# data[].attributes.body
Assessment Task One (Part B) Detailed Description

# data[].attributes.body
Marking Guide

# data[].attributes.body
All speakers were clear, spoke at a good space
Good ideas and explained how they were relevant and how they would benefit grade 7s
Extremely well professional language used
Really good Q&A!!

# data[].attributes.body
things you did well: really good interrogation of references into your presentation, making your own pin! Very creative :)

Things you could improve on: volume, because there was another presentation going on.

# data[].attributes.headline
(Lauren) Things you did well and things you could improve on:

# data[].attributes.subject
(Lauren) Things you did well and things you could improve on:

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
- clearly spoken
- In depth explanation of sections and concepts covered
- Easily understood
- good variety of pins

Things you could improve on:
- Not sure if you answered the question how for all of your examples
- Maybe could have provided one or two more examples of pins with different learning styles

# data[].attributes.body
Good eye contact!

# data[].attributes.body
Able to look upon classroom while reading.
Calmly speaking, not rushed.
Pins are well collected and laid out within the board. Easy to follow.
Clear demonstration of pins/videos.

Self created pins - explanation made in Q&A. Great interactive tool for students so they are kept engaged and entertained.

# data[].attributes.body
Effective organisation of pin, clear and easy to follow. Great use of visually engaging pins.

Things you could improve on:
Further explain the 'how?' when analysing learning preferences and further elaborate on the importance of curation in teaching.

# data[].attributes.body
Great use of non-verbal gestures

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
Pacing, well organised board
Improvements:
Projection

# data[].attributes.body
well organised sections, great use of youtube video to enhance presentation. Good verbal and nonverbal gestures.

# data[].attributes.body
Great explanation and justification of how game-based learning is beneficial for students.

# data[].attributes.body
Very clear and concise. Pinterest board is structured really well.Very good for time

# data[].attributes.body
Very well structured, Pinterest organised in a structurally sound way - making it easy to navigate and understand.
Fantastic use of multiple types of media and learning methods to assist all students.
Well-spoken.
Overall: High 6 xx
shoutout to robert mckirdy for being killer at answering questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Your pintrest board was very visualing appealing and used great space and the sections had the perfect amount of pins

# data[].attributes.body
Link more to curation

# data[].attributes.body
well paced, great design! maybe try to be more engaged with the audience next time - gestures etc

# data[].attributes.body
Was very well spoken and confident. Could possibly cut back on some pins. Strong 6.

# data[].attributes.body
I think there are too many sections

# data[].attributes.body
The speech was well researched and the students seemed as though they were very knowledgeable in the topic. The student talking could have slowed down a bit.

# data[].attributes.body
Vicente Group 1:
Good Job, well spoken, maybe more eye contact could have been used, but the non-verbal features balanced it overall. Very high amount of pins.
A 6 seems fair.

# data[].attributes.body
Very well presented and organised, good use of references and research as well as being very well spoken. We paid more attention to the screen with the Pinterest board rather than the screen with the Prezi but the Prezi was handy to look back on. Highly engaging and deserving of a 7.

# data[].attributes.body
Things that you did well:
- great information on different
types of learners
- great choice of visually appealing pins
-great voice and nonverbal gestures

Things to improve:
-title of the board
-description of the board
-a bit difficult to look at two different screens during presentation
- too many words on a single slide

# data[].attributes.body
Very well spoken, loud and clear
Awesome PowerPoint!
Great different sections
Lots of contact with the audience and gestures made when speaking
Your voices didn’t get lost at all
Great questions from the q&a, really gets the audience thinking
Things that could be improved:
Little bit difficult to look back and forth between the two different screens imo
The look more professional, instead of using a script you could have used palm cards
Towards the end, the speech was getting a bit too fast however it’s understandablewith the 5 minute limit

# data[].attributes.body
Having two boards was very distracting, wasn't sure where I was meant to be looking while the speech was going.
Going back and forth made me feel as if I was watching tennis.
Well spoken, understood their own words.
Eye contact and gesturing was good - While reading off a piece of paper it can be a bit hard to hold eye contact.
Didn't really go through the pinterest board itself

