# data[].attributes.body
Writers at the Boston Globe published a series of stories about how Boston is racist and has made little progress in the past 40 years. They went around the city and studied multiple different areas of the city and saw that black people were not equal to white people. The city is made up of about 75% white people and a mix of the rest and most of the rest are in poverty. No black people are in the Vault, a group of business leaders in Massachusetts and there are very few people in the prestigious Boston schools like Harvard or MIT. This relates to Their Eyes Were Watching God because in the south black people were not accepted into white cities and if they did chose to live there they did not have the same rights and were not liked. This is why Janie and Jody move to an all black town called Eatonville and they had to advance on their own.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Google the phrase "Most racist city," and Boston pops up more than any other place, time and time again.

It may be easy to write that off as a meaningless digital snapshot of what people say about us, and what we say about ourselves - proof of little beyond the dated (or, hopefully, outdated) memories of Boston's public and fierce school desegregation battles of the 1970s.

Except that Boston's reputation problem goes much deeper than an online search. A national survey commissioned by the Globe this fall found that among eight major cities, black people ranked Boston as least welcoming to people of color. More than half - 54 percent - rated Boston as unwelcoming.

Among African-Americans: How welcoming are these cities to people of color?

Little wonder that some comedians and athletes take aim at Boston, like Michael Che of "Saturday Night Live" this year telling a global TV audience this was "the most racist city I've ever been to." Or HBO's John Oliver suggesting that it took this summer's anti-bigotry march on Boston Common to finally make Boston "unracist."

The reputation is real, and pervasive - but, most important, is it deserved?

The Globe Spotlight Team analyzed data, launched surveys, and conducted hundreds of interviews, to answer just that question. Spotlight examined the core of Boston's identity: our renowned colleges and world-class medical institutions; the growth that keeps expanding our skyline; business and politics; and our championship sports teams.

And the Spotlight reporters, to get a sense of how much black residents are part of the mainstream of the city, did something decidedly old-school: They visited a number of iconic Boston places and simply counted the number of black people they saw.

All told, the findings were troubling. The reasons are complex.

But this much we know: Here in Boston, a city known as a liberal bastion, we have deluded ourselves into believing we've made more progress than we have. Racism certainly is not as loud and violent as it once was, and the city overall is a more tolerant place. But inequities of wealth and power persist, and racist attitudes remain powerful, even if in more subtle forms. They affect what we do - and what we don't do.

Boston's complacency with the status quo hobbles the city's future.

Look at the Seaport, a whole new neighborhood rising on the South Boston Waterfront that benefited from $18 billion in taxpayer investment, and you see none of the richness of an increasingly diverse city. Look at Boston's lauded colleges and realize black students remain rare; the percentage of black enrollment at many top universities has not increased appreciably in three decades, stuck in the single digits.

Look at our political institutions and try to recall how many black politicians have been elected to statewide office - or to the top job in City Hall - in the last half century. (Answer: 2.)

Peek, if you can, into corporate board rooms in Massachusetts, where only 1 percent of board members at publicly traded firms are black. Step into the newsrooms and front offices of media organizations anywhere in Boston, including the Globe's Page 1 deliberations, and see few black faces.

And look at the area's middle-class black neighborhoods - if you can find one. There also are not many downtown restaurants and bars where black patrons can go spontaneously and see others who look like them. Living in Boston can be a particularly isolating experience for black professionals.

Although the city's vast sports, entertainment, and cultural offerings are open to all, it's perhaps little wonder why black people are hard to spot at, say, a Red Sox or Patriots game or the Museum of Fine Arts. It could be they simply choose not to go, or it may be the cost. African-Americans in Greater Boston have a median net worth of just $8. That means they owe almost as much as the combined value of what they own, be it a car, or house, or savings.

Finally, know that if you seek an apartment in the region using Craigslist, and if you are black, you can't count on getting equal treatment, even in this day and age, a Globe study found. This inquiry, like this Spotlight series, focuses on the black community specifically, not all communities of color, because blacks have had the longest and most contentious history with racism in Boston.

"To be a black person in Boston, is [often] to be the only one. . . . The only one in the office; the only one in the leadership position. It's lonely," said 45-year-old Bridgit Brown of Dorchester, a communications specialist. "You're aware of the racism. You're aware of the subtleties. It's like the air we breathe, if you're black."

