# data[].attributes.body
i think it was cinda who killed bunny because she wanted a good story to post on her podcast

# data[].attributes.body
i think it was mabel because she knew so much about how bunny was killed

# data[].attributes.body
I believe it is Cinda Canning from the script we read (but personally I watched the show this is extracted from and it's the assistant of Cinda Canning) becuase they suspected it was her from the beginning and she needed a story for her podcast

# data[].attributes.body
I don't really care who killed bunny but I think other people might care because it is human instinct to want to know.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it's Mabel because she has a lot of details about Bunny's death for a young woman just interested in Arconia's history.

# data[].attributes.body
its mabel she gave lots of undisclosed details that no witness would've known

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mabel killed bunny; she had an obsession with the Arconia, this provides and excuse for her to potentially have knowledge to all of the secret passageways which she stipulated in her elaboration

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mabel or Howard because they both seem to know a little to much and Howard was very dramatic.

# data[].attributes.body
in the case, most people are blaming cinda.

Because of her preoccupation with the Arconia, which gives her an excuse to perhaps know about all the hidden tunnels she mentioned in her explanation, I think Mabel killed bunny.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Mrs. Gambolini killed bunny. In the whole script, he only makes a noise once. This silence would raise suspicions because it would be scared to be caught. Noone will know it is him because he is just a parrot

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Howard killed Bunny since they seemed to be way too dramatic for someone who was just their neighbour , besides he lived next to bunny and could have easily killed Bunny at any time.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm going to accuse Mabel because she knows everything about the Arconia which she has stated in the script, she knows there is a secret passage way

# data[].attributes.body
The director keeps the audience engaged by keeping it dramatic and funny at the same time while also intriguing the audience with the mystery of the killer

# data[].attributes.body
Niveen thinks maple was the one who killed bunny because she kept making assumptions and she knows so much about it.
Lourdes thinks that Lester is the killer as a doorman can access anywhere in the Arconia. Bunny could have threatened to fire him thus giving him a motive.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is Mabel because she knows exactly what happened in detail. Mabel also seems to know a lot about Arconia.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mabel killed bunny because she gave a lot of information and kept making assumptions.

# data[].attributes.body
I consider that Mabel is the one that could have killed Bunny, my evidence to this is that when Mabel first talked she theorised all the steps that the killer took to have a successful murder, but it could also be Cinda Canning, a reason could be that she needed a story for her podcast

# data[].attributes.body
The Director keeps the Audience losing their minds on who did the deed and who the real killer is this the the curiosity of the Audience.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was Cinda because she was obsessed with having a good story for her podcast.

# data[].attributes.body
Because in any scenario someone dying is terrible and being murdered is worse so we would want to know who it was, so that person can be held accountable for their actions

# data[].attributes.body
the director uses a lot of dialogue and conflict to distract the audience from a key part of the story.

more_vertical

# data[].attributes.body
I believe it's mabel since she knew too much about the crime, to elaborate she also said unecessary details. She has a weird obsession with history of the hotel.

# data[].attributes.body
They kept us engaged because they left us on a cliffhanger and made it very dramatic.

# data[].attributes.body
he keeps it exilarateing and keeps the reder hooked and want to know more

# data[].attributes.body
The director kept the audience engaged by not telling us who killed bunny and left us with suspense

# data[].attributes.body
I personally don't care but i think it is because it is human instinct to discover the secrets of something.

# data[].attributes.body
I want to know who killed Bunny because the people in the dialogue keep talking about the murderer and seeing how everyone wants to know who killed Bunny I also want to know who killed her.

more_vertical

# data[].attributes.body
Due of her extensive knowledge of how Bunny was murdered, so this is why I believe it was Mabel who killed Bunny

# data[].attributes.body
The director keeps the audience engaged by adding punctuation in the characters dialogue.

# data[].attributes.body
I suspect that Mabel is secretly trying to claim that Cinda is the killer by framing her with details that only she knows about the hotel that way no one can argue with her "secret history facts."

# data[].attributes.body
The director keeps the audience engaged by making the characters point fingers at each other and providing very dramatic dialogue.

# data[].attributes.body
We want the killer to be brought to justice. We want them exposed and locked away before they kill more people.

# data[].attributes.body
The director kept the story engaging when making it have humour and a murder story at the same time.

# data[].attributes.body
We want to know because they posed a question and we want to know the answer, and they left us on a cliffhanger.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it is Charles because how can he just assume that it is Cindy without much evidence. Even though he thinks that Cindy got helped by a crooked Cop and how because if he became a cop, then how could he have helped Cindy kill Bunny. Wasn't he like in duty at night?

# data[].attributes.body
the director makes it interesting, because all the actors are pointing at each other, making accusations. the story is extremely dramatic

# data[].attributes.body
The playright/director keeps the audience engaged by trying to put them in the case, the director also used a very interesting case which would catch the eye of curious readers, the director also didn't give a solution to the problem, so it is discontinued

# data[].attributes.body
The director keeps the audience engaged by ending the story in a cliffhanger. This leaves the audience wanting to know what happens next.

# data[].attributes.body
making most characters dramatic

# data[].attributes.body
The director keeps the audience engaged because of the character's lines and how they try to accuse other people.

# data[].attributes.body
I want to know who killed Bunny because it is a question left unanswered.

# data[].attributes.body
the playwright keeps the audience intrigued in the play by leaving a cliffhanger. This makes the audience anticipated and captivated into the death of the bunny. Additionally, the audience would look into it and could potentially talk to their peers, discovering and exploring each character's backstory to find the killer.

# data[].attributes.body
I would definitely want to know who killed Bunny, because us humans have like an urge or an instinct to know things

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mabel is the killer because she gave more information and detail to what happened

# data[].attributes.body
i think it was cinda who murdered bunny due to her being a famous podcast maker so she more than likely used it for a good story on her show

# data[].attributes.body
This is an interesting story and would like to find out the backstory of this case

# data[].attributes.body
I want to know this so the story won't be left on a cliffhanger or a mystery that won't be solved, so knowing this could conclude the story.

# data[].attributes.body
In my case I usually want to know all the facts in the story, that way once I finish the story I can connect the dots and make a clear opinion on how good the story actually is, therefore the director hides hidden details for the audience to keep on wondering what will happen next by adding a interesting cliff hanger.
*Both Questions Answered Here*

# data[].attributes.body
I generally don't care about it because bunny isn't real and bunny's already dead but it would be important to know so the person who killed bunny go to jail and others might care aswell.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that it could be cinda because she probably wanted a good story that she can tell every little detail about on her podcast, she was also the first suspect from the very start of the story meaning that the others trying to solve the case had a gut instinct it was her cinda. cinda was also acting suspicious as she said that she had never met bunny when lester had logbooks that said she did

# data[].attributes.body
the director keeps the audience engaged by making the characters have all different personalities. the director of the story made most of the characters dramatic but in their own unique ways this makes it much more interesting to read on then having a bunch of characters with the same exact personalities