# data[].attributes.body
Source E
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-first-atomic-bomb-test-is-successfully-exploded

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://eng.the-liberty.com/2013/4554/
This source talks about the dropping of the atomic bomb being against humanity. It also talks about the different options of what to do. This is a reliable source because its facts can be checked. It is also reliable because it comes up multiple times in google for different articles.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/bombing-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki
This source gives many facts about the bombings. It gives statistics about Hiroshima before the bombing. This is a credible source because it is from a trusted, known site that is literally devoted to historical accuracy. The author is stated very clearly and the facts match with other websites and articles.

# data[].attributes.body
Source E
http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/06/world/asia/btn-atomic-bombs/

# data[].attributes.body
Source F
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-two/the-pacific-war-1941-to-1945/operation-downfall/

# data[].attributes.body
Source E
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-two/the-pacific-war-1941-to-1945/operation-coronet/

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://progressive.org/op-eds/archives-atomic-bombing-japan-unnecessary/
The source says that Japan was really more scared of the Red Army than of being bombed. It also talks about how members of the US military did not support the use of a bomb to get Japan to surrender. This is a reliable source because the site is well organized. Its information can also be checked on other sites.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://www.dannen.com/decision/hst-jl25.html
This source talks about how Truman felt about the atomic bombs in his own words. It is credible because it has his exact words in the form of journal entries and has the author of the page printed clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
Source E
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Reference&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=WHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3434600251&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://old.seattletimes.com/special/trinity//supplement/procon.html
This source talks about the pros and cons of dropping an atomic bomb. The pros state that Japan was ready to surrender at this point in the war. This is a reliable source because it comes from a trusted source of news. It also states in formation that can be checked on other sites.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
https://qz.com/472146/its-clear-the-us-should-not-have-bombed-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/
This source talks about the reasons that Hiroshima was a bad choice for the bombing site. It is credible because the author is clearly listed and the site is a professor. The sight is very well organized and the article has facts about the bombing and the cons of where it happened.

# data[].attributes.body
Source E
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/history/wwii_timeline.html

# data[].attributes.body
Source E
http://www.ditext.com/japan/napalm.html

# of Japanese cities bombed.

# data[].attributes.body
http://time.com/3718981/tokyo-firebombing-1945/
This source talks about the bombs used before the atomic bomb. It is credible because it is by a magazine that is well known and trusted, as well as unbiased. The author is listed and the information is similar, though not as in depth on other websites. This consistency shows that the facts are known and truthful

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://www.stripes.com/news/special-reports/world-war-ii-the-final-chapter/wwii-victory-in-japan/would-japan-have-surrendered-without-the-atomic-bombings-1.360300
In this source, it talks about the different ways japan would have easily surrendered to the Soviet Union if they had to. It also talks about how hard it would have been for Japan to win this war being far behind. This source is reliable because it shows that Japan would surrender without much more fighting. It also supports the argument with quotes and evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A

http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/PrimarySourcesDetailsPage/PrimarySourcesDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=PrimarySources&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=WHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3411800105&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=

In the source, it talked about how US troops were pushing japan back which could be a good time for the Russians to join their efforts. The US worked their way up to the Japan with the war in Europe ending with them capturing the island of Okinawa and deciding to launch an invasion on Japan's home islands.

This source is reliable because it was on the academic database and is also considered a primary source. It had a list of all the proper sources used in the informational text.

Source B

http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/PrimarySourcesDetailsPage/PrimarySourcesDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=PrimarySources&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=WHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3411800097&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=

This article talks about what the atomic bomb is and how dangerous it actually is. It also states how the science and testing behind it are kept in secrecy, even from extremely high- ranking officials, including the president.

This database source is reliable because it has a good level of different types of sources. It gives good background detail and explanations along with it being a primary source.

Source C

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/pacific-major-battles/

This article talks about all the battles the US and Japan faced. The Japanese still would not surrender after the loss of the US capturing Okinawa, giving a good space for the Russians to join before Japan makes its next move.

