# data[].attributes.body
I will try this with the photo of football players

# data[].attributes.body
I could show my pupils a series of poorly photographed photos and then I could invite them to identify the faults.

# data[].attributes.body
17 din 25

# data[].attributes.body
we are as a schoool have a project on fake news .There are millions of photos like this and not hard to make .my students are already making fake news .

# data[].attributes.body
It;s very interesting test

# data[].attributes.body
Thanks

# data[].attributes.body
We used photoshop at school for a project about our city but it was easy for everyone to undestand the picture had been changed

# data[].attributes.body
It's a very interesting and not easy test.
I think that a photo like this colud be a great start for young children to talk about photoshop.

# data[].attributes.body
Super test! I can't wait to present it to my students! Thanks

# data[].attributes.body
I got 18 of 25, so I guess I am average. I´m going to do this test with my students as soon as possible. I enjoyed it very much! Thank you!

# data[].attributes.body
I got 17 of 25. It is very difficult to distinguish real pictures from retouched images. It is very important to make the pupils understand that what's around us is not real.

# data[].attributes.body
i think to choose stars' photos because they are all photoshopped. I can explain to my pupil how their idols look very unnaturally on magazines

# data[].attributes.body
I found the game very interesting to recognize the photos taken with photoshop. i will ask my student to take real photos and photos with photoshop. we will repeat the game in class trying to develop the critical sense and observation

# data[].attributes.body
25/25

# data[].attributes.body
It was really amazing! I got19 out of 25...It is very difficult to say for sure if something is photoshopped or not. It certainly worth taking this test with the students!

# data[].attributes.body
I got 19/25.

# data[].attributes.body
I got 18/25 so i'm quite happy spotting skills. I'll do this with my students as well and share the results in my diary, it's going to be interesting to see how they perceive images. From this exercise we could continue to the Dove add, it suites well with our current topics in maths (symmetry) and arts (picture manipulation).

# data[].attributes.body
Last november, we could see "the biggest moon" for the latest seventy years. There were a lot of pictures/photos of the moon on the web, but some of the images weren't really the moon, but other things, such as a slice of mortadella. I would use one of these false photos and I would ask my students some questions about the moon and the space while showing it. After some minutes, I would tell them the truth and I would comment on the risks and fakes they can see on the web every day. I think it will be an efficient task that will make them think of the dangers of the Internet.
Source of the image: Twitter-Luna-Astronomia-La_Jungla_170993313_21127191_1706x1280

# data[].attributes.body
I think I should use some pictures of Hollywood stars (photoshopped and not) to show them  the difference. I would use these pictures to introduce the topic of the perception of beauty and the importance of the appearance. This could be a good way to start a debate.

# data[].attributes.body
I THINK THAT IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO DO IT BUT MAYBE NEXT TIME I WILL BE ABLE.... THE MORE THE BETTER

# data[].attributes.body
I'm a very bad observer :ç

# data[].attributes.body
I thought I had good observation skills, but with the test I realized I have little. We are all potential deceivers and deceived

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to do it, but I cannot open the site and I don't know why.
:(

# data[].attributes.body
I can;t trust my own eyes anymore!

# data[].attributes.body
For me, it was quite a difficult task!

# data[].attributes.body
For me, it was very hard to make the difference for a lot of pictures.

# data[].attributes.body
It was so and so. I could see the photoshoped ones easily sometimes.

# data[].attributes.body
it is difficult

# data[].attributes.body
I did good at test. Some photos were really hard to tell.
Here is a picture that failed photoshop. Web is full of similar photos and by using these tools anyone can be anything he wants on the picture. And what upsets me the most is that these people on the photos are presented as real, relevant, something to look up to. No wonder that you cannot win this game of perfection in real world.

# data[].attributes.body
I made many mistakes too. But these images are really important toconvince my students that many photos are photoshopped

# data[].attributes.body
It is an interesting and very useful test to show good examples of what is true and what is not

# data[].attributes.body
It was a difficult test. It is a great way to start a conversation about the absolute (unrealistic) beauty.

