# data[].attributes.body
First sentence: identify the speaker, assign a tone word, and provide a paraphrase (do not quote).

Second sentence: provide an analytical explanation for one PASTA element (excluding tone). INCLUDE AN OUTSIDE CONCRETE DETAIL!

# data[].attributes.body
First sentence: identify the speaker, assign a tone word, and provide a paraphrase (do not quote).

Second sentence: provide an analytical explanation for one PASTA element (excluding tone). INCLUDE AN OUTSIDE CONCRETE DETAIL!

# data[].attributes.body
First sentence: identify the speaker, assign a tone word, and provide a paraphrase (do not quote).

Second sentence: provide an analytical explanation for one PASTA element (excluding tone). INCLUDE AN OUTSIDE CONCRETE DETAIL!

# data[].attributes.body
First sentence: identify the speaker, assign a tone word, and provide a paraphrase (do not quote).

Second sentence: provide an analytical explanation for one PASTA element (excluding tone). INCLUDE AN OUTSIDE CONCRETE DETAIL!

# data[].attributes.body
Make mention of TWO sources in a single sentence and identify if the sources corroborate, contradict, or qualify each other. A second sentence should explain WHY the two sources either corroborate, contradict, or qualify. For example, your second sentence might start out as, “The reason for this difference is…”

# data[].attributes.body
Stain when presenting this speech is very proud with his 5 year plan and the great"success" that has come with it. In this speech he was talking to other high ranking officials of the party and he is showing how communism is so much better than any other state,such as the Nazi party in Germany.

# data[].attributes.body
In Joseph Stalin's confident report on the 5 year plan, he goes over the very glorified developments of his country and what he had to do with them. He fits his speech to his audience, a group of high-ranking party officials in order to impress and to give himself an edge in a savior-like complex. This tactic used on high ranked officials also works on his followers, where he gains his power.

# data[].attributes.body
Sydney Tanguay + Kayti Wurster + Memphis Herrmann

Joseph Stalin, in his speech to the party, pridefully lists the details of his five-year plan. He does this to convince and persuade his audience to believe that he is going to fix the USSR’s economic issue with his wonderful and well thought out plan.  In the 1920s, industrial and agricultural production dropped due by the Russian Civil War when hundreds of thousands Russians, Ukrainians, factory workers and others went on strike.

# data[].attributes.body
We see Stalin alienating all under his rule and in turn pitting his followers against those whom had disagreed with him and his perfect way of governing. Stalin in turn shines this negative light on, and in a way demonising those like the Kulaks, and fascists rising to power in Nazi Germany. Stalin preaches his 5-year plan to bring his country up from the ashes of what it has succumbed to.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin pridefully reports to the politburo his description of a 5 Year Plan, that would include the collectivization of agriculture, and the movement to an industrial society in the "great" nation state of the U.S.S.R. Through this document, Stalin aims to portray the Soviet Union as the superior nation, especially compared to capitalist economies like the rival: Germany; he does so by gaining morale on making the U.S.S.R an economic powerhouse.

# data[].attributes.headline
Anna Miller and Arielle McMahan - Doc #1 PASTA

# data[].attributes.subject
Anna Miller and Arielle McMahan - Doc #1 PASTA

# data[].attributes.body
In this document of Joseph Stalin’s speech to the Party, he pridefully explains all of the benefits to the new industrial and powerful country of the Soviet Union under his Five-Year Plan by explaining how he is going to increase means of defense and collectivize agriculture. Stalin’s purpose in this speech was to make himself out as a hero, and to demonize fascist and capitalist countries and leaders, such as Hitler and Nazi Germany, and to make everyone think that he is going to fix all of their problems with his amazing plan, while he is really doing the opposite.

