# data[].attributes.body
I am RAUNAK MISHRA.
I am from Odisha, Bhubaneswar. I have completed My 12th from DAV Public School, currently I am pursuing BBA LOGISTICS Management at UPES. I am a keen Observer and a learner also. I love to gain more and more knowledge on topics of my interest. I am also an adventurous person, who is fond of taking part in different activities.

# data[].attributes.body
1.   Trolley dilemmas clearly described the contrast between two separate moral ideas. The dilemma of the trolley is an ethical thought experiment about a hypothetical scenario in which an individual has the option to save 5 persons in danger of being hit by a trolley by diverting the trolley to kill only 1 person. With regard to any choice that obviously has a trade-off between what is better and what sacrifices are acceptable.

2.   I found in the Trolley Dilemma, many people preferred to think of the various ways in which apparent tragedies, including the death of one or five persons, depending on one's preference, could be prevented altogether. If I were the trolley driver, first of all, I would loudly alert the workers on the tracks of the approaching trolley, hoping that they would move and save their own lives. After alerting them loudly still they don’t listen, The only way to save the lives of the five workers is to divert the trolley onto another track that only has one worker on it. If I divert the trolley onto the other track, this one worker will die, but the other five workers will be saved.

3.   I would choose to save the honest, hardworking worker rather than saving the criminal which where on the other track. Saving the honest person will be a great and better job. Honesty leads to a fulfilling, free life. Honesty is not just about telling the truth. It's about being real with yourself and others about who you are, what you want and what you need to live your most authentic life. Convicts person are non-trust worthy persons, they can betray you at any possible time. So its better save the honest and the hardworking person.

4.   If all five workers on the track are terminally ill and the one on the sidetrack is perfectly safe, then I would save the one who is healthy because the other five workers are terminally ill, which means that their condition cannot be healed, which will inevitably lead to their death very soon. But he's safe, he can live for up to 100 years. So, instead of saving the five staff who are terminally ill, it is easier to save the man who is well.

# data[].attributes.body
The diverse world of today is dramatically and spontaneously changing its colour. As a result, as a manager of any company, he must deal with sensitive circumstances and unexpected inquiries from his colleagues, as well as from customers who are either unaware of the situation or are illiterate. In this story, Akbar asked Birbal impractical questions. But Birbal has shown the right attitude and presence of mind to address the questions with sufficient reason. This phenomenon reveals that there is often a way to deal with unforeseeable circumstances. Every problem has a solution given that we are still conscious and awake to solve it with the right mindset that we want to demonstrate. This tale also resembles the excellence of any interviewee: every now and then we keep hearing that the interviewee is asked a few tricky questions by the interviewer to verify his presence of mind. In this story, we get the essence of how one's attitude should be toward any kind of question asked by any person with any intention.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  The situation would have been very different if Cinderella had been a child instead of a girl. Stepmother could not have hidden the baby from the world in the same way she hid Cinderella in the house if she was a boy. She couldn't have given him a maid as she did Cinderella. Cinderella was visited by the fairy in the novel. The fairy came for Cinderella in the tale, but if it had been a child, I doubt the fairy would have come no matter how long the boy waited. In the novel, the prince goes from hut to hut in search of the perfect shoe size. But if Cinderella were a child, I doubt a princess would be so free to search her entire kingdom for a man whose feet would fit in the glass shoe. Even if the writers had depicted Cinderella as a child, I doubt the tale would have had an impact on its audience. If Cinderella had been a child, the tale would have still been incomplete, with the most significant and critical item missing. As a result, the story is best as it is.

2.       Cinderella is an anti-feminist tale because it depicts gender inequality through patriarchy and objectification, especially sexual objectification. Cinderella is more than just a fantasy of fantasies played out for a blameless young lady. It is an anecdote about the male-dominated society's power and force. This plot line also contributes to the male-centric society's convictions by causing women to rely on men to get away from their problems. Through researching Cinderella fantasies, you can see that they are not just accounts of ladies whose fantasies come true, but they are also stories about the simple belief structures and mistreatments of women.

