# data[].attributes.body
(Rabbit 12)dought

# data[].attributes.body
𝙼𝚎𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚎☄️

# data[].attributes.body
6E 17 Randy

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
防治山泥40年　土力工程處：不可能零風險｜即時新聞｜港澳｜on.cc東網

# data[].attributes.body
位於西班牙加那利群島（Canary Islands）的拉帕爾馬島（La Palma）上南部的老峰火山（Cumbre Vieja）於19日首次爆發，摧毀該島至少120棟房子、超過6000人被疏散，不過有人發現竟然有一棟小屋在災難中屹立不搖、並未被波及。

《衛報》報道，根據曝光的圖片顯示，這棟未受影響的小屋和附近被燒焦的黑色景觀形成強烈對比，社群媒體上的網友已經將這棟生還的小屋稱作「奇蹟之屋」（Miracle house）。

據建造這座房子的蒙尼肯丹（Ada Monnikendam）表示，其主人是一對不在島上的退休丹麥夫婦，他們得知小屋「仍然屹立不倒」、讓他們鬆了一口氣，蒙尼肯丹透露「當我告訴他們心愛的房子完好無損時，我們都開始瘋狂地哭泣」。

這所房子位於埃爾帕拉伊索（El Paraíso），那裏有一半以上的房屋和當地學校被毀。蒙尼肯丹指出，這對夫婦當初選擇拉帕瑪島正是因為火山景觀，但也表示「知道這棟小屋孤零零地存在而沒有人能夠照顧它，這很令人難過」。

# data[].attributes.body
fire (that burns buildings etc)

# data[].attributes.body
jbg ygyfbtby

# data[].attributes.body
Cold wave

# data[].attributes.body
volcanic eruptions

# data[].attributes.body
flood

# data[].attributes.body
Tsunami

# data[].attributes.body
volcanic eruptions

# data[].attributes.body
Snow disaster

# data[].attributes.body
mary

tornado

# data[].attributes.body
Hill fire

# data[].attributes.body
landslide

# data[].attributes.body
cyclone

# data[].attributes.body
earthquake

# data[].attributes.body
flood

# data[].attributes.body
earthquake

# data[].attributes.body
volcanic eruptions

# data[].attributes.body
earthquake

# data[].attributes.body
volcanic eruptions

# data[].attributes.body
volcanic eruptions

# data[].attributes.body
earthquake

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Earthquakes devastated both Italy and Myanmar early Wednesday. Though the quakes were similarly sized-magnitude 6.2 in Italy and magnitude 6.8 in Myanmar-the seismic events, occurring more than 5,000 miles (8,047 kilometers) apart, were not related.

We asked two experts to explain whether it's ever possible for one earthquake to trigger another. John Bellini is a geophysicist at the U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center and Michael Steckler is a geophysicist at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University.
Are the earthquakes in Italy and Myanmar at all related?
John Bellini: No, the two earthquakes are not related. They are located along different faults in different parts of the world. They just happened to occur on the same day. Neither of these is really that large either. Around the world, we have something like 150 earthquakes a year- around two or three a week-in the 6 to 6.9 range.

A large earthquake, something like an 8 or a 9, or even a large 7, can trigger small things nearby, but not on the other side of the world.

Michael Steckler: I don't think they are related; they are too far apart. For earthquakes this size, the fault length that broke was roughly 30 to 60 miles long (50 to 100 kilometers). You would expect stress from an earthquake to affect another quake within several of those lengths (up to 250 miles). For something this size, it may be even less.
Are these regions typically susceptible to earthquakes?
JB: Both Italy and Myanmar are tectonically active regions, meaning they have a lot of earthquakes. Italy has many smaller earthquakes and can have some in the magnitude 6 range from time to time.

MS: Italy has a catalog of earthquakes going back hundreds of years. In Myanmar, there was another quake about this size earlier this year. There is certainly seismicity in that slab.

JB: The area in Myanmar is similarly active to Italy in the overall amount of earthquakes, but the largest ones in Myanmar can be a quite a bit larger. Italy's usually top out around 7 magnitudes, but over in Myanmar and Nepal you can have earthquakes in the magnitude 8 range. That's not to say that Italy will never have an 8 magnitude earthquake, but they are more common in Myanmar.
Italy seems to be experiencing more aftershocks than Myanmar. Why?
JB: They're just not being recorded in Myanmar. Italy is a highly instrumented country as far as seismicity goes, whereas Myanmar is not. Any earthquakes that appear on our website are probably coming from data that we received from Italy.

The number and size of aftershocks are partially dependent on the size of the original earthquake. It takes some time for the Earth to settle down after the initial shock; aftershocks are really "adjustment" shocks.

These regions will likely experience aftershocks for weeks. For a magnitude 6.2 earthquake, like that in Italy, we would expect multiple aftershocks in the 5 range. Especially in Italy, people need to be aware that shocks of even magnitude 5 can cause additional damage.
Why does the destruction seem to be worse in Italy when the earthquake was larger in Myanmar?
MS: The subduction zone in Myanmar is relatively deep-the epicenter of this quake was 52 miles (84 kilometers) below the surface. When an earthquake is that deep, nobody is closer than 52 miles to the epicenter. It may affect a broader zone but it is less damaging than a shallow quake.