This is a widely trusted source for educational purposes. This source gave suggestions as to related events within that time period to get further information.

Source D

https://www.trumanlibrary.org/teacher/abomb.htm

This source talks about the decision to drop the bomb and the danger of the new technology. It mentions the refusal of Japan's surrender and the death it caused on innocent civilians in Japan.

The source has a detailed list of sources used in the article. It contains no advertisements and has a credible name, a real place.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=&displayGroupName=Reference&currPage=&dviSelectedPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=UHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX2876300010&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=
-This is a credible source because the gale world history database got the information from such articles as Code-Name Downfall: The Secret Plan to Invade Japan and Why Truman Dropped the Bomb written by an editor of National Geographic.
-This article talks of a few of the reasons President Truman wanted to end the war, one being a quick end. The new bomb's purpose was to destroy the enemy.

# data[].attributes.body
http://teachinghistory.org/history-content/beyond-the-textbook/25484

This source talks about the reason Truman decided to bomb Japan and events leading up to it. It also talks about the major controversy in this decision.

This source is reliable because its authors ae well known and its information checks out. It is also a .org about teaching history so it seems legit.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://www.americamagazine.org/issue/bombing-japan-was-it-only-option

This source shows the events leading up to the bombing which pushed them over the edge. It also talks about what kind of stuff went on in the countries during the war for people who weren’t fighting.

This source is reliable because it was updated recently. It also is a .org and it is from the reliable source the American magazine.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/PrimarySourcesDetailsPage/PrimarySourcesDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=PrimarySources&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=UHIC%3AWHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3411800097&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=
-This is a reliable source because it is from a volume of the memoirs of President Truman, himself.
-In it, President Truman states that to defeat Japan there needs to be a physical conquest; that would alone end the war. The two choices were the bomb or sending soldiers. The bomb is a quick way that would save those soldiers' lives being lost.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A

http://old.seattletimes.com/special/trinity//supplement/procon.html

-This source states that conventional firebombing would have caused as much damage on Japan as the atomic bomb without making the U.S. the first nation to use nuclear weapons.  The U.S. started a domino effect which resulted in other nations becoming nuclearly armed and a possible threat to the U.S.

-This source is reliable because it was written by “The Seattle Times”, a trusted newspaper.  Their papers are the largest circulated daily newspaper in the state of Washington, so they are widely trusted by a highly populated state.

Source B

http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2014/09/22/tokyo-hiroshima/

-This source states how many people would have died if an atomic bomb had been dropped on Tokyo instead of the conventional bombs.  They compare casualty rates from the conventional bombings of Tokyo to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

-This source is reliable because images, charts, and accurate math is included to back up what is said.  This source also has links to their sources and other websites that include information like theirs.

Source C

http://www.cnduk.org/campaigns/global-abolition/effects-of-nuclear-weapons

-This source states that nuclear weapons are a bad idea and have no good purposes.  They list the effects of nuclear devastation into four categories: instantaneous, near-immediate, short term, and long term.

-This source is reliable because they use accurate information proven by scientific fact.  It also states that they are a campaign that’s purpose is for nuclear disarmament.

Source D

http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/uhic/ReferenceDetailsPage/DocumentToolsPortletWindow?displayGroupName=Reference&u=oak30216&u=oak30216&jsid=885fa2cddb280d23cd06bf9c5ed436a5&p=UHIC%3AWHIC&action=2&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CCX2876300010&zid=4a6103da6d025e4543bf83800209eb8f

-This source states the reason behind President Truman’s decision to order the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.  It also includes the conditions leading up to this decision.

-This source is reliable because the authors are listed.  It also shows no biasness.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p-4_weber.html

This source says that Japan was going to be defeated even without the atomic bomb. With Russia's help, the Allies would have definitely been able to defeat Japan without having to use the bomb.

This is a reliable source because it says it is from the journal of historical review and lists the authors name. It also has evidence to support each of its claims.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B

http://www.authentichistory.com/1939-1945/1-war/4-Pacific/4-abombdecision/3-against/

This source goes over the pros and cons of the bombing of Japan. It also did not have any bias points and showed both sides of the story.

