# data[].attributes.body
I think what happened was that the bigger animal saw the smaller animal, and ran to it and attacked it. I think after that the bigger animal ate the smaller animal and walked on.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that there is a small animal making the smaller and more rapid steps and then there is the bigger animal with the bigger steps. I think that the smaller animal was walking in till the bigger animal or predator started to chase the small animal or pray. Because the steps of the smaller animal were neat and in one direction in till  the steps of the bigger animal came closer to the pray the steps became off balance and more messy. Then because the steps became a huge clump and very close to each other . I think that they must have been chasing and fighting each other. Then at the end of the clump the bigger steps start to leave. But only the predator's steps not the pray's steps.Because only the bigger steps leave and are more relaxed. because the steps are closer together. I think the predator ate the pray. This is my hypothesis for what happened throughout the three cards.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that the smaller footprint is a lizard of some sort and the larger is a bird and this depicts the bird chasing and eating the lizard

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the smaller animal and bigger one were not in the same time frame because all of the footprints are so close together and how could one of them not get the other when they are literally 2 feet apart.

# data[].attributes.body
We predict that the smaller animal has been eaten by the larger animal. This is because the footprints on card two have come across each other and are fairly close. On card 3, the smaller footprints disappeared which makes us infer that they got into a fight and the smaller animal was eaten.

# data[].attributes.body
We predict that both of the animals came across each other and had a chase. Then the small animal got eaten and the bigger one went off.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the animals got into a fight and the large footprints killed the small footprints animal because on card 2 It seems that they were fighting and yeah killed the small animal like I said.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the little was brutally stepped on i say this because in picture 2 they were fighting and in picture 3 there was only 1 pair of footprints left

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the Big foot prints and small footprints got into a fight . The small footprint lost the fight and the big footprint killed the small animal. I know this because in the second part of the fossil prints, it looked liked they both were swerving and running around. At the end, the big footprints won and was the only one left.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that those footprints are old footprints and those animals are just walking over those old footprints again. Also the smaller animal is probably not there anymore due to maybe going a different way then the bigger animal.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that two animals crossed paths. One being bigger than the other  the other. They got into a fight and the smaller animal flew away. We may say that it didn't die because there is no body print in the ground. The animal with the bigger footprints (the bigger animal) just walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the to animals had a fight to the death. The animal with the bigger feet won because the smaller animal died.

# data[].attributes.body
A smaller animal is walking when a bigger animal engaged in a fight. but only the bigger animal survived.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that this was a predator prey situation where the animal that becaeme the prey was surprised when the bigger animal showed up and moved to avoid it. Then the clump of footprints meant that they were fighting each other and then dince their is no skeleton the bigger animal might be carrying the smaller animal in it's mouth as it walks away.

# data[].attributes.headline
My hypothesis is that there was a predator, looking for food, and found some prey. The prey was being chased in circles, until the predator eventually caught up to it, and ate it alive.

# data[].attributes.subject
My hypothesis is that there was a predator, looking for food, and found some prey. The prey was being chased in circles, until the predator eventually caught up to it, and ate it alive.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is the animal with the bigger footprints and the animal with the smaller footprints crossed paths. In the second card, I think the two animals had a fight and the animal with the bigger footprint won and ate or killedthe smaller print animal because in the third card, the bigger footprint animal was the only footprints left.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the bigger animal and the smaller animal had a fight and the bigger animal won the fight and walked away from it the littler animal was most likely dead

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the bigger animal footprints hopped until it caught up to the small animal then they tussled then the bigger animal came out triumphant with eating the smaller one then it walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the 2 animals were walking around and then they crossed paths. The one with the bigger footprint won the fight and kept on walking