For all the gains that Greater Boston has made, unfinished business on race is everywhere.

In a 1983 series of stories, a team of Globe reporters took a hard look at racial equality in our region. It was not a pretty picture, but local leaders promised things would improve. Thirty-four years later, the promise has yet to be fulfilled. For example:

Then: Just 4.5 percent of black workers were officials and managers.
Now: That number has barely moved, to 4.6 percent in 2015.

Then: The "Vault" - an organization of Boston's most powerful business leaders - had no black people among its 20 members.
Now: The "New Vault" - the 16-person Massachusetts Competitive Partnership - has no black members.

Then: This area's unemployment rate was about twice as high for blacks as whites.
Now: The gap remains, with black unemployment more than double the rate of white workers in 2014.

"A lot of times when Boston engages in looking at itself around race, it focuses on attitudes and prejudices," said James Jennings, professor emeritus of race, politics, and urban policy at Tufts University. "With that, Boston certainly has made a lot of progress, but Boston needs to start looking at structural inequality - racial hierarchy, poverty, academic achievement - to move the needle forward."

Demographics and destiny

To truly explain why racial inequities persist in the Boston area, it is necessary to understand how much can be blamed on demographics and how much can not.

Greater Boston stands out among the nation's top 10 metro areas in one distinct way. We have the highest proportion of white residents - nearly three out of every four.

Racial makeup of 10 largest metro areas, by percent

Source: US Census

Our area's black population is small and the size relatively unchanged in decades - only 7 percent, or 334,000 people, in a region of 4.7 million. If you look only at the city of Boston, the black population is about 23 percent, or about 148,000 people.

And it's been this way for decades, in large part because the metro area never benefited from the Great Migration - the post-Civil War movement of blacks from Southern states in search of opportunity - the way places like Chicago and New York did.

Boston might think of itself as on par with the country's big cities like New York and Chicago - and in certain ways, it is: Harvard, MIT, and many other of the nation's elite universities are in the Boston area, we are a hub of biotech innovation and the epicenter of medical research, and our sports teams have made us a city of champions.

But Boston is also very different. New York and Chicago dwarf Boston in size and scale. The population of New York City alone is 8.4 million people, nearly 2 million of whom are black. That translates into more black residents who earn more money, leading to a developed middle class with extensive professional representation - in other words, cities made welcoming, in part, because there simply is a critical mass of black residents who reflect the achievement possible within their community. Boston lacks that advantage.

But make no mistake: The relatively small size of Boston's black community is not an excuse for the inequalities - or biases - that persist here.

The experience in other cities shows that, even when the black population is relatively small, things can be done with sufficient will. Minneapolis, Denver, and Seattle - all with smaller black populations than Boston - have elected black mayors at least once. Boston has never even come close.

The size of this region's black population also cannot explain how a new showcase neighborhood triumphantly rose in the Seaport with little to no involvement of the black community. Further, it can't explain why elite colleges here admit only slightly more black students than 30 years ago.

Nor does the relatively small size of Boston's black population have anything to do with barriers to finding housing, an inequity the Spotlight Team documented in detail.

Using a methodology employed by academic researchers who study bias in housing, the Globe conducted a study of nearly 600 Craigslist ads from rental landlords in the Greater Boston area, finding housing discrimination remains in Boston.

Overall, landlords ignored nearly 45 percent of e-mails from prospective tenants with black-sounding names, like Darnell Washington or Keisha Jackson, versus 36 percent of e-mails from people with white-sounding names, like Brendan Weber or Meredith McCarthy.

To be a black person in Boston, is [often] to be the only one... The only one in the office; the only one in the leadership position. It's lonely," said 45-year-old Bridgit Brown of Dorchester, a communications specialist. "You're aware of the racism. You're aware of the subtleties. It's like the air we breathe, if you're black."

For example, when a prospective tenant using the name Allison Wolf asked about renting a two-bedroom condo in Boston's Back Bay, the landlord responded later that day. "It's available," she e-mailed back. "You can see it on Sunday." But when a prospective tenant asked about that same apartment the same morning using the name Tamika Rivers, the landlord never replied.

The difference was even more pronounced when landlords received more informal e-mails with grammatical errors or typos, with landlords seeming more forgiving of such written lapses among whites than blacks.