# data[].attributes.body
I do love Dove commercials and I regularly show them to my teenagers to convince them that beauty of the magazines is absolutely unrealistic.

# data[].attributes.body
nice test, going to use it definitely. My score was miserable: failed at 9 ... The dove campaign is a great way to start talking to kids of 4th grade etc

# data[].attributes.body
It is not good to photoshop your pictures and make yourself someone else. Because of I am teaching in primary schools, I do not come across this kinds of situations. For showing the differences between photoshoped and unphotoshopped pictures:

# data[].attributes.body
I made many mistakes: this is another good way to introduce the theme of media manipulation

# data[].attributes.body
I think that one of the best ways to demonstrate pupils that many images posted online are not real is to make an exposition with them - before and after.

# data[].attributes.body
Not so easy ;)

# data[].attributes.body
Hmmm, not bad!!! Interesting tool to stimulate pupils to give a second try on what they see....

# data[].attributes.body
I found some difficulties. But it was useful. Since Photoshop has existed since the early 1990s, our own way of looking at photographic images has changed to the extent that photo editing has become an exception or curiosity, but a habit. Many controversies: on the one hand there are those who underline the dangers deriving from the establishment of a unique code of beauty, among other things unattainable in real life. On the other hand, there are those who mumble over the mistakes. Like everything, one needs to know and give it the right value.

# data[].attributes.body
One example of a lot of them about the stupid photoshops.

# data[].attributes.body
What kind of spiritual nourishment could give this "piece of sticking"?

# data[].attributes.body
My students are 17 - 18 years of age. They despise the photoshops. They think that it is a waste of time.

# data[].attributes.body
It is difficult to locate the real pictures from those that have been photoshopped. In a classroom I could use pictures of famous people with photoshop on covers of magazines and without photoshop (and even without make up). We could locate the differences. Discuss why do magazines use photoshop their pictures. Discuss how much photoshop is ok and when it is too much. I could use a common sense media lesson on this subject that is translated and addapted in Greek (http://esafeschools.pi.ac.cy/learning-suggestions-csm).

# data[].attributes.body
I am really hard to distinguish between reality and fiction. But it's a great site.

# data[].attributes.body
Good site to show students how difficult it is to tell if a picture is real or fake!

# data[].attributes.body
At first, I was moving well and managed to guess quite a few photos, till I started to stumble. I really enjoyed this activity

# data[].attributes.body
It's really quite difficult to distinguish between real and photoshop images!

# data[].attributes.body
In a classroom I will propose to students do task REAL / UNREAL.

# data[].attributes.body
This was a very difficult test for me. It is so easy to make mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
I found this exercise very difficult. I have no experience of photoshop and rarely do I touch any photos I put on the internet except to crop them. I would find it very interesting to see what my students would make of this exercise.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays one cannot live without social media because it's our way to communicate but unfortunately it has a huge effect on young people's self confidence. We must therefore make our students watchful of what they see and not believe all they come across. I will show them this picture and make them point out what has been photo shopped then show them the answer.

# data[].attributes.headline
John, GR       Hollywood: Famous Before and After Photoshop

# data[].attributes.subject
John, GR       Hollywood: Famous Before and After Photoshop

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.imommy.gr/gossip/article/5881/xoligoynt-diashmoi-prin-kai-meta-to-photoshop/

# data[].attributes.body
I will use photos of people they admire to show how the show business industry has changed the real image and manipulate people to eliminate the real values .

# data[].attributes.body
Too many mistakes from my side!!! Gosh, I feel very aware of internet fakes but I have to admit that photoshop/reality played and won against me!!! I could use this site to show my pupils that not everything we see surfing the net is trustworthy just like not every woman or man is perfect like we see in so many pictures.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a recent photo of the movie star Scarlett Johansson. It has been digitally altered but I wouldn't have noticed if someone on the facebook page hadn't posted the original. Needless to mention the impact may have on young girls such an example of self-image or the influence on boys' imagination about girls.

