# data[].attributes.body
Whether it be agrotourism, within leadership, or in the healthcare industry, Incorporating new perspectives with the old or using old concepts to enhance the new is a very effective way to improve results, whether that be productivity or tourism

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

leadership styles that are willing to challenge the old way of doing things by incorporating new perspectives is effective

Evidence: “The transformational leadership style had significant positive relationships with employees' work engagement and innovative work behavior,”

In-text Citation:

(Gemenda 2020)

Connection to Claim:

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

Tradition fathers innovation rather than inhibiting it

Evidence: “Tradition can also derive from an old industry sector. Agritourism is able to leverage on ancient buildings that can no longer fulfil its original purpose, and that stayed vacant or neglected for ages”

In-text Citation:

(Palmi 2020)

Connection to Claim: This source shows how Agritourism allows the repurposing of ancient buildings for modern needs, incorporating the benefits from both such as increased demand and meeting modern comforts, allowing the maximum growth of Agritourism

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

Engaging patients in decision-making improves health outcomes

Evidence: “There is clear evidence that working to respectfully encourage patient engagement improves health outcomes and wellbeing for patients.”

In-text Citation: (Krist 2017)

Connection to Claim: This source shows that integrating the patient perspective in healthcare decision making improves outcome and reduces cost, justifying my claim that new perspectives improve outcomes

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

This shows how a multidisciplinary approach also helped the staff, not just the patients.

Evidence:

"Cohesive teamwork improved communication between different levels of healthcare workers, and limited adverse events, improved outcomes, decreased the length of stay (LOS), and yielded greater patient “staff” satisfaction."

In-text Citation:

(Epstein 2014)

Connection to Claim:

This strengthens source 7s connection to the claim of improving patient quality of life by showing how it also helps the staff

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

In clinical rounds a multidisciplinary approach decreases cost and patient recovery time

Evidence:

“Multidisciplinary rounds have evolved to reduce patient mortality, complications, length of stay, and readmissions, and they enhance patient satisfaction and utilization of ancillary services.”

In-text Citation:

(Srinivas 2023)

Connection to Claim: This shows how considering multiple disciplines (with different perspectives) can reduce cost and improve recovery time

# data[].attributes.body
These show how accross multiple perspectives, considering multiple perspectives allude to better results overall, wether it be more thorough research or more effective healthcare, multiple perspectives are very beneficial

# data[].attributes.body
These all show how being unwilling to hear alternative perspectives does not only inhibit progress, but can result in going backwards

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language: Polarization is caused by the intentional formation of a misinterpretation of alternative perspectives

Evidence: “combinations of conditions comprising disinformation, hate speech, censorship and surveillance explain polarization better than an individual condition in isolation.”

In-text Citation: (Vasist 2023)

Connection to Claim: This explains how polarization and the inhibiting of understanding other perspectives aludes to the inhibition of progress, And provides solutions to this problem

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

That multidisciplinary research allows new methods to understand results

Evidence:

“Combining approaches frees research from restrictions of individual approaches allowing for deeper insights.”

In-text Citation:

(Wijermans 2022)

Connection to Claim: This shows how in research combing multiple perspectives allows deeper insights

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

Scientists earlier in their career are more likely to embrace new ideas

Evidence: “papers produced by authors with career age 1–10 are the most likely to reference newer ideas in their papers, authors with career age 11–20 are second most likely, authors in career age 21–30 third most likely, and authors with career age 31–40 least likely.”

In-text Citation: (Packalen 2019)

Connection to Claim: It shows how younger people in science are more likely to embrace new ideas

# data[].attributes.body
Source 5 shows an example of new ideas being added to old ways while Source 6 shows an example of old concepts being used in new ideas in ways that benefit society, Thus showing that the best outcomes come from combining multiple perspectives

# data[].attributes.body
Source 6 mentions how a too-fast pace moving world results in higher stress and that incorporating new ideas reduces it. Another method of reducing customer stress is to engage them in decision-making, as Source 9 mentions within healthcare. Thus, incorporating new ideas helps customers in a variety of industries

# data[].attributes.body
They connect by both demonstrating how the lack of healthy 2 way conversation can inhibit progress, whether it be through reduced productivity, or political polarization

# data[].attributes.body
Reminisence with new perspectives combined results in far better outcomes

# data[].attributes.headline
TRANSITION: CONNECTION FROM CLAIM TO CLAIM

# data[].attributes.subject
TRANSITION: CONNECTION FROM CLAIM TO CLAIM

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 3 focuses on how a multiple perspectives enhance outcome, allowing me to allude in combination with claim 2 to how combining reminiscence and new perspectives improves outcome

# data[].attributes.headline
Main Idea (Thesis): Whether it is a conclusion, resolution, or a solution, this should be the answer your research question.

# data[].attributes.subject
Main Idea (Thesis): Whether it is a conclusion, resolution, or a solution, this should be the answer your research question.