Such lingering prejudices are part of the reason Charlotte Streat, who lives in Milton, questions her decision to call the Boston area home.

"I don't know that I would move here again," Streat, a Philadelphia native, said sitting under a hair dryer at Randolph's Styles with Character, a Roxbury hair salon.

Streat's parents were none too happy that she decided to attend college and grad school in Greater Boston several decades ago. "I was called a nigger. So yeah, my mother was not pleased," she recalled.

But she fell in love and married a Bostonian. The couple moved into a spacious home with a circular drive along Canton Avenue about 10 years ago.

Milton is a suburb where 15 percent of residents are black and the state's first black governor, Deval Patrick, once lived. Still, some black residents feel alone.

"We're isolated," said Streat, a former executive at Bank of America. "People say there are more black folk in Milton, but you're hard pressed to find them."

The missing middle class

The lack of a robust black middle class is both a result, and a cause, of Boston's reputation as an unwelcoming place. As blacks move up the economic ladder here, they encounter an increasingly white world, and their solitary and alienating experience becomes part of our city's word-of-mouth reputation.

During the 1970s and 1980s, the city's history - the mayhem surrounding court-ordered school desegregation - was reason enough for many black graduates and professionals to settle elsewhere. Boston's black middle class stagnated, providing little incentive for the next round of graduates to stay in Boston. And so a cycle, or perhaps a spiral, began.

Today, of all the households in the region earning at least $75,000 annually, only 4 percent are black.

"Does Boston lose because it doesn't have a visible, strong black middle class?" asked John Barros, the mayor's chief of economic development and the most prominent black official at City Hall. "Yes. It loses out on talent. It loses out on investments."

The reality is that Greater Boston has few neighborhoods where prosperous black residents can live with others like them, and finding such areas requires a bit of searching.

The Globe ran a data analysis of census tracts nationally to see which met three criteria: At least 15 percent of the residents are black; and among the black residents, at least 30 percent had a four-year college degree and their household income was at or above the median for their metro area. (That is about $75,000 in Greater Boston.)

Here in Greater Boston there are just four such enclaves: two in Stoughton, one in Milton, and one in Boston's Hyde Park neighborhood. If the search were done looking for neighborhoods that met these criteria for white residents, the results would be a bountiful choice of 516 enclaves. The Boston area also reflects a pattern of segregation that is more extensive than in most other metro regions, studies show.

Forty-five other metropolitan areas have far more black enclaves than Boston, including some major metropolitan centers, such as New York, Washington, D.C., and Atlanta, each with more than 100 enclaves, and other smaller urban areas, particularly - but not only - in the South.

Middle-to-​upper-class black enclaves: How Boston compares

The Boston ​metro area includes Suffolk, Norfolk, Plymouth, Middlesex, and Essex​ counties and​ ​New Hampshire's Rockingham and Strafford counties.

Finding those enclaves in other major cities.

The town with the highest concentration of black residents in Massachusetts is Randolph, which is about 30 minutes south of the city. More than 40 percent of Randolph's population is black, as is the town council president and superintendent of schools. Its median household income is about $12,000 less than the overall metro area.

Netty Oliveira, 51, said she and her husband considered living in Randolph before buying their tan and brick, split-entry house in Stoughton 17 years ago. Their street borders one of the four black enclaves identified by the Globe.

And while she appreciates that her town includes other black residents, she hasn't always felt totally welcomed. She'll never forget one of her first encounters with a neighbor who was white and asked her husband skeptically: "What do you do for a living?"

"I think he was afraid of black people moving in," said Oliveira, who works in criminal justice while her husband works in information technology.

She decided the Stoughton public schools weren't the best fit for her children, now 12 and 15. She eventually chose private schools, which vastly expanded her childrens' world view but forced them to contend with being in classes where they were often one of the few black students. She said white children have asked to touch her son's hair and wondered why his clothes were so nice.

"Our kids pretty much broke a lot of the color barriers," she said.

She hopes the trade-offs are worth it, even though she sometimes feels judged.

"Some of my friends say, 'You're too bourgie. You don't think you're black.' I'm very much black," she said. "But I want more. I want all of us to have a college degree. I want us all to climb the corporate ladder."