# data[].attributes.body
In Joseph Stalin's report, he pridefully showed the benefits to the five-year plan he had ready. The author was the leader of the Soviet Union that believed in communism and wanted everything to go his way; he spoke very highly of himself and his plan in this document.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin's speech to his high ranking officials is very prideful over what his 5-year plan has accomplished. Within this time period, the 5-year plan wasn't really working as well as it could have, such as the people not truly being happy with the state of things, but Stalin didn't want this to cripple his power, so he used it to legitimize his rule, and how well he is doing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Document #1- Joesph Stalin's Report to the Party 

# data[].attributes.subject
Document #1- Joesph Stalin's Report to the Party 

# data[].attributes.body
Joesph Stalin's report to the party was explained pridefully about the Soviet Unions five year plan success and goals. Stalins purpose was to re-establish the Soviet Union  as an economic powerhouse. At the time, tensions between the Soviet Union and the rise of Hitler were happening and Stalin's so described amazing plan in fact created a massive famine where millions of peasants starved to death.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin's Report to the Party was introduced and elaborated in confident was explaining the 5 Year Plan into Industrialization. His intended audience are those under the Soviet Union to influence a change from capitalism to socialism. After Britain influence over industrialization, nation's populations increased due to agricultural production, leading to Russia wanting a shift so they could become a unified nation.

# data[].attributes.body
In Stalin's speech to the party, he pridefully states and explains why his five year plan is so great. Stalin does this to persuade the the Communist party to support him and help solidify his rule. Stalin also undermines other governments like the Fascists and Capitalist to help persuade why him and his plan would help the Soviet Union.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin pridefully expresses his excitement about all the positive aspects of his five year plan. By creating this document Stalin wanted to show the world that he had the Soviet Union under control after their struggle in World War I.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin encouragingly promotes and legitimizes the Five Year Plan to his Communist Party. He does this because his audience is the Communist Party who would support him. He wants to solidify their support to ensure their loyalty he also wants to throw the Capitalist governments and the Fascist ones (like Mussolini's Italy) under the bus to show why his would be better.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin's speech pridefully announces how his 5 year plan will industrialize the Soviet Union. His purpose was to show his power and undermine the power of his rivals such as the United states of America where they disliked Communism.

# data[].attributes.body
In document 1, Stalin's speech to his party officials pridefully presents his 5-year plan to transform the Soviet Union into a more powerful country by increasing industrialization and collectivized agriculture. The purpose of this document is to have Stalin create a persona of his real self saying that his 5-year plan will fix and revolutionize Russia, but in reality it had only hurt Russia more than it helped.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin pridefully explains the successes of the Five year plan and the transition to the socialist Industry. During this time, Russia was experiencing widespread famine from peasants burning crops in retaliation and Stalin implemented economic plans to show his ability as a political figure especially contrasted to his opponent Leon Trotsky.

# data[].attributes.headline
Document 1- Alyssa Haberstroh, Irene Goodman, Hannah Villarreal

# data[].attributes.subject
Document 1- Alyssa Haberstroh, Irene Goodman, Hannah Villarreal

# data[].attributes.body
Sydney Tanguay + Kayti Wurster + Memphis Herrmann

In this document, a factory worker bitterly, and with great frustration, describes their experience and life in the Soviet Union under communist control. Stalin's Five- Year Plan was meant to make the Soviet Union an industrial power, therefore, helping the working class and farmers of the USSR. However, the Five Year Plan's forced elimination of private land ownership and redistribution of land, led to many farmers moving to the cities and mass starvation from the lack of food production.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin's speech to the party, proudfully expresses his five year plan. He does this to convince his audience to trust him to fix the USSR's economic issues with this plan. These issues were caused by the Russian Civil War when factories went on strike.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin is strongly expressing his thoughts on introducing five year plans to Russia so that they can become economically stable. Stalin's purpose for giving the speech was to unite Russia so that they would follow his beliefs as well as his ideas of how to run the country. For example, he had introduced hate on the kulak class so that the people would find Stalin's side and unite with him to destroy the kulak class.

# data[].attributes.body
This document despairingly describes the abuse women endured from Senkas and fatigue while working for "land improvement" in the Soviet Union. The author's perspective influences this document because she was a prisoner who personally experienced and witnessed this trauma firsthand. Hitler was gaining power during this time and Stalin was taking drastic actions to prevent his people from believing the amount of power he possessed. This was during the era of the Great Depression and while Stalin wanted people to believe he would solve all existing conflict, he used violence in his attempts as demonstrated by the source.

