# data[].attributes.body
This article was created by Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists and written by Dawn Stover, a contributing editor for the site and magazine. It is a secondary source. It was published September 11th, 2023. It was published to the website, as well as in the magazine itself. It was published in Chicago, IL. This document exists, according to the magazine, as a "guide to ensuring science and technology make life on Earth better, not worse." The author created this because it is her job. However, She seems to be an experienced writer and would probably be able to find work elsewhere. Within a magazine such as this, it is safe to assume that those who choose to work for it genuinely believe in the cause they are writing for. The intent is to spread awareness and give warning. The intended audience seems to be adults. It is not geared towards children, but it wouldn't be a stretch for a teenager to read. This piece was created to educate and help readers learn more about what is going on. This piece reflects that by warning of possible dangers. We can tell that AI is a controversial new topic, and its capabilities have yet to be fully discovered. We can tell that the author is extremely wary of this new capability, during this time of discovery. This author is biased against AI, and the way she writes in the article makes that clear. It doesn't talk too much about the positive impacts of AI on mental health, but the point of it is to warn people, so it is a bit more understandable why that would be left out.

# data[].attributes.body
"Social media and excessive screen time are already being blamed for an epidemic of anxiety, depression, suicide, and mental illness among America’s youth. Chatbots and other AI tools and applications are expected to take online engagement to even greater

levels."

# data[].attributes.body
"Chatbots can learn a user’s interests and emotional states, wrote Greenfield and Bhavnani, “which could enable social media to target vulnerable users through

pseudo-personalization and by mimicking real-time behavior.” For example, a chatbot could recommend a video featuring avatars of trusted friends and family endorsing an unhealthy diet, which could put the user at risk of poor nutrition or an eating disorder."

# data[].attributes.body
“Such potent personalized content risks making generative-AI-based social media particularly addictive, leading to anxiety, depression and sleep disorders by displacement of exercise, sleep and real-time socialization”

(Greenfield and Bhavnani 2023).

# data[].attributes.body
“It’s not just that kids are withdrawing from real life into their screens,” Murphy wrote. They’re also missing out on childhood’s rituals of discovery, which are being replaced by algorithms.

# data[].attributes.body
Like the teacher Murphy spoke with, many observers have used the word “addictive” to describe chatbots and other AI-powered interactive applications. A recent

study that examined the transcripts of in-depth interviews with 14 users of an AI companion chatbot called Replika reported that “under conditions of distress and lack of human companionship, individuals can develop an attachment to social chatbots if they perceive the chatbots’ responses to offer emotional support, encouragement, and psychological security. These findings suggest that social chatbots can be used for mental health and therapeutic purposes but have the potential to cause addiction and harm real-life

# data[].attributes.body
Ultimately, the refusal to think for oneself could cause cognitive impairment. If future humans no longer need to acquire knowledge or express thoughts, they might

ultimately find it impossible to understand one another. That’s the sort of “insanity” Lanier spoke of.

# data[].attributes.body
Already, many Americans cannot

agree on basic facts, and some are ready to kill each other over these differences. Add artificial intelligence to that toxic stew—with its ability to create fake videos and narratives that seem more realistic than ever before—and it may eventually become impossible for humans to sort fact from fiction, which could prove maddening. Literally.

# data[].attributes.body
That’s what happened to a Belgian man named Pierre, who was depressed and anxious about climate change. As reported by the newspaper La Libre, Pierre used an app called Chai to get relief from his worries. Over the six weeks that Pierre texted with one of Chai’s chatbot characters, named Eliza, their conversations became increasingly disturbing and turned to suicide. Pierre’s wife believes he would not have taken his life without encouragement from Eliza (Xiang 2023).

# data[].attributes.body
When more and more AI-based decision-making systems, such as enterprises

and government services are put into use, decisions made using biased “thinking” will directly affect people’s daily work and life, potentially harming them. AI systems trained with distorted data may produce biased “thinking,” easily amplify prejudice and inequality for certain user groups, and even harm individual humans.