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
good volume, engaging presentation, well organised board
Improvements:
Not sure where to look (between two computer screens) - maybe gesture to one or the other when relevant

# data[].attributes.body
Well researched presentations - lots of great references! The speech was well presented!

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
- Categories clearly set out, easy to understand
- Good explanation of pin

Things you could improve on:
- Need to speak a little louder
- Difficult to see which screen to look at
- Need to relate the knowledge back to the pinterest board more.
- Paper in front of face was distracting

# data[].attributes.body
Good and not cluttered through the board. Room for more information.

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
- explanation of structure
- good use of example
- light hearted, speaking to us rather than speaking at us
-link to 'how'through' most of the script
Work on:
- Difficult to look between screens, bit distracting
- speaking very fast, also needed more projection
-needed to lead Q/A more rather than waiting for people to start the conversation

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- The powerpoint was a good asset to the presentation
- The examples were very effective and allowed another depth of understanding

Things to improve on:
- Sometimes spoke a bit quickly
- Question time was a little confusing and hard to understand

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
Good public speaking
Great use of idea of multi-style learning
Great how? of learning preferences in Q and A activity by showing manipulation of activities to suit other learning preferences

Things you could improve on:
Further exploration into all learning preferences (written, reflective, active)

# data[].attributes.body
What you did well:
- justified your choice in curriculum element well
- defined terms key to the communication of meaning
- great justification on how you have targeted year 7 students
- PPT was well presented

Things to improve:
- maybe slow down
- increase volume (other groups presentation)
- not a clear pin targeted to the audible learning preference

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Great explanations and supporting studies!
- Nice Q&A :)
Things you could improve on:
- Projection (mainly because of the other presentations)
- Speaking pace (but it's understandable because time is limited)

# data[].attributes.body
things you did well:
very detailed description about learning preferences
interesting selection of pins

things to improve:
two boards is a bit distracting.
pace of speech was a bit fast

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
-good eye contact and clear voice
Things to improve on:
-very hard to look between two screens as there is a lot too look at in one go.

# data[].attributes.body
Presentation is well structured and easy to follow. Using palm cards could be a better alternative, to A4 sheets.

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
-Great description of learning styles!
- Good idea having several questions

Things you could improve:
- Not sure what your learning objectives were
- A little more projection/speaking a little clearer
- Questions were a little confusing at the end
-Short presentation

# data[].attributes.body
great tone! justification was great

# data[].attributes.body
Really interactive presentation with the Pinterest Board, the board is really well set out and very visually appealing. Little bit more volume for the speech. Maybe a bit more justification of the overall idea. But really good overall.

# data[].attributes.body
Very well spoken and explained. Visually appealing pin board and very clever to use keynote to ask the audience questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Well spoken, good pace, loud and clear
Great division of sections
Good use of professional language
Perfect planning is bright, and caters for all different learning types

Things that could be improved:
Board was blocked by the speakers

# data[].attributes.body
Great pace of presentation. Could have done with some more research

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
- Engaging readers

Things to improve:
- Define the actual learning objectives early
- Question time was more like a speech (Not much discussion) and was a bit confusing

# data[].attributes.body
What you did well:
- good hand gestures & eye contact
- great titles & colours
- good choice of pins in relation to different learners
- good relation to our lectures & our readings
- good relation to why Pinterest is beneficial

Things to improve:
- increase volume
- a bit more into how

# data[].attributes.headline
Lauren Group 3 .              Things done well:

# data[].attributes.subject
Lauren Group 3 .              Things done well:

# data[].attributes.body
Link to yr7s and importance of ICT in learning.

Good speaking speed.

Things you could improve on:
Less white and black pins, for increased visual appeal.

Further elaboration on how learning preferences learn.

Include more pins that evidently show they work for multiple learning preferences.

