# data[].attributes.body
These days, some people are inclined that the media sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, have an adverse bearing on individuals and society as its spotlight are various negative news and problems rather than positive and significant development. In my opinion, these sites do have detrimental impacts on their lives.
First and foremost, people would fall victim to misinformation. Scandals from celebrities and other well-known people are often attract more attention despite their effort in contributing to the society. Not only are those who gain access to media sites misinformed but they are also exposed to malicious comments. Correspondingly, this particular issue would create a toxic and unsuitable environment for others . Another justification is that should these sites not managed properly, they could harshly damage the reputation and prestige of a person or an organization. As mentioned above, people have a tendency to sought scandals; therefore, it is no surprising that people could assume something is true although it is not always. Consequently, media could end one’s career ,result in bankruptcy and much more. Furthermore, the physical and mental health of victims may be tremendously affected. For instence, they would have to suffer from press conferences, which creates more pressure on their lives. In fact, most celebrities and other famous people pay for therapy sessions in hope that they can overcome their exisitential  crisis.
To sum up, I would argue that the social media sites can pose a serious threat to the lives of individuals and community in terms of health complications andproblems encountered on media sites.

# data[].attributes.body
Recently, scandals and  complications are mainly concerntrated by media news, which leads to a fact that negative information gradually overwhelms the positive development. I am convinced by this opinion to some extents.
First of all, many people know that journalists live on finding the latest news that can attract readers. However, there are more and more reporters posting private, unauthorized, or even misleading information for personal purpose;  causing confusion and controversy in social network. For example, in Korea, a newspaper has posted an article with incorrect content about Vietnam form a Covid-19 vaccine fund; the information then makes the Korean netizens misunderstand. Readers if do not distinguish right from wrong can cause conflicts, or even slander the people are posted. Secondly, the victims may be verbally assaulted and suffer from depression, anxiety,...; the worst thing is that they can suicide or be seriously mentalbreakdown in the future. For example, Sulli is among the victims of cyber bullying; she passed away at the age of 25.

# data[].attributes.body
It is a fact that the world is facing a host of serve problems. As social media platform invariably covers hateful or abusive contents, some people argue that this tendency has a negative influence on each person and society as a whole. From my point of view, I completely agree with this view
It is likely that excessive bad news do harm to individuals for several prominent justifications. Firstly, it takes a heavy toll on our mental health. While suffering from such an extreme pressure from daily life, people nowadays also expose to a host of bad news such as economy degradation or appalling state of pollution. This may lead to a pessimistic and anxious feelings.Secondly, there is no denying that news media is blown out of proportion by some immoral journalists. For example, there are many constructions such as apartments make the headline about either qualities or profits which apart from the reality. This will mislead citizens to purchase that houses
Not only do some toxic contents impact on individuals but this trend also effect community as well.Frist of all, bad news are regarded as the main contributions to brain drain phenomenon. In other words,

# data[].attributes.body
It is common that the news media is normally camouflaged by troubles and accidents. Although, I agree that this trend negatively impacts individuals and communities, I think that its advantages should be mentioned.
Firstly, the news on emergencies can expose the negative aspects of the celebrities. For example, a celebrity who does something wrong will be mocked on the front pages of the newspaper time after time. Second, news reports on the scandals of the famous people can be very interesting to read. Hoai Linh's volunteering problem is popular right now.
However, I think that when the news is filled with social issues and emergencies, it sometimes does more harm than good. People can not know what is happening in their neighbourhood and it can lead to real problems. Moreover, the medias sometimes blow news out of proportion. They can exaggerate the real threat of emergencies to attract more people and increase audience ratings. This means that many people have been living in fear and panic of crime or danger because of the misleading information from the media.
In conclusion, media reports on troubles and emergencies can be informatie for  somebodies who might be cared about, but the disadvantages can be stronger if the media only focus on these things.

# data[].attributes.body
It is a global trend that news is concentrated on various issues and emergencies instead of positive information. Although some believe that this tendency is somehow beneficial, it is argued that it is detrimental to readers as well as the society. From my perspective, I totally agree with the latter opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Recently, various accounts of media concentrate in issues and exigencies rather than active evolution; However, others believe it is detrimental to individuals and to society. Although I agree that this trend can have some damages to people, I think that focusing on the scandals and other passive information can also be profitable.
On the one hand, I would agree that sensational news can be advantageous to society. In other words, people are able to know what is going on around the world and can always be informative. For instance, on Facebook or instagram, various scandals of celebrities are updated regularly, in order for the community to know what they did to get on the front page. Besides, it is ordinary for the media platform to pay attention to artists and update news about them.
On the other hand, these negative information can also have many drawbacks. Firstly, the society will become unstable. People often become insecure and worried about some awful situations.
Secondly, the artists can become stressed about those scandals around them. Many celebrities have to take many therapies because they are often under pressure from public opinion, some even have suicidal thoughts.
In conclusion, while I believe that issues and passive news can be useful to people, they can also damage people’s reputation and make the world become an unsafe place.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

# data[].attributes.body
It is true that negative news

such as negative situations and emergencies are more widespread on media than some good news. While I argue that excessive reports of problems are detrimental, I believe that there are some advantages to updating social problems.
On the one hand, the media has widespread and profound influence on our lives. Therefore, the high intensity of undesirable news can have a significant impact on human as it can make individuals more pessimistic about their lives. In this day and age, there are a lot of pressure stem from the burdens of finance, family and others that people have to deal with; therefore the fact that journalists report daily about the unexpected circumstances can push more annoyance on individuals, and it can eventually result in people commit to suicide to unburden everything.
On the other hand, in moderation, there are two main advantages of focusing on problems and emergencies. The first benefit is that when negative reports are exposed, it will raise citizen's awareness of social problems such as theft or robbery. Thanks for that news, readers can have precaution to bad circumstance, thus, avoid the possible risks in their life. Another perk is that by being informed immediately pressing issues, governments and local authorities can figure out the feasible and timely measures to the serious problems. Therefore, they are able to minimize pity consequences before those obstacles become more colossal.
In conclusion, although bad news creates a feeling of anxiety and discomfort to a large number of audiences, the citizen's awareness could be raise significantly and their precaution of avoiding the effects of the bad news could help their lives become more comfortable.