# data[].attributes.body
What I think happened in this little scenario was the bigger animal was running to the little one, they got into a fight, and the smaller one got eaten.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that a predator and a prey came in contact with one another. This caused the two to have a fight, ultimately having the predator eat the small animal. The reason why I think this, is that in card one, you can see the bigger animal getting closer to the smaller animal. (Based on the footprints and how far apart they were from each other, I decided there was a big and smaller animal.) In card two, the footprints got closer and all the sudden they clashed, and the footprints went all over the place. My best guess is that the two animals had a fight, while the predator was trying to kill the smaller animal. In the last card, the bigger animal's footprints walk away without the smaller animal. This shows that the prey probably got killed. This is my hypothesis of what happened.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the bigger animal got into a fight with the smaller one, and the bigger animal won, because it walked away while the smaller one didn't. In the first card, we see that a bigger animal and a smaller animal are about to cross paths. In the second card, we can see that their footprints are in a cluster, which indicates that they have been fighting. In the third card, we see that only the bigger animal has walked away, which indicates that it won, somewhat.

# data[].attributes.body
My leading hypothesis currently is that the first animal (small footprints) got chased by animal two (larger footprints) and eaten after a fight. Animal two (Larger footprints) walked away from the fight but the small footprint animal did not.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is in card one the larger footprint is starting to hunt and chase the smaller animal. in card two i think the larger animal is trying to kill and or eat the smaller animal while the smaller animal is trying to run away. In card three i think the bigger animal is walking away because it is either looking for somewhere to eat its prey or its looking for more prey. in card for if their is one it will show the bigger animal laying down or it chasing another animal.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is the bigger animal watch the smaller animal as it walk past the large animal.  I saw the footprints start creeping towards the smaller animal then a big step and I could tell. The large animal walked towards the smaller one then pounced at him trying to kill it then the smaller animal started to run so the bigger animal started to chase it and finely kill it. Then when I saw the footprints walking away I could tell that the bigger animal won the fight and had killed the small animal and is now walking away.

# data[].attributes.body
My leading hypothesis currently is the larger animal followed the smaller animal, the larger animal chased the small one in circles until the larger animal caught he small. The larger animal then either ate the small one or carried it away to eat later.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the bigger animal is chasing the smaller animal, and in the second card the big animal jumps the smaller animal and in the last card the big animal killed and ate the smaller animal.

# data[].attributes.body
After examining and analyzing the three footprint cards I infer that the larger species of animal had started at an increase in pace ready to pounce on its prey. Eventually, the prey was eaten by the larger animal who then started decreasing in speed after leaving the battlegrounds.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that that the bigger animal surprised the smaller and chased it into a small area. Stomped on it and walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the bigger animal was chasing the smaller animal and they fought which lead to the biig animal eating the smaller animal and walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the animal with the bigger footprints was trying to eat the animal with the smaller footprints. I believe this because in card two, the footprints were close together and all in one area. This leads me to believe that the animal with the bigger footprints was chasing after the animal with the smaller footprints.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the bigger animal in the first card was running to get the smaller one (The big spaces in between the footprints). Then in the second card it ate or killed the smaller animal and in the third card is walking away to find more food.

# data[].attributes.body
The larger species was running after the smaller species, they got into a fight which resulted in the larger species being able to catch his food, by eating the smaller species. The larger species was able to walk away, at a walking speed, with a full stomach.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the larger species was running at the smaller. Then they got into a fight, and it resulted in the larger species catching the smaller and eating it. Finally the bigger species left with a full stomach.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the animal with the bigger footprint, is bigger. I think the bigger animal was chasing the smaller animal (the one with smaller footprints) and leaped at it and then chased it around until it got it and ate it and then walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that a bugger mammal was creeping up on the smaller mammal, planning to eat it. When it got closer, it tried to jump on it but got in a chase. The bigger mammal caught up and killed the smaller animal and walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the animal with the bigger footprint is bigger in size than the one with the sm
aller footprint. I think the bigger animal is trying to eat the smaller animal. I think this because in the first card the supposedly bigger animal is approaching the smaller animal. While the smaller animal is making rapid steps to escape . Then in the second card the smaller animal and big animal are clustered together, suggesting that the smaller animal is trying to escape somehow, but it it might be too small to escape the bigger animal. Finally in the third card revealed that there is no longer the footprints of the small animal and the bigger animal has more lent steps than in the first card. This may mean that the bigger animal has ate the smaller animal, and is no longer in a hurry. This is the explanation for why I think that the bigger animal ate the smaller animal throughout the timeline of the three footprint cards.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the bigger footprint ate the smaller footprint because in the third card the the smaller footprint is non existent.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the big animal is looking for food and is eating little animals.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the larger animal first spots the smaller animal and sneaks up on it. I think it then attacks the smaller animal and the smaller animal tries to get away. Then the bigger animal emerges triumphant from the fight and eats the smaller animal.