Our own worst enemy

There is no doubt that Boston has made gains in overcoming its history of racism. Gone are the days when black people crouched in cars, windows rolled up, hats pulled low so as not to be seen driving through the streets of South Boston or Charlestown, fearing racial slurs or real physical violence.

Though safety remains an issue in some neighborhoods, violent crime in Boston is the lowest in a decade. Also, as police forces nationwide work to end deep mistrust of them within black communities, Boston's officers have so far avoided high-profile clashes that have led to protests elsewhere, and have garnered generally favorable reviews about the city's level of outreach.

Despite the dearth of black politicians elected to statewide office - save for Deval Patrick's two terms as governor and Edward Brooke's path-breaking election as state attorney general and a US senator in the 1960s and 1970s - gains have also been made locally, including the election of black candidates in predominantly white neighborhoods.

Yet this is a city that still stumbles and, in doing so, rekindles seething images of racial discord beamed into televisions during the school desegregation battles of the 1970s.

There was the case of Charles Stuart, a white man who in 1989 killed his wife and then lied, describing the assailant as a black man. The city readily set out in pursuit of a man fitting the fake description.

That was followed by the 2009 arrest of a prominent African-American scholar at Harvard, Henry Louis Gates Jr., handcuffed after being confronted by police for allegedly breaking into his own home, attracting national headlines.

Meanwhile, the image of Boston portrayed on the big screen, and beyond, reinforces the outsider status of many in the city's black community. There are the movies that showcase white-working-class heroes (Remember: "The Departed," "Good Will Hunting," or "The Town"); punch lines (Think: Che and HBO's John Oliver); and sports controversies old and new (Picture: Yawkey Way and Adam Jones).

The region's main tourism website features a video of overwhelmingly white faces inviting visitors to places like Faneuil Hall, Symphony Hall, and along the Charles River. And the introduction of the website's "neighborhood dining guide" only highlights the Back Bay, downtown, the North End, and the Seaport - all neighborhoods with few black residents.

"That's literally making entire communities invisible," said Sarah J. Jackson, a black Ph.D. who moved to Boston six years ago from Minneapolis to teach at Northeastern University. "It became really apparent to me soon after moving here that the version of Boston that the city is really invested in portraying to the outside world is only white Boston. What's the fear? That people are going to go to Dorchester?"

Compare that to Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C., where black travelers can find entire itineraries on those area's tourism websites dedicated to African-American arts, culture, food, and history.

Our complacency on economic issues also works against us.

Despite a thriving economy fueling a downtown building boom, black residents in Massachusetts are twice as likely as their white counterparts to be unemployed. They earn sharply lower salaries when they do land jobs, have little savings, and are far less likely to own their homes.

The median net worth of non-immigrant African-American households in the Boston area is just $8, the lowest in a five-city study of wealth disparities. It's hard to ignore the dramatic contrast to the $247,500 net worth for white households in the Boston area.

"That borders on insane and absurd. The disparity in Boston just transcends everything," said William A. Darity Jr., a professor of public policy at Duke University who was one of the lead investigators of that study, which involved the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. "It's just staggering."

And when it comes to income alone, the imbalance looks like this: For every one black household earning more than $75,000 in the metro region, there are about 21 white ones.

Those findings may provide some context for the results of a Suffolk University/Boston Globe poll completed this summer. Nearly two-thirds of black Bostonians said they were treated unfairly because of race in the previous 30 days.

It also provides insight into the separate Globe-commissioned survey on Boston's national reputation, which compared us to Atlanta, Chicago, New York, Charlotte, San Francisco, Miami, and Philadelphia. The survey was conducted by Chadwick Martin Bailey, a market research and strategy firm in Boston, and designed to update a race image survey already done twice for Commonwealth Compact, a nonprofit group that promotes diversity.

The question was: How welcoming is each city to people of color? And each time it was asked - in 2010, 2013, and 2017 - Boston came in last among African-American respondents.

Atlanta topped the list the last two times, with 83 and 84 percent of blacks respectively saying it was most welcoming to people of color.

Everywhere you look

Even though about 334,000 black people live in Boston's metro region, few of them can be found at the city's most iconic locations.

Less than 2 percent of some 4,600 fans counted systematically at select entrances in Fenway Park on a summer night when the Red Sox beat the St. Louis Cardinals were black. And of nearly 8,000 ticketholders counted at Gillette Stadium at a game this fall, about 2 percent were black.

