# data[].attributes.body
In practioners n family.

# data[].attributes.body
Alignment with language & goals

# data[].attributes.body
Struck that family and practitioners give great weight to reparations

# data[].attributes.body
Is not present/articulated in either of the board reflections

# data[].attributes.body
At-scale is a common theme among staff but not family/practitioners. Is that meaningful in our collective understanding?

# data[].attributes.body
Common themes across the three groups but also large differences in how commonly they were mentioned (judging by text size). Practitioners a bit more emphasis on the concrete nature of the work with emphasis on systems change and capacity building. Family more emphasis on the more general impact around opportunity and justice and freedom. Mention of reparations across all three groups

# data[].attributes.body
Prominent w/staff. Absent or less in practioners n family

# data[].attributes.body
There is a lot of alignment among these charts. It’s also an interesting contrast in that staff were the most specific, and thus had less “big words” that most folks used, family had the most shared or key terms, and practitioners were somewhere in the middle (it seems, I could be over analyzing :-)

# data[].attributes.body
I see values focus from family, strategic focus from Practitioners, and a Misty Re from the Staff. I love to see the references to reparations, power, and at-scale impact.

# data[].attributes.headline
Reparations at size in all three, but three different sizes. Interesting that the people some (or most) perceive to have the most power - family - wrote reparations the largest. Focus on economics?

# data[].attributes.subject
Reparations at size in all three, but three different sizes. Interesting that the people some (or most) perceive to have the most power - family - wrote reparations the largest. Focus on economics?

# data[].attributes.body
Staff and practitioners both focused on creating a level playing field (me essentially equating “Eliminating Disparities” and “Systems Change”) versus what America is about = economic power, unlike the family.

Fascinating!

# data[].attributes.body
Wonder about the strategies and tactics needed to operationalize this definition- how to do more with the foundation’s resources to deepen the work

# data[].attributes.body
Differing priorities with some common themes

# data[].attributes.body
Noting that assets and power and consistent themes in the staff section.

# data[].attributes.body
A real need to define reparations and how Babcock sees it’s work as reparatory. Also, at-scale emphasis from Staff is affirming of extra spend and Influence and Leverage work.

# data[].attributes.body
Staff focused on the goal of eliminating disparities and practitioners on the how…systems change. “assets” show up a lot in the staff chart…assets=power. Interested that reparations was the largest word on the family page.

# data[].attributes.body
Reparations is more prominent for the board (both family and practitioners) than staff

Systems change important to practitioners and staff. Didn’t see it on family

capacity building important to practitioners

At scale very important to staff

Only saw freedom and democracy in family