# data[].attributes.body
C- This article was published on January 26th, 2017.
R- This article relates to my topic by explaining the impact of technology on social interactions with mostly positive effects.
A- This article was written by Christine Aylett.
A- This article supports my claim by showing and listing the various impacts and effects on social interactions that technology has.
P- The purpose of this article is to show the impact of technology on social interactions, with even some negative impacts, and to show that humans are made to be in relationships.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Impact of Technology on Social Interactions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Humans are made to be in relationships. We have an innate longing to share our lives with family, friends, and partners.

# data[].attributes.body
C- This article was posted on June 11th, 2018.
R- The information is important in supporting my claim as the article's main point is that technology should be used to positively enhance human interactions, not replace them.
A- This article was written by Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Molly Schlesinger, Roberta Gollnkoff, and Esther Care.
A- This article supports my claim by a longshot, listing and explaining why technology should enhance social interactions and not completely replace them.
P- THe purpose of this is to list the reasons and positive effects that technology should have on social interaction and why it should not replace social interactions but enhance them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Stanley and Debra Lefkowitz Faculty Fellow, Department of Psychology, Temple University

Postdoctoral Fellow - Temple University

Unidel H. Rodney Sharp Professor of Education - University of Delaware

Director - Child's Play, Learning, and Development Lab

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The New Humanism: Technology should enhance, not replace, human interactions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The introduction of new technology requires us to assert balance between our obsession with digital platforms and real face-to-face human interaction.

# data[].attributes.body
C- This article was published on November 7th, 2019.
R- This information is a contrast to my claim, showing that technology has a more negative and nasty effect on human social interactions.
A- This article was written by DJ Wardynski.
A- This article does not support my claim and is a counterclaim article, showing, explaining, and listing that technology has a more negative effect on interactions than it does positive.
P- The purpose of this article is to explain how technology has a negative effect and less a positive effect, and counterclaim the statement that technology brings more positive effects.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
3Cloud Resources - The Leading Microsoft Azure Consulting Firm

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get all the latest insights, updates, and trends from an exclusive Microsoft Azure consulting firm. Find blog posts, ebooks datasheets and more.

# data[].attributes.body
C-  The article was posted and last reviewed on the 24th of September, 2020.
R- This information is related to my topic by listing the various positive effects of social interaction with technology and how it effects social interactions overall.
A- The article was written by Jake Burgess on 24/9/20.
A- This information supports my claim by showing how technology has positively effected social interactions in the disappearance of in person interactions.
P- The purpose is to support my claim that social interactions can have positive effects by listing the effects technology has actual had on digital interactions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The world is becoming increasingly digital. We do our shopping online, build our businesses online, spend our downtime online, and even make life-long friends online. As of July 2020, 59 percent of the global population were active internet users. Bringing us closer to commodities, the internet is set to become an even bigger part of our lives.

Technology is a fast-paced market, and every pioneer is in a race for first place on the podium. New innovations are piloted every day in a desperate attempt to sell what the masses will buy-tools to make our daily lives easier. As older generations warm to the idea of utilizing technology in the face of a pandemic, we move eerily closer to a world where social interaction is primarily digital.

But should we look at this as a positive or negative change? Will human interaction strengthen or suffer as a result of new communication technologies? In this article we will explore the good, the bad, and the ugly truth of technology's impact on social interaction.

THE GOOD

There is no denying that the internet has had a positive impact on human communication. Compared to pre-internet times, we are now more connected than ever before. Here are some of the ways that technology has a positive effect on social interaction.
Instant global communication
Most of us now have the means to contact people on the other side of the world immediately. No waiting for the postman, messenger pigeon, or message in a bottle-technology has broken down the communication barriers that distance once presented. It is a phenomenon that is commonly referred to as globalization.
Virtual connections
Video calling apps like Skype and Zoom mean people can now experience emotional connections without having to be in the same room. This has been especially important throughout the coronavirus crisis, where families from separate households were forced to stay apart. The day the UK lockdown was announced, Zoom was downloaded 2.13m times around the world-up from 56,000 a day two months earlier.
Online dating
Technology has also made finding love much easier, with online dating increasing in popularity. A report released last year predicted that more than 50% of couples will meet online by 2035. The same report found 47% of people believe online dating makes it easier for introverted people to find love.
Barrier-free interaction
Similarly, people who would otherwise have limited social interaction now have the option to be part of online communities. People with disabilities can forget about their physical boundaries inside a video game universe, while socially anxious people can gain confidence by practicing interaction over the internet instead of face to face. Sending messages allows people the time to process information and formulate a response, whereas face to face is more immediate. On the other hand, this isn't always a good thing.

