# data[].attributes.body
For some time three little pigs of different ages coexisted with a wolf. However, they needed to build a home. All pigs decided to build a house out of different materials: first pig built house of straw, second pig, whose name was Porky, built it of sticks. The last one pig in contrast to the first two took longer but created her house of bricks, which were more expensive. When a hungry wolf came to eat pigs, they hid inside their homes. Despite preparations of first two pigs the wolf easily blew down the first house and with a little more effort did the same with a second one. However, it was impossible to blow down third house because it was made of bricks.

# data[].attributes.body
The story tells us about the lives of three pigs of different ages, worried about the safety of their lives, due to the presence of an evil and hungry wolf nearby. To protect themselves, the pigs decide to build themselves a solid shelter to protect themselves from a wolf attack. But each pig follows to its own strategy in building a house. The first decides to build a house quickly and cheaply, building it out of straw. Following a similar strategy, the second pig named Porky builds a house out of sticks. At the same time, the third pig turns out to be smarter and decides to build a brick house, he knows that a brick house is much stronger and more safely than any other. Although the third pig spends the most time and money on construction, his ingenuity will help him to fight the wolf.

One day, a hungry wolf living nearby decides to attack the pigs and eat them. As soon as the pigs saw the wolf, they fled to their homes, hoping that their shelter would protect them. First, the wolf, without straining, blew away the house of the first pig. After that, the wolf had to spend more time, but the second house was blown away. And so, once again, hoping to easily deal with the third house, the wolf took in more air and blew again. The house stood rooted to the spot. And no matter how hard the wolf tried, he couldn't cope with it.

Thus, we see how important planning is in the construction of your shelter and how much you need to understand the strength of materials in order to stay alive.

# data[].attributes.body
In this experimental work, we examine the choice of construction materials for building a house for pigs. This issue is particularly relevant in the context of potential threats from nearby predators. To compare the suitability of sticks, straw, and bricks as building materials, we selected three pigs of different ages. Upon completion of the construction process, we tested the durability of each house using a common predator attack simulation—a wolf's blow. If a house remained under the wolf's blow, we considered it to have passed the crash test.

As a result, the brick house proved to be the most expensive and required the longest time to build. However, it was the only structure that successfully passed the crash test. In conclusion, we can state that bricks are the best material choice for ensuring safety, while straw and sticks are more suitable for constructing available and quickly built shelters.

# data[].attributes.body
There were three little pigs, of different ages. However, there was a wolf nearby. Thus, they needed to build a home. Therefore, the first pig decided to build a house of straw. Simultaneously, the second built a house of sticks. Its name was Porky. Whereas the third pig built a house out of bricks, although bricks are more expensive material and it took longer to build his house. His house was made of bricks. Bricks are more expensive material. Eventually a hungry wolf came to eat the pigs. Subsequently, the pigs hid inside their homes. Initially, the wolf easily blew down the first house. Although it took longer to blow down the second house, the wolf did it. By contrast, the third house was made of bricks. As a result, it was impossible to blow down.

# data[].attributes.body
The story involves three pigs of different ages living near a wolf. Needing shelter, the first pig built a straw house, prioritizing speed. The second, named Porky, constructed a stick house, offering slightly more durability. The third pig, using more time and resources, built a brick house, a stronger but costlier option.

A hungry wolf soon arrived, intending to eat the pigs. They hid in their homes, but the wolf easily destroyed the straw house and later the stick house. However, the brick house proved impenetrable, ensuring the pigs' safety.

# data[].attributes.body
The three little pigs of different ages had to build the houses to live in. The two youngest pigs built the houses of straw and sticks, respectively. The oldest pig put time and effort into the more reliable brick construction. The latter choice was the best because the wolf lived nearby. As a result, the most reliable house was the best choice for survival.

# data[].attributes.body
Once upon a time there were three little pigs. As the wolf walked nearby, they decided to build houses to hide inside. The first pig built a house of straw, and the second one – of sticks. Although bricks are more expensive, the third pig worked hard to build his house of them. Finally, the hungry wolf approached and three pigs hid inside their shelters. 2 pigs could not survive, as the wolf blew down the straw and stick houses. The brick house was much more rigid, so the wolf could not destroy it.

The three pigs under investigation had to build houses to protect themselves from the wolf nearby. As houses material, pigs 1, 2 (Porky) and 3 used straw, sticks and bricks respectively. Houses build by pigs 1 and 2 (straw and sticks) could not withstand the wind force, produced by the wolf and, as a result, were blown down. As the house build by pig 3 (bricks) was more rigid, it was able to withstand the wolf impact.

