# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Over the course of his remarkable career of nearly 75 years, Piaget opened the doors to new information as to how the mind works. From his first publication at age 10 to his research when he passed at 84, Piaget shed light on new ideas. He developed several new fields of science including developmental psychology, cognitive theory and genetic epistemology. Piaget's work established the foundation for today's education-reform movements, though he himself was not an educational reformer. His works initiated changes comparable to the displacement of stories of "noble savages" and "cannibals" in modern anthropology. Piaget was the first psychologist to take children's thinking seriously ( ¹). A main theorist whose ideas contradicted Piaget's ideas was Lev Vygotsky.

The Life of Jean Piaget

Jean Piaget (1896-1980) was a pioneer in the field of child psychology. He reframed the study of intellectual development during the 20th century. Born in Neuchâtel, Switzerland, on August 9, 1896, Jean was the oldest child of Arthur Piaget and Rebecca Jackson. His father was a professor of medieval literature at the University of Neuchâtel with a keen interest in local history and a dedication to education. His mother was the daughter of a prominent French family. She was intelligent but a bit neurotic- this impression sparked Piaget's interest in psychology.

As a child, Jean was quiet and precocious. Like his father, he had a zeal for learning. He was fascinated by nature and took an interest in collecting shells which burgeoned into a more serious study of the mollusk. At ten years old, he published his first article, a short observational study on his sighting of an albino sparrow. This was only the start of his lifelong publishing success. By age 15, he had published many articles on malacology. Piaget made a name for himself in zoological circles because of these articles. European scientists assumed he was an expert in his field and did not realize he was just a high school student with a passion for mollusks.

Piaget continued to supplement his studies with a part-time job at Nuechâtel's Museum of Natural History, where he worked with the director, Mr. Godel, to classify their collection. His focus on the hard sciences did not allow for study in, as he put it, " the demon of philosophy."

As an older teen, with his mother's encouragement, he began receiving religious instruction. He found the arguments posed in this sphere to be childish. The juxtaposition of religion and science caused him to have a crisis of faith. Piaget revisited this topic throughout his life.

In his continuing study of philosophy and logic, he proposed to find a " biological explanation of knowledge." He was unsatisfied with his philosophical research, so he centered his study on psychology.

After Piaget finished high school, he continued his education in the natural sciences at the University of Neuchâtel. He then went on to earn a doctoral degree in 1918. This intense focus on education and research caused his health to decline. Piaget spent a year in the mountains to recover from tuberculosis. When he returned to Neuchâtel, he began to organize his thoughts on biology, psychology, and philosophy. This combination of viewpoints became the foundation for his life's work.

He explains the basis for his structuralist philosophy by stating, " In all fields of life (organic, mental, social), there exist 'totalities' qualitatively distinct from their parts and imposing on them an organization." This systematic organization of development would influence the Gestaltists, Systems Theorists, and many others.

He went on to study at the University of Zürich, where he spent a year working at Bleuler's psychiatric clinic. In 1919 Piaget finally left Switzerland to work at the Sorbonne in Paris. There he taught psychology and philosophy and was exposed to the works of Freud, Jung, and other prominent psychologists.

In 1920 he was introduced to Théodore Simon at the Binet Laboratory, where they developed the methodology to test children's intelligence and reasoning capability. However, Piaget was not satisfied with the rigid quality of the test. He began conducting his tests at a boys' school by implementing techniques he had learned during his time at the Sorbonne. Instead of asking the children questions that highlighted what the children had learned. He asked questions that showed how the children reasoned.

Piaget returned to Switzerland In 1921, where he held the position of research director at the J.J. Rousseau Institute in Geneva. That same year, he published an article in the Journal de Psychologie discussing the psychology of intelligence. This was his first publication on the topic he would devote the rest of his life to studying. He and a group of research students worked with school-aged children to study the psychology of reasoning in young minds. This work provided the material for Piaget's first five books on child psychology. While the research was only in its early stages, the books received high praise from the public.

In 1923, Piaget married Valentine Châtenay, a research student, and they quickly started their family. In 1925, they welcomed their first daughter, followed by a second in 1927. Their final child, a son, was born in 1931. Jean and Valentine's children became the focus of their study into child development. The results of this research were published in three books. In 1929 he was awarded the post of director at the International Bureau of Education. A position he held until 1967.

Throughout the 30s and 40s, he worked with A. Szeminska, E Meyer, and Bäbel Inhelder. They created large-scale research studies on child psychology. This association was groundbreaking because collaboration with women in scientific research in experimental psychology was rare.

Over his life, Piaget worked at many educational institutions and sat on the board of multiple organizations. In 1940 he worked as chair of Experimental Psychology, director of the psychology laboratory, and the Swiss Society of Psychology president.

During the Nazi occupation of France in 1942, Piaget was invited to give a series of lectures at the Collège de France. He later published the information covered in these lectures in The Psychology of Intelligence.

The broader scientific community was unaware of his work until after the end of World War II. This was also when he was named President of the Swiss Commission of UNESCO.

Piaget was awarded several honorary degrees, starting with Harvard in 1936 and the Sorbonne in 1946. In 1949 he received honorary degrees from the University of Brazil and the University of Brussels as well as published his synthesis, Introduction to Genetic Epistemology.

He became a Professor of Genetic Psychology at the Sorbonne in 1952, and in 1955 he opened the International Center for Genetic Epistemology. He continued to expand his influence by creating the School of Sciences at the University of Geneva.

His research on the general theory of structures and using biology as a lens to view psychology continued even as he wore the hats of professor, director, chairman, and president. Additionally, his dedication to public service was evidenced by his role as the Swiss delegate to UNESCO. By the end of his prolific career, he had written over 60 books and hundreds of articles.

On September 16, 1980, Jean Piaget died in Geneva. He remains one of the most influential psychologists of the twentieth century. His scientific research spanned nearly 75 years, starting as a small boy of 10 and continuing until his death at 84. He changed how scientists view psychology by creating new fields of study, including developmental psychology, cognitive theory, and genetic epistemology.

Piaget's research illuminated the process by which we learn and grow. This new way of understanding children was anathema to the previous philosophy. It could be compared to the change in anthropologists' early perception of primitive cultures to their more modern view.

While Piaget's work was not directly related to elementary education, he provided a new template for understanding the development of knowledge in children. This, in turn, provided a basis for educational reform. This thoughtful approach was revolutionary.

John Dewey in the U.S., Maria Montessori in Italy, and Paulo Freire in Brazil- used Piaget's research to support their goals for positive change in schools worldwide. His influence was not just on large-scale reformers. Generations of teachers implemented new teaching strategies to support children's exploration, creativity, and testing as opposed to the traditional pedagogy of filling empty vessels ( ⁴).

Sigmund Freud and B.F. Skinner may have more name recognition, but Piaget's contribution to the world is possibly more wide-reaching. As the information superhighway increases children's access to a broader range of knowledge, his ideas about how children learn become increasingly relevant.

See also: Merrill's Principles Of Instruction

Jean Piaget's Theory

Jean Piaget had a keen interest in biology. During his teen years, the scientific community highly respected his research in malacology. His passion for science and its history eventually eclipsed his interest in mollusks. While studying the natural sciences, his curiosity about the development of the mind grew, specifically the development of knowledge ( ⁵).

He found that the research in this area of psychology was lacking, which led him to create a uniquely focused branch of study that he termed genetic epistemology, which means the study of the development of knowledge.

In his observation of infants, he noted that they had simple methods for interacting with objects in their environment. These sensory-motor skills were how infants explored and grew their knowledge. With repetition, they could increase the complexity of their methods. These skills he called schemas.

An infant knows how to grasp a toy and put it in his mouth. This is an example of a successful schema. When he comes across a similar object, a new toy, he can apply this " grab and taste" schema to the new object. Piaget defined assimilation as applying a learned schema to a new object.

When the infant encounters an entirely different type of object, a dog, she will apply this current schema of " grab and taste." The old schema will not work as well, so the schema will be adapted to the new object. " Grab and taste" becomes " grab and yank." Applying an old schema to a new object is called accommodation.

Piaget called the process of assimilation and accommodation, adaptation, which is just another way to describe learning. Unlike Behaviorists, Piaget saw adaptation as a biological process. A child's grip must accommodate a ball while sand is assimilated into their grip. All living things adapt, whether plant or animal.

Assimilation and accommodation work together, each affecting the other to progress the understanding of our environment and how we navigate through it. By working in tandem, these forces seek to balance the organization of the mind with the environment. Achieving a balance indicates that the individual has a firm understanding of their world. This balanced state is, Piaget called, equilibrium.

In his observation of children, Piaget noticed a pattern. Sometimes assimilation was the driver, while other times, it was accommodation. There were also intervals of relative equilibrium. He recognized a similarity in when and how these assimilation, accommodation, and equilibrium intervals appeared among all his test subjects. With this information, he developed the idea of stages of cognitive development. This concept influenced the foundation of child psychology.

Piaget's 4 Stages of Cognitive Development

Age ranges can be affected by a child's experiences and environment. Cultural expectations of age-appropriate behaviors vary widely. Therefore these age ranges are only approximate. Four key features define the thinking pattern of these " stages" ( ²):

Stages are completed in order.

Children do not skip any of the stages. All stages are completed.

Stages are significant transformations beyond the previous stage. In other words, each stage shows a significant transformation from the previous stage.

Stages incorporate the previous stages into itself. In other words, each subsequent stage incorporates the earlier stages (³).