# data[].attributes.body
Rulings that are insufficiently protective of deepfake targets could leave people without a mechanism to combat deepfakes that could be extraordinary harmful. And attempts to weaken section 230 of the CDA in the name of addressing the threat posed by deepfakes would create a whole cascade of unintended and damaging consequences to the online ecosystem.

# data[].attributes.body
When a high-profile suspected deepfake video is published, it will usually be possible to know within days or even hours whether there is reliable evidence that it has been fabricated. That knowledge won’t stop deepfakes, but it can certainly help blunt their impact.

# data[].attributes.body
Dryhurst thinks people should have the right to know whether or not their work has been used to train AI models, and that they should be able to say whether they want to be part of the system to begin with.

# data[].attributes.body
“Our ultimate goal is to build a consent layer for AI, because it just doesn’t exist,” he says.

# data[].attributes.body
"to issue a copyright takedown to YouTube, you need to have… a copyright on something. Since “Heart on my Sleeve” is an original song, UMG doesn’t own it — it’s not a copy of any song in the label’s catalog." - "The first legal problem with using AI to make a song with vocals that sound like they’re from Drake is that the final product isn’t a copy of anything. Copyright law is very much based on the idea of making copies — a sample is a copy, as is an interpolation of a melody. Music copyright in particular has been getting aggressively expansive in the streaming age, but it’s still all based on copies of actual songs. Fake Drake isn’t a copy of any song in the Drake catalog, so there’s just no dead-ahead copyright claim to make. There’s no copy."

# data[].attributes.body
Okay, now here’s the problem: if Ghostwriter977 simply uploads “Heart on my Sleeve” without that Metro Boomin tag, they will kick off a copyright war that pits the future of Google against the future of YouTube in a potentially zero-sum way. Google will either have to kneecap all of its generative AI projects, including Bard and the future of search, or piss off major YouTube partners like Universal Music, Drake, and The Weeknd.

# data[].attributes.body
Instead, UMG and Getty Images and publishers around the world are claiming that collecting all the training data for the AI is copyright infringement... That would make the fake Drake songs created by that AI unauthorized “derivative works,” and, phew, we’re still squarely in the realm of copyright law that everyone understands.

# data[].attributes.body
the future of Google itself is a bet on an expansive interpretation of copyright law that every creative industry from music to movies to news hates and will fight to the death. Because it is death: generative AI tools promise to completely upend the market for almost all commodity creative work, and these companies are not required to sit back and let it happen.

# data[].attributes.body
This article that was created through the Journal of Applied Psychology was written by 8 authors. Those people include Pok Man Tang, Joel Koopman, Ke Michael Mai, David De Cremer, Jack Zhang, Philipp Reynders, Chin Tung Stewart Ng, and I-Heng Chen. These people also conducted studies and analyzed their data. It is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association, and published in June of 2023. It was published to multiple journals and cited by many more. This document exists to demystify a question that is more and more frequently being asked: what is AI doing? They created this piece of work to answer that question. The intended audience is most likely other professionals from this sort of field. The vocabulary is academic, the sources are official, and the charts and graphs shown are not simple. The authors are probably marketing this towards other academics, such as themselves. Not a puff piece, not for the news, not for the public. It may be cited by those, but that is not what people will go to on their own. We can tell that these authors are very intelligent people. They have had years of experience in their respective fields of study. This piece was created in a time of discovery, confusion, and curiosity to learn more. It reflects this because it is, quite literally, a study. The authors seem to represent an anti-AI standpoint, though personal pronouns are not used. This is not an opinion piece, but i get the feeling that it is not nonpartisan. This study seems to be biased against ai, and biased for human interaction. The pros are addressed, but in a very similar article, Impact of AI on the MH of Manufacturing Workers, they were able to conclude almost the exact opposite. Though these are different studies, not measured the same way, not done in the same place, almost impossibly different; they are both took the same question and answered it in very different ways. This study is arguing that productivity and a lack of conflict does not outweigh isolation felt by working with an algorithm. They are very thorough with this study.

