# data[].attributes.body
By : Farhan , Syamim , Naviin

State that follow Act 672

Johor

Melaka

Nogori Sembilan

Wilayah KL and Putrajaya

Kedah

Perlis

State that not follow Act 672

Penang

Perak

Selangor

Kelantan

Terengganu

Sabah

Sarawak

Labuan

Difference between Act 672 and Act 171 ?

Act 672:

-Centralized and standardized collection managed by the federal government through licensed contractors.

-Waste collection tends to be more uniform and regulated, with modern practices and oversight by SWCorp.

Act 171:

-Decentralized collection managed by local authorities.

-The approach can vary significantly across municipalities, with some local councils using more traditional or varied methods for waste collection.

Name solid waste companies and which act they follow ?

Alam flora cover areas such as Selangor, Kelantan, Terengganu but at Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya, and Pahang uses act 672

Link Provided for further information: https://alamflora.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Alam-Flora-Green-Financing-Framework.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
by : firza ys teoh

672

pahang

perlis

kedah

n9

kl

putrajaya

melaka

johor

labuan

171

kelantan

penang

terengganu

selangor

perak

local

sabah

sarawak

672 vs 171

672 federal 171 local

672 solid waste 171 general waste

companies (act)

alam flora 672

swm environment 672

e-idaman 672

kdeb waste management 171

vision group 171

cwm group 171

# data[].attributes.body
by: Arif irfan , Nishad Hussain , Izzudin , Hazrie Hakimi

state under ACT 672:

kuala lumpur

melaka

johor

wilayah labuan

wilayah putrajaya

negeri sembilan

pahang

perlis

kedah

state not under ACT 672:

selangor (ACT 171)

kelantan (ACT 171)

terengganu (ACT 171)

perak (ACT 171)

sabah (local goverment ordinate 1961)

sarawak (loca authorities ordinance 1996)

Name of solid waste company and Act they follow:

-Alam Flora Sdn Bhd

-Act 672

# data[].attributes.body
Nisda, Alia, Hidayu, Ain Natasha

States under Act 672

-KL,Putrajaya, Labuan

- Johor

- Melaka

-Negeri Sembilan

-Pahang

-Perlis

-Kedah

States under Act 171

-Selangor

-Penang

-Perak

-Terengganu

-Kelantan

-Sabah

- Sarawak

Differences between Act 672 and Act 171

1. Scope of Application:

• Act 672 deals only with solid waste management and public cleansing at the federal level. It was created to make waste management the same across Peninsular Malaysia and Federal Territories, taking this job away from local councils and giving it to federal agencies like SWCorp.

• Act 171 is a general law that controls how local governments work. It covers a wide range of services, including waste management. Before Act 672, local councils used to handle waste management.

2. Authority and Control:

• Act 672 gives the federal government, through SWCorp, the power to manage waste and cleaning services in states that have agreed to follow this act. This ensures the same standards for managing waste everywhere.

• Act 171 allows local governments to manage public services, including waste collection, in states that do not follow Act 672. In these areas, local councils are still in charge of waste management.

Solid Waste Companies

Penang Green Council (Act 171)

Alam Flora Sdn. Bhd. (Act 672)

SWM Environment Sdn Bhd. (Act 672)

# data[].attributes.body
By: Alia, Diana, Aizah, Izzah, Nisa'

States thay follow Act 672- Putrajaya, N. Sembilan,Kedah, Perlis, KL , Johor

Do not follow Act 672, they will follow Act 171 - Penang, Perak , Kelantan, Selangor.

Differences between Act 672 and other Act 171

ACT 672

Solid waste management and public cleansing

Under federal control in Peninsular Malaysia and federal territories.

Collection , disposal, and treatment of solid waste: public cleansing.

ACT 171

Under local government and states

Full control on public services, including waste.

Urban planning, public health, local infrastructure.

Name of Solid Waste Companies and Act they follow

ACT 672

Environment Idaman

SWM Environment

Alam Flora

ACT 171

MBSP

MDK

MDPT

# data[].attributes.body
Farhana, Whiteney, Khadijah

A.