# data[].attributes.body
Here it is a collection of pictures with celebrities before and after Photoshop. I could use those to raise awareness about the standards of the beauty nowadays and about the danger of the false images of some people we admire.

# data[].attributes.body
My pupils admire models singers and other popular people and they believe that some of the pictures have been photoshoped but they can not understand the degree of interference in image processing. An example of a famous greek singer is given below:

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe I can make an activity about social stereotypes, because is important that pupils understand that all they can see beautiful in internet isn´t necessary real. And also they can find misleading advertising

# data[].attributes.body
I thought I would be able to easily detect when an image is retouched or not. But after doing the above test, I come to the conclusion that I only know that I know nothing. I took the test and I could not detect the photoshop in more than half of the images. In other words, my self-confidence has decreased significantly ...

Today, to manipulate images  is so easy!  Most of times, the use of technology make it difficult for you to spot t when images have been photoshopped . Then, you wonder: Is reality real?

(I’m going to use this site in a classroom  situation, it will be a great starting point for a discussion about image manipulation)

# data[].attributes.body
I don't have a photo-shopped pic of my local situation, maybe cause i'm not able to spot them. However, i made the test and i was wrong in half the case. It very surprised me..

# data[].attributes.body
I took the test and made 9 mistakes: it wasn't easy at all.

# data[].attributes.body
The online test of pictures at the above mentioned link was really difficult. In some cases I was sure it was photoshopped but apparently it wasn't. Here is a picture with photoshop

# data[].attributes.body
It was not easy to recognize a real photo from a photo-shopped one.
It could be a good exercise for students.

# data[].attributes.body
I took the test and I only got 7 right answers out of 25. I know very little about photoshop and I wouldn't be able to recognise a modified picture.

# data[].attributes.body
It is easy to find a photo that has been photoshopped, but I think it's not so easy to recognize the kind of intervention that has been made, I mean, it could be just enhancing the light ir the tone of a colour or completely modify the image. I found the photo of a woman from the video suggested above about real women made into cover models and it made me think od the picture I saw of the real sized barbie. We got used to see the barbie as it is, but she is impossible in nature or at least she would have so many problems that is unconceivable to deside to be like that.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2308658/How-Barbies-body-size-look-real-life-Walking-fours-missing-half-liver-inches-intestine.html

# data[].attributes.body
My students are still young at age, I think it's not always easy for kids to find out if a photo has been modified or not, they are often attracted to them and try to imitate them, especially if the image is about physical appearance.

# data[].attributes.headline
Tiziana Trillocco, Italy Enemies erased, slim dictators, crowds that multiply, exalted leaders: the art of photo-editing has always been one of the main allies of political propaganda.In this site you will find some famous shots redesigned in the diffused versions and in the original and "censored" versions. A famous remake returns a more "healthful, and no cigar" portrait of Winston Churchill.

# data[].attributes.subject
Tiziana Trillocco, Italy Enemies erased, slim dictators, crowds that multiply, exalted leaders: the art of photo-editing has always been one of the main allies of political propaganda.In this site you will find some famous shots redesigned in the diffused versions and in the original and "censored" versions. A famous remake returns a more "healthful, and no cigar" portrait of Winston Churchill.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Nemici cancellati, dittatori snelliti, folle che si moltiplicano, leader incensati: l'arte del fotoritocco è da sempre una delle principali alleate della propaganda politica.

In questa fotogallery vi presentiamo alcuni famosi scatti ritoccati nelle versioni diffuse e in quelle originali e "censurate". Quella qui sopra restituisce un ritratto più "salutista", e senza sigaro, di Winston Churchill.

Per apparire più potente agli occhi dei suoi elettori, il Primo Ministro Canadese William Lyon Mackenzie King fece cancellare Re Georgio VI dalla sua foto con Elisabetta, la Regina Madre d'Inghilterra.

