# data[].attributes.body
Overall, the amount of money spent on Fairtrade-labelled coffee rose in all countries, while the figure for bananas increased in three out of five countries. In addition, the UK had the highest spending on both products.

# data[].attributes.body
The graph illustrates the sales of Fairtrade of coffee and bananas between 1999 and 2004 in five particular European countries, namely ...
In general, WHILE all countries in European increased in sales of coffee and banana, the opposite was true for two different countries: Belgium and Sweden. Another trustworthy observation is that the figure for the UK experienced rapidly in the shown period compared with all other nations.

# data[].attributes.body
The given tables compare earnings of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana between 1999 and 2004 in 5 different countries, namely the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.

# data[].attributes.body
The tables describe how the sales of Fairtrade, labeled coffee and banana changed in five countries in 2 separate years, 1999 and 2004.
Overall,  the sale of coffee rose in all countries while the figure of banana have a grow in 3 out of 5 countries. UK had the highest increase in the money earned from both coffee and banana.
In 1999, Switzerland had the highest sale of Fairtrade for coffee, at 3 millions of euros,  while UK have the highest figure for banana, at 15 millions of euros. By 2004

# data[].attributes.body
The table below describes the number of sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1994 and 2000 in five European countries, namely ....

It is clear that Fairtrade coffee sales increased in five European countries between 1994 and 2004, while banana consumption increased in only three countries, namely the UK, Switzerland and Denmark respectively. Overall, sales of both coffee and banana products are the highest in the UK

# data[].attributes.body
The given tables shows the figures for the selling of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and banana between 1994 and 2000 in 5 different countries namely the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
Overall, it can be seen that the Coffee sales increased in all five countries from 1999 to 2004, while banana sales only increased in 3 countries namely the UK, Switzerland and Denmark. Moreover, the UK was the country which had the highest sales in both coffee and bananas products in 2004.

# data[].attributes.body
The tables illustrate the selling of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004/in 2 different years in five European countries.

Overall, It can be seen that the sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee increased in all five countries, WHILE the figure for Fairtrade*-labelled bananas increased in the UK, Switzerland, and Denmark but a downward trend was witnessed in Belgium and Sweden. Additionally, the amount of money spent on these TWO products in the UK was the highest.

In 1999, Switzerland had the highest at 3 million in Fairtrade*-labelled coffee while the UK to be highest at 15 million in Fairtrade*-labelled bananas. By 2004, however, sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee in the UK had risen to 20 million, and this figure was 3 times higher than Switzerland's sales figure for Fairtrade coffee in that year. In 2004 saw a significant increase in the sales of bananas in the UK and Switzerland, with revenues rising by 32 million and 4.5 million respectively.

Body 2: housework

# data[].attributes.headline
The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

# data[].attributes.subject
The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

# data[].attributes.body
INTRO
the sales of ....
=> the amount of money spent on ...

# data[].attributes.body
The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.

# data[].attributes.body
S + V + what + where + when
S: The line graph / The given graph / The graph above/below
V: illustrates/expresses/compares/gives information about …
WHAT: the figure for … = the number/amount/percentage/proportion of ...

WHERE: in … (namely A, B, C, …)

WHEN: from … to … / between … and … / over the period of …

# data[].attributes.body
Report data:

· In + time, the proportion/percentage of X + was …
· In + time, the number/amount of X + was …
· In + time, the figure for X + was …

· The figures for A and B were … and … respectively

Describe trend

1. X + V + ADV + (giới từ + number) + time

2. There was a/an + ADJ + N + (giới từ + number) + in + X + time

3. X + saw/witnessed/experienced + a/an + ADJ + N+ (giới từ + number) + time

4. a/an +  ADJ + N + (giới từ + number) + was seen + in + X + time

5. Time + saw/witnessed + a/an + ADJ + N + (giới từ + number) + in + X

Make comparison using SIMPLE SENTENCE

· A was + ADV + ADJ + than that of B

Make comparison using COMPLEX SENTENCE - RECOMMENDED

· A similar pattern was witnessed in + WHERE + as S V
. A was ..., số + times as many/much as that of B
. A stood at ... compared to ... B
· The figure for A was ..., while/whereas that for B stood at ...

Make comparison using REDUCED RELATIVE CLAUSE
. A, which stood at ... , was+  số + times as many/much as that of B
. Standing at ..., A was+  số + times as many/much as that of B