# data[].attributes.headline
Anna Miller and Arielle McMahan - Doc #1 and #4 direct comparison

# data[].attributes.subject
Anna Miller and Arielle McMahan - Doc #1 and #4 direct comparison

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin's speech to the Party about his five year plan, and Eugenia Ginsburg's detailed account of her years in the gulag camps contradict each other in terms of what Stalin's motives truly were. The differences are exhibited in the documents in the way that Stalin's speech makes him out to be a great leader who will bring the country into prosperity by freeing labored peasants and creating agricultural land reforms. The account of a woman prisoner who spent years in the gulag camps created by Stalin where workers were abused and mistreated, reveals the truth, that his motives were corrupt and how he wasn't actually helping the people, he was hurting them and doing things for his own benefit and in his own favor rather than the country's.

# data[].attributes.body
In document #1, Stalin proudly and pridefully presents the achievements of the five year plan to a group of high ranking officials.  The five year plan, focused on the overall development and conversion of the U.S.S.R from an agrarian state dependent on capitalist prices to an independent industrial power. Capitalism to Stalin creates a weak nation.

# data[].attributes.body
A factory worker harshly comments on the horrid conditions of those in a similar situation as his vs those who sit above him, do less and get more, which he calls "parasites". The appalling conditions/pay of this factory worker and those in a situation similar to him is a direct cause of his anger and the conditions of his family.

# data[].attributes.headline
Grace Fairchild, Sabrina Lee, & Mariah Lucero 

# data[].attributes.subject
Grace Fairchild, Sabrina Lee, & Mariah Lucero 

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin, in his report to the Communist Party confidently expressed his ideas over his five year plan and encourages the Party members to follow it. During the time from the 1920s-1930s Russia was in a major famine and Hitler was coming to power in Germany; therefore, Stalin needed to prove that Russia was still a powerhouse of industrial success.

# data[].attributes.body
Sorry one of the anonymous´ was me so I logged in to continue with my writing.
We see Stalin alienating all under his rule and in turn pitting his followers against those whom had disagreed with him and his perfect way of governing. Stalin in turn shines this negative light on, and in a way demonising those like the Kulaks, and fascists rising to power in Nazi Germany. Stalin preaches his 5-year plan to bring his country up from the ashes of what it has succumbed to over time. His new plan will cure the famine, and finally place his Russia on top of the pedestal of power he so desires, finally gaining the respect and recognition as on of the greatest countries in the world. This however appeared to be a more manipulative scheme that would in turn put him in power with no more threats against his rule.

# data[].attributes.body
The tone of this letter from a Communist peasant is incredibly resentful and sour. He is talking to the higher ups saying that things are not good, that he is losing his food under collectivization and that only the higher ups are benefiting.

# data[].attributes.body
In the comments of the factory workers, they were very resentful on how they were really getting treated in the factory.The purpose of the factory workers coming out and telling the truth on how they are getting treated.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin, proudly presented his speech about the 5 year plan to persuade the citizens of the USSR that his plan would make their economy flourish and make them a large powerful country.

# data[].attributes.body
In the document, Stalin positively and encouragingly promotes his five year plan, and states the reasons and ways in which Russia has directly benefited from it. Stalin's point of view affects how he views the five year plan because he created the plan, and wanted Russia to become more industrial. He wanted to remain in control of Russia, so he states the ways Russia has benefited from his rule, such as better defense, more industries and a sturdy economy. His point of view leads him to be biased, as he wants to believe everything he does is good for Russia.

# data[].attributes.headline
Alyssa Baker and Isabelle Diaz - Doc #1 and Doc #3

# data[].attributes.subject
Alyssa Baker and Isabelle Diaz - Doc #1 and Doc #3

# data[].attributes.body
In these two documents, the authors contradict each other with the tone; Stalin was very positive and only showed the benefits whereas the factory worker was upset and angry towards everything happening. The reason for this difference is the different points of views the authors have. Joseph Stalin was the creator of these policies and rules so he only has good words trying to convince people whereas the factory worker actually went through the tough times and policies because he was forced to.