1. Sensorimotor:

From birth to 2 years, infants begin with the awareness of their immediate surroundings. Focusing on what they see and do with no understanding of consequences.

Perceives the world in terms of physical actions on their environment

Move from instinctive reflexes to a planned set of actions.

Learn more: Piaget's Sensorimotor Stage Of Cognitive Development

2. Preoperational Reasoning

From 2 years to 7 years old, young children develop the ability to think about abstract concepts. Language continues to mature. They use memory and imagination to help them with the concepts of the past, present, and future. They engaged in make-believe play.

Cataloging a library of permanent objects

Using symbols to represent objects and events

Language develops quickly through imaginative play

Cooperative play and games with rules emerge as children gain experience navigating social groups

Learn more: Preoperational Stage Of Cognitive Development

3. Concrete operational

From age 7 to 11 years, children show logical and concrete reasoning. Thinking becomes less egocentric, and their awareness of external events advances. Begin to Understand the concept of internal thoughts and feelings as personal and possibly not part of reality.

Reasoning skills in children are more logical.

Thinking becomes global, dynamic, and reversible

Objects and people can be organized into hierarchies.

Continuing to develop a theory of mind but may still struggle with the perspective of others

Accounting for intentions in their moral judgments

Learn more: Concrete Operational Stage Of Cognitive Development

4. Formal operational (abstract thinking)

From 11 years old and on, adolescents can apply symbols to abstract concepts like math and science. They employ systematic thinking to postulate theories and consider possibilities. They can understand abstract relationships and concepts such as justice. ( ⁴).

Systematic thinking and reasoning about abstract concepts, with an understanding of ethics and scientific reasoning

Can generate hypotheses

Moral reasoning includes the understanding that rules are a result of mutual agreement

Learn more: Formal Operational Stage Of Cognitive Development

Age ranges are approximate, and these are determined by the child's experiences and its environment. Due to culture variation, children's abilities across cultures vary. Through his ingenious and revealing questions posed to his own children and others, Piaget developed his conclusions about child development. He devised simple problems for children to consider. He then analyzed their responses, sometimes mistaken, and formed a picture of their way of viewing the world ( ⁶).

Conclusion

Over the course of 60 years, Jean Piaget created a study of naturalistic research that shifted the foundational understanding of child development. With a background in Biology and Philosophy, he was able to combine concepts from both to construct new theories and research methods for studying child development. Piaget incorporated his observations of his own children along with other subjects to reach his conclusions ( ³).

He was interested in the process of how children attain knowledge, so Piaget named his general theoretical framework " genetic epistemology" He developed his cognitive theory by observing how children answered a question or set of questions. He devised clever and leading questions about simple problems. He allowed the questions to be flexible. This allowed him to follow a child's reasoning and form a more complete picture of how they view the world. Piaget believed that the spontaneous comments the children interjected showed a light on their thought processes. There were no right or wrong answers, only the observation of a child's use of logic and reasoning.

References

1. Richmond, R. G. (2013). Introduction to Piaget. Routledge.

2. Papert, S. (1999). Papert on piaget. Time magazine, pág, 105.

3. Duckworth, E. (1964). Piaget rediscovered. The Arithmetic Teacher, 11(7), 496-499.

4. Gruber, H. E., & Vonèche, J. J. (Eds.). (1977). The essential Piaget (pp. 435-436). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

5. Smith, L. (2002). Jean Piaget 1896-1980. In Fifty modern thinkers on education (pp. 37-44). Routledge.

6. Webb, P. K. (1980). Piaget: Implications for teaching. Theory into practice, 19(2), 93-97.

See also: Gagne's Nine Events Of Instruction

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jean Piaget: Biography, Theory and Cognitive Development - Education Library

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Over the course of his remarkable career of nearly 75 years, Piaget opened the doors to...

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Introduction

Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development is a foundational theory in child psychology and education. It describes how children's cognitive abilities develop from infancy to adolescence, and provides a framework for understanding how children learn and make sense of the world around them.

Four Stages of Cognitive Development

Core to Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development is the concept that children move through four primary stages as they grow and develop:

1. Sensorimotor stage: this stage occurs from birth to around age 2, and is characterized by the development of basic motor skills and the ability to perceive and interact with objects.

2. Preoperational stage: this stage occurs from around age 2 to 7, and is characterized by the development of language and symbolic thinking, as well as the emergence of egocentrism.

3. Concrete operational stage: this stage occurs from around age 7 to 11, and is characterized by the ability to think logically about concrete objects and events.

4. Formal operational stage: this stage occurs from around age 11 to adulthood, and is characterized by the ability to think abstractly and reason hypothetically.

Key Features of Piaget's Theory

Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development also emphasises several key features linked to the stages of development:

Emphasis on the child's active role in learning: Piaget believed that children learn by actively exploring and manipulating their environment, rather than passively receiving information from adults.

Constructivist approach to learning: Piaget believed that children actively construct their own understanding of the world, rather than simply absorbing information from their environment.

Schemas: Schemas are Piaget's term for the mental frameworks that help individuals understand and interpret information. As children grow and learn, their schemas become more numerous and elaborate.

Assimilation: Assimilation is the process by which a person takes in new information and incorporates it into preexisting ideas and schemas. It plays a key role in cognitive development by allowing individuals to integrate new experiences and knowledge.

Accommodation: Accommodation is when a person alters existing schemas, or creates new ones, in response to new information that contradicts their existing understanding. This process is essential for cognitive development, as it enables flexibility and adaptation in learning.

Equilibration: Piaget believed that children progress through the cognitive developmental stages by the mechanism of equilibration, a balance between assimilation and accommodation. Equilibration helps explain how children shift from one stage of thought to the next.

Practical Applications of Piaget's Theory

There are many practical applications of Piaget's theory in early years education and beyond:

In the following sections, we will explore each of these stages and key features in more detail, and discuss the practical applications of Piaget's theory in early years education and beyond.

Background to Jean Piaget's Work

Jean Piaget, a pioneering Swiss psychologist, revolutionised our understanding of cognitive development in children. His groundbreaking theories have profoundly influenced the field of education and child development, shaping the way we understand how children learn and think. This article delves into Piaget's life, historical context, key influences, and the main concepts and theories that have made him one of the most influential figures in developmental psychology.

Life and Achievements

Jean Piaget was born on 9 August 1896 in Neuchâtel, Switzerland (Vidal, 1994). From a young age, he demonstrated a keen interest in the natural sciences, publishing his first scientific paper at the age of 10 (Piaget, 1952). Piaget pursued his passion for science at the University of Neuchâtel, where he earned his doctorate in natural sciences in 1918 (Piaget, 1952).

Throughout his career, Piaget held various positions, including:

Piaget's prolific research and innovative ideas earned him numerous awards, such as the Erasmus Prize in 1972 and the Balzan Prize in 1978 (Kohler, 2008).

Historical Context and Influences

Piaget developed his groundbreaking theories during the early to mid-20th century, a time of significant intellectual ferment and change.

In the realm of psychology, the dominant perspective was behaviourism, which focused on observable behaviours and discounted the importance of mental processes (Watson, 1913). Behaviourists believed that learning was a result of associations between stimuli and responses, and that the mind was a "black box" that could not be studied scientifically. Piaget, however, challenged this view, arguing that cognitive development was a complex process that involved the active construction of knowledge by the child.

Beyond these specific influences, Piaget's work was situated within the broader context of the early 20th century, a period marked by rapid advances in science, technology, and social change. The rise of evolutionary theory, the emergence of new fields like anthropology and sociology, and the aftermath of World War I all contributed to a climate of intellectual upheaval and questioning of traditional assumptions. In this context, Piaget's emphasis on understanding the mind and the processes of knowledge acquisition fit with a broader interest in the nature of human experience and development.

Although Piaget is often portrayed as a solitary genius, he was also part of a community of scholars and researchers who influenced and supported his work. Piaget studied under the psychologist Alfred Binet in Paris, and later collaborated with colleagues like Bärbel Inhelder and Alina Szeminska in Geneva. These relationships likely shaped and refined Piaget's ideas, even as he developed his own unique perspective.

Piaget's theory, with its emphasis on the active role of the child in constructing knowledge through interactions with the environment, represented a significant break from prevailing behaviourist views. Drawing on influences from philosophy, biology, and beyond, Piaget's work emerged as a powerful new perspective that would shape the field of developmental psychology for generations to come. By situating Piaget's ideas within the rich intellectual and historical context of his time, we can better appreciate the originality and significance of his contributions.

Jean Piaget's Key Concepts and Theories

Jean Piaget's work revolutionised our understanding of cognitive development in children. His key concepts and theories, such as the stages of cognitive development, schemas, adaptation processes, and equilibration, have significantly contributed to our understanding of how children learn and develop cognitively.

Cognitive Development Stages

Piaget proposed four stages of cognitive development that children progress through as they grow and develop:

Sensorimotor Stage (Birth to 2 Years)

Infants learn through sensory experiences and motor actions

Sensorimotor stage is divided into six sub-stages:

Reflexes (birth to 1 month): Basic reflexes, such as rooting and sucking, dominate behaviour

Primary Circular Reactions (1 to 4 months): Infants discover and repeat pleasurable actions centred around their own body

Secondary Circular Reactions (4 to 8 months): Actions become more intentional and focused on objects and people in the environment

Coordination of Secondary Circular Reactions (8 to 12 months): Infants combine learned schemas to achieve new outcomes and engage in more goal-directed behaviour

Tertiary Circular Reactions (12 to 18 months): Infants actively experiment with objects and explore new ways of interacting with their environment

Early Representational Thought (18 to 24 months): Infants begin to develop symbolic thought and engage in pretend play

Object permanence, the understanding that objects continue to exist even when out of sight, develops gradually during this stage
Piaget demonstrated object permanence through the A-not-B task, where infants search for a hidden object in its last known location, even when they have seen it moved to a new location

Example 1: A 6-month-old infant repeatedly shakes a rattle, demonstrating the primary circular reactions sub-stage. The infant is exploring the properties of the object and discovering the pleasurable sensory experience of shaking the rattle.

