# data[].attributes.headline
Add more detail to grant application form to anticipate common questions about grants Place to fill out schedule for the summer dayshow does it apply to collaboration instead of coordination?Look at common questions Melody wrote down about grants - can we add something to the form to anticipate common issues?What products or artifacts will be produced during summer collaboration?Add that to the grant formDivide review process into two days??Pros/ConsLearning goal clarification/school year goal clarification

# data[].attributes.subject
Add more detail to grant application form to anticipate common questions about grants Place to fill out schedule for the summer dayshow does it apply to collaboration instead of coordination?Look at common questions Melody wrote down about grants - can we add something to the form to anticipate common issues?What products or artifacts will be produced during summer collaboration?Add that to the grant formDivide review process into two days??Pros/ConsLearning goal clarification/school year goal clarification

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder if we should do it by splitting into groups and review a stack of grants, so each grant is reviewed by several teams and we can compare notes and make a final decision on each.

# data[].attributes.body
Interesting that Grant is talking about grants.

# data[].attributes.body
Do teams have a model grant to reference as they develop their own?
This could streamline the review and revision process and raise the quality of the submitted grant.

# data[].attributes.headline
I liked working in small groups and then having the large group share their votes.

# data[].attributes.subject
I liked working in small groups and then having the large group share their votes.

# data[].attributes.body
Those responsible for creating that sheet deserve a medal...2 weeks additional paid time off...and a nice thermos with their name monogrammed on it. It has been VERY helpful. Kudos!

# data[].attributes.headline
I liked using the A,B,D rubric on the grants.

# data[].attributes.subject
I liked using the A,B,D rubric on the grants.

# data[].attributes.body
There needs to be some improvement from the CTE side, particularly communication after the Grant Review day. Some of the grants for CTE are still pending.

# data[].attributes.body
It was good to have the chance to see multiple grants before going back to the school and doing the same process there. In other words, we were ready to make good decisions for our teams at the school level.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like we are trapped in this room. I miss Novell when we could watch people play volleyball like that scene from Top Gun. You can always be my wingman Mav.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this process is important.  If we are taking summer collaboration seriously and want teams to use the time for actual collaboration, this process of all getting together and reviewing individual grants is vital.  It helps ensure the grants are used correctly and I believe helps each of us as we review our individual school teams to ensure we are holding them to the same standard.

# data[].attributes.body
Many of the grants that needed review, needed to have a more student focused goal. Maybe we need to help our teachers know that that is the focus -- I know it says it on the form, but we could save a lot of time if we coached our teachers through filling out the grant documents

# data[].attributes.headline
It was fabulous to have all eyes together looking at the grant.  It helped build clarity and common understanding around grant quality. 

# data[].attributes.subject
It was fabulous to have all eyes together looking at the grant.  It helped build clarity and common understanding around grant quality. 

# data[].attributes.body
We made it through in a very reasonable amount of time. It was one day of intense review instead of 2 days...that's an amazing feat. If only local, state, and national governments worked as efficiently as our group did

# data[].attributes.body
Norming together at the beginning was helpful. I wonder if we could have then split into 2 groups or even perhaps into 4 groups to speed the process.

# data[].attributes.headline
I had the opportunity to be involved last year and this year. I valued the input from other coaches and administrators; however, the process is long and therefore it can become quite laborious. I recommend dividing the group in half, which would then alleviate the labor, but we could still accomplish the goal. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I had the opportunity to be involved last year and this year. I valued the input from other coaches and administrators; however, the process is long and therefore it can become quite laborious. I recommend dividing the group in half, which would then alleviate the labor, but we could still accomplish the goal. 

# data[].attributes.body
I loved having CTE first!!! I liked having the small groups read through the grants. It seemed that many groups had the same questions, I wonders... Maybe we can put some of those common items on the application

# data[].attributes.body
The process was helpful by talking through why or why not grants should be approved and how we can coach PLC groups to be more effective in their summer collaborations.

# data[].attributes.body
I can see the reason to have a number of people look at each group, but do we need everyone to look at every grant?

# data[].attributes.headline
It was beneficial to get feedback and the perspectives of others. I wonder if there is way to split the large group of reviewers in two. Then come together and discuss the ones we had questions about. I just felt with the man power we had we could have moved through it faster.  All in all, I thought it was a great day and we accomplished what we needed. 

# data[].attributes.subject
It was beneficial to get feedback and the perspectives of others. I wonder if there is way to split the large group of reviewers in two. Then come together and discuss the ones we had questions about. I just felt with the man power we had we could have moved through it faster.  All in all, I thought it was a great day and we accomplished what we needed. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I really liked how we were in groups of teams with the rating system.  I feel that it might be possible to split the full group into two as 40 voices might not be needed.  Maybe split in two and have 20  going over each etc.     The rating system was very good but maybe combine the A and B ratings. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I really liked how we were in groups of teams with the rating system.  I feel that it might be possible to split the full group into two as 40 voices might not be needed.  Maybe split in two and have 20  going over each etc.     The rating system was very good but maybe combine the A and B ratings. 

# data[].attributes.body
Our teachers thought the document was user friendly.

Glad we did it in one day.

# data[].attributes.headline
On the form that the team fills out, it would be nice to have listed: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, and Day 4.  This would help the reviews to better understand the team plan.

# data[].attributes.subject
On the form that the team fills out, it would be nice to have listed: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, and Day 4.  This would help the reviews to better understand the team plan.

# data[].attributes.headline
It was nice to have a table of people from different schools looking over the same grant and talking about it from multiple perspectives.

# data[].attributes.subject
It was nice to have a table of people from different schools looking over the same grant and talking about it from multiple perspectives.

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of teachers thought the doc was confusing.
I think that we should add what they will do on each of the four days of their collaboration.

# data[].attributes.body
I was involved both last year and this year, and if schedules can facilitate splitting the days was more effective for me.  Doing CTE one day and blended the next.  Being able to leave, and come back fresh was easier.  By late afternoon I was getting loopy.

# data[].attributes.headline
Having many eyes to see it was helpful to give feedback

# data[].attributes.subject
Having many eyes to see it was helpful to give feedback

# data[].attributes.body
I would love to see a change in the format of the doc that allows all teams to list an agenda for their requested days.

# data[].attributes.body
We approved so many that needed coaching.  Is this a surprise?  Is there a plan to Pay coaches to coach during summer work?

# data[].attributes.body
I found it interesting that despite certain grants not meeting expectations, all were approved. Some grants were given the stipulation that coaching was needed, but I wonder if there is a more effective way to ensure that the correct changes/coaching is made. We trust our teams and teachers which is a positive, but might it be more advantageous to send the grant back to the team with the chance to redraft or reclassify how they will use the days and still provide the team coaching time through the process (redrafting and summer days).