# data[].attributes.body
First Amendment--Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969

# data[].attributes.body
The school did violate the students’ rights.  Non-disruptive, passive, symbolic speech cannot be censored just because it makes others uncomfortable.  The symbolic wearing of armbands could not be shown to interfere with school discipline.

# data[].attributes.headline
Example:                            Tinker V. Des Moines--1969:

# data[].attributes.subject
Example:                            Tinker V. Des Moines--1969:

# data[].attributes.body
Three public school students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. Hearing about their plan to wear the armbands, the school district created a policy forbidding armbands.  The three students wore the armbands anyway, and they were suspended from school.  They sued the district for violating their 1st Amendment rights to free speech.

# data[].attributes.body
1- It protect Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof , or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press , or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances .

# data[].attributes.body
2- This right it protects people to have arms that are  necessary for they own security.

# data[].attributes.body
3-solders or police man are not alowed to go to your house or any house with out a permision or the owner consent.

# data[].attributes.body
4- The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, sup-ported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

# data[].attributes.body
5- This Amendment protects you that you can not have to proride any evidens against yourself

# data[].attributes.body
6-In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation

# data[].attributes.body
7-In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law.

# data[].attributes.body
8-Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

# data[].attributes.body
9-The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

# data[].attributes.body
10-The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

# data[].attributes.body
Andmenment 1-McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948),[1] was a landmark United States Supreme Court case related to the power of a state to use its tax-supported public school system to aid religious instruction. The case was a test of the separation of church and state with respect to education.

# data[].attributes.body
1-McCollum appealed the case to the U. S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case, taking oral arguments in December 1947. A number of religious groups including the American Unitarian Association, the Synagogue Council of America, the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists and the Baptist Joint Committee of Religious Liberty filed briefs in support of McCollum's position.

# data[].attributes.body
1-The case was brought by Vashti McCollum, the mother of a student enrolled in the Champaign public school district.

# data[].attributes.body
1-In 1940, interested members of various Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish faiths formed an association named the Champaign Council on Religious Education.

# data[].attributes.body
2 andmenent-Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town

# data[].attributes.body
2-The town of Chickasaw, Alabama, was predominantly a company town near Mobile, Alabama, that was owned and operated by the Gulf Shipbuilding Corporation ("Gulf"). The town exhibited the general characteristics of a more traditional settlement

# data[].attributes.body
2The Court initially noted that it would be an easy case if the town were a more traditional, publicly administered, municipality. Then, there would be a clear violation of the right to free speech for the government to bar the sidewalk distribution of such material.

# data[].attributes.body
andmement 3Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1952), was a case that came before the United States Supreme Court in 1952. It upheld an Illinois law making it illegal to publish or exhibit any writing or picture portraying the "depravity, criminality, unchastity, or lack of virtue of a class of citizens of any race, color, creed or religion"

# data[].attributes.body
In his opinion Justice Frankfurter argued that the speech conducted by the defendant breached libel, which is reasoned to be outside the protection of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

# data[].attributes.body
3-The defendant in Beauharnais distributed a leaflet "setting forth a petition calling on the Mayor and City Council of Chicago 'to halt the further encroachment, harassment and invasion of white people, their property, neighborhoods and persons, by the Negro.'"