# data[].attributes.body
Student Book, Page-45

# data[].attributes.body
Personally for me, I think the first suggestion is a problem since sometimes most parents doesn't have the time for cook lunch for the students and they should take money to buy themselves lunch, but not much. Only the necessary amount. Mobile phones can be banned since most of the time if you want to use your device for research, you'd mostly use a tablet or a laptop. mobile phones should only be used for communication purposes with student parents. The best way to prevent crime would be to hire more security and more cctvs. And a good idea would be a metal detector for it to detect weapons.

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

I personally think that your article was outstanding. I loved the points you showed us and how much thought went in there. However, I do disagree the the suggestions you have created. Let me tell you why.

I personally dislike the idea of prohibiting students to from bringing money or their phones, as students become more reliant on devices like laptops or phones. Phones are often used by students to do research, to work on a project, or to communicate with their parents while at school, and I think that taking all that away severely cripples a student's ability to work efficiently in the higher levels of school. Prohibiting bringing money is also a questionable move, as students use said money to buy their lunch. Without the money, students would not have any lunch.

I have 3 ideas of my own to lower the crime rate in schools. The first one is to prohibit students from bringing in lethal objects. The second one is to hire more security guards to take care of any student with ill intent. The security guards could also alert the teachers about any problems. The final one is to educate the students about the repercussions of serious crimes. This will persuade the students to not commit crimes.

Best of luck,

APM

# data[].attributes.body
I recently came across an article in your paper discussing prevention of crime among schools. Some of the suggested solutions included precluding students from stealing money or cellular phones. While I know that this would be done with the best intentions, I personally think it is a recommendation with both strengths and weaknesses in need of a thorough analysis.

Ethan

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Mr.Editor,

I don't think we need to take away money and phones from the students. I think it's unnecessary because we are invading the students privacy and they would not like it.

There are better ways to prevent crime at school,then taking away students phones and money. We can try putting cameras around the school in unusual places so if there are thieves or bad people we will catch them red handed because they won't expect cameras in places where they shouldn't be.

In conclusion, I think teachers shouldn't take away money and phones form the students because it's a way of invading their personal space and privacy.

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

I have recently read an article in a magazine about preventing crime at school for young people. You made some amazing points and I agree to with most of them.

However, the idea of taking money in schools doesn't sit well with me. In my view, nobody would bring a huge amount of money which can (encourage committing) commit crime at school and plus schools probably have rules about how much students can bring to school. As for banning mobiles phones, phones are not allowed to be used at school as it they can be a disturbance at certain periods but there are times where when students need to do research would be the exception.

To my mind, giving education on crime with their its consequences and how to prevent them would be a good idea. As well as some improvements on things such as a more intense security system would help the students to be more aware of their actions and intentions.

In conclusion, before taking any action on this subject, it's important to make sure the ways of prevention are effective and everyone will cooperative in this. This way, it will leave a result which can make a good change.

Yours truly,

Nadi

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

I read your recent article on preventing crime in school and noted especially the proposal to prohibit students from carrying mobile phones and money. I understand where you are coming from with this issue, yet I don’t think this is a solution.

In my view, phones should be only used in situations of emergency. Instead of banning these items, schools can have tighter security measures such as CCTV cameras, monitoring by teachers, and secure lockers. Educating students on crime prevention would be more effective in ensuring safety.

To sum up, banning money and phones is more of a problem than a solution. Security and awareness are what need to be stressed in school and not restrictions.

Yours sincerely,

Moe Phyu

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

I recently read your article about crime in schools, and it caught my interest because school safety is an important issue that affects all students. While I understand the concern about crime, I believe that banning money and phones is not the right solution. Instead of restricting these necessities, we should focus on finding better ways to prevent crime while ensuring students’ safety and convenience.

In my opinion, banning money and phones in schools is not a good approach because students need them for emergencies. Phones allow us to stay in contact with our families, ensuring our safety, especially if we have to go home alone or face unexpected situations. Additionally, money is necessary for buying food, transportation, and other essentials. Removing these items does not stop crime; instead, it makes life more difficult for students.

A more effective way to prevent crime in schools is to provide students with more engaging activities, such as art clubs and extracurricular programs. If students have creative and productive outlets, they will be less likely to engage in harmful behaviors. Keeping students busy with positive activities can also reduce distractions in class, creating a better learning environment.

