# data[].attributes.body
King John did made the right decision about half the time but definitely not all the time.
He didn't make the right decision when it came to death or war

# data[].attributes.body
We were the weakest link because we could not agree.

# data[].attributes.body
My group did okay, we didn´t alway agree on stuff so then we got it wrong but when we did we got it right.

1) Not always but sometims he did make appropriate decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
my team got +2 and even though I didnt agree with some things they said we did pretty good I thought that we should have done c for questions 1& 3 also

# data[].attributes.body
My group was about the same as King John, we scored 0 points. I think my group made decisions not looking at the aims to get the most points. We all decided that what we chose were good answers but not the answers to get points. We did pretty good I mean we got every other answer right basically. We could have done better as a table .

# data[].attributes.body
I think our team did bad because we got zero and King John was a bad king and their was 1 answer that I suggested that was right and they did not agree.

# data[].attributes.body
We mostly did good.  Sometimes I did not agree with my team and in the end I was right, but together we got 4. We would be good kings and queens.
1) I don't think I was the weak link.
2)I think I was right over half of the time at least.
3)We made good decisions most of the time. Me made some mistakes like everyone, but we did supper good. We were better than king John.

# data[].attributes.body
our team would be a great king because some of the time i did not agree but we still got them right because I was wrong. My team got 4 points

Most of the time I was probably wrong but I tried. King John had so dumb ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
No, our team wasn't the weakest link, we weren't the weakest link because we got 4 points. King John made so bad decisions and some good decisions given the difficult circumstances.

# data[].attributes.body
My group was as good as King John .The Decisions we did bad in where the ones that where around home in the kingdom.The decisions we did good in where  there there where the problems where with the pope or with the Berons. we could have made better choices in the Kingdom. Some of the table groups didn't agree with each other but for the most part we did and we still eneded up near King john.

# data[].attributes.body
We got the same amount of points as King John. We all agreed on the choices that we made so I guess that during the time period that he was in we thought the same way that King John did during that time. there were some choices that when we went back through the slideshow that I think we could have done better than what we actually did. Some of the decisions were just common sense that I guess King John didn't think about in the moment, same with our group. There were a couple of times when only one person thought differently than the entire group, then when that happened we had to go through the question again and rethink it. During the time I don't think that King John made the right decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
I wasn't here, but i'd have to say we were probably better than king John. My team agreed on SOME things, but not all of them. one of us would say something else different than the rest of us, but we went by the law majority rules and went with the answer that had the bigger vote. other that that, I think we did pretty well.

# data[].attributes.body
I thought that we my team did worse than King John. Most of the time we didn't agree on the answers and made it hard to decide which one to chose. When we went back I thought that if we had a little more time and thought about it more we would have made better decisions. King John made some good decisions but most of the decisions he made they weren't very good.

# data[].attributes.body
We did the same as King John. In a couple where my team decided to fight against the Barons I didn't want to do that. If we would have agreed and made a compromise then we would have been smarter than King John and kept our Lords on our side with no rumors about killing King John. If we would have done all this and maybe had a little more time to discuss then maybe we would have made smarter decisions .

# data[].attributes.body
We were about the same as King John.  I think we could of chose better choices and have better reasons. He kind of made appropriate decisions but not the best. Instead of staying a hundred percent loyal and powerful he should of made different/better decisions within the kingdom. He shouldn't be as accepting but take more control.

# data[].attributes.body
We did worse than King John.  I think we were the weakest link because we had a negative number.Most of the time we did not agree on the answer. When we review the answers, I realize we could have thought it through. I think King John made some bad decisions since he was not loyal most of the time and chose more power. My group also made some bad decisions as well. For instance, on one question we chose to accept the problem and not stand up like a king would. I think some of King John decision were correct but overall he made some bad decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
I was about the same as King John.  He sometimes made the right decisions. With the pope he was wrong cause instead of peace he was fighting. In the group we would never agree some of us would want to fight and some would want peace. I think the whole group strengths were when we were deciding to go to war or not. He was always fighting with other people and had rumors about him also he threatened people.

# data[].attributes.body
We were greeater than King John. Even though we should have made decisions that would make the lords trust us more we still make good decisions on war and keeping the Pope on our side. King John did not make the right decisions by the Pope. He should have agreed with him because the Pope has high political power. He also should have just not gone to war with France so many times because I'm sure he knew that they were more powerful than his empire. He also should have just crowned himself so he wouldn't look weak. He would seem like he really believes in himself which makes his people believe in him. He also should have compermised with the barons more often because he really did need the lords and the Pope to on his side so the lords wouldn't plan agaisnt him with France.

# data[].attributes.body
No we were not the weakest link because we didn't get a negative number in the end. King John made some appropriate decisions like not killing the 12 year old who wanted to be crowned king because he thought it was right thing to do

# data[].attributes.body
My group had done the same has King John. But I think that we could have listened to each other better then we should all agree on the best answer and so I thought that it would make us a little smarter than King John. The good decisions I think we made were when it came to when we had to decide to go to war or not and the agreements. I think that King John didn't make very good decisions. I think that he didn't make good decisions because he had all of these empires threatening him and he didn't really discuss with the lords.

# data[].attributes.body
We were right with King John because, we made about all the same decisions as King John did. King John kind of made good decisions. He could have come off more strong for some of the decisions and when it came to war

# data[].attributes.body
Our team successfully dealt with the problematic choices King John was faced with. We got a positive four points. I think that we got a good score because all worked together and considered the circumstances of each situations. Even when we did not all agree, we had to even out our chances. For instance, when the pope threatened political power for the position of the Archbishop, we agreed. But when they threatened land and power we disagreed and made arrangements to where the lords had less tax money to pay and our soldiers were loyal.  In conclusion, by making these decisions, we successfully sustained land by keeping the empire together, stopped other rulers from stealing our land and interfering with our politics. Keep the lords happy, and gain loyalty through out our empire.

# data[].attributes.body
We were right with King John. We made some of the right decisions. He sometimes made the right decisions. He could've made better ones when it came to w though.

# data[].attributes.body
No we were not the weakest link , because we didn´t  get a negitive. Kinda, soemtimes he did and sometimes he didn´t

# data[].attributes.body
I was not the strongest link, but i was also not the weakest. My team got six of the questions correct and six wrong, so we were at King Johns level. On some of the circumstances, King John did fine. But over half of them were not. He sometimes put his greed in front of his nation needs.

# data[].attributes.body
We did worse than King John. Some of the things I didn't agree with, but majority wins, and they had more people. I think that King John may not have made the right choices. For as many bad decisions he made, he did make some good ones, as well. If I were in his shoes, I wouldn't say anything that involved me saying I don't agree, having everyone rebel against me.

# data[].attributes.body
We did worse than King John because we ended up with -2.  King John mostly made Appropriate because he did not kill he made reasonable things but some of them were circumstances. Because he lied for some of the things and did not care that much.

# data[].attributes.body
I Think that our Table group did good because we ended up with 2. King John did not kill people. He made some really good choices but he also made bad choices. if i was him I wouldn't want to fight a 12 year old and kill the kids I am glad he made some of those choices.

# data[].attributes.body
We did better than king john. We  Didn't do double taxes. We agreed with the pope. We didn't up the taxes on the barons.