# data[].attributes.body
The first card showed how the bigger animal was sneaking up on the small animal.The second card showed how the big animal was trying to kill the small animal, and the small animal was trying to escape. In the third card it showed that the big animal walked normally, without the small animal.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that, in card 1, the smaller animal is attempting to scurry to wherever it's going, likely some sort of den or hiding spot. The bigger one, though, is faster and therefore cuts it off. Then, in card 2, the larger animal is trying to swipe at and bite the smaller one as the larger footprints are facing the smaller ones most of the time. Then, in card three, the larger animal walks away after a successful kill. I don't believe that the animal was/will be eaten, because no footprints are messy enough to potentially showcase the larger animal feasting; This is probably because the smaller was to small and not worth the time.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the bigger animal killed the smaller animal.  I think this because in card one, the bigger animal is running towards the small animal, as the footsteps gap is really far. Then, in card two, they collide and chaos ensues. It appears that the big animal is chasing the little animal. After the fight, only the big footsteps make it out. This shows that the little animal must have died, meaning that the big one killed it.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the big animal was running toward the small animal, because the footsteps are farther apart on card one than they are on card three, and they met. I think the big animal started attacking the small animal, and the big animal killed the small animal. The big animal then walked away, continuing on its path.

# data[].attributes.headline
My hypothesis is  that the bigger animal was chasing the smaller animal. And then when the bigger animal caught up he attacked the smaller animal and killed the samller animal and ate it and then walked away.

# data[].attributes.subject
My hypothesis is  that the bigger animal was chasing the smaller animal. And then when the bigger animal caught up he attacked the smaller animal and killed the samller animal and ate it and then walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
I think what happened was that the two animals was going after food, the bigger animal killed the small one and then ran away.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the animal that had the small footprint walked into dangers way. The animal with the larger foot ate the smaller one for food after fighting the small animal for a bit. The reason I know he ate the small animal is because in the fourth image of footprints the only footprint in sight was the larger one and the small foot vanished in plain sight.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the big animal was walking and saw the small animal. The big animal then ran towards the small animal. The small animal tried to run away but the big animal caught up to the small animal and ate it.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the larger animal, with the larger footprints and larger mass, stalked the smaller animal, with the smaller footprints and the smaller mass, and began to fight. Then, the larger animal came out victorious.

# data[].attributes.body
The bigger animal was running after the smaller animal then the larger animal caught up and the smaller animal put up a fight but the larger one ate the smaller and then walked off

