# data[].attributes.headline
both cl and Br gain electrons, but bromine does that more effectively since it falls down the group and thus making it more reactive due to electrons instablility in the outermost shell.

# data[].attributes.subject
both cl and Br gain electrons, but bromine does that more effectively since it falls down the group and thus making it more reactive due to electrons instablility in the outermost shell.

# data[].attributes.body
Both would gain an electron and chlorine would gain an electron easier because chlorine is more reactive than bromine

# data[].attributes.body
Both Chlorine and Bromine would gain an electron to become isoelectronic. Chlorine would become isoelectronic to Argon and Bromine would become isoelectronic to Krypton. Since Br has a higher n value than Cl, it is harder for Br to gain an electron than it is for Cl to gain an electron.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
See all the wonderful things Vivian Mozol has made

# data[].attributes.headline
Cl and Br would both gain to become isoelectronic to argon and krypton respectively. Cl has smaller 'n' (3) than Br (4) and therefore smaller valence energy, which makes Cl easier to add an electron and harder to remove one.

# data[].attributes.subject
Cl and Br would both gain to become isoelectronic to argon and krypton respectively. Cl has smaller 'n' (3) than Br (4) and therefore smaller valence energy, which makes Cl easier to add an electron and harder to remove one.

# data[].attributes.body
Bromine and Chlorine are likely to gain electrons. Chlorine would likely gain an electron more easily due to the fact that there is less energy in the valence shell (n) making it easier to add electrons.

# data[].attributes.headline
It would be easier for Cl and Br to accept an e- than for it to break apart one of their 3p paired e- because once paired the e- are in a more stable configuration. Cl would have an easier time accepting an e- as Br would add an e- to a higher energy shell, it would have a weaker attraction force on another e-.

# data[].attributes.subject
It would be easier for Cl and Br to accept an e- than for it to break apart one of their 3p paired e- because once paired the e- are in a more stable configuration. Cl would have an easier time accepting an e- as Br would add an e- to a higher energy shell, it would have a weaker attraction force on another e-.

# data[].attributes.headline
Since Br has a higher n value it would be easier to remove electrons than it would be with Cl. In this case, because we know both elements have the same number of valence electrons, both nuclei would have the same pull.

# data[].attributes.subject
Since Br has a higher n value it would be easier to remove electrons than it would be with Cl. In this case, because we know both elements have the same number of valence electrons, both nuclei would have the same pull.

# data[].attributes.headline
Both would gain electrons; however, Bromine would have a stronger affinity as its Zeef is larer than Cl.

# data[].attributes.subject
Both would gain electrons; however, Bromine would have a stronger affinity as its Zeef is larer than Cl.

# data[].attributes.body
Cl and Br would both gain an electron in order to be isoelectronic with Ar and Kr respectively. Both have the same effective nuclear charge (Zeff) of 7, but the energy of the valence electrons (n) is different, as Br has an n of 4 and Cl has an n of 3, meaning it would be easier for Cl to gain an electron.

# data[].attributes.body
Chlorine and Bromine would both gain electrons as they want to become more like a noble gas. It would be harder for bromine to gain an electron since it has more valence shells than chlorine.

# data[].attributes.headline
chlorine would gain an electron due to its stronger pull from the nucleus, smaller atom, and bromine would lose electrons due to the larger atom and its 'looseness' on holding electrons. Weaker pull from the nucleus due to larger n.

# data[].attributes.subject
chlorine would gain an electron due to its stronger pull from the nucleus, smaller atom, and bromine would lose electrons due to the larger atom and its 'looseness' on holding electrons. Weaker pull from the nucleus due to larger n.

# data[].attributes.headline
Both Br and Cl will readily gain an electron since there is a strong nuclear pull on the valence electrons. Cl will more readily gain an electron relative to Br as it has lower energy.

# data[].attributes.subject
Both Br and Cl will readily gain an electron since there is a strong nuclear pull on the valence electrons. Cl will more readily gain an electron relative to Br as it has lower energy.

# data[].attributes.body
Chlorine and Bromine would both gain an electron each Cl to become like argon and Bromine to become like Krypton. It would be easier for Cl to gain an electron as it has less number of valence shells compared to Br having 4.

# data[].attributes.body
Both would gain electrons due to them having 7 valence electrons

# data[].attributes.body
They would both gain electrons to become as stable as a noble gas. As we go across the periodic table, the value of n increases therefore making them eager to gain more electrons.

