body
Article A has more "i feel" instead of factual statements. It also has persuading titles to try to grab the readers' attention.

# data[].attributes.body
Article A doesn't have any evidence and just repeats its claim over and over again. Article A is also just based off the hate toward Spain because of the war. Article B has reliable source and evidence that supports its claim.

# data[].attributes.body
because it gives more facts

# data[].attributes.body
Article A is full of headlines that are trying to grab the readers attention with big, bold, underlined words while article B is more about expert opinions and facts.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that "Article B" is more credible.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that "Article B" is more credible.

# data[].attributes.body
Because Article A has actual real sources from real people while Article B has no factual evidence

# data[].attributes.body
ita beyter source

# data[].attributes.body
Article B is more credible because it does not say its fact because no facts prove it wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
Looking at article a, the whole article was based off of feelings rather then factual information that would go against the public's extreme hatred to Spain and it's treatment of other countries. Furthermore, the article used evidence that was completely irrelevant to create a good well-developed claim (evidence was based off stories and not experienced people). Article b contrasts the ideal presented by article a heavily. For example, the evidence is based off of a reliable source, someone that has real factual knowledge and has probable cause for certain outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
because....