# data[].attributes.body
This statement is problematic because there is no real statistical bias for this exact statement. So in turn could be taken as opinionated appealing to the readers emotion/moral

# data[].attributes.body
This statement is problematic because it supports the school to prison pipeline; which focus on the negative. Instead of looking at the amount of prison beds why not focus on the amount of scholarships to give out.

# data[].attributes.body
It is problematic because typically after third grade students are not into reading as much but instead of fixing the education system they will just put their money in prisons

# data[].attributes.body
It shows that rather than addressing issues of inadequate education or how to help adults  who were failed educationally, there is an entire industry in our society that can rely upon people being failed educationally in order to make a profit.

# data[].attributes.body
People recognize that there is a relationship between poor educational opportunities/outcomes and incarceration, and instead of working to eliminate this relationship, "prison planners" are looking to profit from it

# data[].attributes.body
To me, this statement emphasizes that certain populations of students (particularly Black and brown students from low socioeconomic backgrounds) are assumed to inevitably go to jail. Rather than attempt to fix the underlying problem, prisons just make room for more people.

# data[].attributes.body
It is problematic because the people that can fix this issue know that this is happening so what are they going to do to fix this issue?

Clearly funding needs to be in schools rather than prisons.

# data[].attributes.body
This statement is problematic for more reasons than I can honestly comprehend. One reason being that they see there is a wide systematic issue that's failing our students yet they aren't doing anything to derail it. Secondly they are taking a numerical score to predict future behaviors without taking into account the full picture behind the scores.

These prison planners are using data from two systems that were designed to fail certain groups of people so of course it is possible the data could seemingly line up.

# data[].attributes.body
It is an indication of the school to prison pipeline. The fact the some students are marked from the 3rd grade to be bound for prison is definitely expressed  in how they are then treated in school and in society. Either that or the strong correlation between reading scores and future imprisonment is proof that we are failing children with predictive accuracy.

# data[].attributes.body
Well its saying there is a high correlation between education/literacy and incarceration. That is also supported by the reference article. This means two things: that 3rd grade reading levels are a predictor of adult education and literacy (which is not good) and that adult education and literacy are predictors of incarceration (also not good). I think it speaks to the way both society and schools are structured that our laws and "justice" system so heavily incarcerates the less literate

# data[].attributes.body
One reason this is problematic is it makes it seems like politicians are making this claim about prison planners, but in reality aren't they basically one and the same?

# data[].attributes.body
They are indirectly making a plan on what group of people to exploit for slave labor, in this case those who were not given access to a high quality education, either because of underfunded schools or because of a learning disability. And shows that our prison system only punishes the "crimes" of middle class and below, not any white collar or exploitive crimes, like underpaying wages or stealing the data of everyone on facebook and selling.
this also gives them a vested intrest in keeping education underfunded.

# data[].attributes.body
This statement is problematic as it indicates that researchers may have found a correlation between education and prisons but have continued to invest in prisons while defunding education.