THE BAD

Some would argue that the more anonymous and less immediate interaction associated with digital communication is bad news. Behind the screens of smartphones and the keyboards of computers, there are also more chances for deception-particularly for vulnerable people. Here are some of the ways the technology has a negative impact on social interaction.
Decreased human contact
More and more people are beginning to rely on technology to communicate with their loved ones, friends and associates. The coronavirus lockdown that forced millions of people to work from home also accelerated online communication tools-meaning we get even less human contact than ever before.

As remote working becomes the norm, transactional processes are automated with self-service machines too. The increase in the use of technology to communicate could also cause a rise in loneliness, especially among elderly people who may rely on these transactional encounters as their primary source of social contact.
A rise in bullying
Technology has also made cyberbullying possible, and children are now particularly vulnerable to harassment online. While cyberbullying is a worry for children, it is also becoming a common challenge among adults too. Results from a YouGov poll conducted last year showed that a quarter of adults have experienced cyberbullying. Given the disheartening rise in suicide among victims of cyberbullying, it is clear to see that technology is not always a healthy source of social interaction.
Online deception
Catfishing is the practice of creating a fake online identity with intent to manipulate, stalk, or abuse a specific victim. It has become a scarily common activity among dating sites and social media platforms and is the subject of a popular MTV reality TV show. A 2018 survey saw 9% respondents say that being catfished had affected their mental health.
A platform for predators
Technology has also provided a platform for online predators to pursue their victims. And as UK schools closed during the coronavirus lockdown, children were on their devices a lot more often and faced with a sudden drop in social interaction. While there is not yet any overwhelming evidence to suggest the pandemic caused an increase in predatory activity online, The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) has said reports to their CyberTipline increased by 106% during the first months of the pandemic.

The ugly truth

Whether we see it in a positive or negative light, or even a mixture of the two, the truth of the matter is that technology has had a huge impact on the way we communicate with each other. While it allows us to make instant connections with people on the other side of the world, it also puts us at risk of loneliness, as well as new forms of harassment and manipulation.

But as new technologies are unveiled to the world, new laws and safety measures are likely to be put in place too. These aren't likely to protect everyone from the negative effects of technology, but it also rests on our own shoulders to use the internet with caution. Equally, it is our own responsibility to ensure we get enough real-life human contact in our daily lives, in addition to digital social interaction.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How Has Technology Affected Social Interaction? - SoGoSurvey Blog

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The world is becoming increasingly digital. We do our shopping online, build our businesses online, spend our downtime online, and even make life-long friends online. As of July 2020, 59 percent of the global population were active internet users. Bringing us closer to commodities, the internet is set to become an even bigger part of our lives.

# data[].attributes.body
C- This article was posted and medically reviewed on the 25th of February, 2020.
R- This information listed on the article is the counterclaim to my main subject. It lists the negative effects of technology and social interactions contrasted to the positive effects.

A- The article was written by Jon Johnson and medically reviewed by Timothy J. Legg.
A- The information is against my claim by proving the negative effects of technology and social interactions where as the pro-articles proved the good effects.
P- The purpose of the information is to list the positive but also the negative effects of social interactions with technology.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
People are more connected than ever, thanks in large part to rapid advancements in technology.

While some forms of technology may have made positive changes in the world, there is evidence for the negative effects of technology and its overuse, as well.

Social media and mobile devices may lead to psychological and physical issues, such as eyestrain and difficulty focusing on important tasks. They may also contribute to more serious health conditions, such as depression.

The overuse of technology may have a more significant impact on developing children and teenagers.

In this article, learn about the psychological and physical health effects of technology, as well as how to create healthful habits with technology and avoid overuse.

Overuse or dependence on technology may have adverse psychological effects, including:

Isolation

Technologies, such as social media, are designed to bring people together, yet they may have the opposite effect in some cases.

A 2017 study in young adults aged 19-32 years found that people with higher social media use were more than three times as likely to feel socially isolated than those who did not use social media as often.

Finding ways to reduce social media use, such as setting time limits for social apps, may help reduce feelings of isolation in some people.

Depression and anxiety

The authors of a 2016 systematic review discussed the link between social networks and mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety.

Their research found mixed results. People who had more positive interactions and social support on these platforms appeared to have lower levels of depression and anxiety.

However, the reverse was also true. People who perceived that they had more negative social interactions online and who were more prone to social comparison experienced higher levels of depression and anxiety.

So, while there does appear to be a link between social media and mental health, a significant determining factor is the types of interactions people feel they are having on these platforms.

Technology use may increase the risk of physical issues as well, including:

Eyestrain

Technologies, such as handheld tablets, smartphones, and computers, can hold a person's attention for long periods. This may lead to eyestrain.

Symptoms of digital eyestrain can include blurred vision and dry eyes. Eyestrain may also lead to pains in other areas of the body, such as the head, neck, or shoulders.

Several technological factors may lead to eyestrain, such as:

screen time

screen glare

screen brightness

viewing too close or too far away

poor sitting posture

underlying vision issues

Taking regular breaks away from the screen may reduce the likelihood of eyestrain.