# data[].attributes.body
Things did well:
- Good speaking voices / engaging
- Good definitions and quotes

Things to improve:
- speaking in first person rather than as a group with words such as "we"
- Making sure your time is within the limit
- Q&A wasn't really a Q&A

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
-Good gestures/ body language
- Great voice
-great linking to different types of learners
-great choice of pins for year 7 students

Things to improve:
-lack of colours on pins, may not be visually appealing
-too long
-talk more about how did you curate all these pins
-Q&A can be more engaging

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
-good eye contact whilst speaking
Things to improve on:
-brighter pins, as it is a bit hard too look at with a lack of colour

# data[].attributes.body
Good:
-Introduced the learning objective well
-Described 'why' these sections are helpful to students, and the 'how' by being visually appealing and activities
-good speaking pace and interactive
- very engaging speech, really enjoyed it
Improvement:
-needed to self monitor the time better.
-needed to work off the auidence in Q/A rather than brush off and following your script.
-knowing the script a bit better

# data[].attributes.body
(Lauren)
Things you did well:
- Clearly spoken
- Clear pinterest title
- Nice use of sections to organise pins
- Good use of quotes to support your argument

Things to improve on:
- Try to be consistent with palm cards (piece of paper is distracting)
- Not sure the question of 'how' was answered properly
-

# data[].attributes.body
Vicente group 1
Gamification yay!

# data[].attributes.body
Introduction WAS WAS TOO long.
I like the use of the dictionary,

# data[].attributes.body
Vicente Group 2:
Good Board with good resources, well spoken. Maybe refer to more of the readings?

# data[].attributes.headline
Organisation and categories were clear and logical 

# data[].attributes.subject
Organisation and categories were clear and logical 

# data[].attributes.body
Explanation of content was good, though inclusion of resources would have provided evidence to back claims of group implemented work.

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Good explanation in Q&A
- Lots of colour
Things to improve:
- Volume
- Speaking pace
- Could have been more interactions with audience in Q&A

# data[].attributes.body
Unlucky with time, your ideas were well presented, your board was well presented, very visualing appealing. Pheraps find a more effective way to ineract with board rather than just turning back randomly. But yall presentation was lit.  Auidence could tell your group had a great understanding of what you were saying. Also unlucky with time x2.  ps
Girl in the overalls holla @ me u cute.
ps ps
am in group 2 if u down

# data[].attributes.body
For a group of only two, it was good. But when speaking in the future, more direct eye contact and interaction would be ideal. Thinking from the perspective of a student. Otherwise still good for only two of you!

# data[].attributes.body
The categories of the pins on the board were neatly sorted into clear sections. These categories make logical sense in how they have been split.

However, there still wasn't enough explanation of the "how" in relation to some of the identified pins and activities, and there wasn't enough research utilised to strengthen it.

# data[].attributes.body
Lots of research was referred to throughout the speech to back up the different elements of the speech. Well put together overall.

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
Good link to year 7s.

Good Q and A section - very calm and engaging presentation

Things you could improve on:
More conversational speech, talking to us not at us.

Titles of section - easy for year 7s

# data[].attributes.body
Well spoken and nice elaboration of pins. A little rush due to time constraints but well planned.

# data[].attributes.body
Vicente 3:
Good job but need to move more and make more eye contact. You also spoke about "high" achieving students - would this make other students feel bad?

# data[].attributes.body
Two very well spoken presenters. Loved the idea of a warm up activity, I can understand the necessity to ease students into a lesson/initially engage them. Great that you have resources for students of all levels, but agree that perhaps the word 'advanced' could perhaps alienate other students.