# data[].attributes.body
Both Br and Cl would both gain an electron. Cl would hve a lower value so it gains an electron easily than Br

# data[].attributes.headline
Both would gain an electron, and Cl would gain the elctron more easily.

# data[].attributes.subject
Both would gain an electron, and Cl would gain the elctron more easily.

# data[].attributes.headline
Chlorine and Bromine would both gain an electron in order to make their outer energy levels full

# data[].attributes.subject
Chlorine and Bromine would both gain an electron in order to make their outer energy levels full

# data[].attributes.headline
Both Cl and Br would accept the electron because they would be more stable because all of the shells would be full. If they lost an electron they would be more unstable 

# data[].attributes.subject
Both Cl and Br would accept the electron because they would be more stable because all of the shells would be full. If they lost an electron they would be more unstable 

# data[].attributes.headline
both will try to gain an e- in attempt to fill the 3p shell and become more stable.

# data[].attributes.subject
both will try to gain an e- in attempt to fill the 3p shell and become more stable.

# data[].attributes.headline
Both Bromine and Chlorine will prefer to gain electrons.  Chlorine will do it more easily as the electron would be added to a valence shell of lower energy (n).

# data[].attributes.subject
Both Bromine and Chlorine will prefer to gain electrons.  Chlorine will do it more easily as the electron would be added to a valence shell of lower energy (n).

# data[].attributes.headline
Both Br and Cl will readily gain an electron since there is a strong nuclear pull on the valence electrons. Cl will more readily gain an electron relative to Br as it has lower energy.

# data[].attributes.subject
Both Br and Cl will readily gain an electron since there is a strong nuclear pull on the valence electrons. Cl will more readily gain an electron relative to Br as it has lower energy.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Both would gain
2) Cl would gain e- easier b/c smaller so less pull from nucleus and less electron shielding on P orbital

# data[].attributes.body
They're both likely to gain an electron however due to the size of Br it becomes more difficult to pull the energy required to gain an electron, meaning that while they have the same Zedd number Cl is more likely to gain its electron

# data[].attributes.body
Both will gain e- bc they have similar Zeff or nuclear pull. However, Cl will gain more easily compared to Br bc it has lower/closer valence shell.

# data[].attributes.body
This is an awesome class!!!

# data[].attributes.headline
Cl and Br would gain electrons. Br would gain more easily because it has a greater Zeff and therefore has a stronger pull on electrons.

# data[].attributes.subject
Cl and Br would gain electrons. Br would gain more easily because it has a greater Zeff and therefore has a stronger pull on electrons.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Cl atom will gain an election. Br has a larger number of protons in the nucleus, pulling the electrons towards the nucleus. which means it has a higher effective nuclear charge. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The Cl atom will gain an election. Br has a larger number of protons in the nucleus, pulling the electrons towards the nucleus. which means it has a higher effective nuclear charge. 

# data[].attributes.body
Both would gain an electron. Cl would be easier.

# data[].attributes.headline
Bromine and Chlorine would gain electrons.

# data[].attributes.subject
Bromine and Chlorine would gain electrons.

# data[].attributes.body
However, the question was which one gained more easily. As a group we decided that since Bromine had a higher Z eff value, it had more pull on the electrons due to a higher number of protons. So we assumed it would be easier to gain electrons.

# data[].attributes.headline
Both Br and Cl would gain electrons. Since Br has more energy in the valence shell (greater quantum number (n)),  it would be harder for Br to gain an electron.

# data[].attributes.subject
Both Br and Cl would gain electrons. Since Br has more energy in the valence shell (greater quantum number (n)),  it would be harder for Br to gain an electron.

# data[].attributes.body
Bromine and chlorine would both want to gain an electron, to get to a more stable configuration. This ties into the Zeff, as the lower that number, the more stable the atom will be.

# data[].attributes.body
They will both have the same nuclear pull for electrons, however, Bromine (with a higher valence electron energy) will not accept electrons as easily as Chlorine will, and vice versa.

# data[].attributes.headline
Br and Cl would both add an electron from left to right looking at the Zeff it would be easier for both to gain an electron. But since Cl has a lower n value it would be easier for it gain and electron than Br. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Br and Cl would both add an electron from left to right looking at the Zeff it would be easier for both to gain an electron. But since Cl has a lower n value it would be easier for it gain and electron than Br. 

# data[].attributes.body
They would both gain electrons. Chlorine has a higher Zeff so it would gain electrons slightly easier than Bromine.

# data[].attributes.body
Both Br and Cl atoms would gain electrons.
A Cl atom would gain electrons more easily than a Br atom because it has less energy in the valence shell and both atoms have the same strong relative nuclear pull on the electrons.

# data[].attributes.body
Both would gain an electron to have a full shell. Chlorine would more likely gain an electron since it is more electro-negative.

# data[].attributes.body
As a group we concluded that they both would try to gain electrons in order to stabilize in order to complete their distal orbitals. Although bromine has a higher energy level, due to the smaller radius, chlorine would gain electrons more easily due to the stronger pull of its nucleus.

# data[].attributes.body
Both Cl and Br will gain electrons to become isoelectronic with the nearest noble gas.
We concluded that it would be easier for Cl to gain because Br has the lower ionization energy, therefore having less energy to remove electrons.

# data[].attributes.body
Both of them will gain an electron since Cl and Br are missing one. Cl will do it easily because it has higher electronegativity than Br.