# data[].attributes.body
I found that the documents were difficult to analyze mainly because they were wordy and very academic so I wasn't 100% sure I knew what I was reading. After further investigation and using my context clues I felt much better about the assignment.

-Sofia DAmbrosia

# data[].attributes.body
The difference was mainly using your context clues to describe the charges that could be done, but I think the proof was more visible with the map example. You can actually see the damage that was caused whereas with the documents you can only assume what has happened.

-Sofia DAmbrosia

# data[].attributes.body
I found that each case is unique and should be examined from a variety of angles, not just one perspective. If you try to look at things through one lens you lose the multiple perspectives that work together to allow you to see the whole picture.

-Sofia DAmbrosia

# data[].attributes.body
I think being in the Human Rights Group made me realize how there is such a need for human rights organizations to take action in these problems. For example, bringing food to impoverished areas after attacks could be one way of helping those who are in Sudan.

-Sofia DAmbrosia

# data[].attributes.body
My question is, what charges would YOU give for the map activity? I am just curious!

-Sofia DAmbrosia

# data[].attributes.body
The transcripts were a bit more challenging to analyze than the map because I was unsure of the exact context within them, as well as certain language used.

# data[].attributes.body
The difference between processing the court document versus the map was that the map was a lot more straightforward, while the documents required a bit more effort to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
I gained insight about how tedious the process of prosecution is, and how detailed one must be in the court of law no matter how much evidence points in a certain direction.

# data[].attributes.body
My Human Rights Organization perspective influenced my interpretation of these documents because, amid all the information provided, my mind kept going to how this situation affected the local civilians of the area.

# data[].attributes.body
How has learning about the ICC and the way these court cases are processed affected/changed your outlook on politics?

# data[].attributes.body
There was not much background information provided on the court case which made it hard to read and also having to click between the two slides made it difficult. Moreover, the map was very blurry.

# data[].attributes.body
The map was more subjective and there were no right or wrong answers whereas the court case had right and wrong answers.

# data[].attributes.body
I would say that the potential to appeal a ruling makes it hard to prosecute individuals once and for all.

# data[].attributes.body
Being in a Human Rights organization made me a bit more frustrated as I learned context from my group as to why this individual being held accountable is so important and it being so difficult to is frustrating.

# data[].attributes.body
How similarly does it function to law systems in the US?

# data[].attributes.body
While analyzing the documents, I found it very difficult because I felt like I needed more context to understand the transcripts better as well as the language of it.

# data[].attributes.body
The map was very straightforward and simple to analyze with its title. Whereas the court documents needed a bit more context to draw out its order.

# data[].attributes.body
Prosecution is complex in one sense that with the court document provided, sometimes there may not be a guarantee that appealing is a solid outcome

# data[].attributes.body
what were some challenges that your group found that the ICC is facing

# data[].attributes.body
From the perspective of a human rights organization, these documents made me think about in the effectiveness of legal proceedings for AbdAl-Rahman to be held accountable and for justice to be given to Darfur. Overall, it brought attention to the issue of accountability and human rights.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that the information could be more spread out in the PowerPoint. The transcripts titles made the situations harder to understand. Some additional content could help as well.

# data[].attributes.body
The map was more visual so it could be more up to interpretation about the purpose and message of it. The documents seemed to have a straightforward agenda but a lack of context made it seem more vague.

# data[].attributes.body
I felt that reading the transcript was a bit weird because while, yes, it was split up, there was no clear connect from document to document

# data[].attributes.body
As the UN, our group would strongly work with the ICC to better prosecute war crimes and better understand whats going on in these certain countries.

# data[].attributes.body
As members of the ICC, do you now see and view American Laws and judicial system differently?

# data[].attributes.body
The challenges I have run into were thinking about what seemed more like "what's next" and "what goes before that document".

# data[].attributes.body
For me, the court documents represented decision-making and understanding of what seemed accurate, reliable, problem-solving, and worthy. However, the map represented history, knowledge, and visions/ideas or background from before and after perspectives.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that prosecuting individuals is a solemn act and can lead to essential duties and perspectives of decision-making. For evidence in cases like Darfur, I learned that individuals must be honest and accurate when showing proof or wanting to persuade or convince the people in the room, such as the judge.

# data[].attributes.body
My stakeholder group, the United Nations, influences the interpretation of the documents by providing positive perspectives and helpful insights into what should be done to develop a healthy and clean atmosphere and life for the people. So we help with what seems true, accurate, and the understanding of people and their lives.

# data[].attributes.body
it was difficult to discern what was relevant to the time and order in the text and what wasn't and it came down to figuring out the format I think. And the second page had the ordering which helped with that.

# data[].attributes.body
The map was easy I think because you can see the craters and it overall was clear to see that homes and places of living were targeted in the attacks.

# data[].attributes.body
Discerning whether the crimes they committed were justified in a war setting and ensuring that they are prosecuted under the right authority is a difficult think to navigate that takes a lot of time to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
Being with the Humanitarian Aid group relating to those whose homes were lost and those whose loved ones were lost makes me more empathetic towards them. I don't see any justification in the killing of innocent civilians so seeing these maps and the court hearings makes this far more sentimental.

# data[].attributes.body
How would you prosecute those mentioned in the court hearing?

# data[].attributes.body
I found determining which order the Notes belonged in was the most challenging thing, as I had never analyzed a court hearing before.

# data[].attributes.body
The court documents had more given information and a specific order and answer to be expected. Whereas the map could have several interpretations.

# data[].attributes.body
I found the various small details or mishaps can allow for cases to be rejected. For instance, the errors in this case involve interim release, making assumptions regarding the defense, and the form of which to submit an appeal.

# data[].attributes.body
As an Oil Investor I can imagine relying heavily on the mistakes of others in order to remain free and to continue making a profit. This perspective led me to find amusement in the outcome of the case at hand.

# data[].attributes.body
What were the true charges behind the map provided? Did any of them stick to the responsible parties? How long did the trial take?

# data[].attributes.body
The court transcript were a challenge to analyze due to being unfamiliar with court protocol. Trials are subject to strict rules to keep arguments on each side fair and thorough. Additionally, the map had very little detail to analyze, as the residences could have been better labeled.

# data[].attributes.body
The map allowed for interpretation, providing evidence for lawyers to use in court.

The court document was precise and presented each side's evidence to the floor before an appeal is made.

# data[].attributes.body
One insight I gained about the complexities of prosecution is the need for concrete evidence to be used in court and exact instructions. When the defense knows their defendant is guilty, they will try to obstruct the trial by claiming prosecution did not follow conduct.

# data[].attributes.body
As representatives of SunDune Oils, we find that the ICC's claims are conjecture and its evidence is speculative. While massive damage has been caused in Darfur, it is not feasible to charge one person for the crimes of war.

# data[].attributes.body
Why did you choose this particular transcript for us to analyze?