# data[].attributes.body
This case is accusing W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods of contaminating the water supply. They are accusing us of not properly disposing our waste despite their lack of data and evidence. This case is linking our company to the rise of leukemia cases in children in Woburn. We would like to emphasize that there is no probable cause  and that there is lack of evidence connecting these chemicals to our company.

# data[].attributes.body
W.R Grace Company and Beatrice Foods were clearly negligent in deposing their waste, which led to the widespread contamination of drinking water and led to several innocent Woburn families falling ill with Leukemia. We encourage the Jury to take appropriate action against these firms for their gross negligence, which would encourage better foresight and responsibility for both these firms and other potential violators.

# data[].attributes.body
W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods have disregarded their civil duty causing several local children to lose their lives. The chemicals used for their tannery were improperly disposed of into the water which is the same water that is ingested in the homes of many community members. This water was contaminated with a high level of carcinogens which can be traced back to the chemicals used by W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods. It is these same carcinogens found in the water that can be connected to the deaths of these families loved ones. It is time they are held accountable for the killing of innocent children.

# data[].attributes.body
This case is about whether or not there is correlation between the drinking water and the harm caused to the residents of Woburn. There is no proof that the chemical waste from our products is the causation of the harm done to the residents.

# data[].attributes.body
This case is telling people that W.R Grace and Beatrice Food's chemicals infected the town's water and made the children sick. There is no proof that our chemicals had any relation to the sickness that befell the children. There is simply not enough evidence to sustain the claim that our chemicals were cause of the illness of the children of Woburn.

# data[].attributes.body
This case is about whether W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods used and improperly disposed of toxic chemicals which got in the drinking water source, in turn causing the victims to be sick with cancer. The court should rule in our favor because the companies are directly at fault for the victims’ cancer by dumping these harmful toxins into the water. Losing this case would dismiss the negligence of W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods and disregard the long-term damages done to victims in the form of illness. This also would set a precedent that other corporations can get away with this type of action without any repercussions.

# data[].attributes.body
group 1 votes for group 2 because that had the best explanation of the case facts and were able to add information about corporate social responsibility

# data[].attributes.body
group 2 votes because plays on emotion well and is concise

# data[].attributes.body
Group 5 picked this case theory because there was good evidence and was also worded very well.

# data[].attributes.headline
group 6 votes for group 2 because they had the most compelling argument and best explanation 

# data[].attributes.subject
group 6 votes for group 2 because they had the most compelling argument and best explanation 

# data[].attributes.body
group 2 votes because its concise but gets all necessary info across

# data[].attributes.headline
group 4 votes because of the facts they used that tie together the argument

# data[].attributes.subject
group 4 votes because of the facts they used that tie together the argument

# data[].attributes.headline
group 6 votes for group 5 because they do the best job explaining that there is a lack of proof connecting the evidence 

# data[].attributes.subject
group 6 votes for group 5 because they do the best job explaining that there is a lack of proof connecting the evidence 

# data[].attributes.headline
group 4 votes lack of evidence we think is a strong point 

# data[].attributes.subject
group 4 votes lack of evidence we think is a strong point 

# data[].attributes.body
group 1 votes for group 6 due to a better job further explaining and using professional language

# data[].attributes.headline
group 3 votes because they constructed a well written and nearly flawless argument

# data[].attributes.subject
group 3 votes because they constructed a well written and nearly flawless argument

# data[].attributes.headline
group 3 votes due to a very detailed and well written argument for what they had to work with

# data[].attributes.subject
group 3 votes due to a very detailed and well written argument for what they had to work with