La copertina dell'album "Abbey Road", dei Beatles. Che cosa è stato rimosso, rispetto allo scatto originale? No, le scarpe di Paul McCartney non c'entrano...

Nella foto originale, Paul McCartney teneva in mano una sigaretta. Che è però poi scomparsa dalla copertina dell'album.

Per alterare una foto è in genere necessario decomprimerla, caricarla su un programma di photo editing, modificarla, salvarla e comprimerla di nuovo. In questa serie di passaggi, alcune informazioni vengono perse per permettere di creare file più leggeri.

È una delle immagini simbolo della seconda guerra mondiale: i soldati dell'armata rossa che sventolano una bandiera sovietica a Berlino come simbolo della vittoria sui nazisti. Questa è la foto che venne pubblicata sui giornali sovietici con fini propagandistici. In realtà, l'originale era un po' diversa, come si vede nella foto seguente.

Innanzitutto va detto che i soldati furono messi in posa con la bandiera. In seguito il fotografo ha aggiunto il fumo delle esplosioni e ha rimosso un orologio dal polso di uno dei soldati.

Dopo l'ondata di attentati terroristici che ha investito Parigi, i leader di 40 paesi del mondo si sono riuniti nella capitale francese per una marcia di solidarietà, l'11 gennaio 2015. Il quotidiano israeliano ultraortodosso "The Announcer" è stato accusato di aver cancellato con Photoshop da una delle foto ufficiali le rappresentati politiche femminili presenti alla manifestazione. In questa foto si vedono infatti solo i leader maschi...

Mentre nello stesso scatto ufficiale compaiono, accanto ai colleghi, anche Federica Mogherini, Alto rappresentante dell'Unione per gli affari esteri, e la Cancelliera Tedesca Angela Merkel, oltre al sindaco di Parigi Anne Hidalgo.

La foto a sinistra, in cui una presunta Sarah Palin imbraccia un fucile mentre indossa un bikini patriottico, fu per qualche tempo ritenuta vera persino dalla CNN. Quando fu diffusa nel 2008, Palin aveva appena annunciato la sua candidatura alla vice presidenza degli Stati Uniti.

Quando un file jpeg viene compresso, è suddiviso in diversi blocchi di pixel che vengono compressi separatamente. Questi "tasselli" dovrebbero combaciare tra loro come nell'immagine originale; ma se subiscono modifiche, il puzzle finale non torna. Alcuni software, come Verifeyed, da cui è stata tratta la maggior parte delle foto che vedete, riescono a cogliere queste incongruenze.

Questa foto fu scattata durante i primi giorni dell'invasione in Iraq nel 2003. Nell'immagine, un soldato britannico a Basra avverte dei civili di proteggersi dai bombardamenti. In realtà il fotografo aveva unito due foto vedi. A suo dire per migliorare la composizione; secondo molti esperti per dare un'informazione diversa.

Un "eroico" ritratto a cavallo di Benito Mussolini... o forse no? Per distinguere un falso fotografico da un'immagine originale ci si basa su diversi trucchi. Oggi è più facile perché ogni componente di una fotocamera digitale - dal sistema ottico alla scheda di memoria - lascia sull'immagine un'"impronta" riconoscibile, che viene alterata quando la foto subisce modifiche.

Missili iraniani fotografati in fase di lancio, in uno scatto che l'Agenzia francese France-Presse ha ottenuto dall'emittente locale Sepah News. La foto, diffusa nel 2008, è tra le più celebri "photoshoppate" a fine politico.

Le cose non vanno sempre come vorremmo, come dimostra questa foto, apparentemente della stessa scena, ricevuta da France-Presse il giorno successivo alla pubblicazione della prima immagine. In questo scatto, si vede che uno dei quattro missili non è partito. Un insuccesso scomodo, da eliminare dalle foto militari ufficiali.

Un tempo manipolare le immagini era un'arte per pochi, che richiedeva intere giornate di lavoro. Oggi è un passatempo talmente diffuso, che spesso è necessario correre ai ripari. Per distinguere gli scatti autentici dai foto-tarocchi, sono nati software in grado di capire, in pochi istanti, se una foto sia stata modificata.