# data[].attributes.body
The worker within the document describes the deplorable conditions in which an average person lives in within the USSR. Soviet citizens were subjugated to low amounts of food due to the fact that all food had to be shared, and as well lines to get food were so long that often stores closed or went out of stock before everyone could be served.

# data[].attributes.body
During a speech to the party, Joseph proudly presents his 5 year plan and expresses it's evident projected success. The plan was thought to make the USSR stronger as well as other fundamental developments such as in the economy. Stalin creates this plan in order to show the authority in his rule, granting him the acceptance to become the Supreme leader.

# data[].attributes.body
In document 2, a worker in the Soviet Union talks about how miserable life is and talks about how his wife has to wait in long queues to get nothing. The author is trying to let people who have power in the government to see this letter so they understand how living conditions aren't what it should be.

# data[].attributes.body
Both document 1 and 3 talk about the current status of the USSR and who it benefits. However document 3 from a worker goes in direct contrast of document 1 by Stalin because the worker is saying that only the higher ups are benefiting while Stalin says that the whole of the people are benefiting. The worker is saying this because the worker is probably suffering under the collectivization of his land and resources and he would like a better life fro that.

# data[].attributes.headline
Document 1- Alyssa Haberstroh, Irene Goodman, Hannah Villarreal

# data[].attributes.subject
Document 1- Alyssa Haberstroh, Irene Goodman, Hannah Villarreal

# data[].attributes.body
In 1933, Stalin gave a speech which  presented his 5 year plan and boasted about its success in converting Russia from an agrarian  to a commercialized society and the removal of capitalist elements of society. During this time, Nazi Germany was coming to power lead by Adolf Hitler who hated communism and wanted to get rid of it. So, the Soviet Union wanted to fight against this and prove that communism leads to the success of their country.

# data[].attributes.body
This document gruesomely depicts the harsh life of working in a gulag and how people are really treated. The woman who wrote this has a strong point of view against the Soviet Government has this perspective because of the harsh treatment enforced under Joseph Stalin mistreated criminals for personal advancement in industry. These tensions between Soviet Government and citizens led to a civil war in the Soviet Union.

# data[].attributes.body
This factory worker is emphasizing on the depressing scene of how factory workers are truly treated in the Soviet Union. The workers point of view is important to this document because most people outside of Russia would suspect that their working class is not suffering as much, however in this case he wants people to know that the life of the factory workers is not good.

# data[].attributes.body
In this document, the worker is frustrated because the promises that Stalin made to the loyal workers of the USSR were not kept. He is in poverty and blames the 5 year plan because of its manipulation to the lower class.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sydney Taguay, Kayti Wurster, and Memphis Herrmann - Docs 1 + 3

# data[].attributes.subject
Sydney Taguay, Kayti Wurster, and Memphis Herrmann - Docs 1 + 3

# data[].attributes.body
The first document describes the perspective of a powerful government official, Joseph Stalin, and the benefits that he views from the communist system while the third document rejects the views of prosperity, and describes the poor living and working conditions of Soviet citizens. The reason for this difference is the contradicting social standings that the authors held. Joseph Stalin was a wealthy and powerful official who saw only the best results of the communist system, while the factory worker struggled with the severe workload that fueled the basis of the system.

# data[].attributes.body
During his speech, Joseph Stalin proudly informs his audience of his 5 year plan to improve the USSR. The goal of this presentation is to get his comrades to follow him into this plan. Stalin also attempts to convince his audience further more why communism is superior to capitalism.

