# data[].attributes.body
Thomas Paine agrees with Charles Montesquieu.  They both have famous publications. Paine's "Common Sense" and Montesquieu's "Spirit of Laws" both talk about not having a monarchy. They both like a government run by representatives.

# data[].attributes.body
Rousseau doesn't agree. He believed in direct democracy, not the division of powers we have in America today. He believed everyone had free will and controlled their own lives.

# data[].attributes.body
Thomas Paine thinks monarchy the same as Charles Montesque because there shouldn't be to much power for one single person. He also thinks that there should be a few people being in charge of the government at least! So with all of this info they both agree on the same this!

# data[].attributes.headline
Maggie Hayes                          (Paine)

# data[].attributes.subject
Maggie Hayes                          (Paine)

# data[].attributes.body
Thomas Paine and Montesquieu  both disagree in a Monarchy.  He thinks that there should not be to much power put on just one person. Thomas Paine also supports the French Revolution because the government is supposed to help the people. The revolution was letting the people have a say on what they want. I also agree on how Montesquieu had a way he thought the government should be run. If not it would just be crazy.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with you because I think there should be no government at all. The government is a terrible thing that takes control of peoples life. Its unfair and I think it should be put to a end.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Thomas Paine agrees with you about monarchy on a similar level. He dislikes monarchy because he thinks there shouldn't be to much power for one person. But Thomas does think there should be a group of people in charge like the government.

# data[].attributes.body
Thomas Paine also supports the French Revolution. He thinks that a people should have the right to revolt against the government if the government doesn't support them. The whole point of a government is to help us, so if it's not doing that, it's not fulfilling it's purpose and therefore is useless.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1748 Charles Montesquieu wrote "The Spirit of Laws" it was giving ideas on how governments should be run. In this book Charles wrote that we should split governments into three parts, the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches. He said that each part would have different powers as to not give to much to one part. The Judicial branch interprets is formed of the courts like the Supreme court. The Legislative branch has the power to draft laws that are proposed to them. The Executive branch contains The President and the Vice President, this branch makes sure the laws are being followed. When put together these branches form our government. This is how our Federal government is run today. Charles Montesquieu essentially can up with the  basis of our entire government.

# data[].attributes.body
Charles Montesquieu wrote "The Spirit of Laws, which was about the government, for example he did not believe in a Monarchy.. He wrote a book that showed France in the eyes of two Persian nobles and surprisingly was a huge success.

# data[].attributes.body
Two of his major works were: Persian Letters which this
work view France through Persian Travelers, his next major work was his masterwork known as "The Spirit of Laws" gave influence on how government should be run and had huge influence on the U.S. government.

# data[].attributes.body
Charles was born on January 18, 1689, in Château La Brède, France. He was home schooled, as a child and later he moved to Paris to get a law degree. On January 24, 1728 he was elected into the  Académie Française once a spot had opened up.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Early life and career

Montesquieu's father, Jacques de Secondat, belonged to an old military family of modest wealth that had been ennobled in the 16th century for services to the crown, while his mother, Marie-Françoise de Pesnel, was a pious lady of partial English extraction. She brought to her husband a great increase in wealth in the valuable wine-producing property of La Brède. When she died in 1696, the barony of La Brède passed to Charles-Louis, who was her eldest child, then aged seven. Educated first at home and then in the village, he was sent away to school in 1700. The school was the Collège de Juilly, close to Paris and in the diocese of Meaux. It was much patronized by the prominent families of Bordeaux, and the priests of the Oratory, to whom it belonged, provided a sound education along enlightened and modern lines.

Charles-Louis left Juilly in 1705, continued his studies at the faculty of law at the University of Bordeaux, graduated, and became an advocate in 1708; soon thereafter he appears to have moved to Paris in order to obtain practical experience in law. He was called back to Bordeaux by the death of his father in 1713. Two years later he married Jeanne de Lartigue, a wealthy Protestant, who brought him a respectable dowry of 100,000 livres and in due course presented him with two daughters and a son, Jean-Baptiste. Charles-Louis admired and exploited his wife's business skill and readily left her in charge of the property on his visits to Paris. But he does not appear to have been either faithful or greatly devoted to her. In 1716 his uncle, Jean-Baptiste, baron de Montesquieu, died and left to his nephew his estates, with the barony of Montesquieu, near Agen, and the office of deputy president in the Parlement of Bordeaux. His position was one of some dignity. It carried a stipend but was no sinecure.

