# data[].attributes.body
1. It was inconclusive whether the student's emotional problems negatively affected his educational performance.

2. The test scores that were reviewed did not show a large enough discrepancy to conclusively prove that he had an SLD. This was also the only test conducted on the student. RTI and other methods were not used to help diagnose the student.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Student did not have an emotional disturbance, was unable to determine if the student's emotion affected school work

2. Student's test scores did not fit the criteria for a disability, IQ did not determine that there was a disability but his lack of school work performance was from missing school frequently

# data[].attributes.body
1. The factor most affecting the student's educational performance was his non-attendance.

2. H.N/'s test scores identified that any disorder he suffered from was not sufficiently pronounced for him to meet the statutory criteria (no gap in the IQ test as evidence for an SLD - not a large enough discrepancy).

# data[].attributes.body
Student did not have an emotional disturbance

His score was not sufficient in showing the student has an SLD. Highlighting poor attendance being a factor for academic struggles.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Lack of attendance was the reason to his learning issues, not emotional disterbances or SLD.

2. Their wasnt a large enough dicrepancy between achivment scores and intelligence scores to qualify as an SLD

# data[].attributes.body
1. There were no ED found within the student that were effective his academics, it was found to be his poor attendance. Drug use on the students part was also responsible for the poor academics performance.

2. There was not a big enough discrepancy to say that this student has a present SLD.

# data[].attributes.headline
two major factors that affected the decision for Nyugen VS DC 

# data[].attributes.subject
two major factors that affected the decision for Nyugen VS DC 

# data[].attributes.body
Students poor attendance affecting academics

Student did not have an SLD or emotional disturbance, instead was just using drugs.

# data[].attributes.body
The two major factors that affected the decision for Nyugen vs DC were:

The student was not academically low, it was his attendance.

The test scores did not show enough proof.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The student did not have an SLD or an emotional disturbance. The reason their grades were slipping was due to poor attendance.

2. The test scores did not show a large enough discrepancy for a conclusive answer on whether they had an SLD.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Students test scores didn't fit the criteria.

2. Student did not have an emotional disturbance.

# data[].attributes.body
1.) the student's nonattendance.

2.) the student didn't qualify as having an emotional disability.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The students inconsistent attendance

2. H.N. had a drug problem affecting his academic performance

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was determined the primary factor for his poor grades was his low attendance.

2. The IQ testing determined there was no disability present.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The student did not have an ED

2. The students scores did not have sufficient discrepency for an answer for SLD