On a sunny Saturday in September, about 4 percent of the roughly 3,000 patrons counted entering the Museum of Fine Arts, one of the largest museums in the country, were black. And about 4 percent of the more than 1,180 people counted walking into the Boston Children's Museum on an October Saturday were black.

Of the 200 diners sipping cocktails and enjoying Thursday night dinner in October at Eastern Standard in Kenmore Square, four were black. That same night and time, only one black person ate at Ostra in the Back Bay and no black people dined at Blue Dragon in the Seaport.

And during the Saturday night rush at Legal Harborside, about 4 percent of nearly 380 diners were black, while about 10 percent of diners were black that same night at the Cheesecake Factory at the Prudential Center, which could be due to its more moderate-priced menu and accessible location.

There are only a small number of restaurants in which black diners report they can dependably find other black people, including Darryl's Corner Bar & Kitchen, Slade's Bar & Grill, and Savvor Restaurant & Lounge.

"There's really nothing here for us . . . and this is a big city," said Thomas Grupee, a project manager working in biotech. "If you visit a place like D.C. or Atlanta, there's so many places to go that are black-owned. Why not give us a piece of the pie, too?"

Everyone in Boston loses out on the cultural front. The downtown dining and social scene does not reflect the city's full diversity, and some black patrons who want to dine in places with others like them organize "friendly takeovers" of establishments with their friends or hold private events. It's today's answer to social segregation in Boston.

That was the situation that 32-year-old Mike Free stepped into one recent night.

Want to support more Spotlight Team investigations like this one?
Subscribe now
The doors of Scholars, a restaurant in the heart of downtown, had just opened, and the place was almost empty save for the wait staff and DJ.

But Free, dressed in jeans and a button-up, was the first to arrive. His sense of punctuality was honed by four years at West Point. His sense of excitement amplified with anticipation. Today, he was not going to be the only black person at the bar.

By the end of the night, Scholars would fill with some 400 young, urban (read: black) professionals brought together via group chats, retweets, and Instagram - and an ambitious event planner - to create a social scene where one really doesn't exist.

"When I moved, I didn't really know exactly where to go," said Free, who had just moved here from Chicago for an executive training program. "Chicago is easier. Here, you all have a different kind of vibe."

What he did know about Boston was discouraging. This was a town where a racial slur was hurled at a black Baltimore Orioles player. Friends also told him: It's not diverse. It's small. It's a difficult place for a person of color to thrive.

So he set his expectations low, really low. And after several months here, the best Free could say about Boston's social scene was that it is a step up from one of the whitest states in the nation.

"It's not Idaho," he offered with a smile.

Barros, the city's development chief, maintains that Boston needs to show that it is welcoming by creating a "social infrastructure" for black professionals to connect - or risk losing them to other cities, such as Atlanta, Washington, D.C., and New York.

Building a more vibrant black middle class and professional community in Boston may depend on the success of entrepreneurs like Gregory Minott. The 41-year-old, along with business partner Troy Depeiza, both of whom are black, started Dream Collaborative, an architecture and development firm, in 2008. It has 13 employees who design and develop commercial and residential projects with up to $20 million price tags.

Minott knows white colleagues who vacation with their clients, leveraging those personal relationships to broaden their professional networks. This is difficult for black businessmen like him in a metro region where only 1 percent of companies with paid employees are black-owned.

"You miss that part . . . the kind of peer-to-peer thing," he said.

Minott started the firm to inspire other people of color to enter an industry where black architects make up about 2 percent of the workforce.

He'd like to tap into a wider network, including the fast-growing Seaport, but focuses on projects in predominantly black neighborhoods, such as transforming the old Grove Hall Library into the Freedom House's new community center, using culture competency - his blackness - as a competitive advantage.

For black professionals who live or work outside of the heart of the city's black community, day-to-day life can be very isolating.

For many, this means being the only black person in the room, turning them into the de facto emissary and expert on the entirety of the global black experience, a translator of everything from HBO's "Insecure" to soca music to respectability politics and the Black Power movement.

Also, being the only one in the room often means being constantly on guard, policing your attire, aesthetic, tone, speech, and mannerisms.