# data[].attributes.body
It has become a trend that negative news such as scandals and crises are more abundant and widespread than positive ones. This creates controversy about the detrimental effects on both individuals and society. Although I admit that there are drawbacks to this trend, it can be advantageous as well.

On the one hand, a variety of depressing information has adverse influences on the public. Firstly, these types of news may raise unnecessary hysteria about the world we live in. A case in point would be when the WHO announced Covid-19 to be a pandemic in 2020 which caused a wave of panic worldwide resulting in extensive stockouts of toilet paper and hand sanitizer. If all news that appears on media platforms brings negative messages, the public would misunderstand that our society only contains bad things, thus, they are likely to lose faith in humanity and block interactions. Secondly, the news tends to over-inflate information so that more attention is drawn. This situation needs to be addressed as to some people, the news is their only source of information. Exaggerated articles can be something that haunts someone all day, making them pessimistic.

On the other hand, negative reports hold up a mirror to our chaotic society. This kind of news brings light to social problems such as theft or robbery. They may help raise citizen’s awareness and have precautions to keep themselves safe. Another perk is that pressing issues inform the authority to make timely decisions to resolve serious issues. Therefore, consequences can be minimized before the situation is irreversible. Another example is when the Vietnamese government quickly applied safety measures to reduce the spread of Covid-19 when the first few cases were announced.

In conclusion, although negative news exposes our society to the ugly truth, they are unavoidable and can be detrimental to our lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Mỹ Hạnh
Recently, in many media platforms, the positive informations are overshadowed by misinformation.Some people think that it poses threat to individual and society.In my perspective, I am in agreement with this idea.
Recently, in many media platforms, the positive informations are overshadowed by misinformation.Some people think that it poses threat to individual and society.In my perspective, I am in agreement with this idea.

It is widely that information plays an important role in human life. Because, the latest news give people information about the society. Negative information show people the dark side of the society. Moreover, they can get awarness.

Firtly, bad news dominating the headlines is having an undesirable influence on society. The latest information get public attention so that misinformation makes people misunderstanding the society and the government.Secondly, misleading  information cause massive damage to people’s mental states and istilled fear into their mind. It can cause serious consequences.Moreover, readers’outlook on society in a negative way.

In conclusion, in my opinion, I think misleading information will make harmful to humalife and society.

# data[].attributes.body
It has become a trend that the paper cover mostly bad news. While I accept that the media platform is detrimental to both individuals and society, I also believe that there are some advantages to updating social problems.
On the one hand, the surplus of negative articles or reports can create adverse influences on the public. First of all, this news will lead the individuals to feel panic about the place we are living in. If all news exposed to negative aspects, ranging from criminal to natural disease, people will be confused by realized that most of the world concealed bad things. Thus, people may lose a sense of security and faith, this will create an obstacle in establishing a new harmonious relationship with each other in society. Secondly, the pressure derived from media reports, coupled with the concerns of society about social problems, draws the government’s attention and coerces the government to take actions to address those conditions. Hence, this inclination of news reporting, to some extent, can be acceleration for stabilizing society.
On the other hand, in moderation, there are two main advantages of focusing on problems and emergencies. The first benefit is that when negative reports are exposed, it will raise the inhabitant's awareness of social problems such as theft or robbery. Thanks to this news, dwellers can be aware of it and they can prepare in case of a crime break-in. Moreover, positive news should get adequate attention. It is important for newspaper and television channels to accentuate stories of encouragement, fortitude, ambition, perseverance, and achievements. Such stories motivate people and encourage them to strive hard to achieve their goals.
To conclude, while media has crucial roles in helping individuals and society to be informed and prepared with negative developments, I would argue that paying too much attention to that without looking into bright sides is rather detrimental.

# data[].attributes.body
These days, media give excessive coverage to negative news and overlook the positive aspects of the world. Some people opine that this emphasis on negativity news has an adverse impact on people and the society. I tottaly agree with this view to some extent because negative news cannot be ignored. It certainly attracts media attention;  meanwhile good news should also get adequate coverage.
There are some benefits of posting social problems on the media. Firstly, it offers citizens have real senses of their local area. Thus, they can avoid to troubles which are possibly evitable. For instance, when the warning crime or pickpocket was happened currently in the nearest area, everyone might will have methods to avoid from these problems when they have a roads or buses...,so on. Secondly, protecting security and safety at their country that are responsibility of authorities and all inhabitants. As a result, I believe that all people will give the measure in order to address this issues when people know exactly information on the internet and social network as well.
On the other hand, media cannot overlook bad news. Media is the voice of the public and as such it is their duty to highlight the problems plaguing the society. Only then will the authorities wake up and do something to resolve the issues. Also, by reporting crimes and other negative stories, media can urge people to take adequate safety precautions. Meanwhile, positive news should get adequate attention. It is important for newspapers and televisions channels to highlight stories of courage, fortitude, ambition, perseverance and achievements. Such stories motivate people and encourage them to strive hard to achieve their goals.
In conclusion, media should give adequate attention to both positive and negative stories. People should be aware of the happenings around them whether they are good or bad.