# data[].attributes.body
ChatGPT is very knowledgeable and therefore can give me good general information, but it has problems with being specific and developing ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
1) ChatGPT gave me some effective solutions  on supporting cargo truckers in South Korea, and it gave me some new solutions to move forward.
2) However, because the solutions are too broad to be directly incorporated in my Action Plan, I still need to refine them further to make them into more critical solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
Chat GPTs solutions were viable and feasible and very similar to what I thought. Except it gave specific organisations that I could include making it easier for me to make my research specific to the subject

# data[].attributes.body
Chat GPT suggested numerous possible solutions to my topic, including ones that I am planning to include in my action plan. When I asked it bout one of the solutions specifically, it went into great detail, which helped me as feedback to assure that I am on the right track with my action plan. It doesn't support with evidence and sources, but it definitely helps you get a better general understanding of the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Chat GPT gives me some ideas related to my topic. However, those ideas are pretty ambiguous and broad. They are not specific enough to solve the issue and some of them are not able to be applied.

# data[].attributes.body
ChatGPT provides various aspects which I have not thought about, but it lacks specificity. I think it is a useful source to get a sense of ideas in general, but it is your job to develop and extend the thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think it's similar to how basic googling works, except it, happens a lot faster which is a great way to save time than scouring the internet for good sources.

2. Since It's AI it doesn't usually have incredible ideas, but it can give you an interesting overview.

# data[].attributes.body
a) Since my topic is a global issue, ChatGPT provided me with similar solutions that I came up for my action plan. The solutions did include specific details regarding how the solution should be enacted.
b) ChatGPT provided me with a guideline on what root causes I need to focus on.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it can help you give you good ideas, but I d'ont think you can write an essay with it.

# data[].attributes.body
1. give AI some context about the change you are trying to create
e.g. environmental pollution in India

2. ask AI for feedback on an aspect of your Action Plan, can it foresee any problems? can it assess the strengths and weaknesses?
e.g. a campaign to stop saisa sports and mun delegates flying around South Asia

3. create a new note in this Padlet and a) provide your judgement of the usefulness of its feedback b) provide a summary of at least one way it has helped improve your thinking about your Action Plan

# data[].attributes.body
1. ChatGPT is giving me new solutions, but it is just an idea, so there is no more specific method like "how".

2. It does not suggest any feedback but it can expand my perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
It was quite interesting that AI provided me an evaluation on my action plan(regulating fentanyl distribution among adolescents in the US) based on its knowledge, and also suggested me to plan for doing more actions than regulation since the issue that I chose is quite complex that would not be easily addressed by just regulating.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I got the similar solutions as solutions that I already though about my issue. But It express various view point of solutions.

2. It give some feedback such as background kmowdlege.

I think ChatGPT helpful for idea.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I found that if given specific enough information ChatGPT was quite useful. I found that it was able to improve  on my ideas as well as point out potential issues in my ideas and how I might improve them.

2. It helped improve my action plan by building on my website idea.

# data[].attributes.body
chat gpt gave me some strong ideas to follow through with on my action plan however it failed to think critically. It wasn't able to identify actual weaknesses and strength's but was good at generating new ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It successfully grasped the main idea and objective of my action plan and was effective in putting forth a multi faceted approach to resolve my issue.
2. It failed to provide a specific framework, it did not go into detail into any of the specifics.

ChatGPT confirmed the importance of specificity and detail in a successful action plan.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It gave me almost the same solutions and solutions I considered to choose.

2. There weren't much of the feedback for solutions, but it gave some for how can I try the solutions.

3. My issue is one of the main factor for quite a lot of problems in India, but I would consider what the AI told for Action Planning.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It gave me the same solutions as I had written, however when jailbroken it told me to hack into a companies systems.

2.It did not give any effective feedback, however the jailbroken version told me to take more extreme actions that are basically crime

3. I'd say for my issue it is not super great great, however I do like the fact that it tries to make my solutions more

# data[].attributes.headline
Can AI help improve your action plan? - Thomas Benson

# data[].attributes.subject
Can AI help improve your action plan? - Thomas Benson

# data[].attributes.body
a) ChatGPT failed to provide specific, detailed suggestions regarding my action plan.  However, it was able to suggest basic improvements such as 'research more'.
b) ChatGPT affirmed the importance of thorough research, and of using credible sources.

# data[].attributes.body
Referendum in judgment is a process where people are given the power to vote on a particular issue or decision. In the context of the legal system, a referendum in judgment would involve allowing the public to vote on legal matters, such as the guilt or innocence of a defendant, or the punishment that should be given to a convicted criminal.

While the idea of allowing the public to participate in the legal process may seem appealing, it is important to consider the potential drawbacks. One concern is that a referendum in judgment may not be fair or objective, as the public may be influenced by emotions, biases, and misinformation. Moreover, the legal system is designed to protect the rights of individuals, and allowing the majority to determine the fate of a defendant may undermine these protections.

Instead of relying on referendums, the legal system can ensure equal treatment and punishment for all perpetrators by enforcing laws and regulations fairly and impartially. This involves holding everyone accountable for their actions, regardless of their wealth, power, or status. It also requires addressing systemic inequalities and biases that may exist within the legal system.

In conclusion, while a referendum in judgment may seem like a solution to the problem of unequal punishment, it is important to consider the potential drawbacks and to work towards a legal system that is fair and impartial for all individuals.

-from chatgtp