Questa lo è stata, eccome: nella foto di sinistra, vediamo il Ministro della Propaganda del Terzo Reich Joseph Goebbels scomparire misteriosamente.

Esistono algoritmi studiati apposta per identificare queste manomissioni. I software che li sfruttano sono utilizzati in genere da banche, assicurazioni, agenzie di stampa e da quanti si trovino ogni giorno a contatto con centinaia di foto potenzialmente ritoccabili. Ma si possono anche sfruttare per scovare gli inganni orchestrati in foto storiche come questa, in cui il leader del Partito Comunista cinese Bo Gu è stato fatto sparire da una foto dopo essere uscito dalle grazie di Mao Zedong (sulla destra).

La foto ufficiale di un comizio di Lenin. Dopo il 1927 fu sostituita da una versione ritoccata in più punti e da cui fu tolto Trotzkij (nel tondo), caduto in disgrazia.

Il ministro dell'Interno sovietico Ezov, epurato da Stalin nel 1938, e cancellato dalle foto.
Il fenomeno della damnatio memoriae, la "condanna della memoria" è molto antico: la praticavano gli antichi Egizi, era all'ordine del giorno nell'Impero romano, ha accompagnato ogni cambio di regime e ha censurato tanti ex potenti (e non) del '900. Una volta ci si accaniva su statue e monumenti, poi è giunto il momento delle foto. Resiste anche nel mondo contemporaneo che si fonda sul potere delle immagini.

In questa celebre foto di gruppo in cui il Generale Sherman (al centro) posa con i suoi generali, c'è una persona che non era effettivamente presente al momento dello scatto...

Il generale General Francis P Blair (seduto a destra nella foto precedente) non era presente davanti alla macchina da presa. Fu aggiunto in un secondo momento, come testimonia questo secondo scatto, in cui il suo posto appare vuoto.

Il fotoritocco (digitale e non) è sempre stato un'arma della propaganda. Prendete il caso dell'unità d'Italia.
Dopo la presa di Porta Pia a Roma (20 settembre 1870), si diffusero numerose foto delle mura con soldati e bersaglieri morti o nell'atto di sparare. Erano falsi, fotoritocchi realizzati ritagliando e duplicando (in modo grossolano, come in questa foto, i soldati.
Il risultato è stato di rendere epica, agli occhi degli italiani, un'azione di guerra che invece era stata molto veloce (grazie all'artiglieria) e poco pericolosa (a causa della scarsa resistenza opposta delle truppe pontificie).

Sul fatto che i sovietici furono i primi a inviare un uomo nello spazio non ci sono dubbi. Sul numero e le generalità dei cosmonauti che fecero parte di quel primo team di eroici esploratori c'è qualche dubbio in più. In partenza erano 9 cosmonauti, ma poi uno di essi, Grigoriy Nelyubov, venne allontanato dal gruppo. E cancellato dalle foto ufficiali.

Uno dei più noti ritratti di Abramo Lincoln è frutto di un foto-ritocco. La testa del presidente americano venne posta sul corpo di John Calhoun, un uomo politico del Sud Carolina morto nel 1860.

Quando Willy Brandt, cancelliere della allora Germania occidentale si incontrò con il segretario del partito comunista sovietico Leonid Brezhnev, non mancò l'occasione per bere birra e fumare sigarette. Ma sui giornali dell'Unione Sovietica apparvero soltanto le foto opportunamente manipolate per togliere bottiglie e pacchetti di sigarette.

Nel giugno del 1994 le riviste Time e Newsweek pubblicarono in copertina la stessa foto segnaletica del giocatore di football e attore statunitense O.J. Simpson. Rispetto a Newsweek, Time aveva scurito la pelle di Simpson.