# data[].attributes.body
The best method of change is to combine both reminiscence and new perspectives, building upon what has already been developed, in order to maximize progress

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Reiterate the importance of your problem

2. Restate each of your claims, weaving them together to illustrate your line of reasoning

3.  Reiterate your main idea/thesis

The battle between reminiscence and new perspectives not only inhibits change but also results in society going backwards. This is because nostalgia results in memories of a better past and causes the desire to resist any new perspectives that move farther from the "better past." This directly results in worse results, such as reduced performance in jobs or political polarization to some extent. On the other hand, combining perspectives results in lower healthcare costs and improves the insights of research. In fact, combining a degree of reminiscence and new perspectives increased job productivity and resulted in better patient recovery times.

NOTE: in IWA I will make sure to address a cause of the worsening of this problem as explained in my last 3 sources. This is a framework and is not representative of the sophistication I hope to achieve.

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these sources are examples of how over time, people become resistant to change, one in a workplace context, and one in a research context.

# data[].attributes.headline
TRANSITION: CONNECTION FROM CLAIM TO CLAIM

# data[].attributes.subject
TRANSITION: CONNECTION FROM CLAIM TO CLAIM

# data[].attributes.body
claim two focuses on the conflict between reminiscence and new perspectives and multiple points of evidence, allowing me to allude to how this problem could be fixed: combine multiple perspective instead of using one.

# data[].attributes.headline
TRANSITION: CONNECTION FROM CLAIM TO CLAIM

# data[].attributes.subject
TRANSITION: CONNECTION FROM CLAIM TO CLAIM

# data[].attributes.body
This claim shows how people are stuck focusing on reminiscence rather than new perspectives due to negative implications of nostalgia, preparing me to describe how this phenomenon inhibits progress

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these sources mention the benefit of a multidisciplinary approach within healthcare, however, source 7 emphasizes improvement to patient health while 8 emplesizes improvement to the staff, showing how a multidisciplinary approach helps everyone involved

# data[].attributes.body
Just as combining perspectives in research results in deeper insights and thus better results, a multidisciplinary approach to clinical rounds results in lower patient stay and also has better results. Thus, rather it is in clinical rounds or research, taking a multidisciplinary approach is proven to improve results and potentially reduce cost

# data[].attributes.body
source 13 mentions how polarization occurred and is working within the US and source 14 provides some additional sources of polarization and proposes a few solutions to fix this issue

# data[].attributes.body
The older someone is, whether it be in scientific research, or a company, the more likely they are to resist change

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 connects to source 1 by showing that old people ignoring problems is connected to management not considering employees perspectives as older people believe that “efforts to change will have less positive outcomes” thus they would avoid attempting to find the most effective solution and would rather take the fastest route. This competes with young people who believe in more positive outcomes whom are willing to put in more effort and find the more effective solution. This competition between speed and effectiveness is what “may lead the change implementation effort to failure.”

# data[].attributes.body
How do reminiscence and new perspectives compete to make change?

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

Employees try to resist change, inhibiting growth of a company for the future

Evidence: “The employees either try to slow down the change process or terminate the change effort entirely. Hence, resistance is a leading obstacle in the way of an organization’s efforts for improvement, survival, or adoption of new processes and technology.”

In-text Citation: (Rehman 2021)

Connection to Claim: This provides an example in the workplace of how change can be inhiibited

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language: This source describes how older adults are satisfied with reminiscence and have no reason to want to change

Evidence: “older adults see fewer opportunities for change or believe that their efforts to change will have less positive outcomes”

In-text Citation: (National Research Council)

Connection to Claim: This shows that older people don't see reasons to change as much.

# data[].attributes.body
Combining multiple perspectives causes enhanced results

# data[].attributes.body
Using new perspectives or reminisence, but not both, inhibits results

# data[].attributes.headline
Context + Introduction + Focus (Problem/Issue Statement)

# data[].attributes.subject
Context + Introduction + Focus (Problem/Issue Statement)

# data[].attributes.body
(2-3 sources)  SITUATE your investigation of the complexities of the issue.  Present why this issue/problem is worth investigating, and begin to focus this issue to set up for your main idea.

There is always a conflict between the embrace of new ideas and keeping things the way they are. After all, new things are unpredictable, but reminiscence is safe, but does not result in improvement. This is a never ending battle between the risk to improve and the desire for stability. For example, older adults see fewer opportunities for change (s1) so the risk to improve is not worth it to them. However, young people are more willing to embrace new ideas as they see more things that need to improve as a new perspective. For example, scientists who are earlier in their career or more willing to include new ideas within their paper (s3). this never ending battle between reminiscence and new perspectives results in things becoming worse, rather then better, over time and must be changed.

# data[].attributes.body
reminisence commonly avoids new perspectives

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language: This shows how in a job context, resisting change results in reduced performance

Evidence: “toxic leadership has an effect on job satisfaction and motivation. Similarly, job satisfaction influences employee motivation and performance”

In-text Citation: (Wolor 2022)

Connection to Claim: This is an example of how not “Promoting healthy interactions and two-way communication through promoting collective decision-making and open communication between staff and bosses," or in other words, resisting employee perspectives, inhibits progress.

# data[].attributes.body
Attributive Language:

This source shows how people assume their perspective is intuitive, when it may not be.

Evidence: “Partisans on both sides overestimate the extent to which stories from their news sources were familiar to contrapartisans.”

In-text Citation: (Beattie 2023)

Connection to Claim: This shows how in politics not understanding each others perspective results in polarization and resistance to certain beneficial solutions