# data[].attributes.body
The larger animal could smell or see the smaller one and then stalked it for a bit and then went and attacked it because the footprints of the smaller animal looks like it has a destination and then the larger animal's footprints just seem to be going after the smaller animal.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the smaller printed animal was attacked by the larger printed animal. the predator came up on the preys blind spot and tackled it to the ground. how ever the prey held up a good fight, so when the predator killed his prey, he limped away, not running, but waddling in a sense.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the larger animal (larger footprints) was following the smaller animal (smaller footprints). They soon begin to fight and the larger one wins. Because the footprints for the smaller animal stopped right after the fight, the larger one ate the smaller one on the spot.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that that larger set of prints on the right (in comparison to the prints on the left) belonged to a heavier and larger animal due to the fact that the prints were larger and darker in color meaning that the depth of the prints was larger. I think this animal was stalking the smaller animal as its prey. In the second card, we can see that a fight occurred between these to animals because there was a cluster of the 2 types of footprints. We can then see at the very top of the card that the larger set of footprints is walking off the page which I think this means the smaller animal was eaten. In the third card we only see the large footprints walking off in a curving line, leading me to believe it was injured in the fight.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the larger animal picked up the scent of the smaller animal because of the bigger animal having different sized steps than in the third card. Once the big animal got in striking distance, it made its move. Starting to fight the smaller animal and inevitably killing the smaller animal. It then began feasting on the smaller animal, only to begin to return to its nest.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the larger animal was following the the smaller animal and once it caught up to the smaller animal it attacked and ate it. I say this because of the large cluster of footprints on the second paper and how the smaller set of footprints did not have tracks moving away from the cluster of prints. I also believe that the larger animal is walking away after it ate the smaller one possibly to rest.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it's quite certain that the larger animal has killed and possibly eaten the smaller animal. The footprints start to converge in the first photo, but once they overlap, the cart turns into a huge mess of footprints. The third card shows that the large animal is now alone and nowhere to be seen.The depth of the prints is also deeper, signifying harder or heavier steps, which is what would happen after being stressed or eating.

# data[].attributes.body
I hypothesize that the bigger prints was stalking the smaller prints and after a chase in circles, the big prints caught the small prints because only the big prints leave the 2nd card. after that they headed over to a tree or cave to rest because the big animal makes an odd route where they veer to the left as if they are going up a slope or up to a tree.

# data[].attributes.body
I hypothesize that the fossil footprints show a big animal hunting. It seems as if the larger animal was hiding in bushes or among trees and jumped at the smaller animal. At first it seemed as if the smaller animal was not aware that it was being attacked. Once it saw the larger animal, it looked like the smaller animal tried to run but, the bigger animal jumped on the smaller animal. The smaller animal in the end was killed and the bigger animal started walking away from the seen. At first it seemed like the larger animal was making large strides that looked awkward. That was when the larger animal seemed to have started running. At card 3 the animal with larger footprints started walking in a regular way and its strides were not awkward after that.

# data[].attributes.body
i think that the big animal killed the small animal and will be eaten

# data[].attributes.body
I think that in the first card the bigger animal is chasing the smaller animal, and then in the second card the bigger animal catches up to the smaller animal and eats the smaller animal. Then in the third card, the bigger animal continues on.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that a bigger larger animals walked towards a small animal that didn't see the big animal. The big animal the small animal, and walked away to find water and shelter

# data[].attributes.body
I think that at first, the larger animal was stalking the smaller one based on the fact that the larger footprints seemed to be heading towards the smaller one. Then, there was a huddle of footprints, and only the larger animal walked away. The footprints seem to be weaving as the animal walks away, so maybe the smaller animal did end up doing some damage to the larger one. However, only the larger animal walked away, so we can infer that the smaller one has been eaten.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the small animal didnt see the big animal so the big animal ate the small animal and walked away

# data[].attributes.body
At first, the bigger animal approached smaller animal, by running towards it. Then the chase began. The two animals seem to be running in a circular motion, which gives the impression that the bigger animal was after the smaller one. Then, only the bigger animal walked away, so we can hypothesize that the bigger animal has eaten the smaller animal.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the animal with the larger feet followed and ate the smaller animal after a long chase down process. But when youobserve the footprints after the chase down