This source is reliable because the author is well known and the sources they used seem legit. This is also a good source because none of the information is bias.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/14/historians-soviet-offensive-key-japans-wwii-surrender-eclipsed-bombs.html

This source says the the attacks from the Russians would have been just as effective as the atomic bomb or possibly more effective. Many historians think the Russians attacking Japan alongside the U.S. would have caused them to surrender as well.

This is a reliable source because it is a trusted news source. It also supports its argument with factual evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/BiographiesDetailsPage/BiographiesDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Biographies&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=UHIC%3AWHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3411800067&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=
-This is a good source because it is from a biography written about a scientist, J. Robert Oppenheimer, who led the tests and studies of the atomic bomb.
-The source says that the only other alternative to the bomb would to invade Japan which would cost American lives. Oppenheimer and his fellow scientists, who studied this new weapon for years, discussed the pros and cons and thought that to bomb Japan is the better choice than lose many American lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://www.cnduk.org/campaigns/global-abolition/effects-of-nuclear-weapons

This source explains the complete devastation caused by nuclear bombs.  It petitions for them to never be used again because they are so deadly.
This source is reliable because the campaign for nuclear disarmament is a real thing with other articles online that discuss it.  Also, the website provides more information about everything having to do with the organization and have contact information with an address.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/japan-surrenders

This source talks about the conditions of Japan at the end of the war. Japan's whole military was in pieces with no Air force or Navy which shows that America could easily take it.

It is a reliable source because History.com is trusted by everyone. Also, it gives primary and secondary sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
https://www.britannica.com/place/Japan/World-War-II-and-defeat

This source talks about the events that happened at the end of war. It tells that the 2nd atomic bomb was dropped a day after the U.S.S.R declared war for telling their defeat.

It is reliable because it is an encyclopedia.Also, it is the most reliable encyclopedia for info.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://history.howstuffworks.com/world-war-ii/japan-surrenders-world-war-2-ends.htm

This source talks about an invasion of Tokyo that was planned for 1946. This would have ended the war easier that dropping the atomic bomb.

It is reliable because it was made by history.com another reliable source. Also, it is a TV show on the History Channel.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A

https://www.nps.gov/articles/trumanatomicbomb.htm

This shows how, when, and why Truman bombed Tokyo and all over Japan. It also explains why he decided to bomb them in the first place.

This is a good source because it is a .gov and because it has accurate and good information. The information on it comes from a reliable source.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1873164,00.html

This source explains some of the very negative effects on nuclear bombs on the globe and the environment.  It includes details of how they change the world and how too many can bombs could be very bad and even lead to starvation.
This source is reliable because it was published in Time Magazine.  This is very well known, respected, and known for putting out true facts.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/07/30/books/did-we-need-to-drop-it.html?pagewanted=all

This source says that many officials including General Marshall believed that if Russia joined the war, the Japanese would surrender. They believed that the atomic bomb would not be necessary to use to get the Japanese to surrender if this happened.

This is a reliable source because New York Times is a well respected major news source. The article also provides many pieces of evidence to support its argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A

http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/uhic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Reference&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=UHIC%3AWHIC&search_within_results=&p=UHIC%3AWHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CIROGOA515584575&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=

This source talks about the the reason the atomic bomb was made. It was made in fear of Germany, that they were making nuclear weapons, and was not intended for Japan and ending the War.

It is a reliable source because it came for a trusted and education-based database. Also, Truman should accept this one because it is verified as reliable

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp

This source says that the U.S. had pushed Japan back through many victories.  When the U.S. asked for a surrender from Japan, they never mentioned any new weapons (atomic bomb) being used.