# data[].attributes.body
The working class citizen describes a lamentable society and economy in Russia and how everyday citizens deal with the struggling political state. We see such a grim portrayal of Russian society since the source is coming from an everyday person in the working class society and it sounds so grim since, during this time, Stalin was collectivizing Russia so that the government could have control of the land in the early 1930s which cut a lot of farmers out of jobs.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin's speech to his High-ranking officials and the Worker's letter to the Official contradict each other. Stalin's speech is high-praising of his 5 year plan, going as far as saying that everything was going according to plan, while the worker's letter describes the horrid conditions that the people of the USSR actually went through, such as long lines to get food, and little compensation for their work.

# data[].attributes.body
This speech from Stalin  is very encouraging about his 5 year plan. In this inspiring speech he is trying to find support and to solidate that support, this is because the soviet union was experiencing mass famine.

# data[].attributes.body
This comment from a factory worker bleakly describes the horrid working conditions that the soviet workers were subject to. The factory workers first hand point of view helps to understand the conditions that were not met by the five year plan, as well as the promises of equality from Stalin that were not met only reorganized.

# data[].attributes.body
In document 2 the worker confesses the depressing realities of being a worker under Stalin's industrial plans and says that acquiring "luxuries" such as suits, coats, meat, and butter are not up to the standards of Stalin's promising plans. The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate societal frustrations with the realities created by Stalin's plans and to expose the empty promises of Stalin's redistribution of agriculture being able to support the Russian population.

# data[].attributes.body
The worker mournfully describes his reality under the Five Year Plan, and explains how it did not live up to the things that the socialist party promised, instead, it left people without food, and belongings to get by. During this time, Stalin enforces through his dialogue and propaganda how fantastically the Five-Year Plan is going, he forces these words into the mouths of his people, when in reality, the plan is not working; the collectivization of agriculture is leaving families with nothing for themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Joseph Stalin proudly presents the merits and benefits of his five year plan by exclaiming boldly that they had beaten out capitalism and had made Russia a truly powerful country.
In his speech, his purpose is to highlight the merits of his five year plan to the party, to distract them from seeing the bad side of his plan, like the amount of worker deaths across the countryside, or the active rebelling being dome by some farmers prior to this point. He mentions nothing negative in his adressment, using proud rhetoric to make it seem as if Russia is untouchable and flawless.

# data[].attributes.headline
Charlize Bennett and Lelia Bullion - Doc #2

# data[].attributes.subject
Charlize Bennett and Lelia Bullion - Doc #2

# data[].attributes.body
The letter from the worker to the Soviet Official was discouraging about Stalin's opinions and changes to the socialist society.This is situational context because he is elaborating in detail about what is happening to citizens and how it impacts them. He seems like they have a better life, but it's really torturing for them and their families. The five-year plan intends to convert the country into something greater. However, before the plan, people lived peacefully and didn't have to follow Stalin's unjust orders.

# data[].attributes.body
 The letter written to a Soviet Union Official from a worker in 1938 expresses frustration in the working class because each five year plan seems hopeful but never gives anything good back to the working class. The author's point of view shows that they feel hidden because they are fixing problems but nothing is being fixed for them. They even tried to revolt against collective farming by killing animals and plants but nothing was changed. 

# data[].attributes.body
Document 1 and document 2 contradict each other due to #1 being from Stalin's POV compared to a workers. The reason for this difference is because Stalin believed that Socialism and Industrialization can lead to a beneficial and unified society whereas the worker views are coming from the past years were Russia wasn't under this kind of influence. The workers believed that life before Stalin was peaceful and operated in a much more organized way.

# data[].attributes.body
In this document, a worker shares their experience about the miserable conditions they had to live with. This document informed us about their day to day experience, for example, they some times stood in a line for hours to get food and other essential supplies but weren't able to get any, this experience that is being shared with us shows us how bad their living conditions really were when they were forced under these soviet people.

# data[].attributes.body
These two in counters drastically differ from one another, while one flourishes in the greatness of the Soviet Union the other reveals the truth behind the scenes. After WWI the Soviet Union needed to better their economy therefor, Stalin created a five year plan to help all the people of Russia get back on their feet. This plan included giving the working class access to modern technologies. However, it is clear by the factory workers point of view that the working class in Russia was not treated very well. They were overshadowed by people with more money and they often got very little because of this.

