# data[].attributes.body
Umaima's concept map demonstrates the need for partnerships in the global health space in order to properly carry out prevention strategies around the globe to promote global health.

# data[].attributes.headline
Envisioning a Global Health Partnership Movement

# data[].attributes.subject
Envisioning a Global Health Partnership Movement

# data[].attributes.body
This article discusses how partnership is a crucial concept to focus on as the international development community prepares for its next set of developmental goals. It discusses how Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) call for new partnerships that focus on co-development instead of  traditional modes. This new form of partnership involves co-learning, mutuality, and recognition. gain as much as we give by working through partnerships. They stress for health partnerships to focus on mutual benefit rather than monetary gain, which will create policies that strive for global health.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Globalization and Health 12, Article number: 1 (2016) Cite this article

3297 Accesses

23 Citations

12 Altmetric

Metrics

"A universal truth: No health without a workforce" was the rallying cry of the flagship report commissioned by the Global Health Workforce Alliance Secretariat and the World Health Organization [ 1] and one which must be embraced if the aspiration for universal health coverage is ever to be realised [ 2]. One in seven people will never see a qualified health worker in their lives. The world will be short of 12.9 million health-care workers by 2035. The figures speak for themselves. It has never been clearer that there has to be a major global effort to recruit, educate and train health workers.

As the international development community prepare for the delivery of the next set of development goals, focus must include a meaningful revitalisation of the concept of partnership and a shift from short-term global interests to strengthening systems in low and middle-income countries. The Sustainable Development Goals call on new forms of partnership that speak to co-development rather than traditional models of international development - mutuality, co-learning and a recognition that we gain as much as we give by working through partnerships. It is time for donors and governments to look beyond monetary contributions to also consider what resources, expertise and technology that, if shared, could result in mutual benefit. In this sense, health partnerships offer a vision of the way in which learning and knowledge-exchange will take place in the future.

Among those engaged in global health, there is growing interest in long-term, formalised partnerships or links between health delivery and health education institutions such as hospitals, universities and professional associations. These partnerships are often developed by institutions with complementary objectives and are typically, but not exclusively, made up of health professionals from high-resource settings who volunteer their time and expertise to deliver health workforce strengthening or related projects. In many cases, partnerships are a two-way exchange of experience, skills and expertise from a high-income institution aiming to build the capacity of a low-income counterpart. However, multi-country and, increasingly, south-to-south partnership arrangements also exist. The themes, specialisms and methods of delivery of projects are broad, ranging from training and capacity building for in-service staff, providing practical skills, e-learning, online mentoring, continuing professional development, to facilitating research, professional standards and curriculum development to strengthen pre-service training.

We initiated this special series to explore these peer-to-peer collaborations and to start to build an accessible and shared knowledge base on their ability to offer an effective framework for sharing expertise internationally. It's not just about development and capacity building; the series will underscore the additional benefits, challenges, and opportunities of taking multi-national partnership approaches. We anticipate that as the series evolves, it will become clearer where the gaps in our knowledge and evidence base exist and how we might address these.

We were very pleased to discover that our initial call for papers generated interest from all over the world and that a great diversity of health specialties and approaches are represented. This series is intended to be an on-going collection of evidence, reflections, and challenges to the health partnership approach. In this issue we begin with six articles and introduce some of the key questions for future exploration.

Over the past five years, the Health Partnership Scheme (HPS), a UK government-funded programme, has allowed for a variety of projects in different contexts and technical areas to be supported with appropriate levels of funding - the specifics of delivery are identified at the institutional level. Over 40,000 health workers have availed of training course places in over 29 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and the Middle East, through the voluntary engagement of more than 1,500 professionals from the UK's National Health Service (NHS) and the involvement of more than 200 UK and overseas hospitals, universities and professional associations. HPS represents an important opportunity to gather evidence on a larger scale on what works well and what does not in a health partnership approach to capacity building. Suzanne Edwards et al. in seeking to develop a simple typology of international health partnerships, present initial analysis of 54 successful project proposals for health partnerships funded by HPS in 2012-2013. The variability of partnerships contributes to the challenge of understanding their effectiveness and a typology of partnerships could aid evaluation [ 3].

Glorieuse Uwizeye et al. assess the twinning model in the Rwandan Human Resources for Health Program, exploring the United States teaching institutions and Rwandan Faculty goal setting, satisfaction and perceptions of the effectiveness of skill transfer [ 4].

Increasing levels of interest in a capacity building approach have led to questions about the mechanisms, efficiency and effectiveness of health partnerships, prompting a small but rising stream of published evaluations and research papers. A rapid evidence review on the effectiveness of institutional health partnerships is presented by Ema Kelly et al. [ 5].

Ben Hague et al. examine the individual and organisational benefits of a partnership between a National Health Service (NHS) mental health Trust in the United Kingdom and a mental health referral hospital in Northern Uganda [ 6]. Lawrence C. Loh et al. review short term global health experiences and local partnership models and propose a framework to categorise different models of local partner engagement [ 7]. Barbara Anne Jack et al. reports on an initiative where palliative care staff, both clinical and academic, volunteered to help to develop, support and deliver a degree in palliative care in sub-Saharan Africa. The objective of the study was to explore the personal impact on the health care professionals of being part of this initiative [ 8].

