# data[].attributes.headline
Instructional Strategies for Student Engagement Tool

# data[].attributes.subject
Instructional Strategies for Student Engagement Tool

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.entities[].name
Student Engagement & Motivation Strategies & Tips

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Engagement seems to be the 'holy grail' in education. The students want to be engaged, and teachers enjoy seeing their students excited about the lessons they work hard planning. Engagement seems an ethereal state of mind; hard to prove and impossible to measure. And yet, teachers and students know the experience of being truly engaged.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The 5 Levels of Engagement by Schlechty:  A Simple Guide

# data[].attributes.headline
What is student engagement? What does student engagement mean?

# data[].attributes.subject
What is student engagement? What does student engagement mean?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What is STUDENT ENGAGEMENT? What does STUDENT ENGAGEMENT mean? STUDENT ENGAGEMENT meaning

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

# data[].attributes.headline
Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action

# data[].attributes.subject
Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Since the 1980s an extensive research literature has investigated how to improve student success in higher education focusing on student outcomes such as retention, completion and employability. A parallel research programme has focused on how students engage with their studies and what they, institutions and educators can do to enhance their engagement, and hence success. This article reports on two syntheses of research literature on student engagement and how this can be enhanced. It first synthesizes 93 research studies from ten countries to develop a conceptual organizer for student engagement that consists of four perspectives identified in the research: student motivation; transactions between teachers and students; institutional support; and engagement for active citizenship. Secondly, the article synthesizes findings from these perspectives as ten propositions for improving student engagement in higher education. It concludes by identifying some limitations with the conceptual organizer and one suggestion for developing a more integrated approach to student engagement.

Berger JB ( 2000) Optimizing capital, social reproduction, and undergraduate persistence: A sociological perspective, in JM Braxton (ed.), Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle , pp. 95-124. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Google Scholar

Beven JP ( ) Bridging diversity to achieve engagement: 'The Sentence is Right' game show rip off, in Student Engagement. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 30-31 January 2007 . Perth: The University of Western Australia: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2007/refereed/beven.html [accessed 15 July 2008].
Google Scholar

Braxton J. and Lien L. ( 2000) The viability of academic integration as a central construct in Tinto's interactionalist theory of college student departure, in J Braxton (ed.), Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, pp. 11-28. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Google Scholar

Cook B. and King J. ( 2005) Improving Lives Through Higher Education: Campus Programs and Policies for Low-Income Adults. Washington DC: Lumina Foundation for Education and American Council on Education Center for Policy Analysis: http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/2005CampusPP4Adults.pdf [accessed July 2010].
Google Scholar

Kuh G. ( 2001) The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning: http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003.pdf [accessed 17 September 2008].
Google Scholar

Kuh G. , Kinzie J. , Buckley J. et al. (2006) What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Commissioned Report: http://nces.ed.gov/IPEDS/research/pdf/Kuh_Team_Report.pdf [accessed July 2010].
Google Scholar

Law B. ( 2005) Experiential learning in the context of educating for a sustainable future: Is it an appropriate pedagogy for shifting teachers' thinking and engaging learners? Set no. 3.
Google Scholar

Mearns K. , Meyer J. and Bharadwaj A. ( ) Student engagement in human biology practical sessions . Refereed paper presented at the Teaching and Learning Forum, Curtin University of Technology: http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2007/refereed/mearns.html [accessed July 2010].
Google Scholar

Miliszewska I. and Horwood J. ( ) Engagement theory: A framework for supporting cultural differences in transnational education, in Transforming Knowledge into Wisdom: Proceedings of the 27th HERDSA Annual Conference, Miri, Malaysia, 4-7 July: http://www.herdsa.org.au/?page_id=170 [accessed July 2010].
Google Scholar

Moran E. and Gonyea T. ( 2003) The influence of academically-focused peer interaction on college students' development. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478773.
Google Scholar

Ryan R. and Deci E. ( 2000a) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1): 54-67.
Google Scholar

Ryan R. and Deci E. ( 2000b) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well being, American Psychologist 55(1): 68-78.
Google Scholar

Zhao C. and Kuh G. ( 2004) Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement , Research in Higher Education 45(2): 115-38.
Google Scholar

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action - Nick Zepke, Linda Leach, 2010

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Since the 1980s an extensive research literature has investigated how to improve student success in higher education focusing on student outcomes such as retention, completion and employability. A parallel research programme has focused on how students engage with their studies and what they, institutions and educators can do to enhance their engagement, and hence success.

# data[].attributes.body
Behavioral — Students act appropriately and should not act out. They bring everything they need to class, listen to orders, practice diligently, and engage in class discussions.
Emotional — Students feel like they belong to the school community and are excited to be there! They welcome you with a smile, engage with their classmates favorably, and seem alert during your classes.
Cognitive — Students are able to read and inquire critically about the subject matter, which is often known as academic interaction. They pose difficult questions and always go beyond and above while finishing tasks.

# data[].attributes.body
Student engagement occurs as students arrive at class eager to learn, participate in studying, and exhibit a positive mindset.