To sum up, even that bricks are more expensive that other used materials, and it takes more time to build a house of them, this material is excellent for protection pigs from wolfs.

# data[].attributes.body
We start our discussion with considering three little pigs of different ages located at a point with coordinates (t, x, y, z) in Minkowski spacetime. Let us assume that at some finite distance from the three little pigs there is a wolf, which moves at a speed v, which is much less than the speed of light c, along a geodesic line to the pig's coordinate. Consider the problem of saving three little pigs from a wolf. Since the speeds to which the three little pigs can accelerate are equal to u1, u2, u3 < v, respectively, the option of moving along different geodesics does not work. Consider the option of building a shelter, called a house. Let there be three materials for building a shelter: straw, sticks and bricks. A shelter made of sticks takes k times longer to build than a shelter made of straw. And a shelter made of bricks takes n times longer to build than a shelter made of sticks. The time it takes for a pig to build a shelter from straw is tau. Let us assume that initially the distance between the wolves and the piglets is s > k n tau, that is, all the piglets will have time to build a shelter by the time the wolf arrives.

The force of the wolf's exhalation is F. To destroy a shelter made of straw, the required impulse is p = F T1, and for a shelter made of sticks, respectively, F T2, where T1 < T2. A shelter made of bricks cannot be destroyed. Then, after a time s/v + T1 from the moment the wolf begins to approach, the wolf will destroy the piglet's first shelter, and after a time s/v + T1 + T2, he will destroy the second shelter. The wolf will not be able to destroy the third shelter. Thus, the piglet who built a house of bricks is saved.

# data[].attributes.body
Three little pigs of various ages lived near a wolf. In order to protect themselves, they had to construct dwellings. So one of the pigs constructed a house using straw, while another one built a house out of sticks. In contrast, the last pig spent notably more time creating a house made of bricks, despite the higher cost of the materials used within. When a hungry wolf arrived intending to devour the pigs, they hid in their houses. The wolf easily blew down the straw house, whereas the sticks house was destroyed after some time only. As the last house was made of bricks, the wolf did not manage to handle with that at all.

# data[].attributes.body
There were three little pigs, of different ages in need of a home, as there was a wolf nearby. The first pig decided to build a house of straw, whereas the second one, the one named Porky, built it out of sticks. The third pig took longer to build his house and made it of bricks, which was more expensive. As a hungry wolf came to eat the pigs, they hid inside their homes. The wolf easily blew down the straw house. It took him much longer to blow down Porky’s house, but the wolf did it as well. But the third house was made of bricks and the wolf could never blow it down.

# data[].attributes.body
The influence of building materials on the resistance of housing structures to air flow from the lungs was experimentally investigated. The building materials used were straw, sticks and bricks. As a result of the experiment, all housing structures, except for the one for which bricks were used, were found to be beyond repair after exposure to air flow. The experiment also showed that the more expensive the building material used and the longer it took to build a housing structure from it, the longer it took for it to be destroyed by air flow.

# data[].attributes.body
Three little pigs

Three pigs of different characteristics, living near a wolf, needed protection from this wolf. To protect themselves, they constructed houses using different materials. The first pig decided to build a house of straw, which is a lightweight but structurally weak material.  The second pig, which name was Porky, built a house of sticks, which provide greater construction stability than straw.  The third pig, however, selected bricks, a material known for its durability and resistance to external forces, though it required more time and resources to construct. When the houses were completed, the hungry wolf arrived to hunt and eat the pigs. The pigs, having finished their preparations, were able to hide inside their respective homes. The wolf easily destroyed the straw house with time. It then took significantly more force and time to collapse the stick house. However, all wolf’s attempts to blow down the brick house are failed, demonstrating the stability and reliability of bricks compared to straw and sticks.

# data[].attributes.body
Towards Resilient Housing: A Tale of Three Little Pigs

The story revolves around three little pigs of varying ages and their encounter with a nearby wolf. Recognizing the need for shelter, each pig decided to construct a home using different materials. Specifically, the first pig opted for a house made of straw, which was quick to build but lacked durability. In contrast, the second pig, named Porky, constructed a house of sticks. Although this material was slightly sturdier than straw, it still provided limited protection. Meanwhile, the third pig invested significantly more time in building his house, which was made of bricks, a stronger and more expensive material.

Subsequently, a hungry wolf approached, intending to eat the pigs. In response, the pigs sought refuge within their respective homes. The wolf easily demolished the straw house with a single breath. Although it required slightly more effort, he also succeeded in blowing down the stick house. However, when he attempted to destroy the brick house, he found it impossible due to its superior strength and durability.