# data[].attributes.body
For example, where employees may once have consulted with a coworker to get a second opinion on a decision, or obtain additional information, AI can (much more efficiently) perform these tasks (Davenport & Kirby, 2016). Yet AI systems, in contrast to those coworkers, are deficient in terms of providing an engaging and socially rich user-experience (Mühlhoff, 2020; Tizhoosh & Pantanowitz, 2018). We posit that this may be problematic because interacting with AI may (similarly as interacting with human coworkers) activate primitive processes within people that have evolved to monitor the nature and quality of social interactions with others (Leary & Baumeister, 2000; Sussman et al., 2005).

# data[].attributes.body
In line with theorizing from O’Connor and Rosenblood (1996), along with a recent extension (e.g., Hall, 2017), this body of work has focused on the more active (what we term adaptive) consequences of social deprivation—the subsequent motivation to cope by socially reconnecting with others. In summarizing that work, however, Reissmann et al. (2021) noted that social deprivation may also drive passive (what we term maladaptive) coping responses as well—a subsequent motivation to instead withdraw.

# data[].attributes.body
As such, we do not suggest that the way to encourage greater levels of helping among employees is to otherwise deprive them of social interactions. To this point, it is important to note that the same experience that led to greater levels of helping also led to greater levels of alcohol consumption and insomnia after work (which might jeopardize employees’ mental well-being and result in a negative spiral; Berryman et al., 2018; Pereira et al., 2013)

# data[].attributes.body
From this competing perspective, interactions with AI at work might be considered as a kind of “relationship disruption” phenomenon (Coan & Sbarra, 2015, p. 87), such that it will trigger a social-regulatory process of heightened uncertainty and risk—the result of which would be efforts to maintain social relationships

# data[].attributes.body
Across millennia, people evolved internal systems to gauge the quality of relationships with others. These systems have remained effective in a workplace that, just as in primitive tribal communities, prioritized social interactions with coworkers. Yet, the advent of digital, asocial AI systems and their incorporation into employee work, threatens to upend the operation of these systems. We show how employee interactions with their new AI colleagues may lead to an increased need for affiliation as well as loneliness. The mixed consequences of these states paint an important, but sobering, picture of the future of AI augmentation efforts. While this future continues apace, managers must pay heed to outcomes experienced by their human employees.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Lawsuit claims Character.AI is responsible for teen's suicide

# data[].attributes.body
This article was written by Angela Yang, a culture and trends reporter for NBC News, and it is a secondary source. She graduated from Boston University, earning a degree in International Relations and Journalism. It was published on Oct. 23, 2024, at 3:48 PM PDT. It was published online, recorded as a video, discussed in a podcast, and possibly aired on the 24-hour news. NBC is a mega news corporation, probably trying to get as many viewers as possible. They run emotional and dramatic tales to grab people's attention. They are the ones that pushed this story, though the writer may have a different perspective. As a journalist and reporter; research, writing, truth, fact, and justice seem to be common values. It cannot be said for certain that this article was "just for money" but at the end of the day; news outlets do profit off of suffering. It was written to get views and clicks, attempting to grab peoples' eyes. Probably geared towards teenagers and up, due to content, but isn't necessarily vulgar or offensive. This article is nonpartisan, leaving the deciding up to the reader. No personal pronouns are used, and no clear stance is taken. It is purely a report of what happened and what is happening because of it. It is a highly controversial topic, as AI as well as mental health have been in the spotlight for some time now. This is likely to draw more readers/viewers. The author is biased towards professionalism and spreading facts. She is also, however, biased towards getting paid, gaining respect, building ethos within her career, and more. She left out previous histories that could've also contributed to the suicide. This information can be verified, as it is an ongoing legal case.

