# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We've all heard our parents say it; "Look up from your phone every once in a while", "Hey, talk to me don't text", "why are you being so anti-social on your phone?"

Not only our cellphones, but also our laptops, televisions, creations like Facebook and other social media platforms. Are all of these inventions and enhancements in technology making us less social?

Some would say yes. People who lived before the day and age of technology would say people communicated more without these inventions. They ARE partially right. The only difference is their communication was face-to-face, ours is over the internet or some other form of technology. When teens are looking at their phones instead of talking to their parents, usually they are talking to friends, or on social media sites such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. All these are alternate forms of being social, just not face-to-face.

Keith N. Hampton, a Professor at Rutgers University of Communication and Information says technology is enriching our social relationships. Professor Hampton teaches "Yes, some things have changed-but maybe not as much as you might think. Consider 'what a strange practice it is...that a man should sit down to his breakfast table and, instead of conversing with his wife, and children, hold before his face a sort of screen on which is inscribed a world-wide gossip.' These words ring as true today as when they were written, in 1909. They were the observations of one of America's first and most renowned sociologists, Charles Cooley, about how morning delivery of the newspaper was undermining the American family. Thank goodness the scourge of the newsman is in decline."(Hampton). He has studied his students and colleagues and found the students have many more close relationships because of their cellphones and media usage than the older colleagues (Hampton).

In contrast, Professor Larry Rosen, a Psychologist from the University of California State, Dominguez Hills says the opposite. He holds that the multiple relationships we make online are not very fruitful, they aren't really close friends. He believes that technology has forced us to pay less attention to our real world communication and more to online communication. Professor Rosen says, "As a research psychologist, I have studied the impact of technology for 30 years among 50,000 children, teens and adults in the U.S. and 24 other countries. In that time, three major game-changers have entered our world: portable computers, social communication and smartphones. The total effect has been to allow us to connect more with the people in our virtual world-but communicate less with those who are in our real world." (Rosen). Rosen believes we need to put the phones down and technology away and stay focused on our real life communication, even if that means less communication altogether.

What do you think? Is technology making us less social?

Source for all facts:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/is-technology-making-people-less-sociable-1431093491

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
SiOWfa15: Science in Our World: Certainty and Controversy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We've all heard our parents say it; "Look up from your phone every once in a while", "Hey, talk to me don't text", "why are you being so anti-social on your phone?" Not only our cellphones, but also our laptops, televisions, creations like Facebook and other social media platforms. Are all of these inventions and enhancements in technology making us less social?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
LONG BEACH, Calif. - Checking email during meetings. Shopping on your smartphone in the middle of class. Texting at funerals. These are a few of the examples that MIT professor Sherry Turkle offered during her TEDTalk on Thursday, in which she argued that "technology is taking us places we don't want to go."

Turkle, a psychologist who leads MIT's Initiative on Technology and Self, believes that while our constant communication and social media engagement does make us more connected, it's coming at the sacrifice of real conversation.

And she thinks that will have some serious consequences for our relationships, our self-perceptions and our emotions.

One major issue, she said, is that when we text, email or post to a social networking site, we're able to project ourselves as we want to be seen. "We get to edit, we get to delete, and that means we get to retouch."

Inversely, Turkle notes that a face-to-face conversation "takes place in real time and you can't control what you're going to say."

Further, with our phones at our constant disposal, Turkle says we're only paying attention to the things we want to pay attention to. And that leaves us increasingly disconnected from our friends, family and co-workers as we simply turn to our devices when a conversation no longer interests us.

This creates a situation that Turkle said makes us, "expect more from technology and less from each other." In the long run, she thinks technology is ultimately headed towards creating a Siri-like program that can offer "companionship without the demands of friendship."

There's certainly plenty of data that supports Turkle's argument. Surveys showing that we're increasingly texting and social networking during meal time or in the bedroom have become commonplace.

But what's to be done about it? Turkle isn't calling for a return to the dark ages of pre-smartphone life. Rather, she says it's time for us to have a more self-aware relationship with technology. And in turn, we should do things like create sacred places at home and at work where we leave the devices out.