State under Act 672

1. Perlis

2. Kedah

3. Kuala Lumpur

4. Putrajaya

5. Negeri Sembilan

6. Melaka

7. Johor

8. Pahang

State that is not under Act 672

1. Penang

2. Kelantan

3. Terengganu

4. Selangor

5. Sabah

6. Sarawak

7. Perak

B.

They implemented under Act 171

C.

Differences between Act 672 and other acts:

1. Act 672 centralized under JPSPN while Act 171 handled by local authorities in each state.

2. Act 672 implemented separation of solid waste at the source into recyclables and non-recyclables.

D.

Solid waste company

1. Alam Flora (Act 672)

2. SWM Environment Sdn Bhd (Act 672)

3. E-Idaman Sdn Bhd (Act 672)

# data[].attributes.body
By: Nabilah, Asyikin, Zulaikha, Niesya

1. Under Act 672- Kedah, Pahang, Negeri Sembilan, Melaka, Johor, Perlis, Kuala Lumpur

Not under Act 672 - Kelantan, Terengganu, Perak, Pulau Pinang, Sabah, Sarawak, Selangor

2. -Local Government Act 1976 (Act 171) - Pulau Pinang, Selangor, Kelantan, Terengganu, Perak

-State-Specific Laws (Sarawak Local Authorities Ordinance 1996)

-State-Specific Laws (Sabah Local Government Ordinance 1961)

3. Act 672

- Centralized under the federal government

- Services are privatized under federal contracts

- ⁠Standardized federal enforcement by SWCorp

- ⁠Broad, includes waste collection, cleansing, recycling

- ⁠Federally subsidized, uniform waste disposal fees

- ⁠Federal emphasis on sustainability, recycling

Act 171

- Decentralized, managed by local councils

- ⁠Local authorities may or may not privatize services

- ⁠Localized enforcement by local councils, varies across states

- Varies by local authority, may lack centralized recycling

- ⁠Funded by local governments, with variable fees

- ⁠Dependent on local government initiatives

4. Solid Waste Management Companies and Relevant

Acts:

- Alam Flora Sdn Bhd

Area of Operation: Kuala Lumpur, Pahang, Putrajaya

Relevant Act: Akta 672 (Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Act 2007)

- SWM Environment Sdn Bhd

Area of Operation: Johor, Melaka, Negeri Sembilan

Relevant Act: Akta 672

- E-Idaman Sdn Bhd

Area of Operation: Kedah, Perlis

Relevant Act: Akta 672

Trienekens Sdn Bhd

Area of Operation: Sarawak

Relevant Act: Akta 171 (Local Government Act 1976) – Sarawak does not adopt Akta 672

- PPSPPA (Perbadanan Pengurusan Sisa Pepejal dan Pembersihan Awam)

Area of Operation: Federal-level (Regulator under Jabatan Pengurusan Sisa Pepejal Negara - JPSPN)

Relevant Act: Akta 672

Penang Green Council

Area of Operation: Penang

Relevant Act: Akta 171 – Penang does not adopt Akta 672

- KDEB Waste Management

Area of Operation: Selangor

Relevant Act: Akta 171 – Selangor does not adopt Akta 672

# data[].attributes.body
Members: Nurain Rasyidah, Aina Farzana, Siti Katyjah, Hana Khalilah, Aien Quzaima

# data[].attributes.body
By: Alia Adrina, Aina Farzana Faizal, Nur Aishah

State under the act 672

-Kuala Lumpur

-Putrajaya

-Johor

-Melaka

-Negeri Sembilan

-Pahang

-Perlis

-Kedah

Do not follow act 672 (follow Act 171)

-Penang

-Selangor

-Kedah (partially)

-Perak

-Terengganu

-Kelantan

Difference Act 672 and Act 171

Act 672

-follow federal government through the National Solid Waste Management Department and Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Management Corporation (SWCorp)

-Private Company (Alam Flora and Environment Idaman)

-funded by federal government

Act 171

-under the control of the state and local authorities ( MBSP,MBPP and MBSA)

-funded by local authorities

Name of solid waste company and act they follows

ACT 171

Majlis Bandaraya Seberang Perai

Majlis Bandaraya Pulau Pinang

Majlis Bandaraya Shah Alam

Act 672

Alam Flora

SWM Environment

Environment Idaman