Il maggiore esperto di Photoshop al mondo sarebbe comunque, secondo molti, Kim Jong Un. Il leader nordcoreano se ne servirebbe per far aumentare la folla alle celebrazioni politiche ufficiali, ma anche per far "sparire" i personaggi sgraditi. In questa foto ad essere cancellato è stato lo zio del dittatore, Jang Song Thaek, fatto probabilmente uccidere nel 2013 e poi eliminato da tutte le foto ufficiali.

Celebre è anche questo scatto del quotidiano ortodosso israeliano Yated Neeman in cui due politiche donne sono state rimosse e sostituite da colleghi uomini in una foto del Primo Ministro Benjamin Netanyahu (al centro) e l'ex Presidente Shimon Peres.

L'immagine fa parte del progetto Spanish village dedicato a un villaggio rurale durante la dittatura di Francisco Franco e fu pubblicata dalla rivista Life nel 1951. Il fotografo Eugene Smith ritoccò lo sguardo della madre e della figlia che nella versione originale guardavano in macchina.

Una foto pubblicata sul sito di Al-Arabiya, in cui sopra a un combattente libico esultante sono stati inseriti alcuni jet militari.

Le piramidi di Giza, in Egitto, sulla copertina del National Geographic del febbraio 1982. L'immagine originale era stata scattata in orizzontale e fu ritoccata per essere usata in copertina. In questo modo le piramidi sembrano una accanto all'altra. Quando la rivista uscì in edicola il fotografo Gordon Gahan non ne sapeva nulla.

Una temibile flotta di hovercraft affolla le spiagge nordcoreane durante un'esercitazione. Un momento, ma è sempre lo stesso mezzo, quello che appare tra le onde, sia in primo piano sia all'orizzonte. Un abile lavoro di copia incolla, poi smascherato e deriso dal web.

Il sofisticato drone che secondo un'agenzia di stampa governativa sarebbe stato creato in Iran è in realtà un prodotto della ricerca dell'Università di Chiba, in Giappone.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Le foto storiche ritoccate (e smascherate)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
L'arte del fotoritocco ha origini antiche, e alcune manipolazioni sono passate alla Storia: ecco una carrellata di omissioni, aggiunte e modifiche nate per fare propaganda, cancellare vecchi amici e mettere in difficoltà i nemici. Leggi anche: 40 (e più) foto storiche rare e importanti - 10 foto storiche...

# data[].attributes.body
I also found this photo of a celebrity very much appreciated by teen agers. I would use it to make young people understand how important it is to always be themselves without looking for a false image, especially if we refer to the body.

# data[].attributes.body
I noticed that I made a lot of mistakes in evaluating the photos proposed by adobe. If I was so easily mistaken, I wonder how young people could be fooled.

# data[].attributes.body
It was a difficult task to distinguish between the real images and the photoshopped ones. I only guessed 13/25, but I think it may be a challenge even for pupils. I would use this activity to draw their attention on the tendency to distort reality that they may encounter in the virtual world. Nevertheless, there is also the other side of the things that may be discussed (that is the purpose of retouching a photo).

# data[].attributes.body
I have never used photoshop. I tell students how famous celebrities are not real. Real or photoshop

# data[].attributes.body
No!
It was not easy because many photos look real and it is not so.

# data[].attributes.body
I only guessed 15 images correctly. If it was complicated for me, it is even more for my young students. Considering that we're studying Nature these days, I showed them this photo so they could understand what photoshop is capable of:

# data[].attributes.body
Photos like this one could be a good hint to talk with students about the pressure to look perfect in the media. Too many young people aspire to the physically impossible and are consumed with the ideal of being perfect because of these photographs.

# data[].attributes.body
It's definitely not easy telling the real from the photoshopped ones! I got 12 out of 25 right!
I could use this picture to start a conversation on the topic because my students like watching various videos on YouTube of young people doing different amazing or funny things.

# data[].attributes.headline
I guessed 11 pictures. It was nor easy :)

# data[].attributes.subject
I guessed 11 pictures. It was nor easy :)

# data[].attributes.body
There are so many examples of the miracle of Photoshop.
This is a good kick off for talking about the concepts of beauty that the media, and the society in general, try to foist every day.

