# data[].attributes.body
good information. could've talked more about recycling in the slides

3
- Darius

# data[].attributes.body
Better psa
more attention grabbing
3.5
-Jay

# data[].attributes.body
a very good and funny psa but did not show enough information on recycling and more pros and cons should have been showed but it did show the importance

3.5

frank

# data[].attributes.body
soil erosion: 3 the video was great and showed how erosion works. The PSA could have been a little better though.

Recycling: 3.7 I didn't really see anything wrong with the project they gave enough information and the PSA was good.

Switch to organic: 3.6 The PSA could have been a little better other than that it was good.

# data[].attributes.body
Soil Erosion: 3, great video on showing how erosion works but could have been better on the PSA. PSA could have went into more detail. other than that it was great.

Switch to organic: 3.7 Didn't really see anything wrong with what they did besides the PSA could have went into more detail.

Soil Health: 2. some of the slides were unfinished, finish the information on the slides and it would have been great! Go into more detail on the information in the slides. interview was good!

Recycling: 3.5 PSA was good and they gave the right amount of info on each slide.

# data[].attributes.body
soil erosion not really loud good videos explain the types of erosion need to work on showing a little more data  3

recycling  We need a little more showing data and explain more about how to recycle  3.9

pesticide were very good need a little more about the service ancoment 4

soil health
need more data very difficult to understand need to work on showing others what they are talking about 2.4

# data[].attributes.body
4 they spoke loud enough for me to hear what they was saying, and their slides were organized.

Recycling they explained the importance of recycling, how bad it is to not recycle, and what could come in the future if we don't start recycling 3.5

Organic pesticide 3.6 they could have done a little bit better on the PSA, but other than that it was good.

# data[].attributes.body
It was really hard to follow along maybe it was just me personally. maybe the font size was too small for me, or the reader read too fast for me to process. I thought it was all over good, just hard for me personally to follow. Maybe if other people have trouble following as well you could break the text up in more parts, make the font bigger, read slower, and take breaks.

# data[].attributes.body
Soil Health/importance
Rating: .01
The speaking can be improved upon and they could have went more into detail with their slides.

Recycling
Rating: 4
We could have put a little more information in some of our slides, but I think we did a pretty good jobs with our PSA

Organic pesticide
Rating: 3.6
Could have done better with the PSA an


92/100
1
GRADE
Faith

Anonymous
2m
Faith
1. Recycling: 3
-add a more informative introduction slide; add a list of common household objects that can be recycled
- really cool title slide; person being interviewed seemed very informed on the topic and provided useful personal experiences; PSA was entertaining and informative
2. Soil Health/Importance: 3
-the font was difficult to read on the poster; add more information; several of the slides need to be finished; some of the questions were not fully answered
-did a good job of showing us the importance of keeping our soil healthy; the background of the poster was cool;
3. Switch to Organic Pesticides: 





GRADE



Jarrod

Anonymous
10m
Jarrod
Switch to Organic Pesticides- 3.8
I thought the information was well presented, and overall I thought it was a good presentation. I thought the PSA could have been more detailed.

Soil Health- 2.7
I thought the information in the slides was good, but sometimes it was hard to understand. Also, the information presented was hard to understand because the slide wasn't finished. I suggest presenting the slides more clearly. 

Soil Erosion-  3
I thought the powerpoint contained good information. However, I think the presenting could have been better. For the interview, I couldn't understand the question being asked. I suggest looking at the video and make sure the question is asked. 

Recycling- 3.5
I think the information we had was good, but the experiment could have been explained more. I think the poster could have been more creative. I thought the overall project was good. 



99/100
1
GRADE
switch to organic cassie

Anonymous
2m
switch to organic cassie
anwsered questions and the orginiazation was good. they couldve added a little more details. other than tnhat is was good.
GRADE
soil health Anonymous 1m

Anonymous
21h
 soil health

Anonymous
1m

# data[].attributes.body
4 i thought our orginazation was good and i thought our experiment was good.

# data[].attributes.body
4 experiment couldve been better
Amanda Ramey

# data[].attributes.body
Answered a question with a question instead of a valid answer.
-Elizabeth Luckado

# data[].attributes.body
1. Recycling- i really liked this one, they told us how bad it is and they said what we could do to improve, i dont really know what they could do better becasue it was pretty good, rate 3

2. Soil health/importance- this one was ok, they talked about what causes erosion but they didnt go into detail about to help it, rate 2

3. organic pesticide- could have presented it better but it was a good psa, rate 4

4. soil erosion- it was a good psa, awnser qestions good, could have went into more detail, rate- 2

# data[].attributes.body
Soil Health/importance
Rating: 2.9
The speaking can be improved upon and they could have went more into detail with their slides.