Example 2: A 10-month-old infant searches for a toy hidden under a blanket, demonstrating early object permanence. The infant remembers that the toy exists even when it is out of sight and actively tries to find it.

Case Study: Piaget's daughter, Jacqueline, demonstrated the coordination of secondary circular reactions at around 8 months old. When given a new rattle, she systematically explored its properties, shaking it, banging it, and mouthing it to discover how it worked (Piaget, 1952).

Preoperational Stage (2 to 7 Years)

Children develop language and symbolic thinking but are still limited by egocentrism and centration

Symbolic thought allows children to represent objects and ideas through words, gestures, and symbols
Pretend play becomes more elaborate and complex, with children using objects to represent other things (e.g., using a block as a phone)

Egocentrism refers to the inability to take others' perspectives and the belief that others see the world the same way they do
Piaget demonstrated egocentrism through the three-mountain task, where children struggled to understand how a scene would look from another person's viewpoint

Centration is the tendency to focus on a single aspect of a situation while ignoring other relevant details
The classic conservation tasks, such as the conservation of liquid task, highlight how centration can lead to incorrect judgments about quantity

Example 1: A 3-year-old child engages in pretend play, using a block as a phone and having an imaginary conversation. This demonstrates the development of symbolic thought, as the child can use objects to represent other things.

Example 2: A 4-year-old child struggles with the classic conservation of liquid task. When liquid is poured from a short, wide glass into a tall, thin glass, the child believes that there is more liquid in the tall glass, demonstrating the limitation of centration.

Case Study: In a classic study by Piaget and Inhelder (1956), children were asked to describe what a scene would look like from another person's perspective. A 4-year-old child, when asked to describe what a doll would see when placed in a different position, responded by describing their own view, demonstrating egocentrism.

Concrete Operational Stage (7 to 11 Years)

Children develop logical reasoning abilities but are still limited to thinking about concrete, tangible objects

Conservation, the understanding that quantity remains constant despite changes in appearance, is a key milestone during this stage
Children can solve conservation tasks and understand that physical properties of objects remain constant despite changes in arrangement or appearance

Classification and seriation abilities also develop during this stage
Children can group objects based on shared characteristics (classification) and order objects based on a specific dimension, such as size or weight (seriation)

Social cognition improves, with children becoming more able to take others' perspectives and engage in cooperative play

Example 1: An 8-year-old child successfully solves a conservation of number task. When presented with two rows of coins, one spread out and one close together, the child understands that the number of coins remains the same, demonstrating the ability to conserve quantity.

Example 2: A 10-year-old child participates in a group project at school, demonstrating improved social cognition and the ability to take others' perspectives. The child can work collaboratively, listen to others' ideas, and find compromises when disagreements arise.

Case Study: In a study by Piaget and Szeminska (1952), children were given conservation of length tasks. A 7-year-old child, when presented with two sticks of equal length arranged in a cross shape, understood that the sticks remained the same length even though one looked longer, demonstrating the ability to conserve length.

Formal Operational Stage (11 Years and Older)

Adolescents develop abstract thinking, hypothetical reasoning, and metacognition

Abstract thinking allows adolescents to reason about intangible concepts and ideas
Adolescents can engage in philosophical and moral reasoning, considering multiple perspectives and hypothetical scenarios

Hypothetical reasoning involves the ability to think about possibilities and alternatives, not just concrete realities
Adolescents can systematically test hypotheses and draw conclusions based on logical reasoning

Metacognition refers to the ability to reflect on one's own thought processes and knowledge
Adolescents become more self-aware and can engage in introspection and self-reflection

Example 1: A 14-year-old student engages in a debate about a moral dilemma, considering multiple perspectives and weighing the consequences of different actions. This demonstrates the development of abstract thinking and the ability to reason about intangible concepts.

Example 2: A 16-year-old student conducts a science experiment, systematically testing different hypotheses and drawing conclusions based on the results. This demonstrates hypothetical reasoning and the ability to think scientifically.

Case Study: In a study by Kuhn and Angelev (1976), adolescents were asked to solve a problem involving variables in a scientific experiment. A 15-year-old student systematically tested different combinations of variables, demonstrating hypothetical reasoning and the ability to think scientifically.

Each stage represents a qualitative change in cognitive abilities, and children must progress through the stages sequentially.

Schemas

Schemas are mental structures that organise knowledge and guide behaviour (Piaget, 1936/1952). They are the basic building blocks of cognitive development. As children interact with their environment, they develop and modify their schemas to better understand the world around them.

For example, a child may have a schema for a dog that includes four legs, fur, and a tail. When they encounter a cat, they may initially try to fit the cat into their existing dog schema before developing a new schema for cats.

Adaptation Processes

Piaget identified two key processes that enable children to adapt their schemas to new information: assimilation and accommodation (Piaget, 1936/1952).

Equilibration

Equilibration is the process of balancing assimilation and accommodation to create a stable understanding of the world (Piaget, 1975/1985). When children encounter new information that does not fit into their existing schemas, they experience cognitive disequilibrium. They then work to restore equilibrium by adapting their schemas through assimilation and accommodation.

Relationships Between Concepts and Theories

Piaget's key concepts and theories are interconnected and work together to explain cognitive development in children. Schemas are the mental structures that children develop and adapt through the processes of assimilation and accommodation. Equilibration is the driving force behind cognitive development, as children work to restore cognitive equilibrium when faced with new information.

The stages of cognitive development represent the progressive changes in children's cognitive abilities as they adapt their schemas through assimilation, accommodation, and equilibration.

Factors Influencing Cognitive Development

Several factors can influence a child's progression through the stages of cognitive development:

Maturation: As children grow and develop physically, their cognitive abilities also mature (Piaget, 1936/1952).

Experience: Children's experiences with their environment shape their cognitive development (Piaget, 1936/1952).

Social interaction: Interactions with others, particularly more knowledgeable individuals, can facilitate cognitive development (Vygotsky, 1978).

Equilibration: The drive to restore cognitive equilibrium when faced with new information propels children through the stages of cognitive development (Piaget, 1975/1985).

Understanding these factors can help educators and caregivers support children's cognitive development by providing appropriate experiences and interactions.

Jean Piaget's Contributions to the Field of Education and Child Development

Jean Piaget's groundbreaking work has had a profound impact on the field of education and our understanding of child development. His ideas have shaped educational practices, provided new insights into how children learn and grow, and remain highly relevant to contemporary education.

Impact on Educational Practices

Piaget's theories have significantly influenced educational practices, particularly in the areas of curriculum design and teaching methods. Many educational approaches, such as constructivism and discovery learning, are based on Piaget's ideas (Fosnot & Perry, 1996).

For example, teachers who adopt a constructivist approach may:

Piaget's work has also influenced the development of age-appropriate curricula that align with the stages of cognitive development. Early childhood education programs often focus on hands-on, sensory experiences that support the development of schemas during the sensorimotor stage, while primary school curricula may emphasise concrete, manipulative activities that help children develop logical thinking during the concrete operational stage.

Shaping our Understanding of Child Development

Piaget's ideas have greatly contributed to our understanding of child development, particularly in the area of cognitive development. His theory of cognitive development has provided a framework for understanding how children's thinking evolves over time and has highlighted the active role that children play in constructing their own knowledge (Piaget, 1936/1952).

Piaget's work has also shed light on the importance of social interaction and peer collaboration in cognitive development. His ideas have been extended by other theorists, such as Lev Vygotsky, who emphasised the role of social interaction and scaffolding in supporting children's learning (Vygotsky, 1978).

For example, studies have shown that children who engage in collaborative problem-solving activities with peers often demonstrate higher levels of cognitive development than those who work independently (Dillenbourg, 1999). This highlights the importance of providing opportunities for children to work together and learn from each other in educational settings.

Relevance to Contemporary Education

Piaget's ideas remain highly relevant to contemporary education, as educators continue to grapple with the challenges of supporting diverse learners and preparing students for a rapidly changing world. Many current educational approaches, such as problem-based learning and inquiry-based learning, draw upon Piaget's ideas about the active construction of knowledge (Savery & Duffy, 1995).

Recent research has also built upon Piaget's work to explore the role of technology in supporting cognitive development. For example, studies have investigated how interactive digital tools can be used to support the development of spatial reasoning skills during the concrete operational stage (Hawes et al., 2015).

In addition, Piaget's ideas about the importance of active learning and exploration have informed the design of inclusive educational practices that seek to engage all learners. For example, Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is an approach that emphasises the creation of flexible learning environments that can accommodate the diverse needs and abilities of all students (CAST, 2018). This approach is grounded in the idea that children actively construct their own understanding and that educators must provide multiple means of engagement, representation, and expression to support this process.

Criticisms and Limitations of Jean Piaget's Theories and Concepts

While Jean Piaget's work has been highly influential in the field of child development, it has also faced various criticisms and limitations. Considering these critiques is essential for gaining a more well-rounded understanding of Piaget's ideas and their application in early years settings.