Turkle's remarks drew an emphatic standing ovation from the TED crowd. But we want to know what you think: Does technology threaten the quality of our relationships and personal development, or are such fears an overblown perception of a generation that didn't grow up with digital? Let us know in the comments.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Is Social Media Actually Making Us Less Connected?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
LONG BEACH, Calif. - Checking email during meetings. Shopping on your smartphone in the middle of class. Texting at funerals. These are a few of the examples that MIT professor Sherry Turkle offered during her TEDTalk on Thursday, in which she argued that "technology is taking us places we don't want to go."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Is Technology Making People Less Sociable?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Larry Rosen of California State University believes our online connections are distracting us from real-world relationships. But Keith N. Hampton of Rutgers University says we can both broaden our social horizons and enhance our closest relationships online.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It's something everyone suspected, but now it's official: The under-30 crowd is addicted to their cell phones.

Those are the findings of a new survey, which showed that as millennials spend more time engaged on social media platforms, it's causing them to be less social in real life. The study, conducted by Flashgap, a photo-sharing application with more than 150,000 users, found that 87 percent of millennials admitted to missing out on a conversation because they were distracted by their phone. Meanwhile, 54 percent said they experience a fear of missing out if not checking social networks.

Nearly 3,000 participants were asked about how they felt about social media in social settings, and found that the guiltiest culprits are often females. The study found 76 percent of females check social media platforms at least 10 times when out with friends, compared with 54 percent of males.

The most commonly used apps mentioned in social settings among millennials were Snapchat, Tinder, Facebook, Messenger and Instagram.

Julian Kabab, co-founder of FlashGap said that people are too focused on looking at social media when they're out at events, and it may be costing them in social interaction. "People miss out on parties because they want to see what's going on, on social networks, take beautiful selfies and add filters to their pictures," he told CNBC.

It especially becomes a problem when there is alcohol involved and regrets the next morning. The survey found that 71 percent of users regret posting a picture on a social network after more than three drinks.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How social media is making us less social: Study

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It's something everyone suspected, but now it's official: The under-30 crowd is addicted to their cell phones. Those are the findings of a new survey, which showed that as millennials spend more time engaged on social media platforms, it's causing them to be less social in real life.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
For some, making connections has become easier, but others say that life has become more isolated.

Harrison McClary / Reuters

At a time when Americans can flick a keyboard or swipe a touchscreen to connect with products, people, and information from anywhere in the world, are they in danger of disconnecting from their own communities? With the world at our fingertips, are we losing sight of the places outside of our windows?

The latest Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor Poll makes clear those questions are engaging-and concerning-many Americans as they live through a revolution in communications and computer technology so powerful it has justifiably evoked comparisons to a natural upheaval, like a hurricane.

Most Americans see these cascading changes as a reason for optimism-a bright spot in a sky otherwise clouded with concern over the nation's economy, government, and public- and private-sector leadership. Just over half of those polled in the new survey said the explosion of digital technologies and connectivity has done more to connect than to isolate Americans and will continue to improve their overall quality of life. They also said the changes have created more jobs than they have eliminated. Young people are especially optimistic.

But the survey also found a substantial minority of adults who remain concerned that our ever-increasing reliance on digital technologies is costing jobs, undermining local merchants, fraying communities, disrupting families, and unsettling too many aspects of American life. On many of these questions, concerns about the implications of these pervasive technological changes are greater among older Americans, particularly those with children.

In follow-up interviews, the dominant note for many who were polled was a distinct ambivalence. Respondents young and old recognized problems that the new technologies are creating, even as they celebrated the doors this digital world has opened.

"As far as the negatives go, people seem to be more uninvolved or less gregarious-there's less family time, because most teenagers are involved on their devices, compared to some years ago," said Mark Anderson, a 54-year-old retired car salesman in Greenbelt, Maryland. "For the positives, all of the information is at your fingertips. If there's something you don't know, you can Google it. Or if you need directions, things are a lot easier. Overall, it's positive. I just hope that everyone has equal access to the opportunity-that's the bottom line."

Andrew Kowalski, an 18-year-old in Walla Walla, Washington, is studying to work on wind-power systems. He described a similar ledger, though with more entries in the positive column. "The older generation, they don't really think that technology is great, because it takes away the eye contact and communication from person to person," Kowalski said. "Now it's a lot of technology-to-person instead of face-to-face contact. They see that as hiding behind a phone. I think it's good, though, because you're able to access any information at any time you want."