This source is reliable because it is from a well known source. It is also an up to date source.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://www.businessinsider.com/this-chart-shows-the-terrifying-power-of-modern-nuclear-bombs-2012-6

This source explains exactly how much damage a nuclear bomb would create.  The chart creates a visual so the mass destruction is clearly seen.
This source is reliable because it comes from the business insider which is a well known and trusted website.  Also, it lists the author's name and the name of the creator of the chart.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://www.westpoint.edu/history/SitePages/WWII%20Asian%20Pacific%20Theater.aspx

This source lists the many allied victories in the Pacific Theater. The many victories shows that Japan was being beaten and would soon surrender if the U.S. kept winning.

This is a reliable source because it is from Department of History and the U.S. Military Academy. It also has accurate info.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1873164,00.html

This source explains the aftereffects of what would happen if a nuclear war occurred. It also tells of what would happen to the global climate, food supply, and the people of Earth.

This source is reliable because it explains scientific theories of what would happen if someone did drop a large atomic bomb and why it shouldn't be done. Also, TIME is a very reliable and well-known source of historical information.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp

This source explains Truman's decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima. It also explains all of the conditions that led to Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb that he said was the "most difficult decision of his life."

This source is reliable because it is a .org website and provides trustful quotations from Truman himself. Truman should trust this source because it is information that he said himself.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://nagasakiandhiroshimabombing.weebly.com/firebombing-vs-nuclear.html

This source explains the difference between firebombing and nuclear bombing. The aftereffects of these bombs are very different – firebombs just burn everything while atomic bombs leave radiation along with destructive aftereffects.

This source is reliable because the website lists the sources it used to provide information, and all sources were museum websites, history books, or of the like. Truman should consider this source because most of the content is pure fact.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/firebombing-of-tokyo

This source explains the firebombing of Tokyo on March 9, 1945, a few months before Truman dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. US Air Force war planes dropped incendiary bombs in Japan, incinerating 16 square miles of land and people "were killed in the worst single firestorm in recorded history."

This source is reliable because history.com explains events that happened in the past, and at the bottom of their page they state, "We strive for accuracy and fairness." The President should consider this source reliable because this website is a verified source of information that only historians can edit and not any person.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://www.authentichistory.com/1939-1945/1-war/4-Pacific/4-abombdecision/3-against/
This source says that the Joint Intelligence Committee determined that Japan would surrender if Russia joined the U.S. They believed that they would surrender with both the U.S. and the Russians fighting against them without having to use the atomic bomb.

This source is reliable because it includes many sources that it got its information from. It also shows its claim that the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bomb with factual evidence to support it.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://www.pitara.com/science-for-kids/5ws-and-h/how-does-a-nuclear-bomb-differ-from-a-conventional-bomb/

This source explains the differences and similarities between nuclear and conventional bombs.  It also explains just how deadly and harmful nuclear bombs can be.
This source is reliable because it is on a website with many other reliable sounding articles and it lists an author.  Also, it lists 2017 as the last date it was modified which means it has previously been edited and is monitored.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Reference&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=UHIC%3AWHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3401802516&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=
-This is a credible source because the author, Laurence Badash, is a professor from The University of California, Santa Barbara. He has written many reliable research articles as a professor.
-In this article it states that for three full years, the directors of the Manhattan Project worked hard making this bomb, employing over 130,000 employees and spending over 2 billion dollars. The test made on July 16, 1945 exploded with a force equal to 18,000 tons of TNT. So much of the government's money has already been spent on it and it has proven to make a big impact, therefore it should be used if the president wants to destroy part of Japan to make the war end.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/PrimarySourcesDetailsPage/PrimarySourcesDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=PrimarySources&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=WHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3411800105&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=

This source says that the U.S. was progressively pushing Japan back.  The U.S. was very close to invading Japan and had the advantage (Meaning they could have waited for Russia to join to join the Pacific Theater)

This source is reliable because it is published by a well known company. It also has a source citation.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://www.worldwar2history.info/Pacific/

This source says that after battles in the Pacific Theater, Japan was essentially beaten and was defenseless against the U.S.  The atomic bomb was only a final action to get them to surrender quicker (which means they probably would of surrendered anyway if the U.S. waited for Russia).