# data[].attributes.body
This study explores the construction choices of three pigs of varying ages in the presence of a nearby wolf. Recognizing the need for a safe shelter, the pigs set out to build their homes. The first pig decided on a house of straw, while the second pig, named Porky, built his house using sticks. In contrast, the third pig, choosing a more durable and costly material, constructed his house from bricks.

When a hungry wolf arrived with the intention of eating the pigs, they sought refuge in their respective homes. The wolf easily blew down the straw house of the first pig. Although it required more effort, the wolf also managed to blow down Porky's stick house. However, when the wolf attempted to blow down the brick house, he found it impossible to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
Three pigs, faced with the threat of a nearby wolf, built homes using different materials. The first pig constructed a straw house, prioritizing speed and ease, while the second, named Porky, built with sticks for slightly more stability. The third pig, however, invested time and resources into a brick house, known for its durability.

When a hungry wolf attacked, the straw house was easily destroyed, and the stick house, though stronger, also failed. However, the brick house proved impervious to the wolf's efforts, ensuring the pigs' safety. This story illustrates the value of durable construction in the face of external threats.

# data[].attributes.body
In this paper we investigate the feasibility of three different shelter design structures for miniature pig cubs. To answer the question about the most stable structure, the three major experiments were conducted by the expert in household buildings for extreme environments, Mr. Wolf. For the first shelter construction only dry stalks of cereal plants were used, whereas only minor wood limbs were utilized in the second experiment. The third technology required utilization of rectangular building units composed of clay or concrete and turned out to be the most sustainable approach compared to the previous two, despite the drawbacks of the costliness and longer constructing time. To range the sustainability of the shelter constructions the modified stability test was run which consisted of a few steps, including exposure to a directed flow of air with predetermined force, controlled specifically by Mr. Wolf. The second technology proved to be more durable in terms of wind resistance than the first, however it could only be used for a temporal shelter, whereas the third technology was able to tolerate the whole spectrum of wind simulations.

# data[].attributes.body
Three pigs, differing in age and cognitive abilities, constructed shelters to protect themselves from a nearby predator, a wolf. The youngest pig, opting for speed, built a house of straw, which lacked structural integrity. The second pig, Porky, used sticks, a marginally stronger material. The third pig, demonstrating greater foresight, used bricks for superior durability.

Upon the wolf's arrival, the straw house was easily destroyed by its forceful breath, while the stick house, though more resilient, was eventually breached. The wolf's attempts to destroy the brick house, however, were futile. Despite its growls, clawing, and violent strikes, the structure withstood the assault, leaving the pigs safe. This case underscores the critical importance of material strength in the face of predatory threats.

# data[].attributes.body
The Architectural Resilience of Porcine Domiciles: A Comparative Analysis

In a proximal geographical location, three porcine siblings of varying maturity found themselves confronted with the necessity of constructing residential structures due to the presence of a lupine predator in the vicinity. This study examines the divergent methodologies employed by each subject and their subsequent efficacy in withstanding external threats.

The initial subject, demonstrating a proclivity for expeditious construction, opted for a domicile composed primarily of gramineae stalks. Concurrently, the second subject, henceforth referred to as "Porky," selected lignocellulosic materials as the predominant building component. In contrast, the third and final subject exhibited a more protracted and deliberate approach to construction, ultimately choosing fired clay blocks as the primary structural element. It is noteworthy that this latter material is associated with significantly higher procurement costs.

Upon the arrival of a carnivorous canine, ostensibly motivated by nutritional deficiencies, the porcine subjects sought refuge within their respective dwellings. The subsequent events unfolded as follows:

1. The gramineae-based structure succumbed rapidly to the lupine's respiratory assault.

2. The lignocellulosic domicile demonstrated marginally superior resilience, yet ultimately yielded to sustained exhalatory force.

3. The fired clay construction, however, proved impervious to the predator's efforts, effectively nullifying the threat.

In conclusion, this case study illustrates the correlation between material selection, construction methodology, and structural integrity in the face of external pressures. Further research is warranted to explore the cost-benefit analysis of various building materials in similar scenarios.

# data[].attributes.body
The study focuses on investigating the effectiveness of houses constructed from various materials in protecting piglets from a hungry wolf. For the experiment, three piglets of different ages were selected and placed near a wolf. Naturally, the effective shelter construction was necessary to protect the piglets from the nearby wolf. However, rather than collaborating to identify the most suitable solution, they chose to act independently. Consequently, they built three different houses utilizing various materials.