Evidence about the effectiveness of health partnerships is largely qualitative, particularly when it comes to evidencing more complex aspects of training and capacity building such as longer-term changes in health worker performance. Nevertheless, some interventions have been able to demonstrate the effectiveness of their work, not least in terms of tangible outputs and indications of longer-term change, but also evidence of the ways in which their work offers a value-for-money approach. For example, two case studies commissioned by THET, examine the ways in which health partnerships provide a value for money approach to health workforce development [ 9].

There is need for further research worldwide on what partnerships can achieve, examples of failure and on what makes an effective partnership. The breadth of questions should engage clinicians, social scientists, health educationalists, global health specialists, economists and others, but while many partnerships publish on their own experiences and clinical findings, there has been little effort to align research activities that examine health partnerships as a mechanism for delivery. THET's grounding in practice and our connections with both practitioners and researchers put us in a unique position as a hub for research into health partnerships, and we welcome contact from researchers or practitioners exploring these and further issues.

Key questions for future research

How can we talk about the collective impact of the health partnership model or approach, given the diversity of institutions, relationships, health system contexts and interventions?

Under what circumstances do health partnerships offer an efficient and effective way to deliver health workforce strengthening interventions?

How do health partnerships compare with other models for delivering health workforce strengthening interventions?

How can health partnerships measure the value of health workforce strengthening interventions?

How can we measure the value of a health partnership approach beyond supporting the delivery of health workforce strengthening interventions, with particular reference to social capital?

References

Author information

Affiliations

Tropical Health & Education Trust (THET), London, UK

Andrew Jones

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Jones.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Download citation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Envisioning a Global Health Partnership Movement - Globalization and Health

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Globalization and Health 12, Article number: 1 (2016) Cite this article 3297 Accesses 23 Citations 12 Altmetric Metrics "A universal truth: No health without a workforce" was the rallying cry of the flagship report commissioned by the Global Health Workforce Alliance Secretariat and the World Health Organization [ 1] and one which must be embraced if the aspiration for universal health coverage is ever to be realised [ 2].

# data[].attributes.body
Sabrina's concept map highlights the necessity of partnership between two different role players in global health and provides a real life example of two different organizations (Global Fund and the World Health Organization) that have an important partnership that helps to prevent spread of diseases globally.

# data[].attributes.headline
Global health research partnerships in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

# data[].attributes.subject
Global health research partnerships in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

# data[].attributes.body
This article discusses the role of partnerships in the context of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and how the kind of partnerships that are made between countries affect global health policy. This research paper stresses that mutually beneficial and meaningful partnerships must be made between countries in address to carry out public health concerns and promote long-term value within the communities that are involved.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Abstract

This themed issue on global health research has come at an opportune time in the middle of the ongoing global public health crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic which has claimed nearly 756,000 lives in 210 countries and territories around the world as of August 15, 2020. The public health crisis underscores the importance of global health research partnerships and collaborations to develop and evaluate the requisite health technologies to assist in containing COVID-19, other diseases, and health-related concerns that defy national borders. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted by the member countries of the United Nations in September 2015, provide a framework for global development efforts including global health research. SDG3, which promotes health and well-being for the world populations across the age spectrum, highlights disease areas for special focus which can be adapted in specific global health research programs to serve local health needs. SDG17 promotes partnerships between high income (HIC) and low and middle-income countries (LMIC) for sustainable and equitable global development. However, given the wide disparities in fiscal and overall capacity for research between researchers in HIC and their counterparts in LMIC as well as the greater vulnerabilities of the LMIC communities when serving as research locations, a spotlight on the nature of such global health research partnerships in the context of the SDGs is desirable. This is to ensure that they are meaningful and mutually-beneficial partnerships which address local health concerns and promote long-term value for the communities involved.

The objective of this commentary is, therefore, to provide a brief overview of the SDGs by way of context; explore the power differences at play when researchers from HIC are seeking research opportunities in LMIC; examine the social determinants of health and the disproportionate burden of global diseases carried by populations in LMIC to establish their vulnerability; discuss global research partnerships; and attempt to make a case for why community-based participatory research may be the preferred type of global health research partnership in the context of the SDGs.

Keywords

Sustainable development goals

Agenda for sustainable development

Global health research partnerships

Community-based participatory research

Recommended articles Citing articles (0)
View Abstract

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Global health research partnerships in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This themed issue on global health research has come at an opportune time in the middle of the ongoing global public health crisis arising from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic which has claimed nearly 756,000 lives in 210 countries and territories around the world as of August 15, 2020.

# data[].attributes.body
Callie's concept map demonstrates the importance of partnership in global health policy and how it makes global health and medical improvements much easier and more accessible.

# data[].attributes.headline
Conceptual Model for Partnership and Sustainability in Global Health

# data[].attributes.subject
Conceptual Model for Partnership and Sustainability in Global Health

# data[].attributes.body
This article describes the importance of partnership when it comes to creating global health policies and global health in general. It stresses how partnership and engagement are crucial and must come before any type of intervention or planning in order to produce long lasting and effective impacts.

# data[].attributes.headline
Thesis: Partnership is crucial to global health policy in order to create consistent, sustainable, and achievable goals. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Thesis: Partnership is crucial to global health policy in order to create consistent, sustainable, and achievable goals. 

# data[].attributes.body
Partnership plays a huge role in global health policy because it helps to create an important relationship between two parties (countries, health organizations, NGOs, charities, etc.) and strengthens economic and political trust between the two. These are important qualities to have between two global health actors in order to carry out goals that benefits the health of all people. Many global health tasks are impossible to achieve alone, therefore partnerships must be made in order to create these policies.