This source is reliable because it is relatively up to date.  It also has multiple sources in which the website found their info.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162/21.pdf

-This source is reliable because it is a document written by R. Gordon Arneson, who was a US State Department official. He was a Secretary to the Interim Committee on Atomic Energy, and then a Special Assistant to the Secretary of State.

-This document explains that a nuclear weapon should be used on Japan as early as possible and without warning. This is very important to end the war quickly and bring the most possible damage to Japan.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://www.historynet.com/did-russia-really-go-it-alone-how-lend-lease-helped-the-soviets-defeat-the-germans.htm

-This source explains in depth the Lend-Lease Act between America and Russia

-This source is reliable because there are social media links attached to it which work (I tried them). This source also sells magazines and answers questions on their page.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/pubs/fs/46345.htm

-This source explains how Stalin had promised to declare war on Japan while speaking with his allies.

-This source is reliable because it is a government website and has the United States seal. There is a small box of info on the bottom left hand corner of the website, stating that it is from the Office of the Historian and U.S. Department of State.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162/22.pdf

-This source is reliable because it is an Archive that has won multiple awards. The document its was written by the special assistant to the development of the atomic bomb.

-This document recommends the use of the bomb to demonstrate to Russia that we have nuclear capability. The USA wanted to assure Russian cooperation of future international controls over the use of nuclear weapons.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB162/

-This source is reliable because it gives a  in-depth list of documents used to back up it's claims and to provide further information. The Archive is a trusted website that won an Emmy Award.

-(Document 19) In this document, Oppenheimer explains that it is necessary to use the bomb to save American lives. More American lives will be lost if the bomb isn't dropped, as opposed to if it is.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/lend-lease-act

-This source explains the Lend-Lease Act that President Roosevelt created to help the allied countries in the war. One of these countries included Russia, so this means that they technically owe us a 'favor'.

-This source is reliable because History.com is a popular source that includes videos with real history experts.  There are also links to contact them and other links to related topics.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1937-1945/us-soviet

-This source explains the very helpful help that the United States received from Russia while having the U.S.-Soviet Alliance of 1941-1945. The source even goes far enough to state that without the aid of Russia during WWII the U.S. and Great Britain would "have been hard pressed to score a decisive military victory over Nazi Germany."

-This source is reliable because it is a government website and even has the United States seal. There is also a phone and FAX number on the bottom of the page, and is from the United States Department of State.

# data[].attributes.body
4.
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=2&docId=GALE%7CA132709822&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA132709822&searchId=R3&userGroupName=char80082&inPS=true

This article states that each option that President Truman had to consider posed multiple risks. He needed to make a decision that would guarantee the outcome that they wanted, which was an end to the war.

This source is reliable because the author is an American historian. He is also very qualified and knowledgeable about this topic and has written five books on the history of nuclear power regulation.

# data[].attributes.body
3.
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm&currentPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CA16881079&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA16881079&searchId=R2&userGroupName=char80082&inPS=true

This article explains that the Japanese refused to surrender. War was causing many deaths and destruction and something needed to be done.

This source is reliable because it was published by Scholastic Inc. which is a very well known and trustworthy source.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
https://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/index.php?documentdate=1945-03-25&documentid=3-5&pagenumber=1

-This source is reliable because it contains actual pictures of the documents and is part of the NARA- a very reputable organization. It gives an address, phone number, and social media links- all which exist (I tried them).

-This source is a letter from Einstein to FDR expressing his support for the bomb. He also expresses his trust in the scientists who were knowledgeable about it.

# data[].attributes.body
2.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2012/08/01/the-nuking-of-japan-was-a-tactical-and-moral-imperative/#308f4a06ca2d

This article describes how in a possible invasion of Japan, there would have been over 1 million American casualties and 5-10 million Japanese deaths. Also if the war continued, thousands of people, who were not fighting in the war, would continue to die each day.

This source is reliable because it is a popular business magazine/website and the author of this article was educated at MIT and Harvard and was a former researcher at the FDA.