The first piglet decided to build a house of straw because it was the most available and easy-to-use material. Meanwhile, the second piglet, named Porky, chose sticks as the building material for his house. The third piglet, prioritizing durability over time efficiency, constructed a house from bricks. Although this material is more expensive, it offers significantly greater resilience.

When the hungry wolf arrived to eat the piglets, they hid inside their respective shelters. Obviously, the wolf quickly and easily destroyed the straw house. While it took more effort, the wolf ultimately blew down the stick house as well. However, despite numerous attempts, the wolf was unable to destroy the third house, which was constructed from bricks.

Thus, it was concluded that the probability of piglet survival is directly proportional to the quality of the material used to construct the shelter as well as the time invested in its construction.

# data[].attributes.body
In this experiment, the resistance of structures made from different materials to external force, simulating atmospheric pressure (represented by strong wind), was studied. Three objects (pigs) were used, each constructing a shelter from a different material.

The first object (pig) built a house from straw, which was quickly assembled but lacked strength. The second object (pig, named Porky) used sticks, a more durable material but still insufficient for withstanding external forces. The third object (pig) used bricks, a material with high strength and resistance, requiring more time and resources to build.

After construction, a series of tests were conducted using a model of external force (wolf), simulating high atmospheric pressure (strong wind). Results showed that the straw house was easily destroyed, the stick house took more effort to destroy but was ultimately collapsed, while the brick house remained intact, unaffected by the external force. These results support the hypothesis that materials with higher strength and resistance (in this case, bricks) provide more effective protection against external factors compared to weaker materials like straw and sticks.

# data[].attributes.body
Here we report three minor individuals of sp. Sus domesticus of various ages in close proximity to member of sp. Canis lupus species. Experiment participants were given a task to build a house without materials specification. As a result, the first subject has constructed a straw building, and the second* has chosen sticks. Finally, the third, in the case of which the construction took the longest time, built a house of bricks. It should be noted that such a house is also more expensive due to the increased cost of materials. After the completion of the preparatory phase with the construction of houses the unfed for 7 days sp. Canis lupus was set free near individuals of sp. Sus domesticus. Despite the fact that all the test subjects had hidden in their buildings, the wolf attempted to destroy their buildings by means of a strong stream of air from his mouth. In the first case sp. Canis lupus successfully blew down the first building within seconds, in the second case the range of time was minutes. By contrast, the third house is reported to be blownsafe due to use of durable and heavy materials. Thus to summarize the impact of sp.Canis lupus nearby the minor sp. Sus domesticus, we present differences in the approach to predator shelter construction within the same species.

________________

*the participant specifically asked to note his name, which is Porky.

# data[].attributes.body
There were three little pigs, of different ages. Moreover, there was a wolf nearby. Pigs needed to build a home. In the beginning, the first pig decided to build a house of straw. Then, the second, whose name was Porky, built a house of sticks. Although the third pig took longer to build his house, his house was made of bricks, despite the fact that bricks are a more expensive material. Eventually, a hungry wolf came to eat the pigs. As a result, the pigs hid inside their homes. Initially, the wolf easily blew down the first house. It took longer to blow down the second house, but the wolf did it. Finally, the third house was made of bricks. Therefore, it was impossible to blow down.

# data[].attributes.body
In the fable of the "Three Little Pigs," three porcine siblings of varying ages are assigned the task of constructing their homes—an activity that, as the outcome demonstrates, offers valuable insights into principles of structural integrity, resource allocation, and adaptation to environmental challenges. The first pig, perhaps influenced by the "cost-benefit" principle, chose to build his house from straw—a material easily obtained but one that, much like the fragile exoskeletons of certain insects, offers little protection against external threats.

The second pig, perhaps with a slightly more developed understanding of defensive mechanisms, opted for sticks as a building material. While this choice provided marginally more structural integrity than straw, it remained comparable to the weak, temporary shelters built by certain organisms that rely on speed rather than durability to avoid predation.

The third pig, exhibiting what might be considered an advanced level of foresight and resource management, decided to construct his house from bricks—a significantly more durable and resource-intensive material. This decision, while requiring more time and energy—much like the slow metabolism of certain long-lived species—proved to be an evolutionary advantage in the face of external pressures.