Recycling
Rating: 4
We could have put a little more information in some of our slides, but I think we did a pretty good jobs with our PSA

Organic pesticide
Rating: 3.6
Could have done better with the PSA, but is a good thing that everyone should know about.

Soil erosion
Rating: 3
Had a good PSA but could have had more slides and answered more questions

# data[].attributes.body
1. Recycling: 3.4
-add a more informative introduction slide; add a list of common household objects that can be recycled; add a slide introducing the person being interviewed
- really cool title slide; person being interviewed seemed very informed on the topic and provided useful personal experiences; PSA was entertaining and informative
2. Soil Health/Importance: 3.3
-the font was difficult to read on the poster; add more information; several of the slides need to be finished; some of the questions were not fully answered; add a slide introducing the person being interviewed
-did a good job of showing us the importance of keeping our soil healthy; the background of the poster was cool;
3. Switch to Organic Pesticides: 3.5
-listed a herbicide as a pesticide; PSA needs to grab the audience's attention; add a slide introducing the person being interviewed
-cool poster; good information; good picture data of experiment; presenter spoke very clearly and was entertaining
4. Soil Erosion: 3.4
-add more visuals/pictures; add pictures/information of erosion in the surrounding area; add a slide introducing the person being interviewed
-video of experiment was good in showing the experiment data; i liked how each question was listed above the interview video

# data[].attributes.body
Switch to Organic Pesticides- 3.8
I thought the information was well presented, and overall I thought it was a good presentation. I thought the PSA could have been more detailed.

Soil Health- 2.7
I thought the information in the slides was good, but sometimes it was hard to understand. Also, the information presented was hard to understand because the slide wasn't finished. I suggest presenting the slides more clearly.

Soil Erosion-  3.2
I thought the powerpoint contained good information. However, I think the presenting could have been better. The interview was good, but I thought the video clips should not have been separated.

Recycling- 3.6
I think the information we had was good, but the experiment could have been explained more. I think the poster could have been more creative. I thought the overall project was good.

# data[].attributes.body
anwsered questions and the orginiazation was good. they couldve added a little more details. other than tnhat is was good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Recycling - Did not say where we could recycle in Patrick county.
2. Pesticide - What are some ways we could grow crops and not use pesticides.
3. Soil Health - How can we keep soil healthy
4. Erosion - Did not say how erosion is good

# data[].attributes.body
didn't really anwser some questions they were asked properly.

# data[].attributes.body
4 maybe pick a better experiment.
Amanda Ramey

# data[].attributes.body
Soil health - 2.4
Needed to speak louder and some slides wasn't finished.

Erosion - 3.4
Interview, didn't like how it was split up

Pesticide -  3.5
PSA

Recycling - 3.7
Poster needed to be more visual captivating

# data[].attributes.body
soil health

Anonymous
1m
soil health
need more info 2.9
GRADE
Soil Health

Anonymous
7m
Soil Health
The interview video played without trouble. In the other presentations,  they were required to leave the presentation to open and play the video, which wasted time.
-Elizabeth Luckado
GRADE
pesticide

Anonymous
4m
pesticide 
services announcement 4 
GRADE
soil health landon

Anonymous
4m
soil health landon 
2. some of the slides were unfinished, could not answer some of the questions that were asked.

GRADE
soil health

Anonymous
1m
soil health
Faith
2.5
some of the slides were unfinished, it was hard to read the font on the poster. 
GRADE
Pesticide

Anonymous
7m
Pesticide
The information was well conveyed, and understandable
-Elizabeth Luckado
GRADE
Dylan Thompson

Anonymous
1m
Dylan Thompson
Soil Health 
Rating: .01
The speaking can be improved upon and they could have went more into detail with their slides
GRADE
recycling Landon Augustine

Anonymous
7m
recycling Landon Augustine
3.5 great PSA! 