Criticisms of Research Methods

Some researchers have criticised Piaget's research methods, citing concerns such as:

These methodological limitations suggest that caution should be exercised when applying Piaget's findings to diverse populations and contexts.

Challenges to Key Concepts and Theories

Some researchers have challenged Piaget's key concepts and theories, such as:

These challenges highlight the need for early years professionals to consider alternative perspectives and adapt Piaget's ideas to meet the diverse needs of children in their care.

Contextual and Cultural Limitations

Critics have argued that Piaget's theory may not fully account for the role of social, cultural, and historical contexts in shaping child development (Vygotsky, 1978). For example, research has shown that children's cognitive development can be influenced by factors such as:

Early years professionals should consider these contextual factors when applying Piaget's ideas in their practice and strive to create culturally responsive learning environments.

Addressing the Criticisms and Limitations in Practice

While the criticisms and limitations of Piaget's work are important to consider, his ideas still provide valuable insights into child development. Early years professionals can address these limitations by:

By using Piaget's work as a starting point and integrating other research findings and perspectives, early years professionals can enhance their practice and support children's learning and development more effectively.

Practical Applications of Jean Piaget's Work

Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has significant implications for education, providing a framework for understanding how children learn and guiding the design of developmentally appropriate learning experiences. Early years professionals and educators can apply Piaget's ideas in the classroom to create stimulating environments that support children's cognitive growth and development.

Creating a Constructivist Learning Environment

Encourage active learning: Provide opportunities for children to explore, manipulate, and experiment with materials, allowing them to construct their own understanding of concepts.

Example: Set up a water play area with various containers, measuring cups, and funnels for children to investigate volume and conservation.

Foster social interaction: Create opportunities for children to work together, discuss ideas, and learn from each other, as social interaction plays a crucial role in cognitive development.

Example: Implement cooperative learning activities, such as group problem-solving tasks or role-playing scenarios.

Promote hands-on experiences: Engage children in concrete, hands-on learning activities that allow them to directly experience and manipulate objects, facilitating the development of cognitive schemas.

Example: Provide a variety of materials for children to sort, classify, and compare, such as buttons, shells, or leaves.

Designing Developmentally Appropriate Activities

Consider the stages of cognitive development: Plan activities that align with children's current stage of cognitive development, providing challenges that promote growth without causing frustration.

Example: For children in the preoperational stage, focus on activities that involve symbolic thinking, such as pretend play or drawing.

Adapt activities to individual needs: Recognise that children develop at different rates and may exhibit characteristics of multiple stages simultaneously. Differentiate activities to accommodate individual learning needs and styles.

Example: Offer a range of activities with varying levels of complexity, allowing children to choose tasks that match their abilities and interests.

Incorporate multiple domains of development: Design activities that integrate cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development, as these domains are interconnected and influence each other.

Example: Create a gardening project that involves planning, measuring, collaborating, and caring for plants, promoting holistic development.

Scaffolding Learning

Provide guidance and support: Offer assistance and prompts as needed, gradually withdrawing support as children become more capable and independent learners.

Example: Use questioning techniques to guide children's problem-solving efforts, encouraging them to think critically and find solutions on their own.

Encourage exploration and discovery: Create a safe and stimulating environment that invites children to explore, take risks, and learn from their mistakes, fostering a growth mindset.

Example: Set up a block area with various materials and challenges, allowing children to experiment with balance, stability, and design.

Use formative assessment: Regularly observe and document children's learning progress, using this information to adapt teaching strategies and provide targeted support.

Example: Keep a portfolio of children's work samples, photos, and observations to track their development over time and inform future learning experiences.

Applying Piaget's Ideas Across the Curriculum

Mathematics: Engage children in activities that promote logical thinking, problem-solving, and the understanding of mathematical concepts such as number, space, and measurement.

Example: Provide materials for children to explore patterns, shapes, and spatial relationships, such as tangrams or geoboards.

Science: Encourage children to observe, question, predict, and experiment, developing their scientific reasoning and inquiry skills.

Example: Set up a simple experiment where children predict and observe what happens when objects are placed in water, investigating concepts of buoyancy and density.

Language and Literacy: Support children's language development through social interaction, exposure to diverse texts, and opportunities for symbolic expression.

Example: Engage children in storytelling activities, encouraging them to create and share their own stories using props, puppets, or drawings.

Arts and Creativity: Provide open-ended materials and experiences that allow children to express themselves, explore new ideas, and develop their imaginative thinking.

Example: Offer a variety of art materials, such as paint, clay, and recycled objects, for children to create and represent their understanding of the world.

By applying Piaget's ideas in these various areas of the curriculum, early years professionals and educators can create a rich and stimulating learning environment that supports children's cognitive development and lays the foundation for future learning success. It is essential to remember that the goal is not to push children to reach developmental milestones faster, but rather to provide experiences that challenge and support their natural curiosity and growth.

Overcoming Challenges and Barriers to Implementation

Applying Piaget's ideas in practice can sometimes be challenging due to factors such as:

To overcome these barriers, educators can:

Start small by incorporating Piaget's ideas into one or two activities or routines and gradually expanding over time

Collaborate with colleagues to share ideas, resources, and support for implementing new practices

Advocate for the importance of developmentally appropriate practice and the value of play-based learning in promoting children's cognitive, social, and emotional growth

Seek out professional development opportunities to deepen their understanding of Piaget's work and its practical applications

By being creative, flexible, and persistent in their efforts to apply Piaget's ideas in practice, early years professionals can create learning environments that truly support and nurture children's development.

Comparing Jean Piaget's Ideas with Other Theorists

Understanding how Jean Piaget's ideas fit within the broader context of child development theories is crucial for gaining a comprehensive perspective on children's learning and growth. By comparing and contrasting Piaget's work with that of other prominent theorists, early years professionals can deepen their understanding of child development and inform their practice in early years settings.

Comparison with Lev Vygotsky

Lev Vygotsky, a Russian psychologist, emphasised the role of social interaction and cultural context in children's cognitive development (Vygotsky, 1978). While there are some similarities between Piaget and Vygotsky's ideas, there are also notable differences:

For example, while Piaget might observe a child's individual problem-solving strategies, Vygotsky would be more interested in how the child's interactions with others and their cultural tools (such as language or symbols) shape their cognitive growth.

Read our in-depth article on Lev Vygotsky here.

Comparison with Erik Erikson

Erik Erikson, a German-American psychologist, developed a theory of psychosocial development that emphasises the role of social relationships and cultural influences in shaping personality (Erikson, 1963). Comparing Erikson's ideas with Piaget's reveals some key similarities and differences:

For instance, while Piaget might explore how a child's understanding of object permanence develops through their interactions with the physical world, Erikson would be more interested in how the child's relationships with caregivers shape their sense of trust and autonomy.

Read our in-depth article on Erik Erikson here.

Comparison with Urie Bronfenbrenner

Urie Bronfenbrenner, an American psychologist, developed an ecological systems theory that emphasises the role of environmental factors in shaping child development (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Comparing Bronfenbrenner's ideas with Piaget's highlights some key similarities and differences:

For example, while Piaget might study how a child's problem-solving abilities develop through their interactions with physical objects, Bronfenbrenner would also consider how factors such as family dynamics, community resources, and cultural values shape the child's cognitive growth.

Synthesis and Implications for Practice

Understanding the similarities and differences between Piaget's ideas and those of other theorists can inform and enhance early years practice in several ways:

Limitations and Challenges of Comparing Theorists

While comparing theorists can offer valuable insights, it is important to approach these comparisons with a critical and reflective mindset. Some limitations and challenges to consider include:

Ultimately, comparing theorists is not about determining which theory is "right" or "better," but rather about expanding our understanding of child development and informing our practice in ways that best support children's learning and well-being.

Jean Piaget's Legacy and Ongoing Influence

Jean Piaget's contributions to our understanding of child development and early years practice have had a profound and lasting impact. His ideas continue to shape contemporary research, educational policy, and professional practice in significant ways. Understanding Piaget's legacy and ongoing influence is essential for early years professionals and students seeking to build upon and extend his groundbreaking work.

Impact on Contemporary Research

Piaget's ideas have inspired a wealth of contemporary research in the field of child development. For example:

These research efforts have deepened our understanding of the complex and multifaceted nature of child development, and have generated new insights and strategies for supporting children's learning in early years settings.

Influence on Educational Policy and Curriculum

Piaget's ideas have had a significant impact on educational policy and curriculum development in early years settings. For instance:

These policies and curricula have shaped the landscape of early years education, promoting practices that support children's holistic development and well-being. However, translating Piaget's ideas into practice also presents challenges, such as ensuring that play-based learning is purposeful and aligned with educational goals (Wood, 2013).

Ongoing Relevance for Professional Practice

Piaget's ideas continue to inform and guide the professional practice of early years educators and caregivers in many ways. For example:

These practices have been adapted and modified to suit contemporary contexts and challenges, such as incorporating new technologies or responding to the needs of diverse learners. However, their grounding in Piaget's key concepts and theories remains evident.

Current Debates and Future Directions

While Piaget's legacy is significant, his ideas are not without limitations or critiques. For instance:

These critiques have informed contemporary research and practice, leading to new directions and innovations in the field. For example, researchers are increasingly exploring how children's learning is shaped by their cultural context and funds of knowledge (González et al., 2005), and how educators can create more culturally responsive learning environments.

Future directions for research and practice that build upon Piaget's legacy might include:

Early years professionals and students are encouraged to engage critically and creatively with Piaget's ideas, and to contribute to the ongoing development and refinement of the field by pursuing new questions, methods, and applications that address the changing needs and contexts of children and families.