# data[].attributes.body
I do like some grammar quidditich! Good presentation, quite thought provoking

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
- Good explanation of visual 🤬 and learners

Things to improve on:
- Broad statements like 'year 7 students are keen to learn' without backup
- Pace and projection (a little quick and quiet)
- A little disjointed (because of going over time and into question time)
- No layout explanation

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Good intro
- Using the word "how"
- Engaging speech
- Good eye contact

Things to improve:
- Sometimes there was a little bit too much on explaining "what" things were rather than "how" they benefitted students
- Be within the time limit
- Q&A wasn't really a Q&A

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- good introduction to topic
- first speaker very enthusiastic and engaging & all speakers well paced
- great use of statistics

Things to improve:
- a bit more how
- more volume (other group was loud) & try not to turn your back
- would have loved to see more of the Pinterest board itself and how it is formatted

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- great body language, eye contact and voice
-great pace
-great choice of activities for year 7 students
- great interaction with audience during Q&A

Things to improve:
-too many words on one slide
- avoid 'umm'

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Nice use of facts and studies
- Good use of gestures
Things to improve:
- Volume (just because of the other presentation)
- Unlucky for time

# data[].attributes.body
good:
-good hand gestures
-use of academic studies
- good recovering from cut off speech; doing a quick some up of what was cut off due to time
-good interactive in q/a
improvements:
-more eye contact and not leaning over your script, put your head up
-project voice a bit louder
-more 'how'
-slides were a bit cluttered with too many words
-some of the speakers spoke too fast
-don't walk infront of speaker and screen!

# data[].attributes.body
Vicente group 3

Vygotsky’s ZPD very relevant reference

# data[].attributes.body
I like the use of contextualising the learning area, in the world of texting grammar has gone out of the window
-References were limited, but we question their legitimacy i.e bbc
-Targeted all levels

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
Good use of statistics
Took into account the age of the students beyond just the criteria you chose to focus on
Good coverage of topics missed in the main presentation in Q&A time.

Thinks to improve on:
some people had good projection, but other members didn't

# data[].attributes.body
Lauren

Great presentation voice, love how you got into the speech, emphasing
your point.
Great powerpoint, well presented. however too many words, maybe just highlight the important
points. Feel like there needs to be more interaction betweem the presenter and the powerpoint, past just randomingly point to the board.
Bit unorganised switching between pinboard and powerpoint, I know it's hard but maybe have the pin board open befor hand

# data[].attributes.body
things done well:
spoken well
great presentation
Love that you all presented together
Good use of professional words

things that could be improved:
could be spoken a bit louder, some voices got lost within the other presentations
more eye contact
A lot of use of “um”

# data[].attributes.body
Gesturing back to pin board.
Presentation was overall clearly demonstrated.
Some presenters could be a bit louder.
Even though you ran out of time you used your time wisely and explained what was missed.

# data[].attributes.body
Done well:
interactive Q&A, good pins, colourful board, well organised
Improvements:
projection, ran out of time

# data[].attributes.body
Justify and support
What is self-directed learning?
What is Kinaesthetic?

Good
supported by studies
Created own pin -that’s pretty cool

Where to next?
Define terms

# data[].attributes.body
Very interesting board, love the colours

Good group discussion

Improve:

Working within time limit (this is tough, I understand!)

More group discussion! I loved what you did discuss, I just wanted more

# data[].attributes.body
Great presentation (rhetorical questions)

Really easy to follow

Great research supporting visual aid
Great class discussion!

Improve:

How do you know that grade 7s are energetic? Need to support, don't assume

Less "um…" Be confident!
Bad luck on the time, it's unforgiving, but a great lesson to learn early on

# data[].attributes.body
Judge all you like, but i like this

# data[].attributes.body
Your question time was AMAZING - great connection with your audience.

# data[].attributes.body
It would have been good to highlight the board rather than aspects in a powerpoint presentation.

# data[].attributes.body
Things you did well:
- Good introduction and layout of Pintrest board

Things to improve on:
- Making the presentation more engaging
- Didn't ask us any questions
- Disjointed

# data[].attributes.body
This was such an engaging presentation. Enunciated everything super well, very very well presented. Your question time was awesome.

# data[].attributes.body
Loud voice, great intro.
Pin board was well laid out, easily to follow, especially for those within year 7.

# data[].attributes.body
Things done well:
- good projection
Things to work on:
-unclear connections between pieces (disjointed)