# data[].attributes.body
Def: A hasty generalization is a claim made about someone based off who they are as a person

Tip: A tip to avoid this fallacy is to not make an opinion on something based off a poor experience and search for more evidence.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Assuming that because one thing came first, that thing caused another thing to happen.

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure A does lead into B, if it does, give the evidence, if it doesn't, don't put it in your argument.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Two things are compared that don't correlate whatsoever.

# data[].attributes.body
Identify the properties important to your claim, and see if the two things you’re comparing share those properties.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Using the same words but giving them two different meanings.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at important words in your writing and see if they could be taken in two different ways.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Claiming a chain reaction of events will end in the worst result, despite having no evidence towards it.

# data[].attributes.body
Check for chains of consequences, and  make sure those chains are reasonable and fit.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
While the argument does support a conclusion, the conclusion isn't the one the arguer actually draws. 

# data[].attributes.body
Separate premises from conclusions. See if you give the evidence to your conclusion in your argument.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Making assumptions about a whole group based on a small number of people in that group.

# data[].attributes.body
Ask yourself what kind of sample are you using? Is it based on only your experiences? Or is it multiple experiences from multiple different people.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Targeting your opponent specifically and using them as an example to prove your claim

# data[].attributes.headline
(Ad Hominem and Tu Quoque) When the argument about your grades starts to turn into them yelling about your lifestyle. (It’s a fallacy!)

# data[].attributes.subject
(Ad Hominem and Tu Quoque) When the argument about your grades starts to turn into them yelling about your lifestyle. (It’s a fallacy!)

# data[].attributes.body
Focus your attention towards your opponents reasoning and not their character unless you are writing your argument about their actions specifically.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Popular opinions are not always the correct opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
The arguer takes advantage of the desire most people have to be liked and to fit in with others so that the arguer can get the audience to accept their argument.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Be sure to cite resources from experts on the subject you’re discussing.

# data[].attributes.body
Adding strength to arguments by referring to respected sources or authorities and explaining their positions during discussion.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Try not to simply get your audience to agree with you by making them feel sorry for someone.

# data[].attributes.body
Takes place when an arguer tries to get people to accept a conclusion by making them feel sorrow for someone.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Look closely at arguments where you point out a lack of evidence and then draw a conclusion from that lack of evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
When somebody says, “Look, there’s no conclusive evidence on the issue at hand. Therefore, you should accept my conclusion on this issue.”

# data[].attributes.body
Don't base decisions on groups of people without proof

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Stay focused on your opponents’ reasoning, not their personal character.

# data[].attributes.body
Focuses on the people, rather than the arguments or evidence.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
 Know beforehand if there is any information on the topic at hand

# data[].attributes.body
This is when the user claims there is no information without any proof.

# data[].attributes.body
When someone says something’s true just because an “expert” said it, even if the expert isn’t actually an expert on that topic

# data[].attributes.body
This is basically the everyone’s doing it, so it must be right kind of thinking. Just because a lot of people believe something doesn’t mean it’s true.

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of talking about the real issue, you just bash the person or say, “You do it too!” to dodge it.

# data[].attributes.body
Trying to win by making people feel sorry for you instead of giving a good reason.

# data[].attributes.body
Get more evidence if you are relying on opinions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
The argument fails to support the specific conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
Separate your premises from your conclusion.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
That event B became before event A and event B was crucial to event A.

# data[].attributes.body
Flip event B and event A around so event A is first.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
That one small step will lead to events ending in a severe outcome without enough evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure everything is in the correct order.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
The argument relies on a comparison between things that aren't truly similar.

# data[].attributes.body
See what you are comparing holds the same idea.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
When an arguer tries to get people to accept a conclusion by making them feel sorry for someone

# data[].attributes.body
Do not get your audience to agree with you by making them feel sorry for someone or something.

# data[].attributes.body
There is only one choice choose wisely

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: The arguer claims that a sort of chain reaction, usually ending in some dire consequence, will take place, but there's. Tip Check your argument for chains of consequences, where you say "if A, then B, and if B, then C," and so forth. Make sure these chains are.

# data[].attributes.body
Defination Making assumptions about a whole group or range of cases based on a sample that is inadequate. TipAsk yourself what kinda of example your using

# data[].attributes.body
Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular. tip: Separate your premises from your conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
Assuming that because B comes after A, A caused B. Of course, sometimes one event really does cause another one that comes later—for example, if I register for a class, and my name later appears on the roll, it's true that the first event caused the one that came later. tip: To avoid the post hoc fallacy, the arguer would need to give us some explanation of the process by which the tax increase is supposed to have produced higher crime rates.

# data[].attributes.body
Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. tip:Identify what properties are important to the claim you're making, and see whether the two things you're comparing both share those properties

# data[].attributes.body
def, Using the conclusion as proof.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
When someone goes off topic with their claim and usually doesn't go back to it.

# data[].attributes.body
Look at what issues there might be with your conclusion or claim.