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the animal with the larger footprint tracked down the little one and ate it. I belive the larger one was chaing the little animal from the first picture to the second picture and in the third, the larger animal might have began its serch for more food.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that in First the bigger animal was hunting the smaller animal because it looks like they met at a weird angle. In the second card I believe that the two animals were fighting because of how mixed up they are. In the third card I think that the bigger animal killed the little one and walked away by carrying it in its mouth back to it's den.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the bigger animal, when walking towards the small one, was trying to eat the smaller animal. After the smaller animal passes the bigger one in the first card, they both circle around, somewhat meaningless. The way that these animals move in this circumstance seems very unlikely and unpredictably perplexing to me, which initially made me think that these footprints were indeed at different times. After looking at the third card with the bigger animal walking away, I believed that its intentions were to hunt and feast on the smaller animal, and it possibly started to look for more food once the smaller animal was already eaten.

# data[].attributes.body
The first card shows 2 sets of footprints. I think the small prints belonged to a small animal and big prints belonged to a big animal (Thank you captain obvious). The bigger animal was hunting the smaller animal for either food or it was bored (probably the former). On the second card, it shows the 2 prints all over the place. I think they were fighting or the small animal was moving around in a certain pattern to confuse its larger foe (probably the last one). But it shows the bigger prints leaving the struggle. And there were no signs of prints of the smaller animal doing the same. I think the larger animal killed the smaller animal and took somewhere to be eaten. And then we move on to last card. There are just more prints of the bigger animal, probably taking its lunch to its den or cave or whatever. Or already at it and went back to its home or shelter to sleep it off. I think it's the first one more than the second one

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the animal that has the bigger footprints is the predator and the ones with the smaller ones is the prey. I think this because the smaller animals footprints are continuous and even which shows that it was unaware of the predator, while the larger ones have uneven strides. With the uneven strides, I can assume that the prey had started running and eventually caught the animals because of the jumble of footprints that came next. The animal had completed its task of catching the smaller one because I could only see the bigger footprints and the strides were even.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the first card showed us the smaller, unsuspecting animal being chased by the larger animal, because the larger animal's footprints were further apart than in the third card. After that the larger animal pounces on the smaller one. Then the two animals meet in some sort of confrontation and in the end the little animal, dead or alive, is taken away by the larger animal.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the bigger mammal was chasing the smaller one because I observed that the two animals were meeting at an angle which shows us that they were in a chase. Also the bigger mammal only has 6 footprints on the first card which shows us that it was running. In the second card the footprints are in a cluster proving to us that the smaller animal was eaten by the bigger one because in the third card only the bigger mammal's footprints were still there.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is the big animal was hunting the smaller one. In the footprint card 1 I observed they were walking and crossed paths, then in card two the smaller animal was being chased by the larger animal. This is because the footprints were scattered end the big animal ended up walking away from the chase. In card three I also observed the big animals footprints were the only ones there. Therefore the larger animal was hunting the smaller animal.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the smaller footprints belonged to a smaller animal that was being hunted by the animal with the bigger footprints. I think in the first picture, the bigger animal was chasing the smaller animal. In the second picture, I think the bigger animal caught up to the smaller animal and the bigger animal won. In the third picture, I think the bigger animal ate the smaller one because we only see the bigger footprints.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the animal with the larger footprints is a predator, while the animal with shorter footprints is the prey. The predator ran towards the prey and managed to catch it, and then heads onward to enjoy his meal as the smaller footprints are no more.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis on what caused these footprints is that the bigger animal was running fast while the little one was walking slow because the prints were different lengths away from each other showing various speeds. The second card showed the little one trying to get away from the big one but the very last card relieved that the smaller one was dead while the big animal carried on walking.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis for the sets of fossil footprints is that it began with a larger animal hunting/chasing a smaller one, running after it as to hunt it down for prey. The larger animal likely then caught up to the tinier one, and then initiated an attack, forcing a chase between the two. The chase then resulted in the larger animal taking the smaller one prey, and following the capture, the bigger animal then walked off back to its home with its prey, and its next meal.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis for the footprint sets is that there are two animals: one smaller and one larger. Both animals were on a trek northward and saw food. Both of them rushed to eat it. The big animal, however, ate the smaller one, along with the piece of food. And then went on its way northward.