3.       In all forms of Cinderella, she is forced to perform heinous tasks and is treated horribly by her progression family. There are variations in the tales about the father's whereabouts, but the stepmother's abuse of Cinderella will never change. This fractured daily life is tackled in each Cinderella adaptation, portraying the stereotypical evil stepfamily. Guys are depicted as the powerful, solid figures in Cinderella stories. The King never shows his feelings; instead, he uses his male superiority to find Cinderella. These stories represent the stereotypical 'intense' and dominant male who is unable to express his emotions.

4.       When it comes to my personal preferences, I don't believe in fantasy.  My folks ensured from the youth, that I don't live in the realm of creative mind and I have no second thoughts about it. Dreamland works well in films and on television as a break. I never had Barbies to play with, and I never watched hero kid shows on TV. In fact, there is no Mr. Perfect, and only one out of every odd romantic tale ends happily ever after. That isn't to say I don't have feelings; I do. I'm positive that if I ever read fantasies when I was younger, a character from a fantasy couldn't be my role model. No matter how motivational or inspiring they are.

# data[].attributes.body
1.       No, I do not believe that a person will live 14000 years because this is not something that happens naturally.

Even, according to John Oldsman, his only power is that he does not age, but ageing is not the only cause of death. There are several other explanations why people die, such as illnesses, injuries, and so on, and John Oldman being shielded from all of these things for 14000 years is something I will never accept because, as a reasonable thinker, the biggest question that comes to mind is how he might have survived all of the calamities that would have happened in 14000 years. When the Protagonist revealed that he is Jesus, the storey became more irrelevant to me.

2.       Edith, who was a strong believer in Christianity, was the most cynical of all the guests at the farewell party, and the simple explanation was that she was a strong believer in Christianity, and when the protagoist assured everyone that he was Jesus, she was the most sceptical. It was apparent that she enjoyed it. The protangonist, who called himself Jesus, became suspicious of what the proytagonist was saying, and she attempted to return home because she did not like the storey.

# data[].attributes.body
IN OPPOSITION

People were also dissatisfied with a scene from the first episode of the series. Similarly, during the 17th minute, Hindu goddess were depicted in a "undignified manner" and were seen using vulgar and profane language, inflicting religious sensibilities on viewers. Mohd. Zeeshan Ayub was seen dressing as lod Shiv in a college drama.  There are other dialogues attributed to gods and goddesses and other characters in the 22nd minute of the same show, as well as in several other episodes of the series, that have the potential to elicit caste resentment.

On Sunday, BJP MP Manoj Kotak wrote to Information and Broadcasting Minister Prakash Javadekar, seeking that Prime Video's series 'Tandav' be banned for defaming Hindu deities. The ministry has recognised the allegations and has asked Amazon Prime Video for an explanation.

IN FAVOUR

Following a string of blunders, the film's creators issued an official statement on Monday apologising to everyone. The apology from the entire cast and crew was issued on Twitter by producer Ali Abbas Zafar with the statement, Our sincerest apologies. "Any likeness to genuine events, individuals, or occurrences in the web series 'Tandav' is entirely coincidental," the statement said. The actors and crew had no intention of hurting anyone's feelings, caste, community, race, faith, or religious beliefs, or insulting or outraging any organisation, political party, or living or deceased individual. The cast and crew of 'Tandav' understand the public's concerns and apologise unconditionally if they have inadvertently hurt anyone's sentiments."

# data[].attributes.body
F.R.I.E.N.D.S

There is a scenario in the television series Friends where the Questionable Cause fallacy is used.

Questionable cause- it is a type of informal fallacy in which a cause is recognised wrongly.

Assuming that an actual or perceived link between two things indicates that one is the cause of the other.

Joey believes his fridge is broken because of his new roommates, but it is actually damaged because the fridge is incredibly old and has to be replaced. This is intended to persuade everyone that whomever comes into touch with the fridge is to fault. The failure of the refrigerator has nothing to do with the refrigerator itself.