The latest Heartland Monitor Poll explores Americans' attitudes about the rapid advances in communications and computing that has now made it routine for many millions of Americans to reach for their Internet-connected phones or tablets as their first action in the morning and their last one at night. In particular, the poll explores Americans' views on community in the digital age: how the communications and computing advances have changed the way they connect with friends, family members, and neighbors; and how this is reshaping community life, ranging from where people shop to how they participate in causes they care about.

More From

Over the next week, National Journal and The Atlantic will report the results from the survey, including specific assessments of how Americans are using the new technologies and how they believe it is reshaping our social interactions. In the big picture, the poll finds Americans mostly enthusiastic about these hurtling changes-though with some clear hesitations and consistent divisions along lines of age, income, education, and, at times, partisanship.

Americans returned a mixed verdict on the poll's broadest question: "What effect do you believe the digital revolution has had on the overall quality of life in America?" The share of adults who described the impact as positive (28 percent) was nearly triple the share that viewed it as negative (10 percent). But by far the largest group returned a qualified verdict: 62 percent said the impact had been "mixed, both positive and negative."

Those polled tilted toward more positive assessments on questions that probed specific aspects of the digital transformation. Asked whether the ubiquitous nature of modern communications was doing more to connect or to isolate Americans, 53 percent of adults endorsed the positive statement that "the digital revolution is improving Americans' quality of life by making it easier to keep in touch with like-minded people from around the country and the world, and to buy products from anywhere conveniently." Even so, 39 percent agreed with the more negative assessment that the changes are diminishing "Americans' quality of life by isolating people from their neighbors and local businesses, and by weakening the sense of community in our neighborhoods."

The breakdown was virtually identical on a question that asked whether the digital revolution has benefited all Americans or primarily helped the affluent. In this case, a majority, 55 percent, endorsed the positive view that digital advances have "allowed all Americans, including those in low-income and rural areas, to gain access to information and communications technology that's critical to economic opportunity." Some 38 percent of adults objected that the changes have "been mostly beneficial to Americans with higher incomes who can afford to pay for access to this information and new technology."

By almost exactly the same margin, a majority of those polled expect these benefits to continue in coming years. Fifty-four percent agreed that continuing advances in computing and communications "will improve my quality of life in the future, and [they are] eager to see the new products and services that are emerging." By comparison, 41 percent said they worried "that technological advances are moving too fast and are disrupting too many aspects of our economy and social life."

Some demographic divisions remained consistent across the poll's four central questions. Members of the Millennial generation (born since 1982) were repeatedly the most enthusiastic about these developments. For instance, 60 percent of Millennials said they expected the digital revolution to benefit them in the future, compared with 54 percent of Generation-Xers (born 1965-1981), 50 percent of Baby Boomers (1945-1964), and only 45 percent of respondents in their 70s or older. The breakdown was similar on the question about whether the communications revolution was doing more to connect or to isolate Americans: 60 percent of Millennials took the positive view, compared with 50 percent of Generation-Xers, 52 percent of Baby Boomers, and 49 percent of the oldest respondents.

Shelby Carbin, a 20-year-old civil-engineering student in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, was among the Millennials who expect the digital revolution to keep returning benefits-though she sees the costs accumulating as well. "In some ways, technology has made life a lot easier," she said. "The Internet has given us access to loads and loads of information. Before, you had to go to a library to find that information, but if you didn't live close to a library, you'd have to find out from someone else... It also helps you stay connected with people who live far away. But technology isn't necessarily made available to everybody. Sometimes, technology can become pricey, and not everyone can afford it, so some people are left out of the opportunities. People have also become too attached to it-they feel like they can't function without it."

On several questions, African Americans, sometimes joined by Hispanics, were more enthusiastic about the changes than whites were. While two-thirds of blacks said the digital revolution had improved the way that Americans connect with one another, only 50 percent of whites (and 51 percent of Hispanics) agreed. Both African Americans (64 percent) and Hispanics (60 percent) were more likely than whites (52 percent) to say the changes have benefited all Americans, rather than those with higher incomes. Blacks and Hispanics were also slightly more likely than whites to expect that future technological advances will improve their quality of life (though the difference fell within the poll's margin of error).