Anyone regularly experiencing these symptoms should see an optometrist for a checkup.

The 20-20-20 rule for digital viewing

When using any form of digital screen for longer periods of time, the American Optometric Association recommend using the 20-20-20 rule.

To use the rule, after every 20 minutes of screen time, take a 20-second break to look at something at least 20 feet away.

Doing this may help reduce the strain on the eyes from staring at a screen for a continuous period.
Learn more about the 20-20-20 rule in this article.
Poor posture

The way many people use mobile devices and computers may also contribute to incorrect posture. Over time, this may lead to musculoskeletal issues.

Many technologies promote a "down and forward" user position, meaning the person is hunched forward and looking down at the screen. This can put an unnecessary amount of pressure on the neck and spine.

A 5-year study in the journal Applied Ergonomics found an association between texting on a mobile phone and neck or upper back pain in young adults.

The results indicated the effects were mostly short term, though some people continued to have long-term symptoms.

However, some studies challenge these results.

A in the European Spine Journal found that the posture of the neck while texting made no difference in symptoms such as neck pain.

This study concluded that texting and "text neck" did not influence neck pain in young adults. However, the study did not include a long-term follow-up.

It may be that other factors influence neck pain, as well, such as age and activity levels.

Correcting posture problems while using technology may lead to an overall improvement in posture and strength in the core, neck, and back.

For example, if a person finds themselves sitting in the same position for hours at a time, such as sitting at a desk while working, regularly standing or stretching may help reduce strain on the body.

Additionally, taking short breaks, such as walking around the office every hour, may also help keep the muscles loose and avoid tension and incorrect posture.
Learn more about how to stay active and in good posture at work with this article.
Sleep problems

Using technology too close to bedtime may cause issues with sleep. This effect has to do with the fact that blue light, such as the light from cell phones, e-readers, and computers, stimulates the brain.

Authors of a 2014 study found that this blue light is enough to disturb the body's natural circadian rhythm. This disturbance could make it harder to fall asleep or lead to a person feeling less alert the next day.

To avoid the potential impact of blue light on the brain, people can stop using electronic devices that emit blue light in the hour or two before bedtime.

Gentle activities to wind down with instead, such as reading a book, doing gentle stretches, or taking a bath, are alternatives.

Reduced physical activity

Most everyday digital technologies are sedentary. More extended use of these technologies promotes a more sedentary lifestyle, which is known to have negative health effects, such as contributing to:

Finding ways to take breaks from sedentary technologies may help promote a more active lifestyle.

Other forms of technology may help, however.

Research from 2017 indicates that active technologies, such as app notifications, emails, and wearable technologies that promote exercise may reduce short-term sedentary behavior.

This could help people set healthful patterns and become more physically active.

Children's brains are still developing and may be more sensitive to the effects of technology and its overuse than adult brains.

A 2018 review of various studies noted the possible adverse effects of children using different technologies.

Children who overuse technology may be more likely to experience issues, including:

low academic performance

lack of attention

low creativity

delays in language development

delays in social and emotional development

physical inactivity and obesity

poor sleep quality

social issues, such as social incompatibility and anxiety

aggressive behaviors

addiction to these technologies

The research also noted the importance of teaching children to interact with these technologies in healthful ways by monitoring their time using them and providing interesting alternatives.

Additionally, a study of teenagers aged 15-16 found that those who had high digital media use had an increased chance of developing symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

This does not mean that digital media use causes ADHD, rather that there is an association between the two. More research needs to determine what this association means.

The authors of 2015 research found that technology appears to negatively affect the overall health of children and teenagers of all ages. Researchers noted the importance of parents and caregivers controlling screen time in all children.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommend children under 18 months old avoid screen time altogether, while 2-5-year-olds have no more than 1 hour a day of high-quality viewing with an adult.

The recent boom in technology has changed the average American lifestyle. While technology has many positive effects, there are some possible risks.

Anyone uncertain about the effects that technology has on them may want to take steps to cut back on their use of devices and screen time and re-evaluate how they feel with and without these devices.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Negative effects of technology: Psychological, social, and health

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
People are more connected than ever, thanks in large part to rapid advancements in technology. While some forms of technology may have made positive changes in the world, there is evidence for the negative effects of technology and its overuse, as well.

# data[].attributes.body
C-  The article and information was posted in presumably 2008.
R- The information relates to my topic by showing averages in use by different activities and social interactions.
A- HumanKinetics, Salaway, Caruso, and Nelson, 2008.
A- It both supports and goes against my claim. It shows that there is high usage in younger groups and increasingly lower uses in adults (2008),
P-. The purpose of this is to list the social interactions and positive activities to support my article.

# data[].attributes.body
C-
R-
A-
A-
P-

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Effect of Technology on Social Interaction | Kaitlin Kramer | TEDxOakKnollSchool

# data[].attributes.body
C -
R -
A -
A -
P -