# data[].attributes.body
I guessed only 10/25 :(
Last week I saw a picture of an american VIP taken in Mexico who caused her the loss of many followers. It's a real pictures with a powerful retouching to show a perfect body, while in the real picture she looks like every normal woman, with cellulitis. Similar example relates to  models, actors or politicians. That's it! They must appear fit and young and nice to see. But people get older and older in the real life.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, it is very difficult distinguishing real photos to photo shopped ones. I guessed 13 on 25.
I consider Photoshop a very fanny software that permit us to make a lot of things. It is very useful! Also for preparing papers for school! It is used to create art effects by a lot of famous artists.
I don’t want see only the negative aspects as its use for advertising.

I think it is important for pupils learning it so they could find how some bodies can be  not real.

# data[].attributes.body
The teen can see that a lot of pictures of famous people are not real. This person are normal like they

# data[].attributes.body
The practice of retouching photos is a very old procedure and of course what is changing is the purpose of retouching. In this photo, for example, we see the cover of the Beatles' Abbey Road album. What was removed, compared to the original shot? No, Paul McCartney's shoes do not matter .

# data[].attributes.body
Oh ... I was quite bad at distinguishing real images from photoshopped ones.
I think my students would be better ! But is it worthy to trust on appearances more than reality ?

# data[].attributes.body
I was pretty bad at distinguishing real from photoshopped photos: I got the photoshopped ones quite well but i thought some of the real ones were fake! I think I will try this test with my students to compare our results!

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that even if we know about the power of image, about photoshop etc, we are just so used to believe almost everything we see, without critical thinking. For the younger, this is more common. The power of social media is unquestionable.
In the above quiz, i found the 7 out of 10, but I think that this was why I was prepared for that.
I post an actress before/after photo. I would use it in my class, so I would let the students comment on that. Then, we would start a conversation on social media, what they upload on them and how they feel when they don't get "likes"

# data[].attributes.body
I must confess that I am pretty bad in distinguishing the real photo from the photoshopped one. Ten mistakes and most of the rest were guessed. If I can't find the real photos, I can imagine what my students can do...

# data[].attributes.body
Can you find a picture that has been photo-shopped? Maybe you can find something really relevant to your own local area or local situation – something that your students will be able to relate to. Can you share the picture and also identify how you might use this in a classroom situation?
The photoshop test was not easy and I made a lot of mistakes. I do not know how to use photoshop, so I think I wrong a lot of times.This could be done in our class to make students aware of how difficult could be understand and recognize a real and a fake picture.
These topic can be analyzed in many ways. The most common used by my colleagues is of men or women, whose pictures are made more beatiful or cute, deleting imperfections. But we can discuss about historical fake pictures: e.g. this pictures represents Stalin with and without a communist commissar. The commissar was removed after this man fell out of favor from the dictator. Also the american picture of the moon landing is considered fake by some historians. In this way we could make our pupils reflecting about the propaganda use of pictures and movies.

# data[].attributes.headline
I agree with people who say that it is silly to appear beautiful at any cost. But what about just the opposite?

# data[].attributes.subject
I agree with people who say that it is silly to appear beautiful at any cost. But what about just the opposite?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
We are so accustomed to celebrity photos being photoshopped that it becomes a big deal when an authentic image gets leaked.

Singers, models, actresses - you name it, their photos almost always get photoshopped, regardless of the image's final use.

This 20-year-old Spanish artist has been very busy retouching celebrities as well, but not quite as you'd expect. David Lopera doesn't slim waists, make legs skinnier or hide double chins. On the contrary, the bigger the better as far as Lopera is concerned, as he tries to convey the message that big is also beautiful.

Lopera told DIYP he was inspired to create these images after he noticed how overweight women were being treated.

His first image was of Katy Perry and he has been very busy since posting it to his DeviantArt account last year, creating over 200 "super-sized" images.

