# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far to break the 4th amendment because the way they invaded the privacy, they used technology, unreasonable searches and the overuse of freedom to get "justice."

# data[].attributes.body
In tle D.L.K case the government didn't go too far because, the police could and should use new technology available to them, it was a non-violation per carroll and the thermal imager only scanned the outside of the house and not the inside, they merely observed the outside and it wasn't a search 

# data[].attributes.body
The government went to far because the citizens of the United States 4th amendment says" The right of people being secure in their persons, houses,papers and effect. Against unreasonable search and seizures, No warrants shall be issued by probable cause .." The government went to far because they used technology without a warrant.

# data[].attributes.body
the govt went too far because it infiltrated DLK's privacy by using a gadget without warrant.

# data[].attributes.body
The goverment went too far with the DLK case, for the reasons that they used technology and SEarch and seizure and last The violation of private property.

# data[].attributes.headline
The government didn't go too far because they took the photo from the outside and not from inside so they didn't violate someone's privacy

# data[].attributes.subject
The government didn't go too far because they took the photo from the outside and not from inside so they didn't violate someone's privacy

# data[].attributes.headline
The government didn't go too far, because for the DLK case. The government used the thermal imager to scan the heat from the house. They didn't go or try to invade the people's privacy activities. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The government didn't go too far, because for the DLK case. The government used the thermal imager to scan the heat from the house. They didn't go or try to invade the people's privacy activities. 

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far. They used a device not in public hands, they also did not have a warrant. Lastly, the exterior of a house is still part of the persons property. Taking an image is invading their privacy. -Cameroonski

# data[].attributes.body
The govt went too far beause i

# data[].attributes.body
In the DLK case the Govt. went to far. The reason for this is because the govt. used tech that is not available to the public as well as invading DLK's privacy

# data[].attributes.body
In the case of DLK, the government did got to far. Three reasons to prove that the government went to far in the case of DLK are using a thermal imager without a warrant, going onto private property without a warrant and providing wrongly collected evidence to get a warrant.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far reason being they violated DLK's 4th amendment rights, they didn't have a search warrant. and lastly they violated DLK's privacy.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far.

The thermal imager (according to document D) is not allowed to be used unless the user has aquired a warrent

Thermal imagers take away the ability to keep private property private

The 4th amendment protects citizens ability to keep their personal items private, the police didnt ask permission therefore shouldn't have been able to search

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far because the Thermal imager was used without a warrant and violated DLK's expectation of privacy in there home, also the Thermal Imager scanned thermal energy that no one could keep private under any circumstance.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far in the DLK case because they did all of this just because they ´suspected´ DLK of growing 🤬 in his home, the government used a device that wasn´t even allowed for the public and they invaded his privacy by searching his home without a warrant.

# data[].attributes.body
Government did not go too far by using heat-reading devices to scan DLK's house because the images obtained were taken from a public-view perspective, besides no private activities or objects were exposed, and the house of the individual was not invaded during the procedure.

# data[].attributes.body
In tle D.L.K case the government didn't go too far because, the police could and should use new technology available to them, it was a non-violation per carroll and the thermal imager only scanned the outside of the house and not the inside, they merely observed the outside and it wasn't a search

# data[].attributes.body
The government did not go to far, because the thermal imager did not scan any personal items. It only scanned the outside of the house looking for weird thermal patterns.

# data[].attributes.body
No the Government did not go to far because they had probale cause, the police was in a public place, and they did not find/look for personal information.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did not go too far in the DLK case. The government didn't go inside of the house. The government also took and used an image of a location visible to the public and there was no shown address making the house unidentifiable

# data[].attributes.body
the government didn't go to far because they didn't invade privacy with new technology, had probable cause, and lastly did not violate 4th amendment rights.

# data[].attributes.body
the government did go to far in the DLK case because the government didn't need any warrant to use a thermal scanner and there intentions is to see what the person is doing in there house. Also because they did invade the people personal space without using a warrant and still seeing what there doing

# data[].attributes.body
The government went too far and violated D.L.K.'s 4th amendment rights. They went too far because of his property/privacy, they had no warrant, and they used technology that is only supposed to be used with a warrant.

# data[].attributes.body
In the case of DLK the government went too far by useing a thermal imager before they had a warrant. Before now the government was not allowed to use tec to help them with their work. Also even if the outside of the property is able to be veiwed by the public the 4th amendment protects "property" from search as well.

# data[].attributes.body
The government has gone much to far in the DLK case. The first reason being the use of  technology, the second is the usage of a search warrant, and lastly a violation of property.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far to break the 4th amendment because the way they invaded the privacy, they used technology, unreasonable searches and the overuse of freedom to get "justice."

# data[].attributes.body
The government went too far because they violated DLK's 4th amendment rights involving his property, searched him without a warrent, and used technology not available to the general public to search his home.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did not go too far in the Dlk case because the thermal imager was used in a way that Didn't invade anyone's privacy and was collecting data that was out in the open according to document E.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go too far in the DLK case. The government used a theremal imager to gather information about DLK’s house. This invades privacy and the government did not have a warrant to use this technology.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did go to far due to the fact that thermal imaging invades privacy, is very inaccurate, and they(usually) do this with no warrant

# data[].attributes.body
The government did not go too far in the DLK case. This is due to the fact that the thermal imager was used on the outsideof the house; which is blatantly exposed to the public. The imager also did not violate the 4th amendment due to the fact that the imager did not reveal specifics of the inside of the home. When the police did end up searching the house, they did so fully legally, with a warrant.

# data[].attributes.body
The government didn’t go too far because they had probable cause for using the device, didn’t look inside the house or invade DLK’s privacy with the device, and they did later get a warrant to investigate the unusual amount of heat in the house.

# data[].attributes.body
Write your thesis statement.

# data[].attributes.body
The government did not go too far to violate DLK’s 4th Amendment rights because the search was not a violation of his rights per the Carroll case, the search was non-invasive, and the government should be allowed to use new technology available to them.