Conclusion

Jean Piaget's groundbreaking work has had a profound and lasting impact on our understanding of child development and early years education. Throughout this article, we have explored Piaget's key concepts and theories, such as the stages of cognitive development, schemas, adaptation processes, and equilibration. We have also examined the practical applications of his ideas in early years settings, as well as his influence on contemporary research and practice.

The implications of Piaget's work for early years professionals and educators are significant and far-reaching. By understanding and applying his ideas, practitioners can:

Applying these strategies in early years settings can promote children's holistic learning, development, and well-being, laying a strong foundation for their future success.

However, it is important for early years professionals and students to engage critically with Piaget's ideas and consider their limitations and potential adaptations. For instance, his stage theory may not fully account for individual differences or cultural variations in children's development (Rogoff, 2003). Additionally, some of his ideas may need to be updated or extended in light of new research findings and societal changes.

Therefore, practitioners are encouraged to view Piaget's work as a starting point for their own learning and reflections, rather than as a fixed set of rules to follow. Engaging in ongoing professional development, staying informed about current research and debates, and collaborating with colleagues can help practitioners adapt and refine Piaget's ideas to better suit their specific contexts and experiences.

Ultimately, the enduring value of Piaget's work lies in its potential to inspire and guide early years practice for generations to come. By applying his ideas in their own settings, sharing their insights and innovations with others, and contributing to the ongoing development of the field, early years professionals and students can help to extend Piaget's legacy and make a positive difference in the lives of young children and their families.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the 4 stages of Piaget's theory of development?

Piaget's theory of cognitive development consists of four main stages:

Sensorimotor stage (birth to 2 years):

Infants learn through their senses and motor actions

Object permanence develops (understanding that objects exist even when out of sight)

Preoperational stage (2 to 7 years):

Concrete operational stage (7 to 11 years):

Formal operational stage (12 years and above):

Each stage represents a qualitative change in how children think and reason about the world around them. It's important to note that the age ranges are approximate and can vary among individuals.

What can we learn from each stage of development?

1. Sensorimotor Stage: Birth to 2 years
This stage is further divided into six sub-stages:

Simple reflexes: Birth to 1 month

Primary circular reactions: 1 to 4 months

Secondary circular reactions: 4 to 8 months

Coordination of secondary circular reactions: 8 to 12 months

Intentionality: 12 to 18 months

Problem-solving: 18 to 24 months

2. Preoperational Stage: 2 to 7 years
This stage is sometimes further divided into two sub-stages:

Symbolic Function sub-stage: 2 to 4 years

Intuitive Thought sub-stage: 4 to 7 years

3. Concrete Operational Stage: 7 to 11 years
Some sources suggest this stage may extend up to 12 years of age.

4. Formal Operational Stage: 11 years and up
This stage begins around puberty and continues into adulthood.

Each stage provides insights into the cognitive abilities and limitations of children at different ages.

Understanding these stages can help educators, caregivers, and parents create age-appropriate learning experiences, foster cognitive development through play, and identify potential developmental delays. Piaget's theory emphasizes the importance of active learning, exploration, and interaction with the environment in constructing knowledge and understanding.

What are the age ranges for each stage?

1. Providing age-appropriate materials and activities that challenge children's thinking and encourage exploration.

2. Encouraging active learning through play, experimentation, and problem-solving.

3. Supporting language development through conversations, storytelling, and open-ended questions.

4. Fostering social interaction and cooperation through group activities and projects.

5. Observing and assessing children's development to plan activities that match their individual needs and interests.

According to Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development the age ranges for each stage are as follows:

It is important to note that these age ranges are approximate and can vary between individuals. Children may progress through the stages at different rates, and some may exhibit characteristics of multiple stages simultaneously. Additionally, more recent research has led to some modifications and extensions of Piaget's original theory, such as the recognition of greater cognitive abilities in infants and the influence of social and cultural factors on cognitive development.

How is Piaget's theory used in Early Years?

1. Sensorimotor Stage:

Observe infants' reactions to stimuli and their exploration of the environment using senses and motor skills.

Look for the development of object permanence, such as searching for hidden objects.

Notice the progression from reflexive behaviors to intentional actions and problem-solving.

2. Preoperational Stage:

Listen for the use of symbolic language and observe pretend play.

Identify instances of egocentrism, such as a child struggling to see things from another's perspective.

Notice centration, where a child focuses on one aspect of a situation while neglecting others.

Observe a lack of conservation understanding, such as believing that a tall, thin glass contains more liquid than a short, wide one.

3. Concrete Operational Stage:

Observe children's ability to classify objects based on similarities and differences.

Look for the ability to seriate, or order objects logically, such as from smallest to largest.

Test for conservation understanding by asking questions about the equality of quantities after changing their appearance.

Notice decentration, where children consider multiple aspects of a situation simultaneously.

4. Formal Operational Stage:

Engage adolescents and adults in discussions about hypothetical situations and abstract concepts.

Observe their ability to formulate and test hypotheses systematically.

Look for the capacity to think abstractly and reason about concepts not tied to concrete objects.

Notice metacognition, or the ability to reflect on one's own thought processes.

Practical applications of Piaget's Theory in early years settings include:

By understanding and applying Piaget's Theory, early childhood educators can create a supportive learning environment that promotes children's cognitive, social, and emotional development.

How can we identify Piaget's stages in action?

To identify Piaget's stages of cognitive development in action, educators, caregivers, and parents can observe children's behavior and thinking patterns. Here are some ways to recognize each stage:

In addition to these observations, educators and researchers can use various assessment tools, such as the Piagetian tasks (e.g., conservation tasks, classification tasks) to evaluate a child's cognitive development. However, it is crucial to remember that children may demonstrate characteristics of multiple stages simultaneously, and individual differences in development are common. Observing children over time and in various contexts can provide a more comprehensive understanding of their cognitive development.

How Can Piaget's Theory Be Applied to Teaching Mathematics in Early Years Settings?

Piaget's theory of cognitive development can inform the teaching of mathematics in early years settings in several ways:

For more information on applying Piaget's ideas in early years settings, see the "Practical Applications" section of this article.

How Does Piaget's Theory Relate to Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory?

While Piaget and Vygotsky both emphasised the active role of children in constructing knowledge, there are some key differences between their theories:

Despite these differences, many contemporary researchers and practitioners seek to integrate insights from both theories to support children's learning and development.

Can Piaget's Ideas Be Applied to Children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities?

Yes, Piaget's ideas can be adapted to support the learning and development of children with special educational needs and disabilities:

However, it is important to recognise that Piaget's theory may not fully account for the diverse factors that can influence the development of children with special educational needs and disabilities, and to draw on a range of theoretical perspectives and evidence-based practices to support their learning and well-being.

How Does Piaget's Theory Explain the Development of Language in Young Children?

1. Emphasis on active learning: Piaget's theory emphasizes that children are active participants in their own learning, constructing knowledge through exploration and interaction with the environment. This has led to a shift in childcare practices towards more hands-on, experiential learning opportunities that encourage children to discover and problem-solve independently.

2. Age-appropriate activities: Understanding the cognitive abilities and limitations of children at different stages has helped educators and caregivers design age-appropriate activities and curriculums. For example, providing sensory-rich experiences for infants, encouraging pretend play for preschoolers, and offering concrete manipulatives for school-age children.

3. Play-based learning: Piaget's theory highlights the importance of play in cognitive development. As a result, many childcare settings have embraced play-based learning approaches, recognizing that play is not just a leisure activity but a crucial way for children to explore, experiment, and construct knowledge.

4. Individualised learning: Recognizing that children develop at different rates and may exhibit characteristics of multiple stages simultaneously, childcare practices have moved towards more individualized learning approaches. This includes differentiating instruction, providing scaffolding, and offering a range of activities to cater to different learning styles and developmental levels.

5. Supportive learning environments: Piaget's theory emphasizes the role of the environment in cognitive development. Consequently, childcare settings have focused on creating stimulating, supportive learning environments that encourage exploration, problem-solving, and social interaction.

6. Observation and assessment: Piaget's stages provide a framework for observing and assessing children's cognitive development. Childcare professionals use this knowledge to identify potential developmental delays, monitor progress, and adapt their teaching strategies accordingly.

7. Parent involvement: Understanding Piaget's theory has also influenced parenting practices, with a greater emphasis on providing stimulating home environments, engaging in play activities, and supporting children's natural curiosity and exploration.

While Piaget's theory is primarily focused on cognitive development, it also offers insights into the development of language in young children:

Piaget believed that language development was a reflection of underlying cognitive structures and processes, rather than a separate domain of development (Piaget, 1962). Contemporary research has built on Piaget's ideas to explore the complex interplay between cognitive, social, and linguistic factors in shaping children's language development (Hoff, 2013).

How did Piaget's theory change childcare practices?

1. Constructivism: Piaget proposed that children actively construct their understanding of the world through their experiences and interactions with the environment. This constructivist approach emphasised the child's role in their own cognitive development, rather than viewing them as passive recipients of knowledge.

2. Stages of development: Piaget identified four distinct stages of cognitive development (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational), each characterised by specific cognitive abilities and limitations. This stage-based approach provided a framework for understanding how children's thinking develops over time.

3. Cognitive schemas: Piaget introduced the concept of cognitive schemas, which are mental structures that organise knowledge and guide behaviour. He proposed that children adapt their schemas through the processes of assimilation (incorporating new information into existing schemas) and accommodation (modifying schemas to fit new information).

