# data[].attributes.headline
I believe that epigenetics is pure science and we should use it as a forensic tool. Narrowing down a list of suspects based on age,  derive hair and eye colour it means a lot for the police forces. In future, it would be useful to build a face from DNA profile.

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe that epigenetics is pure science and we should use it as a forensic tool. Narrowing down a list of suspects based on age,  derive hair and eye colour it means a lot for the police forces. In future, it would be useful to build a face from DNA profile.

# data[].attributes.body
When family members are involved and a suspect cannot be identified, further investigations should be made. Every method should first be tested and after it's proved infallible than it can be used for excluding suspects.

# data[].attributes.body
Would using epigenetics to assist profilers create stereotyping and pigeonhole certain suspects possibly leading to false identification of criminals and ultimately miscarriage of justice

# data[].attributes.body
If epigentics can be used to identify disease and eye colour, this would help medical personal with medical research and could potentially help to decrease the amount of certain diseases, however this should not be used to adjust DNA for future use.

Within crimes, epigentics will used to help find suspects and shortlist them, but shouldnt be used to convict suspect, as this should be based on the physical evidence at the scene. This information should not be used to find suspects without real evidence.

Would this start to increase the amount of false convictions and increase the amount of guilty people getting away with more crimes? Would this help crime, or potentially lead to riots or other argumentative types of crimes due to disagreements of convictions and justice not served?

# data[].attributes.body
If more people were educated on the methods used to derive hair and eye colour and the reasons why, would they be more for the technique?

# data[].attributes.body
Would only hair and eye colour be the information used in criminal trials or would the techn

# data[].attributes.body
Could epigenetics methods falsely identify innocent people as suspects if they have relatives with criminal convictions?

# data[].attributes.body
Where would the line be drawn for personal information used in trial against a criminal?

# data[].attributes.body
How would identifying behaviours help for criminals who are smart enough to act in specific ways in different situations?

# data[].attributes.body
Would there be issues of deriving hair colour of a suspect in terms of dying their hair? If used in conjunction with the police could this provide false leads?

# data[].attributes.body
care should be used with these techniques, as this could enforce stereotyping if not implemented properly. Convictions should be based on objective physical evidence. The use of epigenetics to identify behaviours in relation to offender profiling is just not reliable enough, it's possible that suspects can fall into several behavioural categories or neither at all. Would this lead an innocent person to be a suspect as they exhibit target behaviours? Or an offender to get away with their crimes because they don't show expected behavioural patterns?

# data[].attributes.body
Who says that the information discovered in the search for the suspect would not reach family members or even members of the public. Some high profile trials are very public. If sensitive information was given during the trail who knows what the consequences could be.

# data[].attributes.body
Using techniques to derive hair and eye colour would be useful to the police forces to identity suspects, however; there could be implications for family members not relevant in the case.