The young Montesquieu, at 27, was now socially and financially secure. He settled down to exercise his judicial function (engaging to this end in the minute study of Roman law), to administer his property, and to advance his knowledge of the sciences-especially of geology, biology, and physics -which he studied in the newly formed academy of Bordeaux.

In 1721 he surprised all but a few close friends by publishing his Lettres persanes (Persian Letters, 1722), in which he gave a brilliant satirical portrait of French and particularly Parisian civilization, supposedly seen through the eyes of two Persian travellers. This exceedingly successful work mocks the reign of Louis XIV, which had only recently ended; pokes fun at all social classes; discusses, in its allegorical story of the Troglodytes, the theories of Thomas Hobbes relating to the state of nature. It also makes an original, if naive, contribution to the new science of demography; continually compares Islam and Christianity; reflects the controversy about the papal bull Unigenitus, which was directed against the dissident Roman Catholic group known as the Jansenists; satirizes Catholic doctrine; and is infused throughout with a new spirit of vigorous, disrespectful, and iconoclastic criticism. The work's anonymity was soon penetrated, and Montesquieu became famous. The new ideas fermenting in Paris had received their most-scintillating expression.

Montesquieu now sought to reinforce his literary achievement with social success. Going to Paris in 1722, he was assisted in entering court circles by the duke of Berwick, the exiled Stuart prince whom he had known when Berwick was military governor at Bordeaux. The tone of life at court was set by the rakish regent, the duc d'Orléans, and Montesquieu did not disdain its dissipations. It was during this period that he made the acquaintance of the English politician Viscount Bolingbroke, whose political views were later to be reflected in Montesquieu's analysis of the English constitution.

In Paris his interest in the routine activities of the Parlement in Bordeaux, however, had dwindled. He resented seeing that his intellectual inferiors were more successful than he in court. His office was marketable, and in 1726 he sold it, a move that served both to reestablish his fortunes, depleted by life in the capital, and to assist him, by lending colour to his claim to be resident in Paris, in his attempt to enter the Académie Française. A vacancy there arose in October 1727. Montesquieu had powerful supporters, with Madame de Lambert's salon firmly pressing his claims, and he was elected, taking his seat on January 24, 1728.

This official recognition of his talent might have caused him to remain in Paris to enjoy it. On the contrary, though older than most nobility starting on the grand tour, he resolved to complete his education by foreign travel. Leaving his wife at La Brède with full powers over the estate, he set off for Vienna in April 1728, with Lord Waldegrave, nephew of Berwick and lately British ambassador in Paris, as traveling companion. He wrote an account of his travels as interesting as any other of the 18th century. In Vienna he met the soldier and statesman Prince Eugene of Savoy and discussed French politics with him. He made a surprising detour into Hungary to examine the mines. He entered Italy, and, after tasting the pleasures of Venice, proceeded to visit most of the other cities. Conscientiously examining the galleries of Florence, notebook in hand, he developed his aesthetic sense. In Rome he heard the French minister Cardinal Polignac and read his unpublished Latin poem Anti-Lucretius. In Naples he skeptically witnessed the liquefaction of the blood of the city's patron saint. From Italy he moved through Germany to Holland and thence (at the end of October 1729), in the company of the diplomat and wit Lord Chesterfield, to England, where he remained until the spring of 1731.

Montesquieu had a wide circle of acquaintances in England. He was presented at court, and he was received by the prince of Wales, at whose request he later made an anthology of French songs. He became a close friend of the dukes of Richmond and Montagu. He was elected a fellow of the Royal Society. He attended parliamentary debates and read the political journals of the day. He became a Freemason. He bought extensively for his library. His stay in England was one of the most formative periods of his life.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Montesquieu | Biography, Spirit of the Laws, Separation of Powers, Books, & Facts

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Montesquieu, French political philosopher whose principal work, The Spirit of Laws, was a major contribution to political theory. It inspired the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Constitution of the United States. Learn more about Montesquieu's life and work.