# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-8CSl1fNa5u6rebrwmoPDYWBYaVXrYUby5S6Hi4LpX0

# data[].attributes.body
Sorry for late submission

# data[].attributes.body
1 Ryan Timothy (LATE)
2 cadence Isabelle
5 Sheryl Nathan
6 Guo zhi, Ryan
13 yu Pei jun jie
16 hao Kai. Guang yi
18 Quinn shiying

# data[].attributes.body
Samantha , Nicole https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tvokmxFVPvJbRKxbupwqBupOuAwtAl9fM4OPoWhHveY/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hujXRONJvnzfr3xufLei0iqrI5TK10ONoXryAfwzTJ0/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l29NIWvCkpE9xGLQaKkPHAm7vlsBXoH4grp713Juxto/edit?usp=drivesdk

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pGN5NKHcn2hWvjBmLSmpLtG5bLIh73OTqAxA4Zf2AFg/edit?usp=sharing

By Choonggi(13) and Yong Da (28)

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/112gVO8ihvwFQPzq-rpT8TnYL4BVcW-Xn0H0e3_c9kQs/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fzbAx0mr4oY3hUvjIWinBfl7RhiFRAt1H-hgKsPnc-0/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
Celynn, Keane
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17kG1xWEnDYcfvS04JnD53vx56KTh0hOnWqLkhDn5cG0/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1okSBfzz0prNyBX04CevMbJl2RucHztZNI9quYwvud9Y/mobilebasic

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kIYYewZV92KWhnEgdYk0f5hbiu10bZBpG5DMPo42JaI/edit?usp=sharing
By Jun Yan(19) & Hong Kai(31)

# data[].attributes.body
Celynn
#CanBeFurtherImproved
I can understand what G3 is trying to explain to us for both questions. However, in the second question, they can explain what a non-included triangle is as to make their explanation a better one.

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion
I feel that the diagrams and how they organize is good as it makes the post much more clearer and easier to understand.Also, the answers are explained in a simple way and makes things easier to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
Jeng Kiat
#INeedToUnderstand
I think that the statement on George's answer was very clear, including a detailed paragraph of explanation and diagrams to show me that equilateral triangles are indeed not always congruent, though I think mentioning scale factor would have improved it even more, it was clear enough for me to understand fully what you are trying  to imply.
However, when it came to proving what a congruent triangle was, you did not clearly state and explain why what you stated was true and why it was true. Furthermore, without the support of any diagrams, it was hard for me to make out what you were trying to say. Though I can understand your stand, I cannot very clearly see why or how.

# data[].attributes.body
Good diagrams and organisation. Explanations may need to be more clearer

# data[].attributes.body
Keane
#ILearned
I learnt new knowledge about equilateral triangles and it has also deepened my understanding. Well written and easy to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion for George statement, it could be elaborated more. but other than that, its nicely done. nice job

# data[].attributes.body
#Opinion #Ilearend
Grp 17 had very clear and detailed explanation as to why equaliteral need not have the same 3 sides length to have the angles at 60 each. As congurence means to have the same angles and sides of 2 figures, an equaliteral triangle does not have to be congruent but similar. I have learned this through the work of group 17

-junyang 8

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion i agree with ur opinion and it has a very clear reasoning in describing congruent figures and proving equilateral triangles are not congruent, pictures were also used to prove your point which was very good

# data[].attributes.body
#INeedToUnderstand what do u mean when u say that if only two pair of corresponding sides and a pair of non-included angle are equal as when the line is rotated,it will not connect with the hypotenuse
#Elaboration maybe you can provide some prior knowledge on congruency and use simpler term to explain

Qian qian
Group 10A

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion I feel that the explanation is well done with reasons why A is false or B is True. However you guys can elaborate using the diagram and show examples using it

# data[].attributes.body
it is very detailed and well explained, as they stated why they disagree/agree with the 2 statements. It can be clearly visualized as there are pictures to help give examples.They also explained the definition of congruent and similar triangles clearly

# data[].attributes.body
#elaboration in my opinion,the explanation is well developed however the diagrams can be further explained to understand clearer

# data[].attributes.body
#elaboration the explaination is gd and easy to understand, however I feel that diagrams are needed to futher prove what has been explained

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion. I agree with your statement 100% as your explanation is easy to understand and is accurate. Good job¡!