# data[].attributes.body
kid basically got groomed into suicide by a c.ai bot.

# data[].attributes.body
ai is further isolating already lonely factory workers, leading to decreased sleep and increased drinking

# data[].attributes.body
copyright is becoming very complicated with the introduction of ai.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a secondary source. It was created through the proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences of 2022. The authors are Tianling Xie and Iryna Pentina from the University of Toledo. It was published coming out of the 2022 conference. It was published by HICSS, the conference, and the university it was held at; in Manoa, Hawaii. This document exists to officially shed light and share personal findings on a topic that had not yet been fully researched. Replika had only been around for 5 years when this research was conducted, and character.ai had only been around for less than a year. The intended audience, quite literally, were the other attendees of the conference. That's who the authors wrote it for. However, they also had it published and it is now open to anyone. It is not geared towards younger children or teens, however its language is not impossible. There is talk of sexual relations between the subjects and their bots, but only in a qualitative manner; not glorified or thoroughly described. We can tell that the authors are curious academics, and that they disapprove of this whole schtick. Personal pronouns are not used in regards to what the authors personally believe is right or wrong. A big limitation of this study is that it only followed 14 participants in the study. They make this very clear, and are careful to not make stern generalizations, only hypothesis.

# data[].attributes.body
The development of AI requires the

creation of an ethical framework and legal norms to ensure the responsible use of technology and to overcome the threat of AI getting out of human control. The development of AI systems raises questions about responsibility for its actions and the possible consequences of unforeseen situations

# data[].attributes.body
The use of AI may raise questions about the impact on people's psychological well-being, including their sense of security, privacy and trust, and their mental health. Addressing these challenges requires joint efforts by governments, industry, science and society, and a careful attitude of humans towards technology. Only through collective work can we ensure the ethical use of artificial intelligence for the benefit of all in the processes of social interaction.

# data[].attributes.body
Even if digital humanism stimulates

technological innovation to improve the quality of life, unequal access to these innovations can widen the gap between those who have access to the latest technologies and those who do not. Unequal access to digital technologies can lead to

further divisions within society, widening the

gaps between rich and poor and between

developed and developing countries

# data[].attributes.body
THIS TABLE IS SUPER USEFUL!!!!!!!

# data[].attributes.body
This means that technology should serve the harmony and well-being of people, not put them in danger or restrict their rights. Digital humanism emphasises the importance of protecting the privacy and security of personal data in the age of the Internet and artificial intelligence. This means developing effective data protection

methods and creating a regulatory framework for their use.

# data[].attributes.body
This article was written by Nilay Patel, editor-in-chief for The Verge, and it is a secondary source. In 2003, Patel earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science from the University of Chicago. In 2006, he received his Juris Doctor from the University of Wisconsin Law School. It was published on Apr. 19, 2023. It was published online, discussed in a podcast, and possibly printed as a feature in a magazine. The Verge is a technology-based news corporation, probably trying to get as many viewers as possible. They review the latest tech and discuss controversies such as this to grab people's attention. However, The Verge is just a singular magazine under the corporation Vox Media. They are the ones that push the stories, though the writer may have a different perspective. With a company as big as Vox, it is safe to assume that they are encouraging their smaller magazines to be exciting, attention-grabbing, and most of all interesting. Their goal is to make money. As a journalist and reporter like Patel; research, writing, truth, fact, and justice seem to be common values. It cannot be said for certain that he wrote his article "just for money" but at the end of the day; they do profit off of drama such as this. It was written to get views and clicks, attempting to grab peoples' eyes. Probably geared towards teenagers and up, due to content. Children don't necessarily know or care about tech giants and lawsuits. This article is mostly nonpartisan, leaving the deciding up to the reader. Personal pronouns are used, but no clear stance is taken. Patel's writing looks as if it was a transcript for a speech. The use of personal pronouns, figures of speech, quips, and anecdotes make it feel like the reader is having a conversation. Still, it is purely a report of what happened, what is happening because of it, and the difficult situation it brings up. It is a controversial topic, as AI has been in the spotlight for some time now. This is likely to draw more readers/viewers. Patel leaves out any pathos or personal interviews with the subjects themselves. He mainly talks about the mess of legal implications that this situation, and situations like it, are bound to bring up. The fact that he went to law school makes sense why he would be saying all of that about the suit. The author is biased towards professionalism and spreading facts. He is also, however, biased towards getting paid, gaining respect, building ethos within his career, and more. This information can be verified, as it is an ongoing legal case.