# data[].attributes.headline
Grace Fairchild, Sabrina Lee, & Mariah Lucero

# data[].attributes.subject
Grace Fairchild, Sabrina Lee, & Mariah Lucero

# data[].attributes.body
In the anonymous letter to a soviet official expressing the despairingly conflicted concerns of a Russian worker that the implemented Five year plan, which started out decently but has turned into a disaster. The plan has left the agricultural side of Russia in famine with enraged peasants ready to rebel.

# data[].attributes.headline
Anthony and Jeremy Document #1 and #2 Direct Comparison

# data[].attributes.subject
Anthony and Jeremy Document #1 and #2 Direct Comparison

# data[].attributes.body
Document 1 portray's Stalin presenting his glamorous 5-year plan, and Document 2 explains how the miserable life is along with his wife waiting in line just to get nothing, in which they contradict each other as one document is explaining that  life will be amazing as this 5-year plan will revolutionize their country, while the other says that their lives are miserable as they are unable to buy food to even feed themselves. The reason for this difference is because Stalin was a government official (Dictator) which meant he gets paid a wholesome amount, while factory workers struggle to earn a living to feed themselves and their family meaning they had no control over the politics or other government businesses.

# data[].attributes.body
In an ironic twist of fate, the factory worker making this document claims that the Soviet Union has become everything that it despised, a class-based system that preys upon the lowest laborers

# data[].attributes.body
The first and second documents show extremely different points of view how the five year plan is going. This is different because Stalin seems to be hiding the issues of the working class in order to show that his plan is prosperous. Whereas the working class no longer believes that the five year plan is good for them because they have experienced issues like collective farming. The second source also has a more aggressive tone to it because it is coming from a working class person instead of someone who is in power and is more fortunate to many things that working class people do not have.

# data[].attributes.body
Documents 1 and 4 immensely contradict each other as 1 praises the policies of the Soviet Government while the other (4) criticizes  and condemns them. The reason for this difference is the points of views of each because Stalin of course is going to promote the system and government that he created while a prisoner of this system would be against the mistreatments involved in it, these contradictions would further weaken the Soviet Union and cause civil war.

# data[].attributes.body
In this document, a factory worker in Soviet Russia is brutally honest about the effects of Stalin's rule in Russia. The author's point of view is important because he is out in the workforce, meaning he see things in a different way than Stalin himself would. The factory worker sees the horrid conditions and effects of the promises of the five year plan that were broken by the USSR.

# data[].attributes.body
In this document, the factory worker harshly describes the scene of what Stalin's five year plan really did to the lower class as well as the farmers. Stalin's plan was meant to help the USSR as an industrial power and to help the lower class. However, the induction of collectivization and redistribution led to the starvation of farmers and worse conditions for the lower class.

# data[].attributes.body
The first document proclaimed that the Soviet Union was to be fantastic and industrialized, Stalin made it seam that everything would work out and everyone would be happy under his dictatorship. In the third document we see another point of view, that of a factory worker, based on what Stalin reported in his speech it would be logical to assume that this worker should be treated well. Unfortunately in the document the worker describes the poor conditions of the Soviet Union and how bad his and his families condition is. That is the big difference between the two documents, the difference in the point of view of someone at the bottom the class structure and the one at the top.

# data[].attributes.body
Within the document, it is addressed how cruel the gulag was to the people who were forced to work there. At that time, Stalin was trying to obtain more and more control over the soviet union as time went on, conditions became worse and worse as Stalin grew in more and more power.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin's report to the politburo about his Five-Year Plan along with the letter to a Soviet Official contradict each other. The reason for this contradiction comes from the point of view of each document, Stalin is the leader of this plan, and is trying to gain support of it from his politburo, and uses language that shows it's greatness. On the other hand, the worker has no reason to proclaim the policy's greatness, because to him, its conditions (especially the collectivization of agriculture) did not live up to the expectation that Stalin created.