In conclusion, banning money and phones is not the right solution to school crime. Instead, schools should focus on providing meaningful activities to keep students engaged and reduce negative behaviors. I hope schools will consider these approaches to create a safer and more enjoyable learning environment for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

I was interested to read the article in your last issue about preventing crime at school. I would say that I agree most your points and ideas, but one of the suggestions intrigued me. It was about banning taking money or mobile phones at school and so I want to talk about it.

Personally, I think banning money and phones should not be a thing at schools. Both of there things are necessities for students and I think both of them should be allowed in schools. For instance, some students don't get to eat breakfast and that means that they need to buy food for lunch at school and money is the only way to do so. Also, most parents are concerned about their child's safety so bringing a phone to school would be the best way to contact their child from far away. Another thing to mention is that these items don't necessarily cause violence. Because of this, I believe that it's fine to bring money and a mobile phone to school.

# data[].attributes.body
I was interested to read the article in your last issue about preventing crime at school. While I understand the reasoning behind banning mobile phones and money, I do not believe this is the best solution. In my view, such a ban would not only inconvenience students but also wouldn’t really fix the real reasons why crime happens at school.

# data[].attributes.body
dear editor

I was disappointed in your suggestions on school crime. I think you can't solve this problem just by taking away their belongings.

I also think that you are not familiar with this generation. You should learn more about it before giving us advice.

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

While I was taking a look at a magazine, something compelling caught my eye. I saw an article, and I was super interested to read this useful article which is very essential to everyone (including me). Your article for young people on the subject of ways to prevent crime to school.

In my view, banning students to bring money isn't actually important at all. If it's a large amount of money, then I think this suggestion is useful. Although, banning students to not bring money may produce problems and issues. Because for some students, they may not have their parents (for some reasons, like they are at work), the children's parents mightn't be able to prepare lunch for their children, so they may give their children money to buy lunch at school or some snacks that may make their stomachs full. I think this is very important. For banning phones, I don't really think it would prevent crime at all. Phones don't affect students' mind to commit crimes. Phones may harm children's mental health and brain, but to my mind, I don't think we need to do this. Moreover, children can contact to their friends, relatives and friends by using phones. Because of this, this option to ban phones isn't very necessary.

Well, there are some ways to prevent crime at school. The school technical team should put CCTV cameras in

common areas, such as hallways, cafeterias, classrooms and playing fields.

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

I was interested to read the article in your last issue entitled "Ways to prevent crime at school". I agree with many suggestions, but one of the suggestions can be either a good or bad idea depending on the situation.

In my view, taking money or mobile phones aren't serious problems for the crimes however big amount of money can be dangerous as there might be pickpocketing between students and cause the school crime. Therefore, I think a better way to prevent crimes that are caused by money is to slightly ban money, like the rule "The money amount more than 5000ks isn't allowed to be brought to school.". We should ban mobile phones as well since we come to school to learn.

There are many other ways to prevent school crimes. We can stop the crimes with safety devices like CCTV or a security guard, which are a must, as we can know what is happening. We should check students bags as well before going into the school for safety. If the principal of the school doesn't want any serious problems, he or she should set rules that are strict enough, such as students not being allowed to stay on campus after school or students engaging in physical altercations, including fighting or threats of violence, will face immediate suspension or expulsion. Both teachers and parents are responsible, so they should also teach good manners to the children and watch their behavior carefully to prevent them from committing any crimes.

In conclusion, all those people who are in educational fields are responsible for the crimes at school, as they have to try their best to prevent any crimes from happening, as it is important to protect our world.

Yours sincerely,

Poe Thitkwa

# data[].attributes.body
Dear Editor,

I was interested to read the article in your last issue about preventing crime at school. While I understand the reasoning behind banning mobile phones and money, I do not believe this is the best solution. In my view, such a ban would not only inconvenience students but also wouldn’t really fix the real reasons why crime happens at school.

In my opinion, banning these items will not stop crime but may lead to other problems. Most parents worry about their child's safety, so having a phone is important for communication. Also, these items do not directly cause violence, so I think students should be allowed to bring them. Instead of making such rules,schools should focus on better security, like adding cameras and checking who enters the school. Educating students on the consequences of crime would also help prevent bad behavior.

Instead of making rules about personal belongings, schools should encourage respect and responsibility. Because of this, when students understand the importance of following rules, crime is less likely to happen.

To conclude, schools need to protect students, and students need to respect school rules. This way, everybody wins.

Yours sincerely,

Thaw Zin