# data[].attributes.body
Jia Heng
#DifferentOpinion
I disagree with what G12 is implying. They are implying that all three sides and angles have to be equal. However, two pairs of corresponding sides and a pair of corresponding angles are enough to prove that the triangles, when you join the sides together to form a triangle, are congruent. Thus, I disagree with your statement on your disagreement with John.

# data[].attributes.body
#Ilearned Thanks for teaching meh that 'all equilateral triangles do not necessarily have to be of the same length for it to be considered an equilateral triangle but must have all three angles be 60 degrees.' This is a new knowledge i have gained from ur work. If you guys are right which I think you're are
~ yx

# data[].attributes.body
I think group 9 did a good job

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion
Good explanation and Easy to understand with visuals

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that your explanation of George's statement has flaws as you did not include the fact that the length of a side of a triangle does not necessary change the angle of said triangle.Though the lengths of 2 equilateral triangles may be different,that does not change the value of the angles if they are to be congruent.
-Jun Yan(19),Grp 17

# data[].attributes.body
#elaboration for the first part the explaination is specific but the second part can be more specific, eg u needa use angle values to prove that it is congruent.
(Timothy, grp 2)

# data[].attributes.body
#ineedtounderstand for group 9, in the first paragraph you mentioned that both George and John's statement are correct. however, when explaining George's statement, you said it was false.

# data[].attributes.body
Gd explanation and clear visuals to help wif understanding

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion on group 13’s work . i feel that this is very well done as there are pictures to show and further elarbarate on what they are saying . furthermore, their explanation was very detailed and i understood it clearly . now i know more about congruent figures and how to use them correctly

# data[].attributes.body
I think that group 16 did a pretty good job in explaining and elaborating on how you guys disagreed with John's statement with enough evidence and explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
#opinion on group 11's group
It is well explained on the definition of the question and is easy to understand by looking at the explanation and pictures. I understand and learn that to be congruent, 2 plane figures would just have to have the same shape and that congruent triangles needs to have three pairs of corresponding lines and angles each.

# data[].attributes.body
it is quite well done and the graphics and images are very helpful when we’re trying to understand the explainations, which help me to understand more about congruency in equilateral triangles, especially from “comgruent triangles needs to have three pairs of corresponding lines and angles each.”

# data[].attributes.headline
To complete the given journal writing question.        Objective: To investigate counterexamples that show two triangles cannot be congruent.

# data[].attributes.subject
To complete the given journal writing question.        Objective: To investigate counterexamples that show two triangles cannot be congruent.

# data[].attributes.body
George said that all equilateral triangles are congruent.

John said that two triangles are congruent if only two pairs of corresponding sides and a pair of non-included angle are equal.

a) Do you agree or disagree with their statements?

b) Explain with appropriate diagrams and working.

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kIYYewZV92KWhnEgdYk0f5hbiu10bZBpG5DMPo42JaI/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
Choonggi and Yongda

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YVC0YEcYQn8xXjPwGjfjuIEw3K5ayKguvqv1juAToEw/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
qian qian and yeo yue

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DfhIe8109swjIQwec4KAc6T6WhxZdd6Ax93AoOc_6B8/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hujXRONJvnzfr3xufLei0iqrI5TK10ONoXryAfwzTJ0/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D6lyMbbH43e7J9rj-wTaVbyMAT-0oYA_u6YoC2K-m8U/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ybxKBq8VDt9MR4-wMNGXrcspoV7wEgy3PUBwRcBD3lc/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fzbAx0mr4oY3hUvjIWinBfl7RhiFRAt1H-hgKsPnc-0/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1okSBfzz0prNyBX04CevMbJl2RucHztZNI9quYwvud9Y/edit

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/11tVzmJg6vydt5GxZ4BKFK79m5Ut2gRBvPhGSv758Ng4/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tdxRyB3AILRn29nYoaJnNF6Q5urH_hVEjHIH5ZMVoRA/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.body
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ByreAXj2iAq6xMCkXaWH3IC8OU16qGwzI02fOSg6r_o/edit?usp=sharing

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
•Students will be able to create different types of transformations •Students will be able to understand that two figures are congruent if they can be mapped onto one another by transformation.

•Students will be able to investigate counterexamples that show two triangles cannot be congruent.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Proving triangles congruent task A transformations SAS part 1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Proving triangles congruent task A transformations SAS part 2

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Proving triangles congruent task A transformations SAS part 3