# data[].attributes.body
Hello there for some reason it won't let me delete the ones I did incorrectly so please only pay attention to the one's titled "NICOLE JOHNSON-CORRECT" Thanks.

# data[].attributes.body
1.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1946/12/if-the-atomic-bomb-had-not-been-used/376238/

This article explains how certain conventional bombing can cause many deaths and mass destruction. There would have been much more death to come if the atomic bomb was not used.

This source is reliable because it is from a magazine with high-quality reviews and the author of this specific article is a physicist and has served in a number of different administrative and scientific roles.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/topic_display.cfm?tcid=63

This source gives quotes from scientists and generals to President Truman. They gave reasons like, Japan was defeated and there was no need to drop the atomic bomb on them.

This article is reliable because it gives sources at the bottom of the page. It also is on a website that has many other articles and videos.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://www.atomicheritage.org/key-documents/franck-report

This article summarizes a report that stated using the atomic bomb would lead to an arms race which would put the US in danger. The factories and economy of the US is gathered and compacted into small areas, one bomb could wipe out hundreds of factories.

This source is reliable because it comes from a website dedicated to the atomic bomb and nuclear technology. The website also has many other articles and videos.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-two/the-pacific-war-1941-to-1945/the-fire-raids-on-japan/

This source states that the strategic bombings and fire raids on Japan were becoming more successful. These raids would eventually lead to Japanese surrender while causing few US casualties.

This source is trustworthy because it was published fairly recently. Also the website it is on has many other articles, not just this one.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/hiroshima-nagasaki-did-us-need-drop-atomic-bombs-japan-1513563

This source states that dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was not necessary and that it was just a tactic to intimidate other countries. It states Japan didn't surrender only because of the atomic bomb but also because of the USSR.

This source is reliable because it gives sources for its information throughout the article. The site it is on also seems reliable because it is up-to-date.

# data[].attributes.body
D) http://nationalinterest.org/feature/no-other-choice-why-truman-dropped-the-atomic-bomb-japan-13504

This article states that the dropping of the bomb was necessary because an Allied invasion would cost thousands of soldiers' lives and the bomb insured zero Allied casualties. Japan also refused to surrender and was prepared to fight to the bitter end.

This is reliable because it is from a site that has the sole purpose of debating what is in the best interest of America. The article also provides opposing points of view but proves why the bombs were necessary with cited fact.

# data[].attributes.body
1.     https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/good-uses-nuclear-energy-0

This source is reliable because the International Atomic Energy Agency wrote it. This agency has its own website and it an organization who has experts and professionals working at it and they also offer internships. The website is updated often and is up to date.

The source says many things today have a potential to be good or bad. Take fire for example, it can be used at a weapon in war or it can be used to keep someone warm or cook food. The same goes for a nuclear bomb, if used incorrectly it can go bad but if used in the right way it can be beneficial.

2.     http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/non-power-nuclear-applications/overview/the-many-uses-of-nuclear-technology.aspx

This is reliable because it was written by the World Nuclear Association which is an international organization that promotes nuclear power. It has also been recently updated.

The source says that in addition to ending wars, nuclear bombs can be useful in other aspects as well. It can reduce the number of people dying from starvation, can kill many insects who are creating bad harvests, and can help to preserve food and water.

3.     http://occupytheory.org/list-of-pros-and-cons-of-nuclear-weapons/

The source is reliable because it is updated frequently. Also, because this website isn’t biased it looks at both sides of the argument. So, that means it isn’t opinionated and is based off facts.

It says that nuclear bombs are useful for deterring war and acts of aggression. It also states that because no nation wants their homeland to be bombed, it will increase communication and the willingness to listen and have open minds.

4.     http://healthresearchfunding.org/pros-cons-nuclear-weapons/

The source is reliable because it is up to date. It is written by Health Research Funding which is an organization that researches health benefits.