For the last decade, 46-year-old Farah Paul has been painfully aware that she is the only black person in management at her downtown office. "That's constantly in my head," she said. "I'll walk into a meeting. I'll scan the room, and that's the first thing I notice."

It's a fact of life that she's become accustomed, but not numb, to. And if there is another black person in the room, there's an automatic, unspoken sense of camaraderie, she said.

"You still maintain that professionalism, but you just feel a bit more comfortable," she said.

The struggle to find a place where black people can connect is part of the reason Farrah Belizaire started LiteWorks, which hosted the event at Scholars, after she graduated from Boston University.

"A lot of people come to Boston with the idea that it's racially unfriendly or that socially, they're going to have to take a loss," the 28-year-old Brockton native said. "So they always place a time limit on how long they stay."

LiteWorks, she said, is about creating the social experience she wanted to have, and she uses technology to help people stay in touch between events.

More than 1,800 people belong to "Boston's Young, Black & Social," a massive group chat Belizaire started using a smart phone app. She also uses Instagram to feature members of the LiteWorks community. Entrepreneurs, engineers, lawyers, artists, and scientists - all black and living in the Greater Boston area.

"It helps reinforce the community aspect that I'm trying to create," she said. "Here, you have to be a little bit proactive."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Boston. Racism. Image. Reality: The Spotlight Team takes on our hardest question

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Globe's Spotlight Team confronts one of Boston's most vexing issues - racism - in a seven-part series that examines the city's pervasive and persistent national image as a place unwelcoming to black people. Spotlight attempts to answer an important question: Is this reputation still deserved?

# data[].attributes.headline
The Real Racism Exposed by Hurricane Katrina

# data[].attributes.subject
The Real Racism Exposed by Hurricane Katrina

# data[].attributes.body
World News Group author Marvin Olasky stated in his article The Real Racism Exposed by Hurricane Katrina that the fake news media was responsible for multiple deaths because of the fake stories they put out about people shooting and raping after the hurricane that delayed relief efforts. He said they would stay stuff like black people were raping people and murdering anyone they saw and were even eating people. Only 4 murders occurred and that was a usual amount in a week said the mayor. This shows how racism can cause problems in society after major events happen. This relates to Their Eyes Were Watching God because there is a big hurricane while Janie and Teacake were down in the everglades and everything went to madness. After the hurricane there was racism because the town payed for all the dead white people to have coffins but all the black people were just buried in a ditch.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Ten years ago today, the presidency of George W. Bush took a fatal hit. Yes, the bog-down in Iraq hurt, but the most devastating single photo of his administration showed him looking out the window as his plane flew over Katrina-flooded New Orleans as he returned to Washington after vacationing at his ranch in Texas. Bush should have been on the ground, as he was in New York City soon after Sept. 11, 2001.

Left-wing mediacrats made that photo their poster for rich people not caring about poor people, or whites not caring about blacks. At a congressional hearing later in 2005, many New Orleans residents charged that racism caused delays in Katrina relief and rescue. They were right, but they misidentified the culprit.

Delays came partly because some politicians and journalists painted a portrait of impoverished, overwhelmingly African-American masses of flood victims resorting to utter depravity, randomly attacking each other as well as police and rescue workers dispatched to protect and save them. Black politicians denigrated black residents: New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin spoke of "hundreds of armed gang members killing and raping people" inside the Superdome and said many of his constituents were in an "almost animalistic state." Police Chief Eddie Compass spoke of "little babies getting raped." Political organizer Randall Robinson said the "thousands of blacks in New Orleans ... have begun eating corpses to survive."

Even those who see cannibalism as benign don't think it happens after four days. It didn't take that long for media hysteria to spread. CNN's Paula Zahn spoke of "literally, people walking around in feces" and "bands of rapists going block to block." Her colleague, Chris Lawrence, raved about "mothers with their babies literally living in raw sewage ... helicopters are literally just completely surrounded the city ... people are literally dying at the Convention Center. ... There have literally been groups of young men roaming the city, shooting at people."

These stories, at best metaphorical but largely mendacious, literally led to good ratings. Facts had a hard time catching up. Orleans Parish District Attorney Eddie Jordan later said four murders had occurred in the entire city during the week after Katrina hit, which made it an average week, but from press reports he thought "at least 40 or 50 murders had occurred." New Orleans Times-Picayune editor Jim Amoss later complained about "classic urban myth" and said that if media had been speculating about the behavior of "middle-class white people its hard to believe that these kinds of myths would have sprung up so readily."