4. Logical reasoning: Piaget's theory emphasised the development of logical reasoning abilities, highlighting how children's thinking becomes increasingly sophisticated and abstract as they progress through the stages.

5. Qualitative changes in thinking: Piaget's work demonstrated that cognitive development is not merely a quantitative increase in knowledge but involves qualitative changes in the way children think and reason about the world.

Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has had a profound impact on childcare practices, influencing how educators, caregivers, and parents approach child development and learning. Here are some key ways in which Piaget's theory has changed childcare practices:

Overall, Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has led to a more child-centred approach in childcare, with a focus on active learning, play, and individualized support that respects children's unique developmental trajectories.

Did Piaget's theory pioneer a new way of thinking about development?

Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development pioneered a new way of thinking about development, revolutionising the understanding of how children learn and think. Prior to Piaget's work, the prevailing view was that children were simply less competent thinkers than adults. Piaget's theory challenged this notion and introduced several groundbreaking ideas that have shaped the field of developmental psychology:

1. Underestimation of children's abilities: Some researchers argue that Piaget underestimated the cognitive abilities of infants and young children. Studies have shown that children can demonstrate certain cognitive skills, such as object permanence and basic problem-solving, earlier than Piaget suggested.

2. Cultural and individual differences: Piaget's theory was based on observations of children from Western, middle-class backgrounds. Critics argue that his findings may not be universally applicable, as cultural and individual differences can influence the rate and nature of cognitive development.

3. Overemphasis on stage-based development: While Piaget's stages provide a useful framework, some researchers suggest that cognitive development is more continuous and gradual than the stage-based model implies. Children may demonstrate characteristics of multiple stages simultaneously or develop specific skills at different rates.

4. Neglect of social and emotional factors: Piaget's theory focuses primarily on cognitive development, with less emphasis on the role of social and emotional factors in learning and development. Critics argue that social interaction, cultural context, and emotional experiences also play crucial roles in cognitive growth.

5. Limited consideration of individual learning styles: Piaget's theory does not fully account for individual differences in learning styles and preferences. Some children may learn better through visual or auditory means, while others may prefer hands-on experiences or social interaction.

6. Overreliance on Piagetian tasks: Some researchers question the validity and reliability of the classic Piagetian tasks, such as conservation experiments, in assessing children's cognitive abilities. They argue that these tasks may not accurately reflect children's true understanding and that performance can be influenced by factors such as language skills and prior experiences.

7. Lack of attention to the role of instruction: Piaget's theory emphasises the child's active role in constructing knowledge, but it does not fully address the importance of instruction and guidance from more knowledgeable others (e.g., teachers, parents) in facilitating cognitive development.

Piaget's theory marked a significant shift in the understanding of child development, moving away from the idea of children as miniature adults and towards a recognition of their unique cognitive abilities and developmental trajectories. His work laid the foundation for further research in developmental psychology and has had a lasting impact on education, parenting, and childcare practices.

While some aspects of Piaget's theory have been challenged and refined over time, his core ideas continue to shape the way we think about children's cognitive development.

Are there criticisms of Piaget's impact?

1. Enduring relevance: Piaget's emphasis on children as active learners, the role of exploration and discovery in cognitive development, and the importance of understanding children's thinking processes continues to shape educational practices and research in child development.

2. Modifications to age ranges: Research has shown that some cognitive abilities, such as object permanence and basic problem-solving skills, may emerge earlier than Piaget proposed. Conversely, some higher-order thinking skills associated with the formal operational stage may develop later or not at all in some individuals.

3. Gradual development: While Piaget's stages provide a useful framework, many researchers now view cognitive development as a more gradual and continuous process, with children demonstrating characteristics of multiple stages simultaneously or developing specific skills at different rates.

4. Integration of social and cultural factors: Contemporary theories and research have placed greater emphasis on the role of social interaction, cultural context, and emotional experiences in cognitive development, expanding upon Piaget's primarily cognitive focus.

5. Individual differences: Researchers now recognise the importance of individual differences in cognitive development, including variations in learning styles, temperament, and the influence of prior experiences and knowledge.

6. Neurological and biological factors: Advances in neuroscience and biology have shed new light on the underlying processes of cognitive development, leading to a greater understanding of the interplay between genetic, environmental, and biological factors.

While Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has had a profound impact on our understanding of child development, it has also faced several criticisms over the years. Some of the main critiques of Piaget's theory and its impact include:

Despite these criticisms, Piaget's theory remains a foundational and influential framework in developmental psychology. Many of the critiques have led to further research and refinements in our understanding of cognitive development, building upon Piaget's groundbreaking work. Contemporary theories and research in child development often incorporate Piagetian concepts while also considering the role of social, emotional, and cultural factors in learning and development.

Is Piaget's theory still viewed as a valid theory?

1. Cognitive stages: Piaget's identification of four distinct stages of cognitive development (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, and formal operational) provided a framework for understanding the qualitative changes in children's thinking across development. This stage-based approach has helped educators, parents, and researchers recognise the cognitive abilities and limitations of children at different ages.

2. Active learning: Piaget's emphasis on children as active constructors of knowledge has shifted the focus from viewing children as passive recipients of information to recognising their inherent curiosity and drive to explore and learn. This understanding has influenced educational practices, leading to a greater emphasis on hands-on, experiential learning opportunities.

3. Cognitive processes: Piaget's theory has shed light on the cognitive processes that underlie learning and development, such as assimilation, accommodation, and equilibration. By understanding these processes, educators and researchers can better support children's learning and cognitive growth.

4. Developmental milestones: Piaget's work has helped establish key developmental milestones, such as the acquisition of object permanence, the emergence of symbolic thought, and the development of logical reasoning abilities. These milestones serve as important benchmarks for assessing children's cognitive development and identifying potential delays or difficulties.

5. Research foundation: Piaget's theory has provided a foundation for a vast body of research in child development. Researchers have built upon, refined, and sometimes challenged Piaget's ideas, leading to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of cognitive development. This ongoing research has explored the influence of factors such as social interaction, culture, and individual differences on children's cognitive growth.

6. Educational and parenting practices: Piaget's insights have informed educational practices, such as the design of age-appropriate curricula, the use of concrete manipulatives, and the emphasis on play-based learning. The theory has also influenced parenting practices, encouraging parents to provide stimulating environments, engage in play, and support their children's natural curiosity and exploration.

Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development is still considered a highly influential and important theory in the field of developmental psychology. However, over the years, some aspects of the theory have been challenged, modified, or expanded upon based on new research findings. While Piaget's core ideas remain relevant, the theory is now viewed as a foundational framework that has undergone some revisions and refinements.

Despite these modifications and critiques, Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development remains a cornerstone of developmental psychology. The theory continues to inspire research and inform educational practices, while also serving as a foundation for more recent theoretical perspectives, such as neo-Piagetian theories and sociocultural approaches to cognitive development.

Did the theory help progress our understanding of child development?

1. Early reception: Piaget's early work, such as "The Language and Thought of the Child" (1923) and "The Child's Conception of the World" (1926), attracted the attention of psychologists and educators who were intrigued by his novel approach to understanding children's thinking. However, his ideas also faced some initial scepticism, as they diverged from the dominant behaviorist perspective of the time.

2. Gradual acceptance: As Piaget continued to publish his research and refine his theory throughout the 1930s and 1940s, his work gained increasing recognition and acceptance within the field of developmental psychology. His books, such as "The Origins of Intelligence in Children" (1936) and "The Construction of Reality in the Child" (1937), provided detailed observations and theoretical insights that supported his stage-based model of cognitive development.

3. Influence on education: Piaget's theory began to have a significant impact on educational practices in the 1960s and 1970s, as educators sought to apply his insights to classroom teaching and curriculum design. The emphasis on active learning, hands-on experiences, and age-appropriate activities aligned with Piaget's view of children as active constructors of knowledge.

4. Criticisms and refinements: As Piaget's theory gained prominence, it also attracted criticisms and further research. Some researchers questioned the universality of the stages, the underestimation of children's abilities, and the lack of attention to social and cultural factors. These critiques led to modifications and refinements of Piaget's original ideas, as well as the development of neo-Piagetian theories and alternative perspectives on cognitive development.

Yes, Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has undoubtedly helped progress our understanding of child development. The theory has made significant contributions to the field of developmental psychology and has had a lasting impact on our knowledge of how children learn and think. Here are some key ways in which Piaget's theory has advanced our understanding of child development:

While Piaget's theory has faced some criticisms and modifications over time, its core principles have undeniably advanced our understanding of child development. The theory has served as a catalyst for further research and has provided a framework for supporting children's cognitive growth in both educational and family settings. Piaget's enduring legacy lies in his pioneering work that has shaped our understanding of how children think, learn, and develop.

Was Piaget's theory initially disregarded?

1. Appreciation of its pioneering nature: Piaget's theory is now widely recognised as a groundbreaking contribution to the field of developmental psychology. His innovative ideas about children as active learners and the stage-based nature of cognitive development have been acknowledged as revolutionising the way we understand children's thinking and learning processes.

2. Criticisms and challenges: As the theory gained prominence, it also faced various criticisms. Researchers questioned the universality of the stages, the underestimation of children's abilities, the lack of attention to individual differences, and the limited consideration of social and cultural factors. These critiques have led to a more nuanced and critical examination of Piaget's original propositions.

3. Modifications and refinements: In response to criticisms and new research findings, Piaget's theory has undergone modifications and refinements. For example, the age ranges associated with each stage have been adjusted, and the notion of strict, universal stages has been replaced with a more flexible understanding of cognitive development as a gradual and continuous process.