It says “nuclear weapons are valuable tools, if placed in the right hands.” Having nuclear weapons can create a great amount of security and increases negotiation. It makes an agreement easier when you know that a country has a destructive power. With that being said you have to know when to use it properly, such as being involved in a big war.

# data[].attributes.body
Source D
http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/battle-of-guadalcanal

During this battle, Japan realized that the chance of defeating the Americans would be slim. The Japanese faced a heavy loss with this battle and the Americans had a stronger army that the Japanese. The website has links to other articles that are related to the topic. There are videos that are available to watch on the subject and about similar topics.

# data[].attributes.body
Source C
http://www.history.com/news/remembering-the-battle-of-okinawa-70-years-ago

Many turning points of the war were in the Pacific Theater. During the battle of Okinawa, Japan was desperate to defeat the Americans. The website has videos on the side of the page that are related to the topic. There are different articles attached that you could click on for more information about the War.

# data[].attributes.body
Source B
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Reference&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=WHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX2876500048&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=

American Marines would do anything to win battles in the Pacific Theater. Japan had many places to fight at so they could be caught off guard. Many references were used to write the article. The authors of the references used were in World War II and were in some of the battles.

# data[].attributes.body
C) https://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymiller/2014/08/05/the-nuking-of-japan-was-a-military-and-moral-imperative/#1edddb505269

This article states that the bombing of Japan was justified because of the numerous atrocities and violations Japan committed during the war such as torture, rape, slavery, and chemical warfare. They also refused to surrender when they faced an invasion of the Allied forces, which if it went through would've cost countless American lives. The quickest and most tactical decision to end the war was the atomic bomb.

This is a reliable source because it comes from Forbes, a well known company known for writing accurate articles on a variety of topics. The author, Henry Miller, has a degree from MIT and has worked as a columnist and  researcher for over twenty years.

# data[].attributes.body
Source A
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=Reference&currPage=&scanId=&query=&source=&prodId=UHIC%3AWHIC&search_within_results=&p=WHIC%3AUHIC&mode=view&catId=&u=char80082&limiter=&display-query=&displayGroups=&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&documentId=GALE%7CCX3048900466&windowstate=normal&activityType=&failOverType=&commentary=

Battles fought in the Pacific Theater with Japan were tough on the Americans. Slowly, Americans were becoming stronger with foreign aid and were pushing Japan back to the mainland. The author has written many books on historical backgrounds. The encyclopedia the topic is in has other topics about U.S. history.

# data[].attributes.body
B) http://www.historyextra.com/feature/second-world-war/was-us-justified-dropping-atomic-bombs-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-during-second

This source states that the atomic bombs were the quickest way out of the war for America. A full-scale invasion of Japan would cost the lives of thousands of US soldiers and last weeks or months while the bomb would end the war quick ad result in zero American casualties.

This is a reliable source because BBC, the owner of the site, is a well known network and this article is directly from their history branch. The author, Emma Mason, is a legitimate journalist who has written many other articles for BBC.

# data[].attributes.body
A)
http://www.ushistory.org/us/51g.asp

This source states that the bombs were necessary for the war to be ended because a conventional surrender from Japan was unlikely even after the threat of total destruction. It was not until after two bombs and the addition of the USSR in the war that Japan surrendered.

This source is reliable because it is from a non-profit organization with the sole purpose of informing the public of US history. It also provides links to other sources which display similar information to that of the main article.

# data[].attributes.body
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/revealed-why-the-soviet-unions-entry-the-pacific-war-matters-13628

"National Interest" states that Russia and Japan signed a non agression pact that would end in 1946. Japan had hoped that Russia would keep this pact, and they would use them as a last resort for help. This source is reliable because it is written by Dr. Jefferey Mankoff, the Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program for the CSIS (Center for Strategic and International Studies).  He also teaches classes at Georgetown.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/08/14/historians-soviet-offensive-key-japans-wwii-surrender-eclipsed-bombs.html