GRADE
It also wouldn't hurt for any group to make a fact box or the do definitions on words many people might not know at the bottom of the slide

Anonymous
7m
It also wouldn't hurt for any group to make a fact box or the do definitions on words many people might not know at the bottom of the slide
Jeorgia
GRADE
Recycling cassie white

Anonymous
4m
Recycling cassie white
4
presentation was good and gave enough details. 
GRADE

Soil Health

Anonymous
7m
Soil Health
Some slides were unfinished, some information was repeated, or not detailed. 
-Elizabeth Luckado
GRADE
Soil Health would need more information and connections between projects and studies.

Anonymous
4m
Soil Health would need more information and connections between projects and studies.
- Chris Hamm
GRADE
Recycling

Anonymous
32m
Recycling
needed more information
3.5 
GRADE
Recycling

Anonymous
5m

# data[].attributes.headline
People need better public speaking skills!

# data[].attributes.subject
People need better public speaking skills!

# data[].attributes.body
The groups can rehearse their speaking roles before presenting, and make sure they can properly pronounce all of the words in a smooth, easily understandable way
-Elizabeth Luckado

# data[].attributes.body
1-Pesticide
2-Erosion
2-Recycling
4-Soil Health
-Elizabeth Luckado

# data[].attributes.headline
i think all of the project were great, but could have had things added. the number you get depends on what criteria and rubric you are graded on

# data[].attributes.subject
i think all of the project were great, but could have had things added. the number you get depends on what criteria and rubric you are graded on

# data[].attributes.body
Jeorgia

# data[].attributes.body
3 readers should've went over the slides and read them before presenting.
Amanda Ramey

# data[].attributes.body
a herbicide was listed as a pesticide

# data[].attributes.body
The interview video played without trouble. In the other presentations,  they were required to leave the presentation to open and play the video, which wasted time.
-Elizabeth Luckado

# data[].attributes.body
The information was well conveyed, and understandable
-Elizabeth Luckado

# data[].attributes.headline
It also wouldn't hurt for any group to make a fact box or the do definitions on words many people might not know at the bottom of the slide

# data[].attributes.subject
It also wouldn't hurt for any group to make a fact box or the do definitions on words many people might not know at the bottom of the slide

# data[].attributes.body
Jeorgia

# data[].attributes.body
4
presentation was good and gave enough details.

# data[].attributes.body
Some slides were unfinished, some information was repeated, or not detailed.
-Elizabeth Luckado

# data[].attributes.headline
Soil Health would need more information and connections between projects and studies.

# data[].attributes.subject
Soil Health would need more information and connections between projects and studies.

# data[].attributes.body
- Chris Hamm

# data[].attributes.body
matthew needed more information
3.5

# data[].attributes.body
Pesticide: 3.5
Had a lot of good information and was easy to understand, was also well presented.
-PSA should've had more information.

Recycling: 3.5
Was very well presented, had a lot of good information, PSA could have had more information about experiment but was interesting and easy to understand.
-Include more information on experiment

Erosion: 3
Had a lot of good information and included videos that could play without leaving presentation. PSA needed improvement by explaining things better.
-Could've done a better job with explaining experiment.

# data[].attributes.body
3.5
Need to explain more about the topic and how it affects us.
Amanda Ramey

# data[].attributes.headline
I think all of them were great but, it wouldn't hurt for any group to make a intro slide naming things you should be thinking about when reading through the slides

# data[].attributes.subject
I think all of them were great but, it wouldn't hurt for any group to make a intro slide naming things you should be thinking about when reading through the slides

# data[].attributes.body
Jeorgia

# data[].attributes.body
1. Pesticide
Believe it had good slides with lots of information. Could've down better on the PSA and explained why we chose Mr. Terry to Interview.
2. Recycling
Wonderful presentation and a funny PSA that got the point across . Could've given a lot more info and better explained experiment.
3. Erosion
Had a good video to show erosion across the world,and they showed us their experiment in a video. could've done better on PSA and should have done a better job explaining everything.
4. Soil
presented there slides very well and answered all questions. PSA needed work along with there explanation of there experiment which they conducted.

All groups done pretty good in my opinion. and Ms. Martin better not give me a 70 on this like she did the last one.