4. Integration with other perspectives: Over time, researchers have sought to integrate Piaget's ideas with other theoretical perspectives, such as Vygotsky's sociocultural theory and information processing approaches. This has led to a more comprehensive understanding of cognitive development that considers the interplay of individual, social, and cultural factors.

5. Continued relevance and influence: Despite the criticisms and modifications, Piaget's core ideas continue to shape educational practices, research, and our understanding of children's cognitive growth. His emphasis on active learning, the importance of exploration and discovery, and the recognition of qualitative changes in thinking across development remains relevant and influential in contemporary developmental psychology.

6. Legacy and further research: Piaget's theory has inspired a vast body of research in child development, with researchers building upon, testing, and refining his ideas. This ongoing research has contributed to a more sophisticated understanding of cognitive development, addressing gaps and limitations in the original theory and expanding our knowledge of how children learn and think.

Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development was not initially disregarded; rather, it was met with a mix of interest, scepticism, and gradual acceptance within the scientific community. When Piaget first introduced his ideas in the 1920s and 1930s, his work was considered groundbreaking and innovative, as it challenged prevailing views of children's cognitive abilities and development.

While Piaget's theory may have initially faced some scepticism and resistance, it was not disregarded. Instead, his work gradually gained recognition and acceptance as a seminal contribution to the field of developmental psychology. The theory's influence on education, research, and our understanding of children's cognitive development is a testament to its enduring significance, even as it has undergone modifications and faced criticisms over time.

Baldwin, J. M. (1902). Development and evolution. Macmillan.

Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Bergson, H. (2001). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. (F. L. Pogson, Trans.). Dover Publications. (Original work published 1889)

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.

Bronson, M. B. (2000). Self-regulation in early childhood: Nature and nurture. Guilford Press.

Carpendale, J. I., & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(1), 79-96.

Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. Academic Press.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). National Association for the Education of Young Children.

Daniels, H., & Diack, H. (1977). Piagetian tests for the primary school. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18(2-3), 187-213.

DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002). Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and activities. Teachers College Press.

DeVries, R., & Zan, B. (1994). Moral classrooms, moral children: Creating a constructivist atmosphere in early education. Teachers College Press.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Elsevier.

Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. Fontana Press.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.

Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1-12.

Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Westview Press.

Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). Norton.

Fisher, K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Singer, D. G., & Berk, L. (2011). Playing around in school: Implications for learning and educational policy. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 341-360). Oxford University Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Van Nostrand.

Forman, G. E., & Hall, E. (2005). Wondering with children: The importance of observation in early education. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 7(2), 1-11.

Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2016). Connecting life span development with the sociology of the life course: A new direction. Sociology, 50(2), 301-315.

González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gonzalez-Mena, J. (2008). Diversity in early care and education: Honoring differences (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Greenfield, P. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 223-240.

Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., & Poliszczuk, D. (2015). Effects of mental rotation training on children's spatial and mathematics performance: A randomized controlled study. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(3), 60-68.

Henson, K. T. (2003). Foundations for learner-centered education: A knowledge base. Education, 124(1), 5-16.

Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press.

Hoff, E. (2013). Language development (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781)

Knopf, H. T., & Swick, K. J. (2007). How parents feel about their child's teacher/school: Implications for early childhood professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(4), 291-296.

Kohler, R. (2008). Jean Piaget. Bloomsbury Academic.

Kuhn, D., & Angelev, J. (1976). An experimental study of the development of formal operational thought. Child Development, 47(3), 697-706.

Lee, K., & Zentall, S. S. (2012). Psychostimulant and sensory stimulation interventions that target the reading and math deficits of students with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 16(4), 308-329.

Lourenço, O. (2012). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial difference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281-295.

Lourenço, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103(1), 143-164.

McGarrigle, J., & Donaldson, M. (1974). Conservation accidents. Cognition, 3(4), 341-350.

Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148-168.

Morra, S., & Borella, E. (2015). Working memory training: From metaphors to models. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1097.

Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piaget's theory of cognitive development to mathematics instruction. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 26-30.

Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301-345.

Piaget, J. (1952). The child's conception of number. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. (M. Cook, Trans.). W W Norton & Co. (Original work published 1936)

Piaget, J. (1962). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed.). (M. Gabain, Trans.). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1923)

Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. (T. Brown & K. J. Thampy, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975)

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1952). The child's conception of number. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.

Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner's theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243-258.

Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.

Shapiro, L. (2019). Embodied cognition (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Syed, M., & McLean, K. C. (2017). Erikson's theory of psychosocial development. In E. Braaten (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of intellectual and developmental disorders (pp. 578-581). SAGE Publications.

Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT Press.

Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge University Press.

Vidal, F. (1994). Piaget before Piaget. Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158-177.

Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.

Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Has the view of Piaget's theory changed since it was first introduced?

While the theory remains influential and is still considered a foundational framework in developmental psychology, it has undergone significant scrutiny, modifications, and refinements over time. Here are some key ways in which the perception of Piaget's theory has changed:

DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18(2-3), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(00)00008-8

Lourenço, O. (2012). Piaget and Vygotsky: Many resemblances, and a crucial difference. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(3), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.006

Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piaget's theory of cognitive development to mathematics instruction. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 26-30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ841568.pdf

In summary, while the view of Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development has evolved since its introduction, with criticisms, modifications, and refinements, the theory's core principles and its significant impact on our understanding of child development remain widely acknowledged. Piaget's work continues to serve as a foundation for contemporary research and practice in developmental psychology, even as the field advances and incorporates new insights and perspectives.

Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. National Association for the Education of Young Children. https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/books/scaffolding-childrens-learning
This book explores the implications of Vygotsky's sociocultural theory for early childhood education, with a focus on the role of scaffolding in supporting children's learning and development.

DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002). Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principles and activities. Teachers College Press. https://www.tcpress.com/developing-constructivist-early-childhood-curriculum-9780807742877
This book provides a comprehensive guide to developing and implementing a constructivist curriculum in early childhood settings, drawing on the ideas of Piaget and other constructivist theorists.

Wood, E. (2013). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/play-learning-and-the-early-childhood-curriculum/book236912
This book examines the role of play in early childhood learning and development, with a focus on how play can be integrated into the early years curriculum to support children's cognitive, social, and emotional growth.

References

Jean Piaget Society: https://piaget.org/
The official website of the Jean Piaget Society, which promotes the study of Piaget's ideas and their application in various fields. The site includes resources such as articles, videos, and conference information.

Piaget's Developmental Theory: An Overview: https://www.verywellmind.com/piagets-stages-of-cognitive-development-2795457
A comprehensive overview of Piaget's theory of cognitive development, with descriptions of each stage and examples of how the theory can be applied in practice.

Simply Psychology - Jean Piaget's Theory and Stages of Cognitive Development: https://www.simplypsychology.org/piaget.html
This page provides a clear and concise overview of Piaget's theory of cognitive development, including descriptions of each stage and key concepts such as schemas, assimilation, accommodation, and equilibration. The site also includes helpful examples and practical applications of Piaget's ideas in education and child development.

Further Reading and Research

Recommended Articles

Recommended Books

Recommended Websites

To cite this article please use:

Early Years TV Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development. Available at: https://www.earlyyears.tv/piagets-theory-of-cognitive-development/ (Accessed: 05 August 2024).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Jean Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development: In-Depth Guide

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Discover Jean Piaget's revolutionary ideas on child development and learning. Practical insights to enhance your early years practice in this comprehensive guide.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Definition/Introduction

In medieval society, childhood did not exist. Around seven years of age, they took the child as a little adult in the community with a similar expectation for a job, marriage, and legal consequences. We can give the crown for originating ideas of development to Charles Darwin, in recognition of his work on the origins of ethology (the scientific study of the evolutionary basis of behavior) and "A biographical sketch of an infant."

It wasn't until the 20 century that developmental theories came forth. When conceptualizing cognitive development, we cannot ignore the work of Jean Piaget. Piaget suggested that when young infants experience an event, they process new information by balancing between assimilation and accommodation. Assimilation is taking in new information and fitting into previously understood mental schemas while accommodation is adapting and revising the previously planned mental schema according to the novel information. Piaget divided child development into four stages. The first stage, Sensorimotor (ages 0 to 2 years of age), is the time when children master two phenomena: causality and object permanence. Infants use their senses and motor abilities to manipulate their surroundings and learn about the environment. They understand a cause-and-effect relationship like shaking a rattle may produce sound and may repeat it or how crying can make the parent(s) rush to give them attention. Soon with frontal lobe maturation and memory development, infants can make mental schemas and can imagine what may happen without physically causing an effect and thus plan out actions better (emergence of thought). Object permanence emerges around six months of age. It is the concept that objects continue to exist even when they are not presently visible. Then comes the "pre-operational" stage (2 to 7 years), when a child can use mental representations, symbolic thought, and language. The infant learns to imitate and pretend to play. He is egocentric, i.e., unable to perceive that people can think differently than him, and everything (good or bad) somehow links to him. This stage is followed by the "concrete operational stage" (7 to 11 years) when the child uses logical operations when solving problems, including mastery of conservation and inductive reasoning. Formal operational stage (12 years and up), suggests an adolescent can use logical operations with the ability to use abstractions. He can understand theories and hypothesize and comprehend abstract ideas like love and justice.