When the wolf, motivated by hunger, arrived to challenge the pigs, each took refuge in their respective homes. The wolf, demonstrating a highly effective (if somewhat simplistic) predatory strategy, easily blew down the straw house. The fragility of straw, akin to the thin protective barriers of certain vulnerable species, was no match for the wolf's formidable force. The stick house, though slightly more resistant, was similarly dismantled after several attempts, demonstrating the limited efficacy of weak, temporary structures in the face of persistent environmental pressures.

However, when the wolf reached the brick house, he encountered a material whose structural integrity was on par with the hardened exoskeletons of certain armored species. Despite his repeated efforts, the wolf's huffing and puffing proved futile—much like a predator attempting to breach the defense of a well-armored prey.

Thus, the third pig's choice of bricks can be seen as a masterclass in evolutionary strategy, illustrating the long-term benefits of investing in durability and resilience rather than relying on quick, short-term solutions that are easily overcome by natural forces.

# data[].attributes.body
Investigation of the strength properties of buildings depending on the building material

Moroshkina A.D.

It is known that three different ages little pigs lived nearby a wolf, thus they had to build a house to hide in it. In this work we study the dependency of the strength properties of buildings on the building material using the wolf-blowing method. Also every little pig was allowed to choose the building material for his/her house, thus the level of the cognitive skills of different ages little pigs can be estimated according to their ability to predict the result of made choice. Three buildings made from straw, sticks and bricks were blown by wolf, the time required for complete destruction was measured. The results shows that the first house was destroyed almost immediately, the second one required some time but also was destroyed. The third house made from more expensive material – bricks – showed the greatest strength properties: it was impossible to blow down the building. Despite the fact that this choice was made by third little pig who seems to be the eldest, there is correlation but not causation between the age of the pigs and their ability to predict strength properties of house.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Fig 1. The relationship between structural integrity and external force for houses made of straw, sticks, and bricks

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluating the Structural Resilience of Building Materials Under External Forces: An Experimental Study of Straw, Sticks, and Bricks

Abstract

This study investigates the structural integrity of houses constructed from various materials when subjected to external force, as exemplified by a wolf's attempt to destroy the homes of three pigs. Straw, sticks, and bricks were analyzed as building materials. Results indicate that brick houses demonstrate superior resistance to external forces compared to straw and stick structures. These findings provide insights into material selection for construction under threat conditions.

Introduction

In architectural and structural engineering, material selection is critical to ensuring the durability and safety of buildings. This research explores the efficacy of straw, sticks, and bricks as construction materials under the specific scenario of an external force applied by a predator, represented here by a wolf. The objective is to determine which material provides the greatest resilience.

Methods and Materials

Three housing structures were constructed by three subjects of varying ages. The first subject built a house using straw, a lightweight and low-cost material. The second subject, named Porky, utilized sticks, a material slightly more robust than straw. The third subject opted for bricks, which are durable but more time- and resource-intensive to acquire and use.

To test the structural integrity, an adult wolf (Canis lupus) was introduced as the external force. The wolf sequentially applied pressure through repeated exhalation efforts ("huffing and puffing") to each structure. Success was defined as the ability of the wolf to collapse the house, while failure indicated structural resilience.

Results

The wolf easily destroyed the straw house, indicating minimal resistance to external forces. The stick house displayed slightly greater durability, requiring additional attempts before collapse. However, the brick house withstood all attempts by the wolf to cause structural failure, demonstrating superior resilience.

Discussion

The findings suggest that straw and sticks, while readily available and cost-effective, are insufficient for construction in environments where significant external forces are anticipated. Bricks, despite their higher cost and longer construction time, offer unparalleled durability under pressure. These results align with existing theories of material strength, where denser and more cohesive materials exhibit greater resistance to external stressors.

Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of material selection in construction. Bricks emerged as the optimal choice for structural stability, providing practical implications for building strategies in hostile environments. Further research could explore additional materials and stress scenarios to expand upon these findings.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Introduction

Three pigs of different ages and small in size were considered. In the framework of the present work they had to build a house under a circumstance of a wolf situated close to them.

2. Materials and methods

The first pig came to a decision to use straw as a building material, the second one have chosen sticks for the same purpose, while the last one preferred bricks, though this is a more expensive material.

A crucial note, inevitable for the following discussion should be done: the name of the second pig was Porky.

After building of all the houses were finished, the wolf approached them with an intention to eat the pigs. To avoid this process, every pig hid inside its own house.

3. Results

First, the wolf immediately blew down the house of the first pig. After that, it started to blow down the Porky's house, which proved to be more robust, but also was blown down after some period of time. Finally, the wolf tried to blow down the last house, and this action had no any detectable effect.

4. Conclusion

The houses made of bricks are impossible to blow down, unlikely the houses made of cheaper materials.