Italy's earthquake was much shallower, and it was more destructive because of the proximity to the surface. In Italy, they are often building on flat mesas that may shake more, and many buildings are older structures made from stone. These don't do well in earthquakes.
These interviews have been edited. Follow Aaron Sidder on Twitter.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Are the Earthquakes in Myanmar and Italy Related?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Earthquakes devastated both Italy and Myanmar early Wednesday. Though the quakes were similarly sized-magnitude 6.2 in Italy and magnitude 6.8 in Myanmar-the seismic events, occurring more than 5,000 miles (8,047 kilometers) apart, were not related. We asked two experts to explain whether it's ever possible for one earthquake to trigger another.

# data[].attributes.body
cyclone

# data[].attributes.body
cyclone

# data[].attributes.body
earthquake

# data[].attributes.body
Hill fire

# data[].attributes.body
hill fire

# data[].attributes.body
Meteorite

# data[].attributes.body
cyclone

# data[].attributes.body
Very dangerous

# data[].attributes.body
flood

# data[].attributes.body
Hill fire

# data[].attributes.body
Tsunami

# data[].attributes.body
Sinkholes

# data[].attributes.body
tsunami

# data[].attributes.body
flood

# data[].attributes.body
Fire tornado

# data[].attributes.body
Waterspout

# data[].attributes.body
volcanic explosion

# data[].attributes.body
Storm Tide

# data[].attributes.body
Fire Tornado

# data[].attributes.body
Tornado.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.provider_name
DCH Toyota of Oxnard - 20 Terrifying Natural Disaster Facts

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Natural disasters can be incredibly scary. Check out this list of facts about crazy, awe-inspiring natural disasters from around the world.

# data[].attributes.body
Flash floods

# data[].attributes.body
cyclone

# data[].attributes.body
Volcano eruption

# data[].attributes.body
tsunami

# data[].attributes.body
Tsunami

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
How is it that one underwater landslide leads to a devastating tsunami, while another of similar size barely causes a ripple? The answer may lie in the way the sediments slide. Cascading landslides are the ones to watch, step by step slippage is usually more benign.

Just over 8000 years ago one of the largest underwater landslides on record occurred off the coast of Norway. Dubbed the Storegga slide, it covered an area of sea floor larger than Scotland, and generated a massive tsunami in the north Atlantic Ocean. That left debris perched 20 metres above sea level on the Shetland islands, and possibly caused a Stone-age population collapse in the coastal region of what is now the north-east UK. Curiously, though, the Trænadjupet slide, another giant underwater landslide in the same area 4500 years ago failed to generate a destructive wave.

To find out why the two landslides led to such different outcomes, Finn Løvholt from the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute in Oslo, and his colleagues, produced computer models of two types of underwater landslides and compared their tsunami-generating potential.

The first model, known as a retrogressive slide, starts at the bottom of the slope and releases its energy block by block, in a staggered series of smaller landslides. The second model, known as the debris slide, begins as a retrogressive slide, but then spreads much more quickly up the slope, leading to multiple blocks of sediment failing in one go.

Debris on the slide

Løvholt and his colleagues found that Storegga could only have produced a tsunami capable of the damage observed today if the slope developed into a fast-moving debris slide, carrying all of its staggering 3000 cubic kilometres of material simultaneously. Meanwhile, Trænadjupet's lack of tsunami is best explained by a sequence of slope failures, ultimately releasing a similar amount of sediment, but doing so in batches - none of which could generate a tsunami on its own.

"Studies like this are very valuable and highlight how important it is to get the landslide mechanism correct to understand the tsunami hazard," says Joshu Mountjoy at the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research in Wellington, New Zealand - who, later this year, will be drilling into a large active landslide that is believed to be flowing slowly on New Zealand's Hikurangi Margin, to investigate its movements.

Until now tsunamis were assumed to be almost inevitable in the wake of massive submarine landslides, but the new findings suggests that perhaps we don't need to fret so much. "Many giant landslide deposits across the world's continental margins display retrogressive development, and our results suggest that some landslides, even when exhibiting giant volumes, may be less tsunamigenic than previously thought," says Løvholt.

Journal reference: Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: 10.1002/2017GL074062

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Mystery of missing tsunamis explained by geological model

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
How is it that one underwater landslide leads to a devastating tsunami, while another of similar size barely causes a ripple? The answer may lie in the way the sediments slide. Cascading landslides are the ones to watch, step by step slippage is usually more benign.

# data[].attributes.body
Miss Yu,I can't post the photo sorry

# data[].attributes.body
Typhoon

# data[].attributes.body
a drought

# data[].attributes.body
Earthquake

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
十大自然灾害有哪些：Top10 - 一起盘点网

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
一起盘点网介绍，自然灾害有哪些？自然灾害的形式有很多种，自然灾害的出现会对人们的生活带来极大的影响，威胁人们的生命安全和大面积的建筑破坏，下面就一起top10十大自然灾害

# data[].attributes.body
An ice storm.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Choose a photo / news of a natural disaster and post on this Padlet)
2. Name the natural disaster.