Most images take a day or two to complete with a total of 6-8 hours invested in each one, but according to Lopera it is time well spent.

Stating that all his images are based on real photos, he explains a bit about his work process:

"First, I search a high resolution image and good quality. Depending on the body shape I do one time morph or another. I used to start with the face and the extremities. Then I search another image for can combine the current body with the searched image. I adjust the shadow and light and that's it".

Lopera says he's received a lot of negative feedback as people aren't used to seeing overweight women depicted as beautiful, confident and seductive, but the love for his work has been pouring in as well.

In fact about 5% of his images were commissioned work, while the rest were requested via DeviantArt or Facebook.

All too often we see skinny promoted as the only form of beauty, and it's reached a point where ads are banned due to being suspected of encouraging anorexia. Even if plump (as Lopera calls it) it not your cup of tea, you must admit his approach is refreshing.

Opinions differ whether photoshopping women to appear fatter is any different than making them thinner, since the web is full of real plus-sized women trying to promote the 'big is beautiful' mantra, but Lopera's intentions are most definitely positive.

Lopera stresses that he is not promoting obesity or unhealthy living, "I just want to people accept the big women a little bit more".

[via Business Insider]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
This Artist Is Using Photoshop To Make Celebrities Look Fat - DIY Photography

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
We are so accustomed to celebrity photos being photoshopped that it becomes a big deal when an authentic image gets leaked. Singers, models, actresses - you name it, their photos almost always get photoshopped, regardless of the image's final use. This 20-year-old Spanish artist has been very busy retouching celebrities as well, but not quite ...

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to think about this. As Photoshop user, I also enjoy using other free online tools like Pixlr just for fun, I know how the whole thing works, but  I must say that I made lots of mistakes in the Photoshop photo test: what a cool idea ! So first things first, sometimes reality is more unimaginable and fantastic than fiction.

Secondly I have to say that when searching for a “photoshopped photo” to use on google, most of them are of people: bodies are the most photoshopped thing, which says a lot I think, and also makes us think about our topic. Are these people all aware of people “playing” with parts of their bodies and exposing them the the public ? (views, comments, hate comments, etc…)

You gave a lot to think about.

About the activity, I uploaded a picture of myself that I photoshopped slightly just for fun: took some lines away, added some brightness… My activity for students would be: take one of your pictures, upload it to Pixlr or any other free tools for photoshopping and change it, add to it make it different, create a new persona. Nothing better than "hands on" to understand a process.
See what you can do ?
See what people online can do ?

# data[].attributes.body
Try to detect photoshopped pics is not at all easy because this technique has become more and more sophisticated. I think useful to discuss about Photoshop used to represent human bodies: it can give a false representation that can be harmful for youngs that don't have a clear idea of thmelselves and lack of self-consciousness. Photoshopped pics can create false miths about how a body must be and about reality.

# data[].attributes.body
It was kind of difficult for me to detect if the pictures was photoshopped or not. I hade 13 pictures wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
Photoshop is widely used to edit photos for magazines, advertisements and entertainment.  Students need to learn how to identify if a photo has been 'photoshopped'.  I think that the best way to help them identify the difference is to provide them with photos to analyze.  They can discuss together in groups why a photo appears unreal.

# data[].attributes.headline
Kate, Ukraine               we watched this dove video at our lesson about famous singers 2 month ago. My students were shocked. The children hat leve in the digital world were shocked!

# data[].attributes.subject
Kate, Ukraine               we watched this dove video at our lesson about famous singers 2 month ago. My students were shocked. The children hat leve in the digital world were shocked!

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the images which have been photoshopped and proposed together with their real counterparts could be a great activity to do in a classroom. Students could try and guess what images are real and what are photoshopped and then explain the reasons why. So they could easily realise the threats and menaces hidden in a virtual world.

# data[].attributes.body
In my learning diary I created a simple learning activity for my students "What makes you beautiful?" after the song and a discussion I will purpose them to play with this tool: http://www.taaz.com/virtual-makeover