# data[].attributes.body
Document 1, Stalin's report, and document 3, a factory's worker comments directly contradict each other about the effects of the Five Year Plan. The reason for this difference is the differing points of view and experiences each author has. Stalin created the plan, and as a result, wants to see it succeed and see only the good. He also wants to remain in control, so may exaggerate a little in his report to make himself seem better. On the other hand, the factory worker sees things as they are, and sees the awful conditions that resulted from the USSR.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin's report in document 1 directly contradicts a factory workers statement in document 3. While Stalin's report glorifies the situation of those under his rule, the factory worker says the direct opposite and even blames the Soviet powers for the life of his and many others in the working class.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin sounds very proud and satisfied with his achievements and how important they are to his five year plan. Stalin was speaking to higher ranking officials trying to gain support for his five year plan based off of his previous successes.

# data[].attributes.body
Within document 4 it is conveyed to us the cruelty and the absolute mistreatment of people whom did not fully obey by such rules Stalin had placed, or just were assigned to work in such gulag.. They were put in these horrid conditions having no time away from the ¨nightmare¨ they were basically thrown into a worse than poverty state of life by force.¨Land Improvement¨ which they were just digging into the ground with spades and picks. This document overall shows us the more violent and cruel nature of Stalin's plan for a ¨better Russia¨ and conveyed to us his true plan, to lead with fear.

# data[].attributes.headline
Document 2- Alyssa Haberstroh, Irene Goodman, Hannah Villarreal

# data[].attributes.subject
Document 2- Alyssa Haberstroh, Irene Goodman, Hannah Villarreal

# data[].attributes.body
The author describes the contrast of the hope people had for the five year plans versus the unfortunately unsuccessful turnout for the working class.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin's report to high-ranking party officials contradicts the letter written by workers to Soviet officials. When comparing the two sources, document 1 boastfully explains the achievements of Stalin's 5 year plan while document 2 points out the short comings and failures of the industrialization from Stalin's plan which can be traced back to Stalin's desires to gain support from the high ranking party officials for his plans while ignoring the flaws.

# data[].attributes.body
In Document 1, Stalin claims that capitalist elements have been completely eliminated from Soviet Society, replaced by communist elements, which contradicts the document made by the factory worker, claiming that capitalist elements still remain in Soviet society, just thinly veiled by soviet ideals. These two sources contradict each other because Stalin, in his prideful statement to the communist party claims that the Soviet society had been completely eliminated of capitalist elements, which contradicts what the factory worker is saying, as the factory worker criticizes how the Soviet society still has a class system, like the owners of factories and even the soviet government.

# data[].attributes.headline
Sabrina Lee, Grace Fairchild, Mariah Lucero - Doc 1 and 2

# data[].attributes.subject
Sabrina Lee, Grace Fairchild, Mariah Lucero - Doc 1 and 2

# data[].attributes.body
In document 1, Stalin is only pointing out the benefits and positive side of the 5-Year-Plan for the USSR, while the worker in document 2 expresses frustration because the government is exploiting the working class. The documents contradict each other because they each express different perspectives from their social class differences with one being overly optimistic while the other is circumstantially realistic.

# data[].attributes.body
In the document Stalin is vigorously describing his accomplishments. Stalin does this with the purpose of convincing his political allies that he is on the pathway to make Russia a world superpower while simultaneously fixing all it's problems such as the economic crisis and famine caused by farmers who would not be subject to giving their produce to the state. 

# data[].attributes.body
In this document a citizen is describing his take on the economic situation is Russia. They believe that despite the propaganda spread and believed by the majority of citizens every internally knows and accepts that their society is extremely flawed and they are having trouble attaining basic goods. This trouble derives from the fact that in a communist society it is challenging for the government to produce enough supplies to satisfy the demand. 

# data[].attributes.body
Source one and source two contradict each other. Source one portrays the point of view of someone who believes the USSR is achieving its goals while the second document is written by someone who believes it's failing. In source one Stalin explains the many accomplishments the USSR has made such as establishing a farming class. However in source two a citizen whose not in power describes how that working class does not have access to basic necessities. 