# data[].attributes.body
There were three little pigs of varying ages. Since there was a wolf nearby, they aimed to build a home.  Each of three pigs built the home from different material – straw, sticks and bricks, respectively.  It is noteworthy, that bricks were the most expensive material.  Finally, the hungry wolf came to eat the pigs, leading to the pigs hiding inside their homes. As the result, the wolf demolished the first two houses almost effortlessly, while the third house, which was made of bricks, remained intact.

# data[].attributes.body
This study explores the behavior of three pigs when faced with the imminent threat of a predator. To ensure their safety, each pig constructed a shelter using different materials. The first pig chose straw, a readily available but flimsy material, allowing for quick construction. The second pig, named Porky, opted for sticks, which offered slightly more durability than straw but still lacked significant strength.

In contrast, the third pig invested additional effort and resources to build a house from bricks. While more expensive and time-consuming to construct, the brick structure provided superior sturdiness. When the predator arrived, each pig sought refuge in their respective shelters. The straw house collapsed almost immediately under the predator's attack, offering little to no protection. Similarly, the stick house, although slightly more robust, was quickly destroyed as well. However, the brick house successfully withstood the predator's attempts to breach it, offering a secure haven for its builder.

This analysis highlights the critical role of material choice in constructing protective structures. Bricks, while more resource-intensive, provide significantly greater resilience against external threats, underscoring the value of prioritizing long-term safety over short-term convenience.

# data[].attributes.body
In the course of our study, we analyzed the behavior of three pigs of different ages. The pigs had to build a house one by one to avoid a wolf. We have identified three types of materials that were chosen by the piglets for the construction of the house: straw, sticks and bricks. The construction time of a house made of these materials and its destruction increased significantly, respectively. Our experiment did not have enough time to destroy a brick house.

Nevertheless, combining the efforts of pigs to build a brick house leads to an increase in survival.

# data[].attributes.body
Three (little) pigs needed to build homes to provide cover from a nearby wolf. The first two pigs build their houses out of straws and sticks respectively. <The second pig’s name as well as the pig’s differing ages are omitted as their inclusion does not serve any purpose in the original version.> The third pig opted to use a more expensive material – bricks and spend more time on construction. As the wolf eventually attacked, to sate his hunger, the first two houses provided little resistance. The third house, however, due to a higher structural rigidity provided by the bricks, proved impossible for the wolf to destroy. <The original leaves any conclusions to the reader.>

# data[].attributes.body
The narrative concerns three pigs of varying ages. A wolf was situated in the immediate vicinity. It was necessary for them to build a house. The first pig decided to construct a house utilising straw as the primary structural material.  Porky, the second pig, constructed a house of sticks. In contrast to them, the third pig took longer to build his house, which was made of bricks. However, bricks are a more expensive material. A hungry wolf came to eat the pigs, but they were able to hide inside their homes. The wolf easily blew down the first house. In addition, he blew down the second house. Hence, third house was made of bricks and was therefore impervious to the wolf's attacks.

# data[].attributes.body
This study describes three piglets’ adaptive behavior.

Since the wolf is an apex predator in this food chain, the piglets should avoid being eaten. In our study, the first piglet used straw to build his house, the second used twigs, and the third used bricks. By comparing these strategies, we aim to identify the best strategy in such environment.

We observe wolf trying to capture piglets. He successfully destroyed both first and second house. Only the third house remained intact because it was built of good material, which cannot be said of the others.

In conclusion, the rate of destruction of houses depends on the quality of the building materials.

# data[].attributes.body
In their article entitled "A TEST SYSTEM BASED ON COMPETITIVE ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY FOR THE DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES TO THE ANIMAL RABIES VIRUS (RHABDOVIRDAE: LYSSAVIRUS TYPE WOLF)," the authors examine the interaction of antibodies in three types of pigs. In the context of this study, three active drugs, namely "Straw," "Sticks," and "Bricks," were identified and subsequently administered to three experimental pigs. It is important to note that each of the three subjects had been artificially injected with Rabies lyssavirus.

According to the research results, the first vaccine, Straw, unfortunately did not provide the expected outcome, resulting in the subject's death. Proceeding to the second type of vaccine, "Sticks," an allergic reaction was detected specifically in the species Sus scrofa domestica. Despite several attempts to save the individual, ultimately, the subject died. In contrast, the third type of vaccine, Bricks, elicited a positive response to the resistance of viral cells, allowing the individual to pass the critical period of the virus passage.