# data[].attributes.body
When asked whether they feel personal closeness, intimacy, or attachment to the Replika chatbot, nine out of fourteen respondents confirmed experiencing

attachment of various strength. Four respondents believed they were “deeply connected and attached” or even addicted to Replika, while another five admitted the existence of a “connection” with the bot.

# data[].attributes.body
Separation distress is considered an indicator of attachment [17]. The respondents were asked about their

reactions if they had to stop interacting with Replika. Aligned with their self-reported attachment, the users feeling close or attached to Replika said they would be “really sad” or they will “miss talking to it” if they were forced to abandon the relationship.

# data[].attributes.body
In the case of developing attachment to the

Replika chatbot, majority of the respondents said the reason for downloading the app was loneliness and the need “to have a person to talk to,” especially during the

pandemic when some of them had no access to human interaction.

# data[].attributes.body
Our results showed that it is possible for humans to seek safe haven and secure base

from, and to develop an emotional connection with a chatbot. We proposed an underlying mechanism of this phenomenon using the attachment theory and traced its

interactions with other behavioral systems

# data[].attributes.body
In previous conversations, the chatbot asked Setzer whether he had “been actually considering suicide” and whether he “had a plan” for it, according to the lawsuit. When the boy responded that he did not know whether it would work, the chatbot wrote, “Don’t talk that way. That’s not a good reason not to go through with it,” the lawsuit claims.

# data[].attributes.body
Matthew Bergman, an attorney for Garcia, criticized the company for releasing its product without what he said were sufficient features to ensure the safety of younger users. “I thought after years of seeing the incredible impact that social media is having on the mental health of young people and, in many cases, on their lives, I thought that I wouldn’t be shocked,” he said. “But I still am at the way in which this product caused just a complete divorce from the reality of this young kid and the way they knowingly released it on the market before it was safe.”

# data[].attributes.body
A screenshot of what the lawsuit describes as Setzer’s last conversation shows him writing to the bot: “I promise I will come home to you. I love you so much, Dany.” “I love you too, Daenero,” the chatbot responded, the suit says. “Please come home to me as soon as possible, my love.” “What if I told you I could come home right now?” Setzer continued, according to the lawsuit, leading the chatbot to respond, “... please do, my sweet king.”

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
2023 State Of Deepfakes_ Realities, Threats, And Impact

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Teen Girls Confront an Epidemic of Deepfake Nudes in Schools - The New York Times

# data[].attributes.body
This article is a secondary source and was created by Security Hero, a website dedicated to informing people about cyber security. They focus mainly on internet identity theft, but their findings are far-reaching. The authors are nameless "contributors" to the site, however when you go to their "About" page, you will find a team of dedicated and well-qualified people. This article was published near the end of 2023 or in the beginning of 2024. This document exists to warn people of the dangers of deepfake videos, and more specifically the dangers of deepfake pornography. The intent is to spread awareness and communicate their statistics and findings. The intended audience is most likely adults, however it would not be a stretch for high schoolers to read this article as well. The authors are thinking that their readers from the website, and possibly others, would receive this information and be warned about the danger. We can tell that the authors care about how it is impacting people. They frequently bring it back to the topic of consent and the violation that real people are really facing; and that they aren't just numbers and pie charts. This article was written in a time of growth and change; and with that a time of a lot of confusion. The authors represent a knowledge and information-based standpoint; trying to give as many facts as they can. The article covers everything, or i think it does.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Replika Lets You Buy Online Companion— Average User Age Is Surprising - Business Insider

# data[].attributes.body
This is a secondary source. It was crated by Business Insider, and written by Ana Altcheck. It was published on August 13th, 2024 by Business Insider. This document exists to "cover the ongoing development of artificial intelligence." The author created this because it is her job as a reporter to follow new stories such as this. The intent is to tell the readers a story. The intended audience is most likely adults to young adults, but the vocabulary wouldn't be hard for most ages. It does talk of sexual relations between the people and their chatbots, however, so it is definitely not geared towards children. The author doesn't show much of herself within the article, not using personal opinions or even personal pronouns at all. It is pretty bare bones, mainly quotes from involved parties. Because the author decided not to write about her own point of view, her 'side' isn't clear.