# data[].attributes.body
This document gives a depressing reality of how workers were treated differently from others. This article accurately describes how during Stalin's 5 Year Plan how workers were treated drastically different from the higher class. The purpose of this doc is to express how even thought both classes were working one would work harder than the other not getting enough credit. This goes to show how different the lower class is treated than the higher class. In the 19th century when many were migrating for work or resources they were discriminated for various reasons. They believed there was a higher more superior race than the others and should be treated more respectfully.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin outlines how he plans to make Russia great and how he already has as well by introducing the five year plans along with destroying the kulaks so he can collectivize Russia, but readers see the other side and how Russian citizens are struggling, like the factory worker. This factory workers family is struggling to get the necessities like food and clothing, while we see Stalin parading around, like a savior.

# data[].attributes.body
Stalin's speech to his high ranking officials and the Worker's letter contradict each other. I know this because Stalin's speech talks about how well things for his five year plan have done so far, while the workers letter is explaining how hard and miserable things are going for them.

# data[].attributes.body
This document entails the point of view of a factory worker in the Soviet Union. This personal comment depicts the grim condition that Stalin's 5 Year Plan has led the USSR. Starving children, poor conditions for hard workers, and other unpleasant living and working conditions most likely derived by the unrealistic expectations that Stalin had set.

# data[].attributes.body
Two excerpts, Joseph Stalin's speech and a USSR factory worker's opinion both contain detail of Stalin's 5 Year Plans. However, the perspectives are very different. The reason for this difference is that Stalin's speech portrays the image that his 5 Year Plan will be great for the USSR, that it will strengthen the economy and the state as a whole. On the other hand, the factory work detail the poor working and living conditions for the working class.

# data[].attributes.body
Document 3 dives into the point of view of a factory worker in the U.S.S.R or Soviet Union.  The factory worker states that any success of Soviet power is a lie.  The living conditions are awful consisting of poverty and famine.  The true state of the nation is covered up in the media and made to look as though life in the Soviet Union is wonderful.  The idea of a classless system was created, but in this ideology, classes were made contradicting the original plan.

# data[].attributes.body
Document #1 comes from the point of view of Stalin and mentions all of the great success the Soviet Union has had due to Stalin's 5 year plan. Stalin mentions that the Soviet Union has now developed from weak nations dependent on capitalist prices, to a strong independent industrial power. This completely contradicts document #3 as, document #3 is from the point of view of a factory worker. This factory worker states that life is grime in the Soviet Union. Poverty and famine are on the rise and any success of the Soviet Union mentioned is false as the media covers up the true nature of things. The idea of a classless system which was mentioned by people such as Stalin has completely contradicted itself as within this classless system, classes have been made.

# data[].attributes.body
The documents tone is brutal. The factory worker gets into details by describing her experience in the Soviet Union. The serious tone shows the dangerous situations the Soviet workers were put in. The authors purpose was to reflect the true actions the Soviet Union was taking. In Stalins report he made it out to be an amazing success that only benefited the people and the answer to bringing the Soviet Union back to a good economic standing. At this time, Stalin present the five year plan talking up his party while putting down facsim.

# data[].attributes.body
In sources #1 Stalins motivating tone presents the five year plan as a benefit to the Soviet Union ,however, document #3 contradicts this belief by showing an alternate perspectives from the workers having to perform the labor. The reason for this difference is the Soviet Unions real intentions with the five year plan and the curtain begins to unravel the realties happening compared to what Joesph Stalin presented to the party.

# data[].attributes.body
I had went over the first document and the fourth previously and both of which contradict each other heavily. In the first document Stalin brings up his 5 year plan and how agricultural advancements and Industrial economy will flourish under his rule. In turn the fourth document shows us quite the opposite, a poor lady is placed in horrid conditions for the simple reason that she was forced to work there, she had no heat so they huddled the stove and did multiple other acts that where almost promised to be gone in Stalin's rule however seem to be intensified under it. All in all both of these passages are so different and show us the lies Stalin spouted and the underlying truth that was hiding from Russia's eyes.