# data[].attributes.body
96% of papers can be deposited in open access repositories but only 12% is achieved - figures based on previous REF exercise

# data[].attributes.body
Hubbard: funders - want researchers to create impact. Institutions - want outputs for repository. Publishers - want to publish

# data[].attributes.body
Users searching full text more likely to find useful resources than searching abstracts

# data[].attributes.body
Hubbard on reporting outputs: too many people asking for too much of the same information. ORCID is a great solution to this

# data[].attributes.body
Nice to hear about OA from an academic's POV, especially when I'm not in the position of trying to persuade them to comply

# data[].attributes.body
Hubbard: How to make OA and reporting easier? Take academics out of the equation. Hmm

# data[].attributes.body
Glad to see a wider range of research outputs being discussed. If only all repositories accepted these

# data[].attributes.body
Whitty: what constitutes research data in practice-based research? Sketches, models, audio - the trail of the work's inception

# data[].attributes.body
Carter: research must be discoverable, accessible, understandable, translatable, applicable

# data[].attributes.body
Carter: academics will not start publishing with institutions while career progress is still tied to journals they publish in

# data[].attributes.body
Uni of Manchester Faculty of Life Sciences has a writer in residence to help researchers write for non-academic audience

# data[].attributes.body
Wolf: librarians are doing more than funders in explaining policies to academics - and to publishers - wrt OA

# data[].attributes.body
Librarians acting as proxies for funders, publishers and academics by explaining policies to researchers

# data[].attributes.body
Librarians acting as proxies for funders, publishers and academics by explaining policies to researchers

# data[].attributes.body
'poppycock' to the notion that libs will cancel subs if content is openly available after short embargo

# data[].attributes.body
Do librarians over-complicate through innate conservatism? Stop doing so!

# data[].attributes.body
Wolf: being *at the centre* of the current info supply chain doesn't make libraries *central* to it

# data[].attributes.body
Wolf: "if you want to pronounce it archive, then spell it as archive rather than arXiv...." :-)

# data[].attributes.body
Wolf: OA will become mainstream; new disrupters in the next decade will be based on the need for (a) speed & (b) transparency

# data[].attributes.body
Hoyt - 8000 preprints deposited in arXiv every month. Not depositing is now exception to the rule in physics

# data[].attributes.body
Almost 100% of preprints on ArXiv go on to then be published. Preprints also dominate the citation data

# data[].attributes.body
biology catching on to the idea of publishing preprints following the example of physics/maths

# data[].attributes.body
Is open peer-review the future?

# data[].attributes.body
Real-time connectivity, transparency of data, rise of the preprint - all contributing to unstoppable rise of OA

# data[].attributes.body
We have better tools for managing personal music & photo collections than for managing, tracking & mining information

# data[].attributes.body
Many researchers are not confident using social media to tell their research stories

# data[].attributes.body
#altmetrics are good indicators of research impact & they are a welcomed additional measure to the publishing environment IMO

# data[].attributes.body
What is the social media buzz measuring? Academics not convinced but suppliers sure it adds value

# data[].attributes.body
Altmetrics? Verdict seems to be interested, but need more convincing