Consequently, the test for the defeat of viral cells yielded results in the form of a capable vaccine designated under the working name "Bricks." Therefore, the study demonstrated the potential of the Bricks vaccine as a viable candidate for further development.

# data[].attributes.body
In this narrative, three pigs of varying ages find themselves in a predicament due to the presence of a nearby wolf. To ensure their safety, the pigs decide to construct homes. The first pig, seeking a quick solution, chooses to build a house made of straw. Similarly, the second pig, named Porky, opts for a house constructed of sticks. However, the third pig adopts a more methodical approach, dedicating additional time to building a sturdier house made of bricks, a material known for its durability despite being more expensive.

When a hungry wolf arrives with the intention of preying upon the pigs, they take refuge inside their respective homes. The wolf, using his breath to destroy their shelters, easily blows down the straw house. Although the stick house resists slightly longer, it ultimately succumbs to the wolf's efforts. In stark contrast, the brick house proves impervious to the wolf's attempts, rendering it an impenetrable sanctuary for the pigs.

This progression highlights the significance of careful planning and the use of robust materials in ensuring safety and durability.

# data[].attributes.body
Three pigs of different age decided to conduct an experiment on whether it is possible to live nearby a wolf. They chose a set of different materials to build their houses with varying cost and time needed to build. Specifically, the first house was built from straw, the second, constructed by Porky – from sticks, and the last, the most expensive one – from bricks. Eventually, the wolf came, starting the final phase of experiment. Houses were tested by blowing air out of the wolf’s mouth with pigs hiding inside. As a metric they chose the time houses stood against the wind. Obtained results were as follows: lowest rating for the straw house, then sticks, and finally, bricks, with an infinite value of chosen metric meaning that this house could not be blown down at all. Therefore the third pig proved it is possible to live near a wolf.

# data[].attributes.body
An experimental study was conducted by the three pigs and their assistant, the wolf, to investigate the steadiness of different materials. In addition, the authors provide data regarding their age differences. It is notable that the corresponding author, who is the second author, identifies himself as Porky. The study simulates a scenario in which a hungry wolf pursues the three pigs, necessitating the construction of houses for defense.

Initially, the first author employs straw as a building material; however, the study demonstrates that the wolf easily blew it down. Subsequently, Porky gathers sticks to construct a more robust house. Despite this, after numerous attempts, the wolf succeeded in blowing it down as well. Ultimately, the third pig utilizes bricks, the most expensive material presented in the study. Nevertheless, the house constructed from bricks proved to be sufficiently steady to withstand the wolf's attempts to blow it down.

# data[].attributes.body
Three little pigs of different ages lived nearby a wolf. When the pigs needed to build a home, the first pig decided to build it of straw. Meanwhile, the second pig, whose name was Porky, built a house of sticks. In contrast, the third pig made his house of bricks, although bricks are a more expensive material and it took longer to build the house. When a hungry wolf came to eat the pigs, they hid inside their homes. The wolf easily blew down the first house. Although it took longer to blow down the second house, the wolf did it eventually. However, it was impossible to blow down the third house, since it was made of bricks.

# data[].attributes.body
Three little pigs

There were three little pigs, of different ages.  As well as there was a wolf nearby.  For this reason they needed to build a home.  Initially the first pig decided to build a house of straw.  Then the second pig named Porky built a house of sticks. The third pig build his house of bricks, even though it took longer and brick is a more expensive material.  One day a hungry wolf came to eat the pigs.  So, the pigs hid inside their homes.  Firstly, the wolf easily blew down the first house.  However, it took longer to blow down the second house, but the wolf did it. Since the third house was made of brick, it was impossible to blow down.

# data[].attributes.body
Draganov Ivan

For a long time, the scientific community has been faced with the question of choosing a material for building a house, implying its resistance to destructive factors. The purpose of this work is to study the stability of a house depending on the material of construction. The following materials were used: straw, wood, brick. The authors of the work alternately exposed the houses to a strong wind flow. Under such an impact, the house made of straw was destroyed the fastest, then the house made of wood. The authors found that, despite the strong wind flow, the brick house did not collapse. Based on the above, it is safest to build a house from brick. In the future, the authors plan to increase the list of initial building materials.

# data[].attributes.body
In this study three cases of dwellings constructed individualy by juvenile domestic pigs of varying ages to defend from Canis lupus predator were investigated. Pig 1 utilized straw, Pig 2 (Porky) employed sticks, while Pig 3 constructed a dwelling from bricks, a comparatively more costly material requiring a greater construction time. Upon the arrival of a C. lupus, each pig shelter to its respective dwelling. The wolf readily demolished Pig 1's straw structure. Pig 2's stick dwelling offered increased resistance, however was destroyed from the wolf's efforts. On the other hand, Pig 3's brick dwelling proved invulnerable to the predator’s attempts at demolition.

