# data[].attributes.body
- Can cause delay in case progress (eg: CPS gather information and get back to SSFR; 6 months delay)
- Professionals unclear of harm, making it difficult to assess progress in safety, align in goals; thus, also causing delay in SSFR intervention to start

# data[].attributes.body
Not time specific in question. Are you willing vs are you willing in 6 months

# data[].attributes.headline
A sense of low awareness of SSFR among CYPH. 

# data[].attributes.subject
A sense of low awareness of SSFR among CYPH. 

# data[].attributes.body
Possibly following CPO lead?
More focus on child welfare?
New staff? Bandwidth to learn their own service before considering referral
CYPH increased contact and no need for SSFR intervention; more for families who have limited progress

# data[].attributes.headline
Referral workers talk more about post-reunifcation vs pre-reunification process. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Referral workers talk more about post-reunifcation vs pre-reunification process. 

# data[].attributes.body
Did not communicate the preparation stage

# data[].attributes.headline
Different views on what progress looks like

# data[].attributes.subject
Different views on what progress looks like

# data[].attributes.body
Safety that is due to danger being resolved vs Safety due to CYP staying in OHC

# data[].attributes.headline
Time is required to go through the goals and agreement with the parents after network meeting

# data[].attributes.subject
Time is required to go through the goals and agreement with the parents after network meeting

# data[].attributes.headline
Difficulties to find common date and time for triage meeting

# data[].attributes.subject
Difficulties to find common date and time for triage meeting

# data[].attributes.body
intense monitoring leading up to discharge

# data[].attributes.headline
Difficulty to retrieve information from professionals sometimes eg access safety plan, medical reports etc 

# data[].attributes.subject
Difficulty to retrieve information from professionals sometimes eg access safety plan, medical reports etc 

# data[].attributes.body
use of CANS to inform about progress for reunification, limited info on safety

Reunification is considered by CANS, focussing on child needs (in the context of child residing in CYPH). As opposed to family progress. It doesn't measure case progress if child/family is ready for reunification.

# data[].attributes.headline
Differing opinions by professionals and may not agree with referral worker's assessment & suggestion for SSFR

# data[].attributes.subject
Differing opinions by professionals and may not agree with referral worker's assessment & suggestion for SSFR

# data[].attributes.body
Professionals working in silo, not much collaboration and holistic assessment of the family

# data[].attributes.headline
CYPH do not know what pre-reunification work is needed before referral.

# data[].attributes.subject
CYPH do not know what pre-reunification work is needed before referral.

# data[].attributes.body
Desk head at CYPH have knowledge of SSFR service.
CYPH also calls in to CIC to enquire about service.

# data[].attributes.headline
Do not know the referral process, eligibility criteria or contact point.

# data[].attributes.subject
Do not know the referral process, eligibility criteria or contact point.

# data[].attributes.body
ECRM is difficult to navigate referral to SSFR.

# data[].attributes.headline
Referral agencies might have their own agenda so information shared might be selective or angled towards their agenda

# data[].attributes.subject
Referral agencies might have their own agenda so information shared might be selective or angled towards their agenda

# data[].attributes.headline
Missing pre-SSFR prep work with birth family (especially for children in CYPH, who is working with the birth family?)

# data[].attributes.subject
Missing pre-SSFR prep work with birth family (especially for children in CYPH, who is working with the birth family?)

# data[].attributes.body
Families report they are willing. However, where is the motivation coming from? (eg: teens want freedom as opposed to connectedness to family)

# data[].attributes.headline
Caregivers report high readiness to go home

# data[].attributes.subject
Caregivers report high readiness to go home

# data[].attributes.body
However, not much family progress (complicating factors still there and not addressed)

# data[].attributes.body
No other proposed interventions for reunification

To re-engage family, not receptive to CPS (hoping that SSFR can make a difference).
Limited progress for the family and testing whether intensive service can help progress case
To determine if reunification possible for this family, if not, considering an alternative permanency plan for the child

# data[].attributes.headline
- Information provided may not be clear enough eg why has contact been progressing slowly? 

# data[].attributes.subject
- Information provided may not be clear enough eg why has contact been progressing slowly? 

# data[].attributes.body
- information might contradict from professionals and from CYP and their family
eg during triage, it was mentioned that contact was frequent but after that then worker realized that contact was cancelled in the past

# data[].attributes.headline
OHC's assessment is for the readiness to go home

# data[].attributes.subject
OHC's assessment is for the readiness to go home

# data[].attributes.body
Due to too long in OHC and no safety concerns thus far as opposed to family's motivation for reintegration and progress in intervention

# data[].attributes.body
1. Seek approval from supervisor
2. Seek feedback from other professionals and family
3. Latest reports and assessments; fill up SSFR form (what supporting documents do we need?)
4. Liaise CIC (mini triage, do CIC reject on this point?)
5. SSFR requests for more reports, safety plans
6. Organise the triage
7. In the end, rejected?!?!

We do not ask for social report specifically for SSFR referral.

# data[].attributes.headline
Supervisor might disagree with referral.

# data[].attributes.subject
Supervisor might disagree with referral.

# data[].attributes.headline
4a. Quality & quantity of information during triage

# data[].attributes.subject
4a. Quality & quantity of information during triage

# data[].attributes.headline
3. Prep work required for referral to take place

# data[].attributes.subject
3. Prep work required for referral to take place

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Referral worker's understanding of SSFR service

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Referral worker's understanding of SSFR service