# data[].attributes.body
My hypothesis is that the bigger animal was chasing the smaller animal to eat it for dinner. Once the bigger animal caught up to the smaller animal, you can tell there was a struggle because the footprints of both animals are everywhere. The bigger animal killed and ate the smaller animal and walked away at a normal pace.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the two animals were walking toward each other in the first card, then in the second card they crossed paths and got into a fight. The smaller animal was running away from the larger one but in the end the larger animal ate the smaller one. I know this because in the third card, it shows that there are no more of the small footprints, only the larger ones that are walking away.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the large animal was hunting the small animal, which was unaware it was there, until the large animal pounced on it, and the small animal tried scurrying and running away, but the large animal either ate it or kept it's body to eat later.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the animal with the large prints was hunting the animal with the smaller feet. I observed that the footprints met at an angle, as if the big one was chasing the small animal. Also, the large animal had sixteen less prints than the small animal on the first card. This shows that the large footed mammal was chasing the smaller animal.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the two animals were walking and they crossed paths and they felt threatened by each other so they decided to fight and attack each other. The bigger footprint overcame the smaller footprint so in the end, the bigger footprint was the only who walked away from the dispute.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the bigger animal and the smaller animal are both looking for food since they are walking towards the same direction. I think that the bigger animal saw the smaller animal and started to run after it since its footprints are more spaced out, and one could assume that while someone is running, they take longer strides which could be true. Then, I think that since the footprints were jumbled up on card two, the bigger animal tried to chase the smaller animal and ate the smaller animal since there were no more smaller footprints on card three.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the smaller animal is a chicken and it was the prey to a bigger animal who tackled the supposed chicken, ate him or carried him. Then walked away.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the animals with the smaller footprints was on it's way somewhere. But the bigger footprints saw the smaller footprints and tried to attack it. The smaller animal died and the bigger animal got a meal.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the animal with the big footprints and the animal with the small footprints ran into each other. The animal with the big footprints is trying to hunt the small animal so it it tries to get away. Sadly at the end, the animal with the big footprints ate the animal with the small footprints

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the animal with the bigger footprints spotted the animal with the smaller footprints and starts running towards it for food. Then, the animal with the bigger footprints catches up and they run in circles. Finally, I think that the animal with the smaller footprints doesn't make it and the animal with the bigger footprints can rest.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the big animal may have been following and taking larger but quieter steps to stalk the small animal, then when the small animals saw it, it started walking faster, then the bigger animal did too, then it followed it, caught it, then started to take normal steps as it walked away

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the larger animal started charging toward the smaller animal. They got in a fight and the smaller animal did all that it could to get away but the larger animal wouldn't back off. Sadly, the smaller animal did not make it and the larger animal walked away with his/her stomach full.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that two animals, one bigger and the other one smaller, were walking towards the same direction when the bigger one noticed the small one and started chasing it until he/she caught the small animals and ate it, causing the big animal to walk away with a full stomach.

# data[].attributes.body
I think when the animals crossed paths, the big and small animal started running around because the big one was chasing the small animal. Then the big animal ended up eating the small animal and walked away from his meal spot.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the animals were walking and crossed paths and then they got into a little fight and the big guy one and ate the little one and then he got out of there.

# data[].attributes.body
The larger prints and the smaller prints had a fight and the larger won ate the smaller one and continued it walk

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the bigger animal was stalking the smaller animal and once it got near its prey, it attacked it and tried to catch the smaller prey. The predator killed the small prey and continued on its way, taking normal steps.

# data[].attributes.body
the larger print was hunting the smaller print it succeeded then walked away after it ate its fill.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the small animal was walking around, and then the bigger animal came from behind and attacked the smaller animal. The two animals fought, and the bigger animal was victorious. He walked away with dinner.