When Wolf Blitzer on CNN at the end of Katrina week said, "Had this happened in a predominantly white community, the federal government would have responded much more quickly," he was probably right. Had politicians and reporters not made racist, false assumptions about black behavior, rescuers would not have thought their operations demanded military precaution rather than humanitarian speed. Had commanders not seen the need to arrive at the Convention Center with overwhelming force, in the media-driven expectation that residents would shoot at them, they would have been able to evacuate people from there a day earlier.

The New York Times was one of the exaggerators, but at least on Sept. 29, 2005, it reported that "the most alarming stories that coursed through the city appear to be little more than figments of frightened imaginations." Hype was not a victimless crime. It slowed down rescue work. Two patients died while waiting for evacuation helicopters grounded for a day by false reports of sniper fire. And yet, instead of emphasizing the need for accurate reporting, NBC's Brian Williams told his national audience that the hurricane would "necessitate a national discussion on race, oil, politics, class, infrastructure, the environment, and more."

George W. Bush came to New Orleans this past weekend. He's said that he could have done better a decade ago. Many reporters have not been so honest. If you're interested in more on this subject, you can read a book of mine that Thomas Nelson published a year after the hurricane hit: The Politics of Disaster: Katrina, Big Government, and a New Strategy for Future Crisis.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The real racism exposed by Hurricane Katrina

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ten years ago today, the presidency of George W. Bush took a fatal hit. Yes, the bog-down in Iraq hurt, but the most devastating single photo of his administration showed him looking out the window as his plane flew over Katrina-flooded New Orleans as he returned to Washington after vacationing at his ranch in Texas.

# data[].attributes.body
The New York Times article What is Whiteness talks about how there are only two types of white people racist or people that do nothing to fight against racism. They say that not all white people are in the same race and that now a days whiteness is anything besides being black. They mention how before world war two white people were different in how they identified as either northern European or Irish or Italian but those aren't different races those are just countries that their ancestors are from. This connects to Their Eyes Were Watching God because in the story there are nice white people like the Washburn family that let Janie and her grandma lived with for a while. Then there are the racist people like Ms. Turner even though she was only half white, she believed she was better than other darker black people. She though that Janie should not be with Teacake because he wasn't good enough for her just because he was dark.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.

# data[].attributes.body
The slam poem What Kind of Asian Are You? is about how most people stereotype all asians into the same group when in reality there are many different types and cultures through out Asia. Alex Dang talks about how he was stereotype into a smart math kid or the ninja and how he was neither of those things but he had to act like it to be accepted by others. He said it was hard to grow up in America because everyone else though they were better than him and didn't respect him or his culture but he couldn't stop it. This relates to Their Eyes Were Watching God because the same thing happens to Janie except its even worse because she's a black woman living in the south. Every one she meets thinks that she is unable to take care of herself and work hard but all along the way she proves them wrong and lives a very successful life.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Alex Dang - "What Kind of Asian Are You?" (NPS 2013)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Subscribe to Button! New video daily: http://bit.ly/buttonpoetry If you loved this poem, check out Sam Cook: http://bit.ly/1qP8vvM Alex Dang, performing for Portland, OR at the 2013 National Poetry Slam. Follow Button on Facebook: http://bit.ly/SG5Xm0 About Button: Button Poetry is committed to developing a coherent and effective system of production, distribution, promotion and fundraising for spoken word and performance poetry.

# data[].attributes.body
The source What is White Privilege, Really? connects to the story Their Eyes Were Watching God because it talks about how people that are not white do not have as easy of a time doing things as white people. The source explains that minorities may have the same opportunities as white people but they have a harder time being successful at it. This relates to Their Eyes Were Watching God because in the story, Janie the main character, goes through life struggling because she is a black woman even though she works hard. She lives in a completely different world than white people and men and they don't respect her through out the whole story. Today the white privilege is not as big of a deal because most businesses and schools realized this and made it more equal for everyone to be successful in America.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Get access to files anywhere through secure cloud storage and file backup for your photos, videos, files and more with Google Drive.