# data[].attributes.body
Both closings were the perfect length and matched each sides' respective case theory. Side note: Veronica was giving me "We the People" vibes!

# data[].attributes.body
both told great stories and made their client seem relatable

# data[].attributes.body
use of rhetorical questions was very persuasive; like how you ended with the statute since that's what we have to ponder at the end of the day

# data[].attributes.body
Well spoken, good use of the facts and the legal standard. Even tone and speech.

# data[].attributes.body
"a knock and a push" caught my attention right away. Very persuasive and kept up with goal of not demonizing Barnes, but still showing she was the aggressor.

# data[].attributes.body
Calm, measured speaking. Very confident and clear. Built Anthony's credibility.

# data[].attributes.body
Good follow up cross questions and getting at Margaret's bias; sometimes bled to being too aggressive bc the witness was so calm

# data[].attributes.body
Good questions that allow the witness to shine

# data[].attributes.body
Great job by with leading the witness to the responses
you wanted.

# data[].attributes.body
Good idea about that she did not call for help.
I didn't love the way you questioned the witness. It was a little too aggressive for me.

# data[].attributes.body
Strong, leading questions. Great job looping back on questions to get witness to admit where she didn't admit right away.

# data[].attributes.body
Great job at emphasizing the key facts and highlighting your case theory.

# data[].attributes.body
Great open-ended questions; elicited a testimony that bolstered defense's case theory.

# data[].attributes.body
Great questions and you did a great job allowing the witness to lead.

# data[].attributes.body
The direct flowed nicely and the cross was very effective, it may benefit on cross to cut out some background and make sure questions are closed

# data[].attributes.headline
Amanda - really nice job highlighting key facts through your line of questioning. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Amanda - really nice job highlighting key facts through your line of questioning. 

# data[].attributes.body
Creative use of size and weight in relation to self-defense. I also enjoy listening to your questions because your tone is direct, without being overbearing, and it commands attention in a great way.

# data[].attributes.body
Great job in responding to the objection and laying out your reasoning. Also, great line of questioning.

# data[].attributes.body
great cross without being hostile/kept professionalism up all throughout.

# data[].attributes.headline
Leanna - really well thought out questions. You have such a nice way of making the witness feel comfortable with answering your questions and not presenting them in a hostile manner. Great job!

# data[].attributes.subject
Leanna - really well thought out questions. You have such a nice way of making the witness feel comfortable with answering your questions and not presenting them in a hostile manner. Great job!

# data[].attributes.body
thoughtful questions, very detailed, prompted witness well.
Measured and confident responses to objection.

# data[].attributes.headline
Leanna: Putting this in here now because I will forget. The tempo and balance are great for each section in the direct, such as background, relationship, involvement, observance, etc.

# data[].attributes.subject
Leanna: Putting this in here now because I will forget. The tempo and balance are great for each section in the direct, such as background, relationship, involvement, observance, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Great job, Madison. I like how you included the definition of intrafamily in your opening statement.

# data[].attributes.body
Great iteration of the legal standard for the judge, made it clear what we should be looking for in the trial

# data[].attributes.headline
Hannah - really nice job setting up the facts in a clear and concise way. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Hannah - really nice job setting up the facts in a clear and concise way. 

# data[].attributes.body
Great tie-in of the statute and how it relates to the facts

# data[].attributes.body
Great framing of the incident without demonizing opposing party

# data[].attributes.headline
Madison: Great job! Clear and persuasive. Identified the narrative elements at play and characters. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Madison: Great job! Clear and persuasive. Identified the narrative elements at play and characters. 

# data[].attributes.body
I liked how you started with neglect hearing. Relatable and invoked empathy, in that it would be a long and tiring day for anyone.

# data[].attributes.body
Great job, Madison. I like how you included the definition of intrafamily!

# data[].attributes.body
Great recitation, clear. Persuasive. Good job bringing up the act. Ask at the end was good.

# data[].attributes.body
Great description of the facts - very persuasive but not in an over-conclusive way.

# data[].attributes.body
Hannah: Clear presentation, good framing of the issues. Good persuasion.