# data[].attributes.body
5/5 stars because it would scare the pants off little kids for me.

# data[].attributes.body
1/5 stars
No, I do not recommend it because the story does not make sense. -Oliver T.

How do you like shin Godzilla?
(off topic)

😄 yes or no 😐

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this book 3.5 stars because it is not the worst book I have read but it is definitely not the best book I have ever read. I would recommend this book to people who like slow books.

# data[].attributes.headline
I would give it two stars because it was a slow book. the book has no action nor does it have any exiting incidents. The story teller is not a good book I would recommend it to nobody except people that really like very slow books. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I would give it two stars because it was a slow book. the book has no action nor does it have any exiting incidents. The story teller is not a good book I would recommend it to nobody except people that really like very slow books. 

# data[].attributes.headline
click the arrow with the line under it at the bottom to put in pics

# data[].attributes.subject
click the arrow with the line under it at the bottom to put in pics

# data[].attributes.body
You put pictures by making a comment and there should be something that looks like a magnifying glass with a globe in

# data[].attributes.body
i would give this story 4 stars

# data[].attributes.headline
3 and a half stars because I think that the story could give more details about the  children's past. For example,why are they with the aunt? Are their parents dead? Are their parents on a trip? Where are they on the train? Are they going to their parents? I also would want to see more action, like in the monkeys paw.

# data[].attributes.subject
3 and a half stars because I think that the story could give more details about the  children's past. For example,why are they with the aunt? Are their parents dead? Are their parents on a trip? Where are they on the train? Are they going to their parents? I also would want to see more action, like in the monkeys paw.

# data[].attributes.body
Just had a better pace, and kept you entertained the whole time, while the Monkey's Paw was just boring and left of a cliffhanger. While this story was entertaining, no dumb cliffhangers, and a good pace.

# data[].attributes.body
I prefer this more than monkeys paw because it seems more interesting, it has a unique story line. Its satire in this story was very funny, having kids like the violent vs. the happy. It also has a better message. Nobody is perfect.

# data[].attributes.headline
Padlet is the easiest way to create an... From your hobby to your career, your...

# data[].attributes.subject
Padlet is the easiest way to create an... From your hobby to your career, your...

# data[].attributes.body
padlet

# data[].attributes.body
I would give this story 4 stars

# data[].attributes.body
I think there was some good things to talk about but we need to stay on topic.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that we did a good job on presenting good ideas. But we have to find out how to stay on task at times.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that we did a good job on presenting good ideas. But we have to find out how to stay on task at times.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the story is about 3 1/2 because it pulls you in a bit, which drags it down, but it pulled me in and had a good theme.
-A

# data[].attributes.headline
I think it went well and I think we did well on bouncing off other people's ideas but some people did not get to talk. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think it went well and I think we did well on bouncing off other people's ideas but some people did not get to talk. 

# data[].attributes.body
I would give the story three stars because the main story with the kids wanting a story was not supported very well but the bachelor's story was good so three stars.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it went well because everybody was sharing and a lot of quite people were speaking more than usual. Even though we only got through 2 and half questions we were sharing very good ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
I think we need to improve on not talking at the same time
I am thinking about whether the bachelor wanted the kids to learn or to keep them quiet.

# data[].attributes.headline
I am walking away with the bachelor telling the story to prove to the aunt that she can't make the children perfect.

# data[].attributes.subject
I am walking away with the bachelor telling the story to prove to the aunt that she can't make the children perfect.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that it went well because people agreed on multiple questoins.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that it went well because people agreed on multiple questoins.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think we need to improve on not talking at the same time.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think we need to improve on not talking at the same time.

# data[].attributes.headline
i walked away with knowing that the aunt might have been nice

# data[].attributes.subject
i walked away with knowing that the aunt might have been nice

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that we had a good conversation but I don't think we did well in bouncing off each other's ideas because some people who wanted to speak didn't get to speak and the people who already had spoke interrupted them to speak again.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that we had a good conversation but I don't think we did well in bouncing off each other's ideas because some people who wanted to speak didn't get to speak and the people who already had spoke interrupted them to speak again.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that we did well because people were fle

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that we did well because people were fle

# data[].attributes.headline
I think it mostly went well because people were flexible and ag

# data[].attributes.subject
I think it mostly went well because people were flexible and ag

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that we had plenty of ideas to do the seminar with and that was good. But I feel like we could improve on turns because there were a lot of people were trying to talk at the same time. I know that the bacheleor might have traveled the world

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that we had plenty of ideas to do the seminar with and that was good. But I feel like we could improve on turns because there were a lot of people were trying to talk at the same time. I know that the bacheleor might have traveled the world

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that we can make sure that everyone gets to talk. But otherwise I think that we did a great job and  that we are really good at arguments.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that we can make sure that everyone gets to talk. But otherwise I think that we did a great job and  that we are really good at arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
I an walking away with a new outlook on some of the questions. I really liked the idea of the satire how it was about how the children acted. How they were supposed to be perfect.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think we had a lot of good ideas and a lot of thoughts. I think we need to improve on giving more people a chance a talk. An idea I am walking away with is that the aunt is more protective and wants them to be happy even though she doesn't let them do anything fun  

# data[].attributes.subject
I think we had a lot of good ideas and a lot of thoughts. I think we need to improve on giving more people a chance a talk. An idea I am walking away with is that the aunt is more protective and wants them to be happy even though she doesn't let them do anything fun  

# data[].attributes.body
What did we do well- we did well on including people and having many points of veiw in our discussion.
What we need to improve on- we need to improve on taking turns talking since everyone has things to say!
Things I learned- I didn't even think about the other satire we figured out (the one about stories and chldren's preferences).

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that we did well on discussing all of our ideas and getting them out. I also think we did well on Diagreeing and agreeing.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that we did well on discussing all of our ideas and getting them out. I also think we did well on Diagreeing and agreeing.

# data[].attributes.body
TIME EFFICIENCY. If you agree, great, but please don't repeat what someone said. (Let people who haven't talked, but if you haven't talked... talk. We can't do it for you
I don't think we have not gotten far enough to have something else to walk away with.

# data[].attributes.body
We did well discussing ideas and agreeing on things, I think we need to improve on letting others talk and not the same share people every single time, I am walking away with new ideas about the bachelor's personality and the personalities of the characters.

# data[].attributes.headline
Storyteller Socratic Seminar Exit Ticket

# data[].attributes.subject
Storyteller Socratic Seminar Exit Ticket

# data[].attributes.body
I think what we did well was different people talked from last time. We need to improve on is make sure only one person talks at a time. I'm walking away with different thoughts than when I was making the slides.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that we need to stop repeating someones idea because it wastes time, and we could be doing other questions while people are saying the same thing as their neighbor.

# data[].attributes.headline
Storyteller Socratic Seminar Exit Ticket 

# data[].attributes.subject
Storyteller Socratic Seminar Exit Ticket 

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think we did well on bouncing of others ideas.
2. I think we need to improve on making sure everyone can speak and only having one person speak at a time.
3. I changed my mind about the satire.