# data[].attributes.body
Fails to create a valid system of equations or inequalities. Modeling attempts are missing or mostly incorrect. Representations are missing or unrelated.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates a simple or flawed system. Modeling attempts are incomplete or contain significant errors. Representations are inconsistent.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates a basic system of equations or inequalities. Attempts to model the problem through all required representations, but with some inconsistencies or errors.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates an appropriate system of equations or inequalities. Models the problem through a graph, equations/inequalities, and table with minor errors. Representations are mostly consistent.

# data[].attributes.body
Creates a complex, original system of equations or inequalities. Accurately models the problem through a graph, equations, and table. All representations are consistent and precise.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathematical work is fundamentally flawed or missing. Equations, graphs, and tables are incorrect or absent.

# data[].attributes.body
Significant errors in mathematical work. Equations, graphs, or tables are mostly incorrect, leading to an incorrect solution.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathematical work has some errors. Equations, graphs, or tables contain noticeable mistakes that partially affect the solution.

# data[].attributes.body
Most mathematical work is correct. Minor errors in equations, graphs, or tables that do not affect the overall solution.

# data[].attributes.body
All mathematical work is correct. Equations, graphs, and tables are perfectly accurate and solved correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
Fails to adequately describe the problem. Little to no explanation of relevance or solution process. Shows minimal understanding of the task.

# data[].attributes.body
Provides a vague or incomplete description of the problem. Minimal explanation of relevance or solution process, with significant gaps in understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Presents a basic description of the problem. Attempts to explain its relevance and solution process, but lacks depth or clarity in some areas.

# data[].attributes.body
Offers a good description of the problem. Explains its personal relevance to the group and shows a solid understanding of the solution of a system of equations or inequalities and begins to describe the the relationship in context of the variables chosen.

# data[].attributes.body
Provides a clear, detailed description of the problem. Thoroughly explains its personal relevance and demonstrates a deep understanding of a solution for systems of equations and inequalities in context of its variables.

# data[].attributes.body
Lacks creativity and fails to demonstrate a system of equations or inequalities.

# data[].attributes.body
Limited creativity in problem creation.

Real-world application is forced or unclear if choosing a real-world scenario.

Fictional application lacks enough details to understand the problem situation if choosing a fiction scenario.

# data[].attributes.body
Problem shows some creativity. Basic understanding of how systems relate to practical situations, but connections may be lacking, or have misconceptions throughout the problem.

# data[].attributes.body
Creative problem with detailed problem outline. Shows good understanding of how systems of equations/inequalities can be applied to any situation with more than one variable and more than one relationship.

# data[].attributes.body
Highly creative problem with clear application (whether choosing a real world or fictional scenario). Demonstrates exceptional insight into how systems of equations/inequalities are represented.

# data[].attributes.body
Work is extremely disorganized and hard to understand. Graphs and tables are missing or incomprehensible. Written work is unclear or illegible.

# data[].attributes.body
Work is disorganized and difficult to follow. Graphs and tables are messy or incomplete. Written work lacks clarity and detail to math content or explanation.

# data[].attributes.body
Work is generally organized but may have some areas of confusion. Graphs, tables, and written work are legible but could be neater or more clearly presented.

# data[].attributes.body
Work is well-organized and neat. Graphs, tables, and written work are clear with only minor presentation issues. The conclusion section discusses the system adequately.

# data[].attributes.body
Work is exceptionally well-organized, neat, and easy to follow. Graphs are precisely drawn, tables are well-formatted, and written work is clear and goes into depth about the findings of the problem created by the group.