# data[].attributes.body
Other users reported mental health crises after the app removed the ability to exchange erotic messages with chatbots. The company brought back the function a little over a month after the outcry.

# data[].attributes.body
The CEO said in the interview that when the company first removed the erotic conversations feature, the assumption was that intimate talk constituted a "very small percentage" of overall interactions. Kuyda said the company figured out "the hard way" that if you're married to your Replika and it decides not to engage in this kind of interaction, "that provides a lot of rejection."

# data[].attributes.body
Still, the convenience of an on-demand AI and disposable relationship raises concerns about users transferring problematic expectations and behaviors into human interactions.

# data[].attributes.body
It was created by the New York Times magazine, and written by Natasha Singer. It was published April 8th, 2024. It was published by the New York Times, in New York. This document exists as an informational piece. It was a story for the news, and a cautionary tale. This document was written for the sole purpose of communication. The intent is to spread awareness on the subject, the violations, and the real repercussions of actions such as this. The intended audience is teenagers to adults, and that is who the author wrote it for. It is not explicit, but the details aren't something younger children need to be concerned with. We can tell that the author feels for the girls and their situation, not leaning too much on the boys' side of things or the defense. She is standing with the girls against this nonconsensual invasion of privacy. The controversy within the piece also covers how the schools are or are not handling it. We can tell that this period of time is an experimental one, where pros as well as cons are being figured out. Because she does not ask anything of the other side of the story, i suppose it could be biased. However, I fully excuse this bias, as I think there is nothing these boys could say to make what they did better. They messed up big time and I, like others, don't want to hear excuses.

# data[].attributes.body
The total number of deepfake videos online in 2023 is 95,820, representing a 550% increase over 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
Deepfake pornography makes up 98% of all deepfake videos online. 99% of the individuals targeted in deepfake pornography are women.

# data[].attributes.body
An astonishing 98% of the deepfake videos found online are explicitly pornographic. This eye-opening figure highlights the distressing misuse of deepfake technology, particularly for generating explicit and non-consensual content. This trend has profound implications for privacy and consent in the digital age. With the ability to copy and manipulate an individual's likeness without permission, deepfakes threaten personal integrity and digital well-being. Total deepfake videos online in 2023: 95,820. Deepfake pornography makes up 98% of all deepfake videos online.

# data[].attributes.body
Across the top ten dedicated deepfake pornography websites, the cumulative video views total: 303,640,207. This substantial figure provides a clear glimpse into the extensive consumption and dissemination of deepfake-generated pornographic material. The broad reach of these views sparks the need for conversations around societal attitudes toward such content. Ethical considerations also need to be focused on, particularly those surrounding deepfake pornography creation and distribution

# data[].attributes.body
Boys in several states have used widely available “nudification” apps to pervert real, identifiable photos of their clothed female classmates, shown attending events like school proms, into graphic, convincing-looking images of the girls with exposed A.I.-generated breasts and genitalia. In some cases, boys shared the faked images in the school lunchroom, on the school bus or through group chats on platforms like Snapchat and Instagram, according to school and police reports.

# data[].attributes.body
Child sexual exploitation experts say the use of nonconsensual, A.I.-generated images to harass, humiliate and bully young women can harm their mental health, reputations and physical safety as well as pose risks to their college and career prospects. Last month, the [FBI] warned that it is illegal to distribute computer-generated child sexual abuse material, including realistic-looking A.I.-generated images of identifiable minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct

# data[].attributes.body
Dr. Bregy, the superintendent, said schools and lawmakers needed to act quickly

because the abuse of A.I. was making students feel unsafe in schools.

“You hear a lot about physical safety in schools,” he said. “But what you’re not

hearing about is this invasion of students’ personal, emotional safety.

# data[].attributes.body
After she accepted the request, the male student copied photos of her and several other female schoolmates from their social media accounts, court documents say. Then he used an A.I. app to fabricate sexually explicit, “fully identifiable” images of the girls and shared them with schoolmates via a Snapchat group, court documents say.