# data[].attributes.body
Three pigs of different ages needed to build a home. Despite the fact that everyone knew about the wolf nearby, not every pig was success in the choice of home materials. The houses of the first and the second pigs were eventually built of straw and sticks, respectively, while the third pig was not so hasty in its decisions and made its house out of expensive but high-quality material, bricks. As a result, when the hungry wolf came to eat the piglets, only the brick house withstood the destructive blowing of the wolf.

# data[].attributes.body
There were three young pigs, each a different age. Nearby, there was a dangerous wolf. Because of this, the pigs needed to build houses to keep themselves safe.

The first pig decided to build quickly and used straw to make a house. The second pig, named Porky, chose sticks to build its house, which took a little more time. The third pig, however, spent the most time building. It used bricks, which are stronger but also more expensive.

Later, a hungry wolf arrived. The pigs hid inside their homes. The wolf tried to blow the houses down. The first house, made of straw, fell down easily. The second house, made of sticks, lasted longer but also collapsed. However, the third house, built from bricks, was too strong. The wolf could not blow it down.

This shows that stronger materials, like bricks, make safer houses. Even though building with straw and sticks is faster and cheaper, these materials do not provide much protection. The brick house, while more expensive and slower to build, kept the pigs safe.

# data[].attributes.body
Three Little Pigs: A Comparative Analysis of Housing Construction and Predatory Threat :)

Three little pigs, of different ages, needed to build houses to protect themselves from a nearby wolf. Therefore, the first pig quickly built a straw house. Meanwhile, the second pig, Porky, built a stick house. In contrast, the third pig built a much stronger brick house, which, while taking longer, also cost more. Despite the wolf’s efforts, he easily blew down the straw and stick houses. However, he could not blow down the brick house.

# data[].attributes.body
This text examines three piglets belonging to different age categories. Since the piglets and the wolf make up the food chain, the piglets were forced to build a shelter. The first piglet used straw as a material to build his house, the second used twigs, and the third used bricks. The last house was built longer than the others due to the fact that brick is an expensive material. When the wolf felt hungry, he decided to go to the piglets. In response, they began to hide in their shelters. Only the third house remained intact, because it was built of good material, which cannot be said about the others. To sum up, the rate of destruction of houses depends on the quality of building materials.

# data[].attributes.body
Emil Alkin.

We consider three piglets of different ages. Under conditions of a high probability of wolf presence nearby, they have decided to build shelters. We observe that each one has chosen its own material for the house: the first – straw; the second, which name is Porky, – sticks; and the third – the most expensive material – bricks. After a while, driven by biological instinct, the wolf approached the piglets. When the wolf came close to the piglet houses, they were inside. In a relatively short time, the wolf destroyed the first two houses. However, it did not destroy the third brick house.

# data[].attributes.body
There were three little pigs representing different age categories. There was a wolf in the close proximity. The piglets needed to build a dwelling for its protection. The first piglet decided to build a house out of straw. The second piglet, whose name was Porky, built a house out of sticks. In contradistinction to his fellow tribesmen, the third piglet decided to spend more time building his home, choosing bricks for this, although they are more expensive. Soon, a hungry wolf approached the piglets with the intention of eating them. Therefore the piglets took refuge in their homes. The wolf easily destroyed the first house built of straw. The destruction of the second house took longer, nonetheless the wolf still coped with this task. Whereas for the third house, which was made of bricks, it remained unshakable and proved impossible to destroy.

# data[].attributes.body
The experiment was as follows: three pigs of different age (referred to as test subjects in further mentions) had a task of building a house, each one of them had to be constructed from different materials.

The first test subject used straw as a building material for their shelter. The second test subject (labeled Porky) used sticks as their material of choice. The third test subject came up with the idea of building a house of an expensive and durable material -- the bricks.

The test for their newly built houses was as follows: a hungry wolf was used to test their building and decision making (materials-wise) skills .

The test results are as follows: the wolf was able to eliminate 2 test subjects (which had the houses built of straw and sticks) in a short and moderate time respectively. The third test subject has passed the test as it was unfeasibgle for the wolf to eliminate them due to their wise choice of materials.

Bricks proved to be the safest option in terms of resisting predator's assault. Other options turned out to be inpractical in resisting a hungry predator.