"Fox News" is saying that Russia promised to invade Japan and help us fight Japan. They said they would invade three months after the Germans surrendered.   This source is reliable because it is from a well-known and trusted  news network, Fox. It also has interviews and quotes from credible authors, historians, and military generals that know a great amount of information about this period.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didnt-beat-japan-stalin-did/

"Foreign Policy" states that Japan did not want Russia to invade them. They wanted them to act as their mediator between them and the Allies for better treaty terms. This source is reliable because it comes from the political magazine, Foreign Policy. This article was written by Ward Wilson, Senior Fellow and director of the Rethinking Nuclear Weapons project at the British American Security Information Council.

http://www.stripes.com/news/special-reports/world-war-ii-the-final-chapter/wwii-victory-in-japan/would-japan-have-surrendered-without-the-atomic-bombings-1.360300#.WNGVEvnyuUk

"Stars and Stripes" states that one of the main reasons that Japan surrendered was Russia. Since Russia invaded their country, they didn’t think they could fight both Russia and the US on two different fronts.  This is a reliable source because Stars and Stripes is a military newspaper that operates from inside of the Department of Defense.  The article’s author, Erik Slavin, is a reporter based in Tokyo that covers Japan and Asia for Stars and Stripes.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.dannen.com/decision/bardmemo.html

-This source is reliable because it cites the U.S. Nation Archives and the exact place you can find it in there. It also contains pictures of the actual document.

-This source explains that the bomb was unlike the Americans to use, because it was inhumane and the USA is not an inhumane nation. It also explained that the Japanese were close to surrender and not much force was needed.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.dannen.com/decision/int-law.html#d

-This source is reliable because it includes the actual issue from the League of Nations. It cites multiple other trustable sources where the same information can be found and books where the actual quotes are included.

-This source says that the use of bombs on civilian locations is illegal. It was written on behalf of those who are concerned about the effects the bomb could cause, including the catastrophic deaths.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.dannen.com/decision/franck.html

-This source is reliable because it is an actual report written the meetings of the Manhattan Project at the University of Chicago. Pictures of the actual documents are attached and all of the authors are listed.
-This source discusses the danger of the bomb because of the unbelievable amount of damage it will cause. By dropping a bomb, you are running the risk of threats from other countries, and it could possibly effect the home country too.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.doug-long.com/einstein.htm

-This source is reliable because it has multiple citations listed. It was also written by Doug Long, who's site won a Critical Mass Award for it's work and he has worked as a professional historian.

-This source talks about the letter Einstein wrote to FDR urging for the creation of the bomb, in fear of the Germans building one first (he then regretted writing this). Einstein contributed little to bomb making activites in fear that he would not be able to keep the project a secret.

# data[].attributes.body
http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/uhic/ReferenceDetailsPage/DocumentToolsPortletWindow?displayGroupName=Reference&u=oak30216&u=oak30216&jsid=885fa2cddb280d23cd06bf9c5ed436a5&p=UHIC%3AWHIC&action=2&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CCX2876300010&zid=4a6103da6d025e4543bf83800209eb8f
-In this source, it says that the Americans wanted to be able to defeat their enemy without the help of Russia or anyone else, and show that they were more powerful than the Russians. It also says that the use of the atomic bomb was an alternative to negotiating with Stalin.
-This source is reputable because it is from Gale Group, which is a certified reliable source. It also has all citations listed.

http://www.history.army.mil/books/AMH/AMH-23.htm
-In this source, it says that a peace agreement was proposed to Japan, but after increasing resistance from the Japanese, the United States dropped the first atomic bomb on Japan. It also says that Russia was a part of the peace agreement, and actually attacked forces in Manchuria.
-This source is reputable because it"s location is ".mil" which means it is from the military. It also has an author that is real and has written other books.

https://www.trumanlibrary.org/teacher/abomb.htm
-In this source, it says that that if Russia would have invaded Japan before the nuclear bomb was dropped, then the war would have continued. It says that the United States or Britain had to do something to end the way once and for all.
- This source is reputable because it is from a very reputable source, the NSA. It also has sources listed at the bottom.