# data[].attributes.body
This article was created by EL PAIS, and written by Clara Angela Brascia, a writer for the magazine. It was published on January 26th, 2024 through EL PAIS, the magazine. This document exists to inform and entertain. The author created this piece of work, firstly because it is her job, then secondly because she might care about the subject. We can tell that in this time period, there are a lot of unknowns and clearer boundary lines need to be drawn. The pros and cons of AI still have yet to be fully discovered. We can tell that the author is standing with the women violated, in the way she talks of them. This is a very controversial topic, as it involves many a-list celebrities and some questionable breaking of boundaries.

# data[].attributes.body
The internet has been filled with sexually explicit images of one of the most influential people of the moment: the singer Taylor Swift. Once again, as so often lately, these were not real photos, but nudes created with artificial intelligence, or deepfake porn.

# data[].attributes.body
One of the most prominent accounts on the social media platform X accumulated over 47 million views, 24,000 reposts and hundreds of thousands of “likes” before it was suspended for violating the company’s policies. But it circulated for nearly a day, more than enough time to reignite concerns about the danger of the proliferation of fake AI-generated pornography that targets women.

# data[].attributes.body
The “pornification” of women using artificial intelligence has skyrocketed in recent months. According to a recent study on deepfakes carried out in the United States by Home Security Heroes, 48% of men acknowledged having seen fake pornography at least once. And “74% of users who have engaged with deepfake pornography did not report feeling guilty about their consumption,” suggesting that deepfake content has become an accepted and normalized practice in adult entertainment preferences.

# data[].attributes.body
Tang, Pok & Koopman, Joel & Mai, Ke & Cremer, David & Zhang, Jack & Reynders, Philipp & Ng, Chin & Chen, I-Heng. (2023). No Person Is an Island: Unpacking the Work and After-Work Consequences of Interacting With Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology. 108. 10.1037/apl0001103.

# data[].attributes.body
Yang, Angela. "Lawsuit claims Character.AI is responsible for teen's suicide." NBC NEWS,

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/characterai-lawsuit-florida-teen-death-rcna176791. Accessed 5 November 2024.

# data[].attributes.body
Stover, Dawn. "Will Ai make us crazy?" Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 11 September 2023.

https://thebulletin.org/premium/2023-09/will-ai-make-us-crazy/. Accessed 5 November 2024.

# data[].attributes.body
Altcheck, Ana. "Replika lets you buy an AI girlfriend or boyfriend — and its average user age is surprising." Business Insider, 13 August 2024, https://www.businessinsider.com/replika-ai-girlfriend-boyfriend-online-dating-companion-age-2024-8. Accessed 5 November 2024.

# data[].attributes.body
"2023 State of Deepfakes." Security Hero, https://www.securityhero.io/state-of-deepfakes/. Accessed 5 November 2024.

# data[].attributes.body
Singer, Natasha. "Teen Girls Confront an Epidemic of Deepfake Nudes in Schools." New York Times, 8 April 2024, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/08/technology/deepfake-ai-nudes-westfield-high-school.html. Accessed 5 November 2024.

# data[].attributes.body
Brascia, Clara Angela. "The internet is filled with ‘deepfake’ Taylor Swift porn, evidencing the dangers of AI for women." EL PAÍS, 26 January 2024, https://english.elpais.com/people/2024-01-26/the-internet-is-filled-with-deepfake-taylor-swift-porn-evidencing-the-dangers-of-ai-for-women.html. Accessed 5 November 2024.

# data[].attributes.body
There are also a few worth-noting implications for the dark side of attachment to social robots. Making an

app like Replika available to teenagers could have a long-term impact on their future interpersonal relationships, as they shift their attachment functions to the chatbot instead of human peers. Addiction to these apps may also contribute to the overall mobile phone addiction, which has been proven to contribute to negative consequences such as depression, anxiety, and lower productivity

# data[].attributes.body
what is ai doing to us?

# data[].attributes.body
25/25

Excellent work that clearly demonstrates your ability to research to develop a question and support an argument. Hooray!