Some concerns to keep in mind when understanding child cognitive development and Piaget's stages, is poor generalizability of stages. For example, conservation may overlap between pre-operational and concrete operational stage as the child masters it in one task and not in another. Similarly, our understanding now is that a child masters the "Theory of Mind" by 4 to 5 years of age, much earlier than when Piaget suggested that egocentrism resolves.[1]

Stages of Cognitive development (problem-solving/Intelligence): The word intelligence derives from the Latin word "intelligere," which means to understand or perceive. Problem-solving and cognitive development progresses from the establishment of object permanence, causality, and symbolic thinking with concrete (hands-on learning) to abstract thinking and embedding of implicit (unconscious) to explicit memory development.

Newborn to 2 months: At birth, the optical focal length is approximately 10 inches. Infants seek stimuli actively, habituates to the familiar, and respond more actively when stimuli change. The initial responses are more reflexive, like sucking and grasping. He can fix and follow a slow horizontal arc and eventually will follow past the midline. He prefers a contrast, colors, and faces, understanding familiar from moderately novel stimuli. As he habituates to the caregiver's faces, he develops a preference. He will stare momentarily where an object has disappeared from (lack of object permanence). At this stage, he prefers high-pitched voices.

2 to 6 months: Infants engage in a purposeful sensory exploration of his body, staring at his hands and reaching and touching his body parts. Thus, building on to the concept of cause and effect and self-understanding. He appreciates sensation and changes outside of himself with less regularity. As he masters his motor abilities, something happens by chance, and then he repeats it. For example, touching a button may light up the toy, or crying can cause the appearance of the caregiver. He will anticipate routines at this age.

6 to 12 months: Object permanence emerges as the infant looks for objects. He will look for partially hidden objects first (6 months) and then completely hidden, for example, will uncover toys and engage in peek-a-boo (9 months). Separation anxiety and stranger anxiety emerge as he understands out of sight is not out of mind. As his motor abilities advance, he further explores using his senses by reaching, inspecting, holding, mouthing, and dropping objects. He can manipulate his environment, learning cause and effect by trial and error, like banging two blocks can produce a sound. Eventually, he builds a mental schema (as Piaget suggested) and learns to use objects functionally, for example, presses a button intentionally to open and reach inside a toy box.

12 to 18 months: Around this time, motor abilities make it easier for the child to walk and reach, grasp, and release. He can explore toys to make them work. Novel play skills emerge. He imitates gestures and sounds, and egocentric pretend play emerges. As object permanence and memory advance, he can find a toy after witnessing a series of displacements and tracks moving objects.

18 to 24 months: As memory and processing skills advance and frontal lobes mature, he can now imagine outcomes without so much physical manipulation, and new problem-solving strategies emerge without rehearsal. Thought emerges, and there is the ability to plan actions. Object permanence establishes completely, and he can search for an object by anticipating where it may be, without witnessing its displacement. At 18 months, symbolic play expands from self, and instead of pretending to eat himself, he may give the teddy bear a bottle and can imitate housework.

24 to 60 months (Preschool years): During this stage, magical and wishful thinking emerges; for example, the sun went home because it was tired. This ability may also give rise to apprehensions with fear of monsters, and having logical solutions may not be enough for reassurance. Perception will dominate logic and giving them an imaginary tool, like a monster spray, to help relieve that anxiety may be more helpful. Similarly, conservation and volume concept lacks, and what appears bigger or larger is more. For example, one cookie split into two may be equal to two cookies. At this stage, a child also has a poor concept of cause and may think he got sick because he misbehaved. He is egocentric in his approach and may look at situations from only his point of view, offering comfort from his stuffed toy to an upset loved one. At 36 months, he can understand simple time concepts, identifies shapes, compares two items (e.g., bigger), and counts to "3". Play becomes more comprehensive from simple scripts of feeding a baby doll to going to the park. At 48 months, he can count to four, identifies 4 colors and understands opposites. At 60 months, pre-literacy and numeracy skills further, and he can count to 10 accurately, recites "ABC's by rote, and recognizes a few letters. A child also develops hand preference at this age. During the ages of 4 to 5 years, play stories become yet more detailed and may include scenarios from imagination, including imaginary friends. Playing with some game rules and obedience to those rules also establishes during the pre-school years. Rules can be absolute.

Age 6 to 12 years: During early school years, scientific reasoning and understanding of physical laws of conservation, including weight and volume develop. A child can understand multiple points of view and can understand one perspective of a situation. They realize the rules of the game can change with mutual agreement. There is mastery of basic literacy skills of reading and numbers are mastered initially, and eventually, around third to fourth grade, emphasis shifts from learning to read to reading to learn, and from spellings to composition writing. All these stages need mastery of sustained attention and processing skills, receptive and expressive language, and memory development and recall. The limitation of this stage is an inability to comprehend abstract ideas and relying on logical answers.

Twelve and above (adolescence): During this age, teens can exercise logic in a systemic, scientific way. They can apply abstract thinking to solve algebraic problems and apply multiple logics simultaneously to reach a scientific solution. It is easier to use these concepts to schoolwork only earlier. Later in adolescence and adulthood, these can also apply to emotional and personal life problems. Magical thinking or following ideal guides decisions more than wisdom. Some may have more influence from religiosity/moral rules and absolute concepts of right and wrong. Questioning the prevalent code of conduct may cause anxiety or rebellion and eventually lead to the development of personal ethics. Side by side, social cognition, apart from self, also is developing and concepts of justice, patriarchy, politics, etc. establish. During late teens and early adulthood, thinking about the future, including ideas such as love, commitment, and career goals, become important.[2]

Issues of Concern

Pediatricians and primary care practitioners are in a prime position to monitor a child's growth and development in children and, in particular, a child's cognitive development. A lag may show a developmental disorder like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, learning disability, global developmental delay, developmental language disorder, developmental coordination disorder, mild intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders, moderate-severe intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, fetal alcohol syndrome (FASD), vision impairment or deafness. The most well-known causes of intellectual disability are FASD, Down syndrome, fragile X, other genetic/chromosomal problems, lead, other toxins, and environmental influences such as poverty, malnutrition, abuse, and neglect. Prenatal causes of intellectual disability (ID) include infection, toxins and teratogens, congenital hypothyroidism, inborn errors of metabolism, and genetic abnormalities. Fetal alcohol syndrome is the most common preventable cause of ID. Down syndrome is the most common genetic cause, and Fragile X is the most common inherited cause. Thus for a workup for intellectual disability, first-tier tests recommended are chromosomal microarray and fragile X testing.

Clinical concerns can arise in the following areas, visual analysis, proprioception, motor control, memory storage and recall, attention span and sequencing, and deficits in receptive and/or expressive language. Early recognition leads to earlier diagnosis and intervention, which has shown promising results in improved cognition. Apart from what is best for children and families, it saves economic expenditure on disabilities later. Thus, not only surveillance but also active screening for developmental delays should be an integral part of medical practice.[3] Some commonly used measures are the Ages and stages questionnaire, Survey of well being of young children, etc. If surveillance and screening are concerning, a referral is necessary for early intervention instead of watchful waiting.

Intellectual disability is defined when there is a concern for both intellectual and adaptive functioning. Usually, on standardized measures, this means a score below two standard deviations to the mean, which is 100 for most measures. Standardized tests used to measure intellectual function include:

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC),

Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI)

The standardized test for adaptive functioning include:

Learning disability should be suspected when the Intelligence score is within the average range, but there is a significant discrepancy when compared to achievement scores and/or when a child does not respond to evidence-based interventions. Evidence-based interventions include increasing instruction time and specialized instructions by trained personnel in the deficit areas.

Clinical Significance

Early intervention during the "critical period" in development has shown promising results.[4] Thus clinicians must take the lead to diagnose, treat, and establish resources for early intervention to provide optimal health opportunities to our children. The provision of early intervention services should be in two areas; biological risk/disabilities and environmental risk.

Pediatricians and primary care practitioners should know and understand The Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and other federal policies. Early intervention laws give entitlement to services from birth, through early intervention home-based service, the Individualized family service plan (IFSP) for birth to 3 years, and individualized education plans (IEP) for ages 3 to 21 years. The goal is to minimize or prevent disability by accommodating children with intellectual disabilities or changing the curriculum to the child's individualized needs. This plan should be based on an interprofessional assessment to understand the child's needs.

Thus, medical homes should establish a partnership with social workers and psychologists/psychiatrists for thorough evaluations, lawyers to explore legal support and advocacy for services, therapists, early intervention providers, and schools to plan individualized goals and monitor progress.

References

1.

Newcombe NS. Cognitive development: changing views of cognitive change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Sep;4(5):479-491. [ PubMed: 26304241 ]

2.

Wilks T, Gerber RJ, Erdie-Lalena C. Developmental milestones: cognitive development. Pediatr Rev. 2010 Sep;31(9):364-7. [ PubMed: 20810700 ]

3.

Council on Children With Disabilities; Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics; Bright Futures Steering Committee; Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):405-20. [ PubMed: 16818591 ]

4.

Alderman H, Behrman JR, Glewwe P, Fernald L, Walker S. Evidence of Impact of Interventions on Growth and Development during Early and Middle Childhood. In: Bundy DAP, Silva Nd, Horton S, Jamison DT, Patton GC, editors. Child and Adolescent Health and Development. 3rd ed. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; Washington (DC): Nov 20, 2017. [ PubMed: 30212122 ]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In medieval society, childhood did not exist. Around seven years of age, they took the child as a little adult in the community with a similar expectation for a job, marriage, and legal consequences.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
WebMD explains the Piaget stages of development and how they are reflected in your child’s intellectual growth.