Generally, both minorities and whites without a college education were just as enthusiastic about these changes as their counterparts with four-year college degrees or more. The exception: College-educated respondents, both minorities and whites, were much more likely than their non-college brethren to expect benefits from future advances. Across partisan lines, Democrats were more likely than Republicans or Independents to believe that communications advances have already knit Americans together more closely and will provide benefits in the future.

Perhaps not surprisingly, given the concern about the impact of digital technologies on how children interact with family and friends, parents expressed more ambivalence about these changes than childless adults did. While those without children saw the changes as improving the way Americans connect by a lopsided margin, 58 percent to 37 percent, parents split more closely, 51 percent positive to 40 percent negative. (Respondents also felt considerable unease about the specific impact of the communications changes on young people, as a later story in this series will show.)

On questions that specifically assessed the economic impact of the digital revolution, the survey found Americans split even more closely. More respondents said the changes have created more American jobs than they've cost. But only 46 percent voiced this positive view, less than the majority that gave a thumbs-up on other questions about the digital revolution's impact. Thirty-eight percent held the negative view, that technological changes in communications and computers have mostly cost jobs.

On the question of jobs, optimism coincided with youth. Millennials (54 percent positive) and Generation X (52 percent) were much more likely to view the digital revolution as a job-creator than Baby Boomers (just 35 percent) were. The very oldest respondents (49 percent) were nearly as positive as the young.

Two respondents encapsulated this generational divide. Anderson, the 54-year-old retired auto salesman, has seen the pressure that online commerce can exert on retail jobs-on selling cars, say. "You can buy items online so you don't need as much retail personnel," he fears. But Kowalski, the 18-year-old wind-technology student, foresees a steady stream of new jobs. "Anything that has to do with electrical or technological capabilities, there has to be somebody who has to maintain it, so that opens up a job," he said. "It'll be good for younger generations, I'm sure, because of how many jobs will be opening up."

Interestingly, Hispanics (53 percent) and African Americans (50 percent) were more likely than whites (44 percent) to say that the new technologies have mostly created jobs. The white ambivalence reflected a sharp educational divide. College-educated whites, by a solid margin of 50 percent to 34 percent, said they thought digital technology was more likely to create than to eliminate jobs. Whites who didn't go to college saw the downside; more of them said (by 45 percent to 38 percent) that the changes, on balance, have cost jobs.

One of those is Albert Hohn, of Reedsville, Pennsylvania, who dropped out of high school and is now unemployed. He worries that the increased reliance on digital technologies has reduced his job opportunities. "I'm job-searching for something in retail stocking, like a midnight stocker, [but] I think there are less [jobs available to me] because of the technology and the qualifications required for that technology," the 26-year-old said. "I'm one of the few who never got to finish school, and to go back to get a GED for me now with two kids is very hard. I just don't have the time for it. For most of the jobs out there, they want you to have a high school diploma or equivalent."

Poll respondents split almost exactly on a related question: whether the economic gains from the digital gains accrued mostly at home or abroad. While 41 percent of those surveyed said the advances have primarily benefited "the United States, where much of the technology is designed and developed," another 40 percent said the principal beneficiaries have been in "places like China, where most of the technology is manufactured." Ten percent said both have benefited equally.

Millennials (at 51 percent) were far likelier than older generations to believe the United States has mostly benefited from the digital transformation; just 33 percent of generation X, 39 percent of baby boomers, and 40 percent of the oldest respondents concurred. Democrats were more likely than Republicans or independents to see domestic benefits, and African-Americans more likely than whites. But by other criteria, such as education levels, the differences were muted.
Janie Boschma contributed to this article.

Ronald Brownstein is Atlantic Media's editorial director for strategic partnerships.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How Has Technology Changed the Concept of Community?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
For some, making connections has become easier, but others say that life has become more isolated. At a time when Americans can flick a keyboard or swipe a touchscreen to connect with products, people, and information from anywhere in the world, are they in danger of disconnecting from their own communities?